More

Space Shuttle Atlantis Crew: Meet NASA's Final 4 Shuttle Astronauts

Space Shuttle Atlantis Crew

First Posted: 07/03/11 12:21 PM ET Updated: 09/02/11 06:12 AM ET

MARCIA DUNN, AP/THE HUFFINGTON POST) CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- America's longest space-flying streak ends this week with the smallest crew in decades – three men and a woman who were in high school and college when the first space shuttle soared 30 years ago.

History will remember these final four as bookending an era that began with two pilots who boldly took a shuttle for a two-day spin in 1981 without even a test flight. That adventure blasted space wide open for women, minorities, scientists, schoolteachers, politicians, even a prince.

On Friday aboard Atlantis, this last crew will make NASA's 135th and final shuttle flight. It will be years before the United States sends its own spacecraft up again.

Commander Christopher Ferguson, co-pilot Douglas Hurley, Rex Walheim and Sandra Magnus are delighting in their good luck.

"We're very honored to be in this position. There are many people who could be here," said Ferguson, a retired Navy captain. "When the dice fell, our names were facing up."

NASA managers were looking for space vets when they cobbled together this minimalist crew with seven spaceflights among them, to deliver one last shuttle load of supplies to the International Space Station.

They are an eloquent, colorful bunch in their 40s, accepting if not embracing the spotlight.

Ferguson is a drummer for an astronaut rock `n' roll band. Hurley is nuts about NASCAR; his cousin is married to crew chief Greg Zipadelli. Walheim is a former shuttle flight controller; his graphic designer wife creates the mission patch every time he flies, always on Atlantis. Magnus is arguably the first out-of-this-world chef: She whipped up Christmas cookies and Super Bowl salsa aboard the space station in late 2008 and early 2009, using – as all good chefs – ingredients on hand.

They were originally recruited to be a rescue team. The idea was that back in May, if anything seriously damaged Endeavour during its final flight, Ferguson and his team would have rushed to the space station and brought those astronauts home.

If no rescue was needed, the original plan went, Ferguson's crew simply wouldn't fly. And Atlantis would be sent to a museum along with the two other retired shuttles.

But early this year, NASA decided to add one more flight. Since Atlantis was being groomed for a potential rescue anyway, NASA reasoned, why not make a cargo run with a year's worth of food and other provisions to keep the space station well-stocked.

That added a new wrinkle: What if Atlantis were damaged? There are no more shuttles to rescue them.

The only viable option is the Russian Soyuz spacecraft. The capsules can carry a maximum three people at a time, and at least one must be Russian. That's why Atlantis' crew was capped at four, instead of the usual six or seven.

It will be NASA's first four-person shuttle crew since 1983.

Ferguson and his short-handed crew know there's a chance – about 1-in-560 – that they could be stranded at the space station because of flight damage to Atlantis.

If that happens, it will take close to a year to get the last person home. Hurley, a Marine, drew the long straw.

The travel sequence is based on robotic-arm and spacewalking skills, as well as accumulated exposure to cosmic radiation. That last factor alone prevents Magnus, a former space station resident, from spending too long a time in space.

Hurley – who is married to astronaut Karen Nyberg and has a 1-year-old son – looks at the bright side.

"If it works out that way, I get a yearlong expedition for nine months of training, so that's a pretty good return on the investment," he said. He points to Magnus, a scientist whose specialty is in cathodes and radar, who trained four years for a mere four-month station stay.

Yearlong space missions are exceedingly rare; only three Russian cosmonauts have attempted it. The longest an American has spent in space, at a stretch, is seven months.

That's how far NASA's astronauts are willing to go, these days, for a shot at space.

Until private companies get piloted spacecraft flying – an estimated three to 10 years out – NASA will have to stick with the pricey Russian Soyuz to get U.S. astronauts to and from the space station.

For Americans, that means just a handful of flying opportunities a year. Compare that with the 35 to 50 seats that the shuttles typically provided each year.

