iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.S. Adds 18,000 Jobs In June As Jobless Rate Climbs To 9.2 Percent

Jobs Report

First Posted: 07/08/11 09:37 AM ET Updated: 09/07/11 06:12 AM ET

The unemployment rate rose and the economy added far fewer jobs than anticipated in June, confirming fears that an economic slump has taken hold and further dashing hopes that a powerful recovery will be soon forthcoming.

Only 18,000 jobs were added to the American economy in June -- a blow to Wall Street expectations, which had estimated between 90,000 and 140,000 added jobs -- and the unemployment rate rose to 9.2 percent, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics monthly employment report.

"Clearly it's a disappointing number," said Bernard Baumohl, chief global economist at The Economic Outlook Group. "There are just too many factors that are really creating downward pressure on new job growth, among which is the simple fact that the U.S. economy has slowed markedly from late last year."

"Companies are focused -- laser focused -- on keeping their costs down," Baumohl added. "And that means that they are not in a mood to hire unless there is a genuine reason to do so."

May's employment numbers were also revised downward on Friday, suggesting that this is more than just one month's bad numbers. The unemployment rate rose to 9.1 percent in May and only 25,000 jobs were added to the U.S. economy, cutting the 54,000 added jobs the Bureau's June report had estimated in half. Labor experts say a bare minimum of 125,000 jobs must be added each month simply to keep up with population growth.

Average hourly earnings for all private sector employees decreased in June by 1 cent to $22.99 and the average workweek decreased by .1 hour to 34.3. Meanwhile, more Americans gave up looking for work altogether, as the labor force participation rate fell to a 27-year low of 64.1 percent.

As Capital Economics chief US Economist Paul Ashworth put it: "June's US employment report doesn't have a single redeeming feature. It's awful from start to finish."

In recent weeks economists have been confronting with mixed economic signals.

Some signs looked promising: The manufacturing sector picked up in June for the first time in four months, and fresh data showed a glimmer of hope for the housing market, with home prices in major cities rising for the first time in eight months.

New claims for unemployment benefits declined, gas prices fell and auto makers cranked up production. Reuters declared the "dark clouds over the U.S. economy are starting to lift" in a report on U.S. private companies hiring double the expected number
of workers in June

But there have also been indications that a faster recovery will not soon materialize. While home prices are no longer in free fall, there is still a massive pipeline of foreclosed homes that are awaiting processing. Meanwhile, fears of a Greek default and a slowdown in Chinese growth spurred anxiety about the potential ripple effects on America's still-fragile economy.

Baumohl pointed to one looming factor which explains why, despite a handful of promising signs, companies still won't hire.

"Today companies are producing more goods and services than ever before," he said. "The GDP now is bigger than it ever has been before. And the economy is able to do that with 7 million fewer workers. If we can do so much with so much less, where is the incentive to hire?"

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The unemployment rate rose and the economy added far fewer jobs than anticipated in June, confirming fears that an economic slump has taken hold and further dashing hopes that a powerful recovery will...
The unemployment rate rose and the economy added far fewer jobs than anticipated in June, confirming fears that an economic slump has taken hold and further dashing hopes that a powerful recovery will...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13,989
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (246 total)
11:41 AM on 07/13/2011
In all reality, the economy wont get any better without job creation and growth. With 65% of all new created jobs being generated from start-up companies the solution is simple: WE NEED MORE STARTUPS!

I added this topic to my blog since this topic is popular.
http://www.collegeminer.com/cm/post/2011/07/13/US-only-adds-18000-jobs-in-June.aspx
photo
Leigh49
Hey, you, get off of my cloud
10:38 AM on 07/12/2011
Goodbye GOTP. It wasn't nice to know ya.
03:27 PM on 07/11/2011
I've been having trouble getting a job for the past year. Had to resort to trying some of these "work from home" type of things. I hope they work but i doubt they will. If anyone wants to try them, be my guest. http://385edc4t7uh29n1e-d87pgzo8j.hop.clickbank.net/, http://5a91ba2pg-a43r4tmd2zsd3qas.hop.clickbank.net/, http://cf51fd5ob1916z2cw737j6vp2u.hop.clickbank.net/
photo
68Namvet
Sioux, French, German, Jew, American mutt
12:51 PM on 07/11/2011
Jobs, jobs, jobs !!! Taxes, taxes, taxes!!! Blah, blah, blah!!!

Most people simply do not understand business and taxes. While it's true that poor people do not create jobs, neither do the wealthy. Most jobs are created by businesses and ALWAYS have a single reason behind their creation - production of products and/or services for the purpose of securing a PROFIT.(and there is nothing wrong with PROFITS when earned legally)
If the business in question can produce their products or provide their services with less people, thereby cut expenses and increase profits - THEY WILL.
If the business in question cannot produce their products or provide their services with the personnel they have, and need to add employees, THEY WILL.
Taxes, raised or cut, will play almost ZERO percent in these decisions. Raises in taxes are simply passed on to the consumers in increased prices to maintain profitability. Cuts in taxes are simply added to the bottom line in the form of increased profits.
So, if you cut the taxes of a business there will not be a job created that is not required by the conduct of the business - NO ONE hires people they DO NOT NEED to conduct their business.
Similarly, the wealthy DO NOT invest in businesses to create jobs. They invest to create profits - and more likely than not - more profits will be obtained by cutting jobs than increasing them.

If you do not understand these simple principles - you do not understand
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Hansy Peguero
09:51 AM on 07/11/2011
"Companies are focused -- laser focused -- on keeping their costs down," Baumohl added. "And that means that they are not in a mood to hire unless there is a genuine reason to do so."

