More

Regulators Shut Banks In Illinois And Colorado

First Posted: 07/09/11 12:11 PM ET Updated: 09/08/11 06:12 AM ET

Bank

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Regulators shut down a bank in Illinois and two in Colorado on Friday, boosting to 51 the number of U.S. bank failures this year.

The latest closings come even as the overall pace of bank failures has slowed as the economy gradually improves and banks work their way through the bad debt accumulated during the financial crisis. Through July 9 last year, regulators had closed 90 banks.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. on Friday seized First Chicago Bank & Trust in Chicago and Colorado Capital Bank in Castle Rock, Colo., and Signature Bank, in Windsor, Colo.

Northbrook Bank & Trust Co., based in Northbrook, Ill., agreed to assume the deposits and a majority of the assets of First Chicago, which had about $959.3 million in assets and $887.5 million in deposits.

Northbrook paid the FDIC a premium of 0.50 percent for the failed bank's deposits and agreed to buy about $880.7 million of First Chicago's assets.

In addition, the FDIC and Northbrook Bank agreed to share losses on $699.8 million of First Chicago's assets.

First Citizens Bank & Trust Co., based in Raleigh, N.C., assumed all the deposits and essentially all the assets of Colorado Capital, which had about $717.5 million in assets and $672.8 million in deposits.

The FDIC and First Citizens also agreed to share losses on $580 million of Colorado Capital's assets.

"We look forward to working with existing clients and establishing new relationships in the days to come," said B. Holding Jr., First Citizens Bank's CEO said in a statement. The bank is a unit of First Citizens BancShares.

Points West Community Bank, based in Julesburg, Colo., agreed to assume Signature Bank's $64.5 million in deposits and essentially all of its $66.7 million in assets.

The two bank failures are expected to cost the deposit insurance fund $590.4 million, combined.

In all, four banks have failed in Colorado this year. First Chicago is the fifth lender to collapse this year in Illinois.

In 2010 regulators seized 157 banks, the most in a year since the savings-and-loan crisis two decades ago.

The FDIC has said that 2010 likely would mark the peak for bank failures.

There were 140 bank failures in 2009, costing the insurance fund about $36 billion. The failures last year cost around $21 billion, a lower price tag because the banks that failed in 2010 were smaller on average. Twenty-five banks failed in 2008, the year the financial crisis struck with force; only three were closed in 2007.

From 2008 through 2010, bank failures cost the fund $76.8 billion. The deposit insurance fund fell into the red in 2009. With failures slowing, its deficit narrowed in the first quarter of this year and stood at about $1 billion as of March 31.

The FDIC expects the cost of resolving failed banks to total around $52 billion from 2010 through 2014.

Depositors' money -- insured up to $250,000 per account -- is not at risk, with the FDIC backed by the government. That insurance cap was made permanent in the financial overhaul law enacted last July.

The number of banks on the FDIC's confidential "problem" list edged up to 888 in the January-March quarter from 884 as of Dec. 31. The 888 troubled banks is the highest number since 1993, during the savings-and-loan crisis. But that doesn't mean the pace of bank failures is likely to accelerate again because, historically, only 19 percent of the banks on the "problem" list actually fail.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DENVER

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Regulators shut down a bank in Illinois and two in Colorado on Friday, boosting to 51 the number of U.S. bank failures this year. The latest closings come even as the overall pac...
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Regulators shut down a bank in Illinois and two in Colorado on Friday, boosting to 51 the number of U.S. bank failures this year. The latest closings come even as the overall pac...
Filed by Ryan Grenoble  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 61
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:30 AM on 07/10/2011
got a question what if every body pulled out there savings & checking accounts from bank america ,wells fargo,chase and put there accounts in threr communiy level banks ? also would that help the local communities for local ecconomy growth? if so why are people not doing this ?
04:07 PM on 07/10/2011
Go ask your govt. they regulate the banks!!
photo
pa30
All things bright and beautiful
04:14 PM on 07/11/2011
remember the '80's?
10:24 PM on 07/11/2011
not really I was overseas in the military at the time but I do remember that the economy was lousy then and president Regan froze our promotions forever after his promise for military pay raise, was a while ago though and my mind was on training and the disapointment of my grandfathers death and not being able to come home cause of my training
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nic the wonder puppy
When life throws lemons, throw them back
10:40 AM on 07/10/2011
I'm glad I'm a dog
10:09 AM on 07/10/2011
The "too little to succeed" feeds the "too big too fail"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
11:10 AM on 07/10/2011
That was the far right's strategy with TARP. They wanted to reward the banks who broke the law, and in exchange they'd either buy out or shut down the banks who were run properly.
10:05 AM on 07/10/2011
The government decides the running of the banking system in this country. The govt and their regulators decide if a bank will stay in business and they control the operations of the banks based on govt. regulations. What is so difficult to understand that those who dislike the way the govt. runs the banking system the people are upset with the banks and not the government who have the control. How much longer before the people understand that the banking problem in this country is all about the govt. not doing their jobs in the control of the banks. The out of control govt. also runs out of control banks . Some need to see reality and the problem.
photo
SmotPoker
Medical Marijuana saved my life.
08:25 AM on 07/10/2011
Why is the list of problem banks kept secret? Our government is protecting the crooks interest over the interest of the citizens. In a sane world this list would be known to all citizens that cared to know so they could avoid doing business with them, instead our government goes to great lengths to protect the white collar criminals from themselves at our greater peril. Insane and backwards!
09:58 AM on 07/10/2011
It isn't a secret.
Why are the media companies and non-profits not making this a major story? It is about our press. Our media.
photo
SmotPoker
Medical Marijuana saved my life.
10:31 AM on 07/10/2011
"The number of banks on the FDIC's confidential "problem" list edged up to 888 in the January-March quarter from 884 as of Dec. 31."