Little wonder, then, that NASA's astronaut corps has shrunk to 61 active members. Only the youngest and most patient are willing to wait out these conflicted, money-tight times.

Few people, it seems, can agree on where NASA should aim next. The moon, an asteroid, Mars? And how best to get there?

As the debate and uncertainty drag on, Ferguson said he's seen no ill feeling toward NASA by those still toiling in the shuttle program. Thousands more layoffs are coming as soon as Atlantis lands, on top of the thousands of jobs already lost.

Ferguson rejects suggestions the U.S. space program is headed downhill with the shuttle's retirement. "Hopefully, we'll see 10 years of good quality science out of the space station," he said. "We still have a vibrant program going on."

Despite two horrific accidents that killed 14 astronauts and destroyed two spacecraft, the shuttle program has carried more people than any other space fleet – 355 people from 16 countries. That includes Saudi Arabia, which flew a prince aboard Discovery in 1985.

Space miles logged by the five shuttles: 537 million, with 4 million more to come this mission.

"There is not an American who doesn't look upon an ascending shuttle with a certain sense of American pride, hair on the back of your neck, chills, call it what you will," Ferguson said.

The space shuttle is "a quintessential American vehicle," said Walheim, a retired Air Force colonel who will serve as the flight engineer. "You point to that and people know it's from the United States, so I think we're losing that piece of identity."

The four astronauts feel the extra burden of putting "the best possible face forward for the last go-around of this," as Ferguson describes it.

This should not be a time of mourning, these astronauts say, or for second-guessing the shuttle retirement decision made seven years ago by President George W. Bush in the wake of the Columbia disaster.

Ferguson and his crew want this final flight to be a celebration. They point to the Hubble Space Telescope, which was launched and repaired by shuttle crews, as well as the International Space Station. Nearly one-third of the 135 shuttle flights were spent building or supplying the nearly 1 million-pound orbiting laboratory.

For now, Atlantis' astronauts are focused on the upcoming cargo mission, humble as it is.

They'll provide robotic-arm support for a spacewalk by two space station astronauts. But most of the work involves hauling supplies from Atlantis into the station, and carting out broken equipment and junk for disposal back on Earth.

One thing Ferguson didn't count on, when mapping out the training flow months ago, was all the emotional conversation that has added to the crew's already long workdays. Almost every shuttle worker they encounter wants to share a story: How long they've worked at Kennedy Space Center and what the shuttle program means to them.

"At the end of the day ... we're like, wow, there's a lot of emotion here," Ferguson said. "But they're all stories that we want to hear."

Ferguson expects "the enormity of it to hit us" at wheels-stop on landing day – July 20, the 42nd anniversary of man's first steps on the moon, if the schedule holds.

The astronauts say they will have to be pried from the cockpit. Magnus expects to shed tears as she sits on the runway, "contemplating 30 years of a spectacular program."

"We are blessed to have been a part of it. All of us, not just perhaps the chosen few who are lucky enough to fly it, but as a country," Ferguson said.

Until then, he said, "We're just trying to savor the moment. We want to be able to say, `We remember when. We remember when there was a space shuttle.'"

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

MARCIA DUNN, AP/THE HUFFINGTON POST) CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- America's longest space-flying streak ends this week with the smallest crew in decades – three men and a woman who were in high school an...
MARCIA DUNN, AP/THE HUFFINGTON POST) CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- America's longest space-flying streak ends this week with the smallest crew in decades – three men and a woman who were in high school an...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 116
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
07:41 PM on 07/04/2011
I'm amazed at the number of comments here! Suddenly, the press and the people are talking about space exploration. Sure, some of it is off topic, and I wish we'd had a more vigorous public conversation about these issues over the past decade (before this week). Lofty Ambitions blog has been covering the end of the space shuttle program since November (the final missions of each of the remaining shuttles). If you're interested, check out videos, photos, commentary at http://loftyambitions.wordpress.com. Fun guest post there by a novelist space-geek today.
02:58 PM on 07/04/2011
Another step toward mediocrity by this President and the Democrat Party; ceding our role as the preeminent leader in space exploration, we now are behind Russia and can see Japan and China rising toward the lead. Rather than discontinue our manned space program, the shuttle could have endured at least five more years. Instead, the program is terminated and the brain drain from NASA has been significant - 10,000 of the 17,000 supporting the program have been have also been terminated.

