iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Federal Bank Regulators Scrutinizing Mortgage Lawsuits Against Banks, Opening New Worry For Investors, Bankers


First Posted: 07/06/11 07:07 PM ET Updated: 09/05/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Federal bank regulators are scrutinizing more than 150 home loan-related lawsuits directed at lenders and mortgage companies, a top official at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation plans to say Thursday, underscoring the threat the largest U.S. banks face from faulty and improper mortgage and foreclosure practices.

The revelation will likely add to large banks' woes, as the five biggest servicers -- Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial -- currently face up to $30 billion in penalties from state attorneys general and federal agencies for wrongful foreclosures and other mortgage-related misdeeds.

Lenders and servicers, which collect borrowers' monthly payments and foreclose on them when they fall behind, face 67 pending class-action suits in more than 20 states that challenge foreclosures based on so-called "robo-signing" and other poor documentation practices, according to FDIC Director of Depositor and Consumer Protection Mark Pearce's prepared remarks for a Thursday congressional panel.

The companies face 57 additional suits in 25 states over alleged improprieties resulting from loan modifications in the Obama administration's signature foreclosure-prevention initiative, known as HAMP, and 24 lawsuits over non-HAMP modifications, according to the remarks. Further, investors in mortgage securities have filed 21 suits that allege misconduct and seek to force banks to buy back the loans at face value, an outcome that could cost banks hundreds of billions of dollars.

The FDIC is also tracking separate suits launched by state attorneys general in Ohio, Nevada and Arizona against Ally and Bank of America.

Regulators sanctioned the banks in April, saying at the time that they expected the firms to improve their procedures and compensate abused homeowners.

But those findings were based on bank-provided information and their own limited review of less than 3,000 loan files. And in that case, regulators didn't act until reports emerged of banks' shoddy practices. Private litigation -- and the discoveries they could produce -- could yield nuggets about poor behavior that regulators missed.

Regulators guide banks in deciding how much money to put aside to guard against losses -- cash that otherwise could be used to pad their profits -- and approve requests to pay dividends to shareholders or buy back shares to drive up the company's stock price. Concerns over lawsuits -- and the merit of plaintiffs' claims -- could derail banks' financial plans.

Bank of America shares are down 22 percent over the last three months in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. JPMorgan has slid 15 percent, while Wells Fargo has declined 13 percent. Citigroup has dropped 8 percent.

"Servicing problems continue to present significant operational and litigation risk to servicers and originating banks," Pearce plans to say, according to a copy of his prepared remarks.

For the larger economy, the lawsuits represent potential pitfalls that could delay a broader recovery.

"The housing market cannot heal and recover until mortgage servicing and foreclosure problems are resolved and systems are adequate to the task at hand going forward," according to Pearce's prepared remarks. "A comprehensive resolution for past servicing errors is essential to the recovery of the housing market and greater economy."

The five largest servicers, which collect payments for three out of every five home loans, are engaged in discussions with state and federal authorities to settle accusations of defective and sometimes-illegal foreclosure practices.

"Poor mortgage servicing practices have both contributed to the creation of the housing crisis and acted as an impediment to its resolution," Pearce plans to say, according to his prepared remarks.

A recent Treasury Department audit of the 10 largest servicers in the HAMP program found that four of them needed "substantial improvement." The remainder were found to need "moderate improvement." None passed with flying colors.

Pearce says in his prepared remarks that about 90,000 homeowners are contesting their foreclosures in court, an indication of poor mortgage and foreclosure practices. As a result, the average foreclosure took nearly nine months to process as of December, according to Pearce's remarks. It took just four months as of 2007.

* * * * *

READ THE STATEMENT:

Mark Pearce 7-7-11 testimony

* * * * *

Shahien Nasiripour is a senior business reporter for The Huffington Post. You can send him an email; bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed; follow him on Twitter; friend him on Facebook; become a fan; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 1+917-267-2335.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Federal bank regulators are scrutinizing more than 150 home loan-related lawsuits directed at lenders and mortgage companies, a top official at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ...
WASHINGTON -- Federal bank regulators are scrutinizing more than 150 home loan-related lawsuits directed at lenders and mortgage companies, a top official at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 320
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
01:18 AM on 07/08/2011
It's about time that the FDIC and other bank regulators paid attention to the epidemic of mortgage holder abuses!! The pity is that the "system" requires class action lawsuits as the only means of retaliation for homeowners who can't afford to retain competent counsel to combat the impudence of bankers who merrily threaten and harass them, since the "risk" in loans acquired when mergers occur.

So regular payers of mortgages are prevented from doing so, by illegal means. As usual the only winners in this fraudulent paridy, are lawyers. They make millions of dollars for their efforts, while the homeless former mortgagee is finally paid a paltry amount (under $100.)

Wells Fargo Bank has refused to accept my usual mortgage payments when I brought cash, in person, to their Wachovia branches in Virginia on time each month. An escrow account was created without my knowledge when the bank found my real estate tax hadn't been paid yet, at the beginning of November, 2010.

