More

Frank Rich: Disappointments With Obama (VIDEO)

First Posted: 07/08/11 11:45 AM ET Updated: 09/04/11 06:12 AM ET

NEW YORK -- Since Frank Rich left The New York Times in March after over three decades with the paper, the liberal columnist and veteran cultural critic has kept a pretty low profile.

But Rich, now in his new home at New York magazine, broke his silence this week with a blistering critique of how the Obama administration hasn't held Wall Street accountable for the financial crisis. He's dubbed the article "Obama's Original Sin."

Rich stopped by The Huffington Post to discuss his cover story on "The Backstory," a new video series featuring individuals shaping news and opinion.

Rich went on to discuss why Obama can't seem to get across that the economy and jobs are a priority:

There are two reasons. Part of it is the optics are bad. He doesn't talk about it enough and he doesn't talk about it passionately. Part of it is that he, for whatever reason, and I think this Tim Geithner certainly is a big part of this, has sort of fallen for the line that the country's obsessed with deficits. Whereas I point out in my piece, if you look at every poll from Inauguration Day until two weeks ago, the deficit is a much lower priority for Americans in every single poll than jobs and the economy in general. And there's the substantive thing; there never was really a stand-alone huge jobs program ... It's almost as if he went from the stimulus to the year-long health care debate marathon, and then to the Republican-turf of deficit reduction without ever having that big jobs push in a time of bruising unemployment.

Rich isn't the only left-leaning columnist or commentator to take issue with Obama, with others mainly critical of his administration escalating the war in Afghanistan and not complying with the War Powers Act with regard to Libya. In addition, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow recently called out Obama for his "evolving" position on gay marriage, while former Vice President Al Gore took the administration to task over climate policy in the pages of Rolling Stone. Salon's Glenn Greenwald has long questioned Obama's use of executive power and the administration's aggressive pursuit of journalists' government sources.

And recently, "Daily Show" host Jon Stewart said Obama hasn't met his expectations since getting to the White House, and even admitted he'd consider voting for a Republican. Rich isn't going that far! Still, does he share some of Stewart's frustration?

WATCH:


In the second part of our chat coming soon, Rich talks about moving over to New York, the future of the New York Times, and why he's not exactly lighting up the Twitterverse.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

NEW YORK -- Since Frank Rich left The New York Times in March after over three decades with the paper, the liberal columnist and veteran cultural critic has kept a pretty low profile. But Rich, no...
NEW YORK -- Since Frank Rich left The New York Times in March after over three decades with the paper, the liberal columnist and veteran cultural critic has kept a pretty low profile. But Rich, no...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 722
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
davidpkronmiller 01:47 PM on 07/08/2011
Hey Frank