At some point, a strategy will need to be developed by a forward looking Administration that recognizes the leadership role of America in this world. Reconstituting this program will be extraordinarily expensive.
09:33 PM on 07/04/2011
The Space Shuttle was cancelled effective 2010 by President Bush and a bicameral Republican majority in early 2004. The Vision for Space Exploration (VSE) was one of the few positive policy initiatives conceived during the Bush admin, in the view of this left-leaning independent.

The problem was that in order to rescue the Shuttle program after the Columbia disaster, NASA had to cancel programs that would have allowed Shuttle to stay relevant to the International Space Station after assembly complete.

For example, the X-38 would have been a dedicated emergency return vehicle (ERV) for the US segment of the ISS. This would have allowed Shuttle to be used for crew rotation. The Russian Soyuz doubles as an ERV. But Shuttle can't stay on orbit for six months, so any ISS crew members delivered on Shuttle must have an open seat on a Soyuz docked to the station. Why rotate ISS astronauts on Shuttle while Soyuz has to launch with empty seats that can accommodate them?

Shuttle doesn't make sense for ISS crew rotation, and it doesn't make sense for ISS logistical resupply, either. Shuttle is a 110-ton vehicle that can carry 20 tons in its cargo bay, but it can only carry 8 tons of pressurized cargo in a special logistics module. The European Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV) is a 20-ton unmanned spacecraft that delivers the same 8 tons of cargo to the ISS.

The ISS needs about 20 tons of logistics per year. The ISS partners have funding for the following annual logistics resupply manifest through 2020: one European ATV (8 tons), one Japanese HTV (6 tons), six Russian Progress (2 tons each), four SpaceX Dragon (6 tons each), and three Orbital Cygnus (2-3 tons each). This is clearly more than enough without the Shuttle. We'll still have plenty of headroom even if Cygnus or Dragon have difficulty entering service. These vehicles are inexpensive, and they don't put astronauts at risk simply to deliver food and underwear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gottlieb
hated by left since 1973 and right since 1982
02:48 AM on 07/05/2011
Well said. NASA needs more funding for Earth Observation satellites to better predict the weather and monitor climate change. I think we still need something of our own to get our astronauts up to the ISS which means funding US commercial space efforts. NASA needs to keep doing research. NASA is more than just the Shuttle or manned spaceflights to the Moon or Mars.
09:37 AM on 07/05/2011
Great overview. The point of my comment is the absence of a long term US commitment to manned space flight and exploration, which has historically been a leadership role for America.