As a "senior" in financial difficulty I had been accepted into my community's real estate tax waiver program, yet the amount for the year before, with late charges and interest, was paid by the bank and placed in an "escrow" account.

I was able to get the Tax Collector to refund the bank's money in May, 2011. That's in cyberspace, too. The bank really didn't want money, they wanted to foreclose, so a date for the auction of my property was set.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lizinsarasota
06:59 PM on 07/07/2011
Anyone who is interested in where this is trending should look at the bravest courts - the US Bankruptcy courts. Bankruptcy courts in several jurisdictions have looked long and hard at the affidavits that have been used by affidavit "mills," notably Lender Processing Services, and come up with one word: fraud. Lender Processing Services was instrumental in providing hundreds of thousands of robosigned (not "so-called" - I wish reporters would stop using that hackneyed phrase!) affidavits PER YEAR from 2006 in foreclosure cases, filed by law firms we all know as foreclosure mills, foreclosure mills that are making the front page of newspapers all over the country.
If you think that the facts put forth in sworn affidavits are a mere detail, consider this statement by the US Bankruptcy Court of the Eastern District of Louisiana:
"...affidavits are a lender's representation as the to the status of a loan. They are routinely accepted in both state and federal courts in lieu of live testimony. They are an accommodation to the lending comunity based on a belief by the courts that the facts they present are virtually unassailable. ...While they can be refuted by a borrower, too often, a debtor's offer of alternative and conflicting facts is dismissed by those who believe that a lender's word is more credible than that of a debtor. The deference afforded to the lending community has resulted in an abuse of trust."
(http://www.scribd.com/doc/52938762/In-Re-Wilson pages 21)
02:54 PM on 07/07/2011
And let's all be very honest here...if any one of us homeowners walks into court tomorrow with a fraudulent document saying "We are the owners of the home now" "We own the Note" "We paid that off a long time ago...we just forgot to record the proper documents, we'll send that over to you right now and just back date it for your records"

ARE YOU KIDDING ME????
We would go to JAIL...DIRECTLY TO JAIL....no monopoly money....no nothing!!!!
iam99
To know what you prefer...
02:41 PM on 07/07/2011
How many different reasons are needed before the generous application of RICO?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cats530
16 Trillion To Banksters Per GAO Audit
12:59 PM on 07/08/2011
Speaking of RICO, this is quite frightening...

"But Judge Robert Sack, writing for a three-judge panel, said a federal ban on civil RICO claims based on securities fraud also covers aiding and abetting claims."

WHAT federal "ban"? When did TPTB sneak this in when we weren't watching?


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/07/jpmorgan-dismissal-madoff-conspiracy_n_892667.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cats530
16 Trillion To Banksters Per GAO Audit
01:48 PM on 07/07/2011
"Now, there are all sorts of reasons that I could go after these guys for being beyond offensive. I mean, just the fact that any of these CEOs still has her job is nothing short of astonishing. Traditionally, as far as I can remember, CEOs that captain their corporate ships only to go fatally crashing into the cliffs of insanity get canned, right? Not only did these guys keep their jobs after, at the very least, spectacularly failing, but they also picked up very nice bonuses to boot. So, I’d have to say, very well done there."

http://mandelman.ml-implode.com/2010/06/the-banksters-lloyd-blankfein-john-mack-vikram-pandit-jamie-dimon-brian-moynihan-et-al-have-we-forgotten-what-lying-is/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen1p
01:39 PM on 07/07/2011
Anyone trying to obtain a loan mod needs to also get an agreement to clear title in conjunction. You may obtain your loan mod and find out later that you will not be able to convey title.

The banks have done everything in their power to resist loan mods for one reason: they want the house. They have no money invested in the deal, but by claiming ownership and foreclosing, they get a free house. THEY WANT THE HOUSE......that is the game.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cats530
16 Trillion To Banksters Per GAO Audit
01:50 PM on 07/07/2011
The ones who peddle the "free house" meme here in their comments on this site and are so h*teful against borrowers have absolutely NO PROBLEM with the banksters fraudsters getting a free house that they do not own - stealing from the true creditors. Funny how that works, isn't it?
11:55 AM on 07/07/2011
Well, I hope Ocwen Loan Servicing is included in any type of punishments..they have been very dishonest.
10:44 AM on 07/07/2011
I do believe everyone who signed a loan for a mortgage should pay to the best of there ability. However, with the big banks...there is no one to talk to face to face...no one to tell your plight to...no one to tell you just lost your $100,000 income and you need a break. The loan mods are a flippin joke...because OH...the servicers can't modify securitized loans in most cases. There is absolutely no help for people who want it and need it. Homeowners stand to lose all of their investment, all that they have worked for to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars...the banks stand to take back a home...give the poor homeowners nothing...sell the house...make a huge profit...leaving homeowners penniless. It is a travesty in America and a crime that not more is being done to keep people in their homes. It will effect generations to come. All of the sudden the house your parents worked so hard to pay for will not be part of their estate when they are gone.
iam99
To know what you prefer...
10:24 AM on 07/07/2011
It is incomprehensible as to how any foreclosure is legal/valid after the banks broke the chain of title, or fraudulently created documents, falsely signed documents, failed to do appropriate due diligence when making the loans, and so on. I have been in the business since 1992.

