iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Exxon And Montana's Yellowstone Pipeline Controversy

Exxon Montana

MATTHEW BROWN   07/ 7/11 11:03 PM ET   AP

BILLINGS, Mont. — Indoor air, cropland soils and residential wells downstream of a Yellowstone River oil spill will be tested for contamination after residents raised concerns about hazards from the tens of thousands of gallons of crude that poured into the watercourse, the Environmental Protection Agency said Thursday.

EPA and local officials said they do not expect to find significant health dangers but were acting as a precaution. Some residents in oil-stained areas have complained of nausea, dizziness and shortness of breath that have lingered for days.

An estimated 1,000 barrels of oil, or 42,000 gallons, have fouled areas along the scenic Yellowstone since Friday after a 12-inch pipeline operated by Exxon Mobil Corp. broke near the south-central Montana town of Laurel.

George Nilson, 69, of Billings, said the fumes from oil that washed into his neighbor's property have been overwhelming.

"I've been in it for five days now, and the only way I can breathe is to have all the windows open," he said.

Contractors for the EPA and Exxon Mobil were to collect air samples beginning Thursday or Friday, and the results would take about a week, said EPA on-scene coordinator Steve Merritt. Twelve homes would be tested initially, with possibly more to follow.

Crude oil contains dangerous chemicals including benzene and hydrogen sulfide. But officials said much of those substances would have evaporated quickly after the initial spill, meaning the long-term health risk is low.

Air sampling along the river has not detected either of the chemicals, and water sampling shows no petroleum hydrocarbons that exceed drinking water standards, the EPA said in a written statement late Thursday.

"The air is not inundated with these potentially harmful chemicals," said Yellowstone County Health Officer John Felton. "We can smell things that are no longer creating the same level of hazard."

Soil from agricultural areas and water from hundreds or residential wells also will be tested in coming days, Merritt said. Exxon Mobil's contractors will collect duplicate samples so their results can be verified by government scientists, he said.

The cause of the July 1 pipeline rupture remains under investigation.

Earlier this week, the U.S. Department of Transportation released documents that said Exxon Mobil had reported the line was buried under "at least 12 feet of cover" where it crosses the river near Laurel.

A DOT spokesman Thursday clarified that the 12-foot figure applied to the section of pipeline at the riverbank.

The company's measurements in December showed that the pipeline was 5 to 8 feet below the river bottom. Determining its depth when the pipe failed will be part of the federal investigation into the spill.

Also Thursday, Gov. Brian Schweitzer said state officials were leaving a command post set up to coordinate the spill response because Exxon Mobil has blocked public access to the site.

Schweitzer told The Associated Press that state employees cannot be involved in a group that does not make itself transparent to the public under Montana law.

Exxon Mobil security workers have closely guarded access to the command post on the second floor of the Crowne Plaza Hotel in Billings, where the EPA and other federal agencies also are stationed. Attempts by the AP to talk to government officials there have been denied.

"The state will no longer have a presence at the Crowne Plaza because Exxon Mobil tells us they can't respect the open government laws we have in Montana," Schweitzer said. "I can't allow state employees to be in meetings at the Crowne Plaza talking about this cleanup without having it open."

An alternate, state-run oil spill office opened Thursday at state Department of Transportation offices in Billings. Schweitzer said the move will improve the flow of public information and not impede the state's ability to respond to the spill.

Exxon Mobil spokesman Alan Jeffers said the command post had been a joint operation between EPA, the state Department of Environmental Quality and the company.

"We do not run the unified command. We are providing security services for the unified command, just like we are providing cleanup serves for the unified command," he said.

Authorities in Yellowstone County said Thursday they would ease travel restrictions along a road near the spill site after some area residents and members of the media complained about a lack of access.

Those restrictions at times have been enforced by private security contractors working for Exxon Mobil, who turned away reporters or blocked them from areas where cleanup work was going on.

"We have been frustrated since the spill took place because we've burned up time waiting for Exxon officials or other authorities to respond to our request for information and access," said Steve Prosinski, editor of the Billings Gazette. "We realize cleanup is their primary focus but they have a responsibility through us to communicate how the cleanup is going."

Yellowstone County Sheriff John Linder said his deputies were working in conjunction with the company but had not ceded any authority to it. Linder said the restrictions were meant to protect public safety.

"They're not calling the shots down there as far as access," Linder said of Exxon Mobil. "They'll let us know when there is a safe time or not a safe time. We're working together, is what we're doing. If it's a safety issue, we will address it. If it's not, we will work with them to make sure everybody has access."