So why did they get a tax cut in the first place??
photo
68Namvet
Sioux, French, German, Jew, American mutt
12:10 PM on 07/11/2011
To pay their lobbyists to wine and dine the representatives to get them more of their tax cuts - duh!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JudgeMoonbox
09:20 AM on 07/11/2011
One thing this report overlooked is the impact of the Arab Spring on the economy. While everyone thrills to see another part of the World open itself to democracy and reform, the movement did threaten the oil supplies. Libya was knocked out as a producer and the other suppliers were threatened. Egypt sees much of that supply going through the Suez Canal, and if the Mubarak regime had reacted more thuggishly, that could have interrupted supplies as well.

We now have some assurance that the producers other than Libya will have some breathing room (they may not use it wisely, or they might) and the price at the pump fell before Memorial Day, something that almost never happens.

I think that if we had more solar energy and more alternatives to consumption like public transit, the prices would not have gone as high as they did, and the economy would not have suffered as badly as it had.
photo
intellectualTradition
corruptisima re publica plurimae leges
08:16 AM on 07/11/2011
and the left clings to the fantasy that in the real work-a-day world they have something viable and valuable to offer the rest of the country. I guess those 2010 elections weren't a fluke after all

one drools thinking of the next elections....if only we could get progressives/liberals listed in PDR and treat accordingly
05:11 PM on 07/10/2011
This is a lame report on the jobs numbers. It skips over the reality that as the economy is creating jobs in the private sector, government at all levels (local, county, state, federal) is shedding jobs left and right. That is to say over the last two years as the private sector has created 1 million jobs, government had eliminated 500,000 jobs.
This doesn;t happen very often. Like never. But as we know government needs so shed more jobs like in the military. But what did the GOP do in the House this week. They passed a new Defense Budget for next year with an increase of like $17 billion I think over this year as we pull out of Iraq and Afghan. Why is that? How can they sau they want to "pu our fiscal house in order."
The Military Industrial Complex is killing us. The GOP is out of control when it comes to the Defense Budget. How big is it? I think its about the size of every other nation's Defense Budget combined.

Lets cut the Defense budget by $60 billion this year and spend $20 billion of that on our aging infrasctructure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
04:51 PM on 07/10/2011
The NYT reported Friday that 39k government jobs were lost in June.
03:24 PM on 07/10/2011
You're living in a dream world if you think the job market is somehow going to welcome you with open arms. There's a glut of desperately unemployed in a job market that is trying to pare down to maximize profits. Employers used the 2008 downturn to re-invent themselves as leaner / more profitable businesses. The message is clear: We won't be needing MORE employees, thank you! In a global economy where the U.S. contributes very little, I can't imagine what the premise would be for a "bounce back."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
04:57 PM on 07/10/2011
Corporations defend their stockholders during a recession by cutting production, laying off workers, and raising prices on what they do sell. This is what we call leaner and more productive. If a recession lasts forever, we surely will not have more jobs.

All of this is why "small businesses" are a big employer and a hope to escape a recession. Those hundreds who turn up for every job opening will have their occasional success and this will increase consumption and open more jobs. Short of finding a good employer, they may become self employed (a small business). Protecting their resources (fair wages, unemployment compensation, the social programs) may better their prospects and our own.
12:13 PM on 07/10/2011
I sure wish reporters would include the "real" "labor underutilization rate," as the Bureau of Labor Statistics now euphemistically calls unemployment.

That "real" number is the U-6 figure included in the press release every "first-Friday-of-the-month morning. It runs about twice the "official unemployment rate". And oh by the way, every story on the "unemployment" numbers should have, somewhere in it, a disclaimer that "These figures are provided by the US BLS and have not been verified by [this reporter, this column, this publication, etc.]

Because as we've learned over the years, US citizens must presume that whatever our government tells us, announces, etc., is a lie, unless proven otherwise, beyond a reasonable doubt. It wasn't for nothing that GW Bush got the title "Unitary Liar-In-Chief", if you happen to remember back that far.

Here's the link to the BLS unemployment figure release; it stays the same month after month--only the numbers change, to reflect the innocent (who're being gobbled up in the government tree-chipper, so to speak). http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm
11:40 AM on 07/10/2011
A fraction of the jobs created by Canada for the same month. Pathetic. These policies are not working.
10:56 AM on 07/10/2011
You've got to love the headline - Trying to make it sound like good news - "US adds 18,000 jobs in June"... the headline should read "US adds only a dismal 18,000 jobs in June,,,," Not even the start of summer hiring season could bring the numbers up.
06:24 AM on 07/11/2011
Yeah they don't point out we need 125k jobs to break even. Things would be so much worse if not for obamas "programs" ...right...lol
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:56 AM on 07/10/2011
confirming fears that an economic slump has taken hold and further dashing hopes that a powerful recovery will be soon forthcoming.

/////////////// this says it all folks.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
08:01 AM on 07/10/2011
When has it become acceptable to not create jobs for our children or our population? It is an actual failure of our government, capitalism, and patriotism to keep our nation strong. Strength in today's world requires intervention in the market, not the hands off approach we have by bad luck and intensive lobbying. But, there is no one worthy that has the power to change things. We have only idiots that think mom and pop store strategies will work. No, we can't transfer the wealth from the rest of the world to us by capitalism. It just isn't going to be allowed by the other countries of the world. They are smarter than those in power and those at universities.