You seem to have detailed knowledge of the space program. Typically our political leaders articulate our strategy and plans. It would be helpful to know what those are.
photo
mycall8
Spiritual not religious, One Planet, One Humanity
08:44 AM on 07/04/2011
You can send the "American Dream" to the museum also
08:31 AM on 07/04/2011
That's sad.. I fantasized about being an Astronaut when I was little and now it will be a dead career and I think is the starting point to the degradation of our society in terms of vision for our future. I thought by this time we would be discussing building or at least starting to build bases on the moon. After all they did report that the moon could be used to create helium 3 which was supposedly this amazing fuel source. Then we find water on several planets/moon and all of it will be for nothing??
To me, thats like spending years looking for gold. Hitting a rock and finding a huge piece, but giving up because it will cost too much money to mine. Just watched the film Pandorum a film in which our planet was dying and we spent all of our resources to our space program so that we could save as much as we could. It's nice to know that's not an option anymore..
09:59 AM on 07/04/2011
E could have afforded a permanent moon base but we decided to invade Iraq.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mcmutter
A Groover has to expect a few setbacks .....
09:58 PM on 07/04/2011
don't just sit there moaning .... fire off a copy of your resume ....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaled_Composites
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Douglas
07:48 AM on 07/04/2011
The shuttle's been going up for thirty years. I say it's high time the aliens come and visit us for a change.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RJII
Yes "you" can. BO2012
12:27 PM on 07/04/2011
riiight.
Vinnster
The One=The Zero job creator!!
06:04 AM on 07/04/2011
The results of Progressiveness puts the death kneel in US space expansion. History will show the US at its pentacle in the 1970s. The US was expanding into space like all great countries in history, they came into being, grew, expanded to their largest size, then social spending and corruption halts the expansion and they start to decline.

The cancellation of the Apollo project was the turning point. By the early 1970s Progressive policies like the Great Society were kicking in full swing and social spending, corruption, and entitlements exploded sucking up any money for space exploration,

Since that time spending has gone parabolic with more than 50% of the population on the dole. All our politicians are bought and paid for.

This is nothing new, but just a repeat of history as governments grow and become corrupted. What is so amazing is so many are so blind to what is happening. They still think they can "fix" things if they could just control everything. Not going to happen, unless you can show just ONE government that became more honest and less corrupt as it grew.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Douglas
07:39 AM on 07/04/2011
the result of Progressiveness? The article clearly points out it was G.W. Bush who ended the shuttle.
"This should not be a time of mourning, these astronauts say, or for second-guessing the shuttle retirement decision made seven years ago by President George W. Bush in the wake of the Columbia disaster."
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
07:54 AM on 07/04/2011
Um, first of all, the word is "pinnacle".  I had no idea that a pagan talisman is what the US was in the 1970s...

Still, if the Great Society is bad, without it, how do you expect to live/  What new system will take its place and, more to the point, what will your role be in it, assuming you even get a role?  (Didn't think that far ahead, now did you?)
Vinnster
The One=The Zero job creator!!
04:55 AM on 07/05/2011
"What new system will take its place"

How about we teach self-reliance and personal responsibility... Instead of teaching generation after generation the government will take care of you from cradle to grave...
Vinnster
The One=The Zero job creator!!
05:05 AM on 07/05/2011
"your role be in it, assuming you even get a role?"

Only to demonstrate by example...I do not suffer from a life of self abuse or lack the ability to pay my way because I lived below my means and saved. The majority of peopell are in a bad way because of poor choices they made. That is just a fact.

A person who stayed in school, avoided drugs, avoided pregnancy, learned about finance, lived below their means will almost always be successful....and all are choices.

The problem with those type of people are Progressives have a hard time controlling them...Progressives have succeeded at their goal. Create a nation of government dependent people they can control in every way, even what light bulb or shower fixture they are allowed to own.