Jeffers said the company was trying to be transparent and has worked over the week to improve media access to cleanup areas.

Federal regulators have ordered Exxon Mobil to make safety improvements before re-starting the 20-year-old pipeline, including re-burying the line as much as 25 to 30 feet deep to protect against external damage and assess risk where it crosses a waterway.

There is still no definitive word on how far downriver the spill could spread.

There have been confirmed reports of oil as far as 80 miles downstream, although most is concentrated in the first 30 miles, according to the EPA.

An estimated 350 federal and Exxon Mobil contractors were cleaning contaminated areas of riverbank by Thursday, said Exxon Mobil Pipeline Co. President Gary Pruessing.

"It's not soiled everywhere but there are pockets of it," Pruessing said. "It's going to take a while as we try to get our hands around where the contamination is and then clean it up."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BILLINGS, Mont. — Indoor air, cropland soils and residential wells downstream of a Yellowstone River oil spill will be tested for contamination after residents raised concerns about hazards from...
BILLINGS, Mont. — Indoor air, cropland soils and residential wells downstream of a Yellowstone River oil spill will be tested for contamination after residents raised concerns about hazards from...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 332
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
08:09 PM on 07/10/2011
Take a look at the photo attached to this article. How do you expect anyone to clean up a spill in a river that is in flood stage? You couldn't talk most kayakers I know out into those waters, let alone guys stumbling about in hazmat suits. You don't even know how far the oil has spread, and you expect them to snap thier fingers and magically make it disappear? I'd rather a professional, engineering-based solution next week than a media dog-and-pony show today. Exxon needs to clean it up right - not screw around and make people think something is being done when it is not. It blows my mind that is exactly what people on here seem to want, though...
10:04 PM on 07/08/2011
Exxon --- Aren't they the largest most profitable corporation in the world?

Surely they would have spent the money to be the best prepared and have the best safety systems in place. If that failed I'm sure they would have the best response clean up crews with the most advanced technology in the world. These are the same people that want more drilling permits in the Gulf of Mexico because they say they can "HANDLE" any spill.

They do not want any of those government regulations slowing down their production. The Republicans say the industry should be able to self regulate.

TI%)G)%K%#JFFG$%%%^ ------ Big money and politics --- if you are not part of the top 2% then you better watch your wallet. The big companies make the profits and the taxpayers will pay for the clean up. That is why the Republicans want to defund the EPA and reduce regulations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
In Financial Theocracy we Trust
06:03 PM on 07/08/2011
I remember the spilled amount from the Gulf slowly going up but only while BP was kicking and screaming. This will be the same way.

It's just a drop.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
05:18 PM on 07/08/2011
actually heard the gov of MT on the thom hartman show today and he laid out how ridiculous the 'pollution, dilution, solution' theory really nice. was a great interview, available at hartmans web site for any who are interested.
10:11 AM on 07/08/2011
Why do we have to hunt for this update? I think we could take one of Palin's articles off the front page and report this situation there. (I thought she was done).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
12:44 PM on 07/08/2011
This isn't an update. We still don't know whose oil it was. We still don't know what caused the rupture. We don't know what is being done about it. We don't know how many lawyers are staying in town. We don't know how many Exxon bigwigs are staying in town. We don't even know where it happened, except it was in Montana on the Yellowstone River.
02:18 PM on 07/08/2011
Schwietzer gave a thorough rundown of all of this as only he can do. Are you in this state. Do you need to know every step. Try to bing the Govenor. It was Exxon's pipeline. And you won't get the truth from them...as the Guv...found out. Happened north of Laurel I think.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
12:53 AM on 07/08/2011
More like BP behavior than Exxon.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-whDR3lbD70
10:10 AM on 07/08/2011
Oh ...do you know about the Exxon mess 20 years ago in Alaska. These oil companies are all the same.
10:27 PM on 07/07/2011
Simple answer. Not enough people live there for any public outcry or legal action to be damaging to Exxon.
photo
Hoodooit
Every animal is smarter than you
09:28 AM on 07/08/2011
Do not underestimate Montana's Governor Schweitzer.
10:14 AM on 07/08/2011
That is right, he is creative constructive and smart and we will hear from him. But hiding these updates and news items on this page is disengenuous. Who doesn't want us to know. It is a mess and I am so sorry for the great and beauiful Yellowstone River. Exxon also has some answers to give too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
05:19 PM on 07/08/2011
i dig the guy too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
11:56 AM on 07/08/2011
The lawyers are on the way, if they aren't there already.
photo
SeenItBefore
Ya want to super size that?
10:24 PM on 07/07/2011
Slow response... slow response?

