More

HuffPost Social Reading

Iran War Games Showcase Homegrown Arms

Iran War Games

ALI AKBAR DAREINI and BRIAN MURPHY   07/ 5/11 10:51 AM ET  AP

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran's latest war games have featured the predictable blaze of missile tests and an unexpected peek at underground launch silos. There's one bit of military showmanship, though, that ties it all together: Promoting the Made in Iran label.

Boasting about homegrown defense technology is growing louder as Iran claims U.N. sanctions cannot blunt efforts to keep pace with America's Gulf allies – led by Saudi Arabia – that are awash in Pentagon weaponry and taking an increasingly tough line against Tehran.

The 10-day military exercises – which wrap up Thursday – also fit into Iran's narrative of growing self-sufficiency on other fronts including equipment to create nuclear fuel and ambitions to join the club of space-exploring nations.

There's little direct evidence about how much of Iran's military arsenal is now built at home. But many defense analysts note that Iranian engineers have had decades to copy and modify designs first obtained from abroad, including No-Dong missiles from North Korea and air defense batteries based on Russia's S-300 system and America's Hawk missiles purchased before the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

"There's been a long learning curve for Iran," said Theodore Karasik, a regional affairs expert at the Dubai-based Institute for Near East and Gulf Military Analysis. "But compared with five or 10 years ago, Iran seems to have made significant strides. They probably aren't fully self-sufficient for defense needs, but they are moving in that direction."

Iranian officials claim they are already there. Defense Minister Gen. Ahmad Vahidi said the current war games highlight the futility of U.N. sanctions over Iran's refusal to halt uranium enrichment.

"The war games ... show Iran's great capability in designing, producing and using various kinds of missiles based on domestic knowledge. This showed that the sanctions imposed had no effect on Iran's missile program," Vahidi claimed in comments posted Saturday on sepahnews.com, the official website of Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guard.

Iran says it already has missiles with ranges of up to 1,240 miles (2,000 kilometers) – putting Israel, U.S. bases in the Gulf and parts of Europe within reach.

The commander of the Revolutionary Guard aerospace force, Amir Ali Hajizadeh, further claimed that Iran "possesses the technology" to make even longer-range missiles, but doesn't plan the upgrades because the country's primary potential targets – Israel and U.S. bases in the region – are already in striking distance.

But the biggest potential game changer in the region was the main surprise of the war games so far: State TV showing the first images of underground missile silos. Iran claims the sites can withstand direct attacks and allow for simultaneous mass firings of its Shahab-3 and Sajjil-2 missiles, allegedly capable of hitting Israel and U.S. bases in the region.

Iranian officials say the silos, too, were constructed only with Iranian know-how.

This joins a roster of other military advancements Iran claims as its own, including a guided-missile destroyer that began patrolling the Gulf last year and an attack drone that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad dubbed the "ambassador of death."

On Tuesday, Iran's first domestically built submarine returned to port after a mission that included reconnaissance in the Red Sea, the semi-official ISNA news agency reported.

"Iran undoubtedly has dedicated significant resources into its own defense industry. That said, however, it's clear they are not there yet," said Paul Rogers, who follows international defense affairs at Bradford University in Britain. "Iran still relies on the help of a few friendly countries."

Among them is China, which opened a factory in Iran last year to help produce Iran's new generation of anti-ship missiles, Nasr-1, according to reports including Jane's Defense Weekly. The main tactical advantage for Iran is widening its range over the Gulf, including the strategic Strait of Hormuz that is the passageway for 40 percent of the world's oil tanker traffic.

On Monday, Iran's state-run Press TV said test firings of new "supersonic" anti-ship missile are expected later this week as part of the military exercises.

It's also another direct challenge to Saudi Arabia and the other Western-allied Gulf nations that host major foreign bases, including a French naval outpost in Abu Dhabi and the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet in Bahrain.

In many ways, the Arab uprisings have only hardened the Gulf Arab fears over Iran.

They have openly accused Shiite power Iran and its proxy forces, such as Lebanon's Hezbollah, of actively encouraging Shiite dissent in places such as Bahrain, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, the Gulf monarchs and sheiks have bonded together to try to snuff out any political opposition that could threaten their rule – including sending a Saudi-led force to help bail out Bahrain's embattled rulers.

In their view, any cracks in the Gulf establishment by street revolts is a potential gain for Iran. The Gulf's fortress mentality has reached new levels. The Gulf's main political bloc has gone far afield to offer membership to the other royal-ruled nations in the region: Jordan and Morocco.

Kuwaiti Prime Minister Sheik Nasser Al Mohammad Al Sabah opened a tour this week of Gulf neighbors by describing Saudi Arabia as "the rock that shatters the dreams of the enemies" – an apparent reference to both Iran and opposition groups inspired by the Arab revolts.