Confidential is just another word for secret. That these banks are troubled should be public knowledge in order to protect the public from making a serious mistake and doing business with a bank that isn't working as it should do to mismanagement and greed.
11:09 AM on 07/10/2011
To prevent a run on the banks? Like in it's a Wonderful Life?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:47 AM on 07/10/2011
only 19 percent of the banks on the "problem" list actually fail.
Damn! I feel better already
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhatDaBleep
Left is Right and Right is Wrong
05:32 AM on 07/10/2011
Stop bailing out banks and put their CEO's in JAIL!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronnie Avatar Dixon
Legislation is the art of compromise.
04:03 AM on 07/10/2011
The main point that I was looking for was the fact that, "Depositors' money -- insured up to $250,000 per account -- is not at risk, with the FDIC backed by the government." I was relieved when I read this...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:50 AM on 07/10/2011
This is so awesome.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RPDash
You talkin' to me?
03:22 AM on 07/10/2011
And so, the cash hemorrhage continues to bleed out of control in America, and we the tax-payers continue to bailout the Banksters with no end in sight. And the CONservatives in Congress continue to block any meaningful legislation to stop the fleecing of America, welcome to the USA.
11:04 AM on 07/10/2011
Yes, I am afraid that our country is very poorly run.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnnShahan2
Americans first, Republicans second
01:31 AM on 07/10/2011
I would like to point the finger at the greed of Republicans under Bush for this continuing fallout. You are all unconscionable as you will not accept adult responsibility for what you have done to this country. And to add insult to injury, you will not make any changes in what you do that caused this crisis. We're voting you all out in 2012. The sweetest sound will be you all pleading to be heard when you are nothing but a simpering, whimpering minority.
01:46 AM on 07/10/2011
Thank you! You saved me a bunch of typing.
photo
GulfportM
"It's like deja vu all over again."
07:15 AM on 07/10/2011
Are you saying the Democratic Party leaders that were in charge of the Banking and Finance Regulations and oversight since 2007 have no responsibility?
photo
SmotPoker
Medical Marijuana saved my life.
08:29 AM on 07/10/2011
It's sad but some people get too caught up in the Dem vs Rep debate when it is both parties that are damning the rest of us in their greedy quest for ever more riches. We need to evolve beyond left and right and move towards a philosophy of right and wrong as our standard.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J GRAYBOSCH
Bowties are cool...
10:04 AM on 07/10/2011
The roots of this problem did not start in 2007, but..yes...both parties share blame. The GOP for pushing irresponsible de-regulation and many Democrats for allowing it to continue.
01:00 AM on 07/10/2011
Today we are facing the greatest threat to our way of living, threat for our kids’ future. The banks, together with our government brought America to its knees and we have to stand up together and demand justice!
Prosecuting Wall Street investment banks and their “geniuses” is not only a matter of democracy, but more importantly, it is about survival of America that we all love…and the only path for our kids’ future.
How did we become just one big hypnotized mass, even after the truth has been revealed? We're walking around as if we're mesmerized, not standing up, not demanding justice, still paying our mortgages to lenders who don't even legally own them...
Please read about MA Register of Deeds – John O’Brien - the first register in the nation to say NO to fraud, MERS, robosigning - a real people’s hero: http://tinyurl.com/3qsu87x
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
nopojoe
You can never have too many friends. Or enemies
12:04 AM on 07/10/2011
Holy shades of Silvarado, Batman!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
earthling1111
Lean and Green
11:47 PM on 07/09/2011
Hard to believe Americans insure these banksters and they want less regulation.
11:06 PM on 07/09/2011
Well Windsor I can understand. The tornado a few years back wiped out most of the town. Sad
photo
Chaucea
Think of the otters!
11:52 PM on 07/09/2011
*chuckles* Oh, no it did not. I live right in this area and, although a few blocks of Windsor were torn up, that tornado has nothing to do with these banks going under here throughout the whole of Colorado. We've had some real schister bankers in Greeley screwing over a whole lot of folks and the banks ending up being seized by FDIC.

Greed is what does this, not tornadoes. Really. :-)