Talk to the residents of Prince William Sound, they can tell you about s.....l...o....w....!
10:15 AM on 07/08/2011
And still twenty years later...it is not "fixed".
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
09:48 PM on 07/07/2011
What do you call people who come to the defense of billionaire corporations that are gouging them at the pumps, poisoning their waters, not paying taxes, and doing their best to bankroll politicians who want to help stiffle new technology ?
10:36 PM on 07/07/2011
Stupid! Clueless! Fools with their heads buried in the sand!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
11:57 AM on 07/08/2011
Gasoline buyers
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joebudgie
09:10 PM on 07/07/2011
Everybody is singing the same old song again. Blame Exxon for pipes that don't last forever. Boycott them, put them out of business.What will you do when there is no gasoline for your car and lawnmower?
photo
SeenItBefore
Ya want to super size that?
10:22 PM on 07/07/2011
M.0.R.0.N!
10:38 PM on 07/07/2011
We need to stop being dependent upon oil and find other alternatives. It's not the pipes.. it's the company that lies and cuts corners all in the name of the almight dollar.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
12:35 PM on 07/08/2011
The company is made up of normal Americans. Companies are not alive except in Disney movies. We judge others by our own actions. We think everyone is just like me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rwaller
My bio never meets guidelines!
08:54 PM on 07/07/2011
Being the black sheep in a Montana republican family of farmers and legislators, I would love to know how many of those now raising alarm over ANOTHER oil companies lack of response, were over the past 2 years clamoring to ease all those nasty restriction on our wonderful oil companies??? It never ceases to amaze me the level of hypocracy when the reality they advocate comes back to bite them personally. It seems to be the only way they are able to learn. Sad!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rrfotobus
08:43 PM on 07/07/2011
And, the GOP still want to continue giving them millions of dollars in tax breaks the rest of us have no chance of receiving..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ninthraphael
i have my god! He/she doesn't look like yours!
08:04 PM on 07/07/2011
Lovely! Expect a mea culpa with no penalty!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
methnkng
07:58 PM on 07/07/2011
Come on folks. Our country is being run by the global corporations through their bought and paid for politicians. They can do whatever they want and nothing will happen to them.
10:19 AM on 07/08/2011
I think it is about time that the shout starts building on how we fund elections. Perhaps then we would get real loyal and possibly smart politicians in WA DC who would actually work together to save this country and all it is. We won't ever have that when they can be bought and paid for ..for favors and to keep these corporations flowing in wealth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
12:01 PM on 07/08/2011
And we fund these global corporations because they give us the tools we need to rape this planet. We approve of their methods by our patronage.
05:45 PM on 07/08/2011
Yes you are correct...and I keep hoping for a miracle...and tyring very hard to believe that most people have a good cell in their brain too. But I really am doubting all republicans on that one. I used to be the eternal optomist. It is hard to not buy some of that stuff when you don't know. We try to not buy items that are Koch brothers..but they own companies that I am sure the company doens't know who owns it and some of those products are good ones. And as naive as it sounds...what difference does it make if all of us dont' do that...one isn't going ot make the difference. Raping the planet is not a goal of mine. Saving it is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mspat44417
Rock it if ya got it...Music
07:15 PM on 07/07/2011
Again with Exxon...I haven't bought gas from them since the Valdez incident....Gas companies just what they want..Thanks to our government and their greed they share with oil companies...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KateInMT
May you stay forever young.
08:36 PM on 07/07/2011
Not buying from a particular oil company doesn't mean you aren't buying gas or other products from that company. All oil companies operate on an exchange program, meaning Shell oil can sell a branded Shell product even though the base stock comes from Exxon. It's the additives a particular company puts in the finished product that makes it branded. Therefore, Exxon can sell gas from Conoco refineries, Sinclair can sell sell gas from Exxon refineries and minor gas stations can sell from a variety of sources.

That said, I'm not in favor of any of the dirty deals and massive profits made by any major oil company.
10:21 AM on 07/08/2011
True but I think the claim is that Exxon is the only american oil company. Do they import from another place? Probably. I don't buy from them either or shell..but it is hard to find a reputable gas company when there are none.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
12:10 PM on 07/08/2011
But it is OK that Apple's profit margin is three times that of the oil companies. Apple is destined (by Wallstreet) to pass Walmart and the oil companies as the richest corporation in America. Exxon has to sell $130 billion in products to net $5 billion. Apple sells $25 billion in products to net $5 billion. What's the difference? Political party agenda. Truth be known, governments make at least $50 billion for every $130 billion in Exxon sales. It's all there on US government-approved financial pages for you to check this out.