"Saudi Arabia has definitely established itself as an alternative to the Arab Spring," said Ehsan Ahrari, a political affairs analyst based in Alexandria, Virginia. "And they have done so quite independently of the United States."

Iran has pushed back, too, with claims that Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies are pumping up fears over the Islamic Republic as excuses for crackdowns on political dissent. But Tehran also appears pleased to rattle the region.

"We are delighted the West and allies are worried," said Foreign Ministry spokesman Rahmin Mehmanparast in reference to the war games. "When they are not concerned, it means that they are comfortably pursing their interests in the region."

___

Murphy reported from Cairo.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran's latest war games have featured the predictable blaze of missile tests and an unexpected peek at underground launch silos. There's one bit of military showmanship, though, t...
TEHRAN, Iran — Iran's latest war games have featured the predictable blaze of missile tests and an unexpected peek at underground launch silos. There's one bit of military showmanship, though, t...
Filed by Curtis M. Wong  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 137
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
karim banned
A fool's mind is at the mercy of his tongue and a
03:48 PM on 07/07/2011
West's hypocrisy at display.

First they boycott Iran so she cannot buy weapons to defend herself on open market.
Then threaten Iran will war day and night and sometimes even with nuclear bombs.

When Iran finally react to the provocation by producing her own defensive weapons, West shows it as a sign of aggression from Iran's part.

The truth is that West is the real aggressor here, anybody with little brain should be able to see this fast just by studying the wars that West and Israel wages right now in the region.
08:15 PM on 07/06/2011
The article makes no reference to the fact that Iran has spent 2.5 billion per year for defense purchases on the international market. A fraction of what tiny Bahrain spends from its stolen public funds, more than $10 billion per year. The Saudi's are the largest buyers of weapons, and the most insecure.
11:31 PM on 07/06/2011
Weapons that Saudi, Kuwaiti and the rest buy is a form of payoff. Basically recycling their petrodollars back into US economy. No one is scared of Princes flying clubs and M1s without crew. Remember, Saudi had to hire mercenaries from Pakistan to invade little Bahrain.
01:52 AM on 07/06/2011
I say good for them and good for US too. At least when the US decides to address their aggression, no one can claim that they are a defenseless country.
07:34 AM on 07/06/2011
Address their aggression? Name me one country that Iran has attacked.
08:19 PM on 07/06/2011
Good point.

But we need not evidence. We attacked Iraq, Yemen, and Pakistan. We are in Libya, they did not attack anybody. We are eyeing Syria, and the ultimate goal is Iran. Meanwhile we are going bankrupt.
photo
Bushido08
Spirit of a Warrior
06:39 PM on 07/05/2011
Stay tuned...Iran will soon learn that it is a waste of money and resources to get into the "war machine" mode. Like Russia before them, you can only spend so much money on these platforms before you have to start syphoning large sums of money from programs that are for the citizenry. And much like even the US, the citizenry begins to question why the government is spending so much money on weapons and not the needs of the people.
07:11 PM on 07/05/2011
Iranian military budget represents less than 2.5% of their GDP, while the US military budget represents 19% of the United States federal budgeted expenditures and 28% of estimated tax revenues.

Iran is not interested in competing with US on a global scale. They are just making what they need to defend themselves.
photo
Hunter3203
Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to b happy
09:34 PM on 07/05/2011
Current US military spending all in represents 4.5% of GDP which is exactly half what it was in 1961 when Eisenhower made his famous MIC speech. Roughly 25% of our spending is for war costs in Afghanistan and Iraq. As our participation in those conflicts comes to a close spending will drop correspondingly. It will probably level out at 3.25 - 3.5% of GDP.
01:29 AM on 07/06/2011
You are comparing apples, oranges an kumquats with the various types of statistics you use.

As Hunter 3203 says, the US defense budget is 4.5% of US GDP.

That said, the US's GDP is a lot higher than Iran's, so the US's defense budget is huge compared to Iran's. In fact, the US's defense budget equals to about the total defense expenditures of the next twelve largest defense spending countries. Also Iran is now bordered on two sides by US forces, as well as having another well-armed and nuclear enemy, Israel, in the neighborhood, so I don't blame It for bumping up Its defenses, particularly since the US and Israel keep threatening Iran with attack.

I'd also imagine Iran's national debt is a far smaller fraction of its GDP, than is the US's, so Iran isn't paying out a big chunk of Its budget just on interest, unlike the US; hence, it can afford to spend 2.5% on defense, whereas the US can't keep spending 4.5% on it.
08:21 PM on 07/06/2011
Bushid

And we are doing the same? Are we not going bankrupt thanks to your beloved wars? Sounds like you are talking about Washington.
photo
Bushido08
Spirit of a Warrior
11:33 AM on 07/07/2011
leutenizer banned twice...You are right, we are doing the same and I do agree we are waisting money. And of course I'm talking about Washington, and George Bush's two wars and unfortunately the conflict we are now involved in with Libyia.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:34 PM on 07/05/2011
When was the last time Iran started a war?
When was the last time Iran used WMD?