William K. Black has the expertise to fix this and I believe Elizabeth Warren would be excellent too. Not fixed, don't we have the market in chaos?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Sta
10:39 AM on 07/07/2011
Because Ws and banks, have bought and paid for Govt, they are quite secure that Govt will continue to fosters and condone abhorrent behavior, no one is being punished, and no one will be.
iam99
To know what you prefer...
10:53 AM on 07/07/2011
We live in a corruptocracy. It is surprising that any buyers would want to engage in the chaotic, unregulated, goofy system, where they have the bulk of their estate on the line at the mercy of the whim of the moment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:49 AM on 07/07/2011
The market will really experience true chaos at the the point where people unilaterally and without regard for the rule of law decide to abdicate from their obligations and responsibilities. Reading many of the posts here, sadly, we may not be far off from that point. I guess that's the new American way, eh? Even though I asked the bank for the money and they gave it to me and I enjoyed and spent it, I'm not going to be held accountable for repaying it because ____________ (you can fill in whatever reason you'd like here - there are LOADS of them to choose from elsewhere in this Comments section)....

If a borrower stopped making his/her payments and abandoned the property, why should ANYTHING stop the foreclosure action? It should be fast and simple. You think the borrower should not have to pay back the money they borrowered because the Bank didn't do its due diligence in making the loan (I'm going to leave that nonsensical thought alone for the time being).... or because documents were signed by electronic signature? That's all form over substance... Mortgages generally are very clear and simple documents - you don't make your payments, you lose the house.

Let me ask you - how'd you like it if you loaned someone money and they refused to repay you because they say you should have know that they were a bad credit risk? Or because the promisorry note was kept in somone else's vault?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
curmudgeon98
12:34 PM on 07/07/2011
"Let me ask you - how'd you like it if you loaned someone money and they refused to repay you because they say you should have know that they were a bad credit risk? Or because the promisorry note was kept in somone else's vault? "
Most people are refusing to pay because:
1) the same people who loaned them the money, took their jobs...by financing overseas operations of US cos.
2) committed fraud and by high risk wheeling, dealing, enriching the rich, destroyed the value of the property mortgaged so that more is owed than new value."

What you mean, is pay the loan shark or get your knees ready for surgery.

What if the guy who gave you the money lied about your obligations, destroyed the legal chain of property and sold the collection rights to the mob? What if required by law to renegotiate?...and doesn't.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cats530
16 Trillion To Banksters Per GAO Audit
01:05 PM on 07/07/2011
Let me ask you this? Should the TRUE CREDITOR be paid for the loan or an imposter who fraudulantly comes before the court claiming ownership? You sound like you work for Bank of America's propaganda department. How's that working out for you, to know you can't stem the tide and millions of people despise your employer?
photo
madinpahuff
Domari Nolo
10:23 AM on 07/07/2011
Bankers breaking the law - PREPOSTEROUS! †
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TeraWatt60
Cogito Ergo Sum
10:21 AM on 07/07/2011
This is the same industry that Teapublicans whine is "over -regulated" even today?? The result of letting the inmates "police" themselves as Teapublican/Libertarian theology would suggest is quite evident but like most theology they do not want to be deterred by facts. The Teapublicans are now doing everything they can to limit Dodd-Frank and to undermine the Consumer Protection Bureau....
10:14 AM on 07/07/2011
Slap on the wrist, business as usual. Wouldn't want to hurt the job creators.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bg66astoria
Research Helps
10:13 AM on 07/07/2011
Maybe they'll even find their way to illegal foreclosures, wrongful foreclosures, etc. with the aid of County registers, registrars & deed clerks.

The shadow of MERS malfeasance looms larger against the banks/servicers.
Vinnster
The One=The Zero job creator!!
09:18 AM on 07/07/2011
Move along...Obama and Holder have already stated publicly they are not going to prosecute and of these crimes for fear of making markets unstable...We all know thousands of crimes were committed by Obama's Banker and Wall Street buddies and he has got their back....move along.
08:47 AM on 07/07/2011
When the crisis hit, the law didn't say "bail out". The law said "Prompt Corrective Action" enacted after S&L disaster, mandating takeover and resolution of banks. Leaving the people in place who caused financial crisis only allowed them to keep papering it over, hiding it.

See William K. Black, former S&L regulator, on video or read his earlier HuffPo piece.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Kp07aLCP4
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-k-black/foreclose-on-the-foreclos_b_772434.html