Let me guess you actually believe ObamaCare was created to help people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhatDaBleep
Left is Right and Right is Wrong
05:29 AM on 07/04/2011
This is incredible - I remember the first launch and I will remember this one too. Good luck
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joshua Kaanaana
Liberal, Democratic, Patriotic
03:29 AM on 07/04/2011
So when this industry goes private, will the public have free reign to do whatever they want in space? Pollute it with trash and broken equipment? Start a self-preserving colony? Travel as far as they like? There's many possibilities here, too much to be named, but I think many of them have to be addressed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhatDaBleep
Left is Right and Right is Wrong
05:30 AM on 07/04/2011
Go to the moon to look at the Apollo landing craft? No doubt that the corporations will pollute space more than the government has!
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
07:55 AM on 07/04/2011
Only whatever is deemed "profitable"... research for its own sake is wrong, as that can cost too much in terms of profit generation.
03:28 AM on 07/04/2011
I can not image what it feels like to be the final shuttle crew. What a huge honor!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Rau
03:16 AM on 07/04/2011
So when are we sending someone to Mars? I thought that was an attainable goal before 2020.
photo
Vuittondon13
Black Excellence
01:23 AM on 07/04/2011
I actually was banned for my comments about NASA on another news site that I wont mention here. So I'll keep this short and sweet. NASA is one big Lie and always has been, way to much money has gone into absolutely nothing and look where they are now. Square 1. One big joke thats not funny.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joshua Kaanaana
Liberal, Democratic, Patriotic
03:31 AM on 07/04/2011
Square 1? And what lie? Nasa's mission was to explore space, come up with new technology and hopefully one day they would be able to expand into landing on another planet or something bigger than the moon. I don't know exactly what you got banned for but maybe it was because you're way too general in your statements without enough actual substance to back up your opinion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Douglas
07:43 AM on 07/04/2011
And the Hubble is amazing. Our space program has allowed us to learn so much plus we've benefited from the technological advancements in tech because of it. But now on to Earthly matters. I have to go try and dig up my septic tank so I can have it certified so I can sell my house. Happy fourth everyone!!!!!
photo
Vuittondon13
Black Excellence
11:02 AM on 07/04/2011
If you read my comment clearly I said I was going to keep it short and sweet. Maybe if I laid my whole case out the same result might happen here, which is exactly why I didn't in the first place. Happy 4th!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Always Conservative
Shovel ready was not....
08:05 AM on 07/04/2011
I do not see why you were banned but I can see why we would call you ign0r@nt...
farleft1917
Nothing is new but only forgotten.
11:56 PM on 07/03/2011
Back to the future, splashing down in the ocean, wasting rockets...no moon, no mars, soon no Space Station..just Oligarchs drinking champagne in near orbit....what a small piddling nation we have become...good news plenty of money for wars of choice and the rich...nothing for us anyways.
photo
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
12:32 AM on 07/04/2011
Fanned #120
How much more disgusting can our government get?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:23 AM on 07/04/2011
never ask how much worse can things get.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joshua Kaanaana
Liberal, Democratic, Patriotic
03:32 AM on 07/04/2011
Disgusting? For going to space? Advancing science? I agree it cost a bundle of money, but I'd rather spend that money on cosmic technology (which may be of much use on Earth which is usually the case) than some irrelevant war in the middle east or where have you.
07:44 AM on 07/04/2011
There's still ESA. Soon they'll be able to launch Soyuz capsules from Kourou and they're pretty advanced in developing a vehicle with atmosphere reentry capability.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PiedType
Old editors never die, they just revert to type
11:52 PM on 07/03/2011
I saw the birth of the space age, Telstar and Sputnik and the first man on the moon. And now it's ending. I know, intellectually, that various forms of space exploration will continue, but this sure feels like the end of America's greatest aspirational and inspirational endeavor.
photo
soundping
America: Love it or leave it !
11:13 PM on 07/03/2011
The iPhony isn't shielded against radiation. Last I seen the shuttle's computer equipment was shielded.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CHARLESTHETENTH
10:38 PM on 07/03/2011
It's about time. This program since its inception has been draining us dry. There is nothing out there that we really need to know and if we did makes no difference anyway. Billions upon Billions of dollars beaming up to the void in outer space. The latest CNN poll shows the majority of Americans favor continuing the Space Program and you would think with all the Domestic issues facing us and the enormous debt it would be the other way around. Michael Moore was right when he said we were stupid...the Politicians know it, the President knows it and the World knows it. That's the main reason we are where we are today and slowly declining as a once great Country...to many dumb people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MMMMarilyn
10:45 PM on 07/03/2011
Drink your Tang.
farleft1917
Nothing is new but only forgotten.
11:58 PM on 07/03/2011
No it's wars of choice that are draining us dry and the rich who are asset stripping us.