When was the last time Israel started a war?
When was the last time Israel used WMD?

Which is the real threat to Middle East peace?
11:52 PM on 07/05/2011
Iran never openly started a war, just provides support & $$ to terrorists.

Iran never used any WMD on anyone, yet..

Isreal launched a pre-emptive strike in 1967 after getting caught TWICE(1948 & 1956) by their "Peacefull" Islamic neighbors.

Isreal never used any WMD..

WHAT WAS YOUR POINT ?????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cliffhammond
Onward through the fog!
02:39 AM on 07/06/2011
Israel and the United States are the premier terrorist nations in the world. Both conduct covert ops all over the world.
07:37 AM on 07/06/2011
Israel used white phosphorus and cluster munitions against Lebanon during the dustup with Hezbollah.
photo
Jack Daniels Esq
Hold the ice
11:53 AM on 07/05/2011
Same old, multiple rocket launches - embellished by counterfeit Photoshop s/w
12:19 PM on 07/05/2011
If Iran is just a 2 bit country that we can take out with 2 well placed cruise missiles, then why do you bother posting a comment?
01:19 PM on 07/05/2011
thats not what they said. But it is true that the iranian defense establishment has a long and colorful history of falsifying military reports such as these. Technologically, it could be argued that their armed forces haven't significantly progressed since the downfall of the shah.
photo
Bushido08
Spirit of a Warrior
06:43 PM on 07/05/2011
Jack Daniels Esq...good post, faned and faved. And here's the link to the photo and story you refer to. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=is-that-iranian-missile
07:05 PM on 07/05/2011
This is the actual footage that showing 1 of the 4 missiles didn't launch during the simultaneous launch exercise. It was launched about a minute later.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-R393bG2xI&feature=related

This is a US Javelin missile launch showing how wonderful it worked.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icJOjKwn_7Y

No weapon system always works 100% of the time.
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
11:45 AM on 07/05/2011
Iran's got a nice heavy anti-tank guided missile named the Toophan. Its would look familiar, its a domestically-produced, reverse-engineered version of the American TOW anti-tank missile system. It was based on the large number of TOW missiles stolen by Ronald Reagan from US warfighting stockpiles and sold to Iran (he then pocketed the profits). There's some irony that recently we had to completely redesign TOW's guidance system because we no longer have a domestic manufacturing source for the trailing spooled guidance wires. Apparently, Iran has that manufacturing capability.
photo
Jack Daniels Esq
Hold the ice
11:48 AM on 07/05/2011
URL ?
photo
Hunter3203
Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to b happy
11:52 AM on 07/05/2011
Iran was one of the largest purchasers of US military equipment until the Revolution. They are the only Country besides the US to fly F-14 Tomcats which had the most sophisticated AAM in the world. They flew and still fly F-4s and F-5s as well. They purchased TOW missiles by the hundreds prior to the revolution. Due to sanctions they have reversed engineered a number of US weapons including fighter planes, helicopters and missiles.
thankgodimanatheist8
Think for your self
02:39 PM on 07/05/2011
You are right. The sanctions harm the Iranian people but in fact have forced a home grown defense industry which gets most of what it needs.

The history of sieges shows this. In any siege (sanctions are military sieges) the soldiers end up eating most of the food (both because they are more powerful and the civilians are more scared of the enemy than starvation/malnourishment). When the siege of Stalingrad was over the Red Army troops within the city were excellent at the counter attack.

If we really wish to liberalize and perhaps end the current theocracy/military government of Iran we should remove most sanctions and allow commerce. It has worked in China, and Vietnam. We make exceptions of Iran, Cuba and a few other countries not for geopolitical reasons but for local political reasons (AIPAC and similar organizations in case of Iran, and the old Cuban expats in Florida).
11:32 AM on 07/05/2011
If you want peace be ready for war. Good for Iran, they understand that the only way to prevent NATO from bombing them into democracy is to have a large military capability and nuclear weapons. Libya has less than 10% of Iranian population and no industrial capabilities. That's why NATO vultures are bombing them with impunity for months. Recently, Iran shut down two US drones and shared technology with Russia, officially, and as you may guess with China, unofficially.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/iran-showed-russia-downed-us-drones/story-e6frf7k6-1226083658311