Stop being angry at Obama and realize we have three branches of government - one of which has been ineffective I think since mid-last century. I've noticed democrats of his generation are unhappy with Obama - and I think, and I'll call it, I think it's because they are Clinton Democrats - unhappy that Obama won at all. This idiotic idea that Obama's somehow in anyone's pocket is  Read More...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alicam
01:53 PM on 07/11/2011
I agree 110%. There are millions of people in extreme dire straits right now--and have been for the past couple of years--and it's like no one in Washington cares. Obama not only bailed out Wall Street without a single substantial concession from them. He compromised on health care reform and he even extended tax cuts for the wealthy. He has no spine and foggy vision. I will not vote for the lesser of two evils in 2012. I will vote for the one who gets it--JOBS, JOBS, JOBS. And if no one gets it, I won't vote for anyone, then.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:49 AM on 07/11/2011
This is just a plug for New York Magazine...
We shouldn't be listening to what Frank Rich says...
he's part of the 'smoke and mirrors society' that "is" the problem.
MtnGeek
Partisan thinking is an oxymoron
12:50 PM on 07/11/2011
Really? Did you even take a minute to read the article? The issues he is presenting are exactly the same ones you read about over and over in the comments on HuffPo and talking to friends, co-workers and family ... where are the jobs?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timothy2700
Voice Talent
07:54 PM on 07/10/2011
The Presdient may not be living UP to my expectation but there is NO WAY a REPUB will fix the damage done by W and wall street. My choice...Obama 2012!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ivotes
09:24 PM on 07/10/2011
Obama IS a Republican for all intents and purposes. What would his 2nd act be like? I'll sit out the whole thing, thank you, with all the potential damage which will/could ensue...Can you hear me NOW?
01:08 PM on 07/11/2011
Please rethink sitting it out....Supreme Court nominations are too important.
07:45 PM on 07/10/2011
Please....the I'm-disappointed-with-Obama bandwagon is getting soooo boring. Vote him out in 2012 and see how wonderful the world becomes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lilchas
02:42 PM on 07/10/2011
I did not work for Obama's election to have him cut Social Security.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ttowse
08:23 PM on 07/09/2011
Obama's failure to lead will cost him as it has cost us. Americans want their country back. Politicians sponsored by Wall Street and corporations need not apply.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TOCB
Liberal leaning Independent
08:04 PM on 07/09/2011
Obama may have been a good president during a different time, a time of prosperity. But in these times of economic peril, he doesn't have what it takes to move the country forward. For these times the country needs a proven strong leader. However, the electorate is not informed enough to know what they want or need. As a result most people will vote for whoever the media tells them is leading in the polls. Could Bachmann be elected president? Well, George W Bush was elected/selected twice. What does that tell you about Bachmann's chances? It was very disappointing to me that Americans would elect/select George W Bush, twice. What is even more disappointing is someone like Bush can and probably will be elected again. So we have not learned anything from Bush's tenure in office. We can expect politicians to be politicians. The question is what do we expect of ourselves?
06:11 PM on 07/09/2011
I treat Obama the same way I treated Bush, when he comes on TV I switch to another channel. Disappointment does not even say it the way I feel about Obama. Twenty percent of the time he shows a little guts the rest of the time he just rolls over for a little scratch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SCStoday
Can't seem to locate those jobs promised?
04:55 PM on 07/09/2011
As long as the Republicans are in the mood of destroying this country, Obama is limited in what he can get done. Regardless of that, he has not lived up to my expectations. I am strongly disappointed in his leadership. I don't feel he has made a good president. BUT there is no way on gods green earth that I will ever again vote for a Republican president.....period.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pj-smith
solidarity with OWS
08:42 AM on 07/09/2011
This is a great piece in NY magazine. I am glad Rich found somewhere to express himself without the absurd NYT editors breathing down his neck.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peguy
07:38 AM on 07/09/2011
The funniest thing to me about the complaints from the GOP about Obama, is that he has for almost all intents and purposes been Bush part 3. I say this, having voted for Obama and knowing that I will probably vote for him again lacking any really progressive candidate in the next election, but I never really believed that he would be radically different in his views towards the military (which he hasn't been), nor his views towards Wall St. (which he hasn't, and from which he takes campaign money), so we have what we normally get - a politician, bought and paid for, just like the rest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank Smith
01:44 AM on 07/09/2011
Obama fiddled for two years and lost Congress while Rome burned. Too bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ochaye
11:39 AM on 07/31/2011
You should look up the origins of that expression. I'm really tired of hearing it.
01:09 AM on 07/09/2011
Rich's disappointments would be regrets if McCain won the Presidency.
MtnGeek
Partisan thinking is an oxymoron
12:52 PM on 07/11/2011
Don't kid yourself, we would all have regrets is McCain had won.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:46 PM on 07/08/2011
Frank Rich was great while he lasted at the NY Times. Now he is history and feeling ignored.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marco01
05:47 PM on 07/09/2011
LOL, what nonsense. He left the NYT on his own after a highly successful career. Of course he is still going to comment in other venues.
06:07 PM on 07/09/2011
This comment is totally disingenious. Should he have stayed with the Times for the rest of his life? People change jobs all the time and NY magazine will be a good fit.
08:08 PM on 07/08/2011
These people keeps on making the word "liberal" look childish. Constantly demonizing your own weakens them, it doesn't matter if you are the president or just a friend. All this attacks does not do good to Obama. Until Liberals starts acting like adults, American people will never have a positive image of liberals.
08:12 AM on 07/09/2011
He wasn't demonizing. He was criticizing. Adults can criticize themselves. Republicans and children don't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pj-smith
solidarity with OWS
08:36 AM on 07/09/2011
GOPs fall in lockstep with their party, no matter how ridiculous and far to the right wing their leaders venture.

The "liberal-progressives" have ideology and standards that we want our leaders to hold to, and if they veer to far off, we call them out.

It is "childish" to blindly follow without thought or ideals, and to criticize us for sticking to ours.

And it is also childish to use such awful grammar...REALLY? Are you a grown up, did you go to school?