Drone technology is highly sensitive, US and UK lost several dozen drones in Afghanistan and spec ops teams were sent to recover the wreckage. Likewise a helicopter drone shut down or crashed in Libya will be going same way, technology transfer so to speak.
01:12 PM on 07/05/2011
NATO would sweep iran aside in about a week, with minimal loses. Their air force, for one, is small, ill equipped, and falling apart.
01:59 PM on 07/05/2011
US lost 5,000 people and $ 1 tr in nice folding cash for the pleasure to hang Saddam with 8 years of occupation included. How much do you think Iran will cost US, my militaristic friend?
06:01 PM on 07/05/2011
In any war scenario, Iran will destroy all US bases in and around Persian Gulf, will close the strait and will sink every warship that's stuck in the Persian Gulf. Good luck with sweeping anything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kenport
11:28 AM on 07/05/2011
Iran will eventually implode from within ... the younger generation want jobs and personal freedoms ... not war with the West and Israel .... the internet will eventually lead to the downfall.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheLonelyGod
The oncoming storm
11:37 AM on 07/05/2011
Let's hope so. We've already seen it in Iran and elsewhere in the Arab world.
photo
Totto
Not "noises", One-Round, *music*!
11:46 AM on 07/05/2011
Unfortunately, the jobs all seem to be in Asia. Oil and opium are all the Middle East has.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shaun Patrick ORourke
Actor, Writer, Producer
02:16 PM on 07/05/2011
I like your thinking. I will be crossing my fingers.
bighornman
"You take the blue pill ~ the story ends ..."
11:13 AM on 07/05/2011
Sunnis vs. Shiite rivalry will die down. They both resent Israel and will put down their differences for the Israeli final annihilation. They know they can't afford to kill each other so they would put the blame on Israel for their woes.
photo
Hunter3203
Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to b happy
11:43 AM on 07/05/2011
That would be the end to all in the Middle East. Israel is capable and would take everyone with them if they were faced with annihilation.
12:25 PM on 07/05/2011
That's the Israeli narrative, but more likely, many Israelis would immigrate out if the pressure become intolerable. In any event, Israel is on its way to a single state along with the Palestinians and that would mean end of Israel as a Jewish state without resorting to war and violence.
01:18 PM on 07/05/2011
actually, most non-religiously fundamentalist iranians have nothing against israel, despite decades of propaganda. Persians and jews have a long history of mutual respect and understanding, and are natural allies. If Iran would cease threatening israel, they have nothing to gain from being rivals.
06:06 PM on 07/05/2011
Respect for Jews, yes. respect for Zionist Israelis, no.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Pearce banned
Never let them tell you it can't be done.
10:57 AM on 07/05/2011
"In many ways, the Arab uprisings have only hardened the Gulf Arab fears over Iran."

That sentence is missing one very important word, 'dictator's'.

Because while the Gulf Arab dictators fear the example that Iran shows the citizens they oppress (showing them that they could replace their dictators with democracy and not have their new leaders have to pursue the same economic and foreign policies, because a change in those policies would upset the Americans and result in conditions in their country become worse due to US economic attacks), the citizens of those states do not.

Think on this, if they did see Iran as a threat, why would 50% of those Saudis who are convinced Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons say they want Iran to continue their nuclear program? Why would the majority of the people of the region, if they feared Iran, say that Iran getting nuclear weapons would be a positive thing? Why would they rank Iran as the same level of threat to their countries as Britain?
photo
Hunter3203
Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to b happy
11:48 AM on 07/05/2011
Iran is not a democracy, it is a theocracy. The Mullahs have ultimate authority over everything that goes on within Iran. They may have a few more freedoms than the Saudis but the Iranian people are also yearning for real freedom.

Most of the Gulf states have a Shia minority and in the case of Bahrain a majority. Those citizens do see Iran as their savior. Don't underestimate the Sunni/Shia problems or even the Arab/Persian issue.
12:26 PM on 07/05/2011
Iranian politics is complicated. Never the less, Iran is popular with the Arab streets.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:33 AM on 07/05/2011
Good for Iran. They have a right to defend their way of life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StansDad
Guy who eats food
10:55 AM on 07/05/2011
at least they stopped stoning women
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheLonelyGod
The oncoming storm
11:19 AM on 07/05/2011
Such as hanging gay people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TellMeSumn
A luta continua
11:26 AM on 07/05/2011
I don't think that hanging gay people is good enough reason to go to war with a country.
photo
Brian Gilmer
Respect the bunny.
11:31 AM on 07/05/2011
How close are some states in the US from passing the same type of laws? I would say one or two elections cycles away.
photo
the grange gorman
Rachel Corrie is the greatest person since Lennon
08:51 AM on 07/05/2011
There is no morality and little logic in siding with saudi and against iran , and most saudis resent the west for proping up their corrupt royal family.
10:21 AM on 07/05/2011
actually most saudis support the royal family, because it has made them rich.
photo
the grange gorman
Rachel Corrie is the greatest person since Lennon
10:26 AM on 07/05/2011
bizarre statement

most saudis are not rich , a few tens of thousands are
11:45 AM on 07/05/2011
On what FACTS do you base this assumption?