More

World Population Day: A Connection Between Global Warming And Overpopulation?

World Population Day

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 07/11/11 01:02 PM ET Updated: 09/10/11 06:12 AM ET

The world population is expected to soon surpass seven billion. That is more than double the number of people living on Earth just 50 years ago. Monday is "World Population Day," a yearly event created by the United Nations to highlight the significance of population trends. But just what is that significance?

Every day, one billion people go hungry. One billion people don't have access to clean water. According to CBC News, part of the message of World Population Day is that despite declines in fertility rates around the world, 215 million women in developing countries don't have access to effective family planning methods. A goal of the U.N.'s 7 Billion Actions campaign is to "break the cycle of poverty and inequality to help slow population growth."

Although an unpopular subject, the world's growing population has become a topic of concern for some who fear that as the world's population grows, the state of our environment will decline.

Thomas L. Friedman, author of "The World Is Flat," writes in his book "Hot, Flat, And Crowded":

It is getting hot, flat, and crowded. That is, global warming, the stunning rise of middle classes all over the world, and rapid population growth have converged in a way that could make our planet dangerously unstable. In particular, the convergence of hot, flat, and crowded is tightening energy supplies, intensifying the extinction of plants and animals, deepening energy poverty, strengthening petrodictatorship, and accelerating climate change.

Some argue that there are two underlying issues with population growth and the environment. The first is that simply by the world population increasing, resources will become more limited. The second is that the world's population is continuing to use these resources in inefficient ways. As Arthur H. Westing wrote in an op-ed to The New York Times, "Population is a double-barreled environmental problem -- not only is population increasing; so are emissions per capita. In 1970, when worldwide greenhouse gas emissions had just begun to transgress the sustainable capacity of the atmosphere, the world population was about 3.7 billion; today it's about 6.9 billion -- an increase of 86 percent. In that same period, worldwide emissions from fossil fuels rose from about 14 billion tons to an estimated 29 billion tons -- an increase of 107 percent."

Westing concludes that since the connection between overpopulation and global warming is still considered a taboo subject, there should at least be an increased focus on combating global warming through emission-control measures.

Friedman proposes a solution in his book, and though he questions whether the U.S. is ready to take charge, he believes positive change could happen with "Code Green":

Code Green means making America the World's leader in innovating clean power and energy-efficiency systems and inspiring an ethic of conservation toward the natural world, which is increasingly imperiled. We're going to need both massive breakthroughs in clean power and a deeper respect for the world's forests, oceans, and biodiversity hot spots if we're going to thrive in this new age.

As the U.N. Population Fund writes, "Whether we can live together equitably on a healthy planet will depend on the choices and decisions we make now."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

The world population is expected to soon surpass seven billion. That is more than double the number of people living on Earth just 50 years ago. Monday is "World Population Day," a yearly event create...
The world population is expected to soon surpass seven billion. That is more than double the number of people living on Earth just 50 years ago. Monday is "World Population Day," a yearly event create...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 359
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
This American
An end to all this nonsense
08:04 PM on 07/30/2011
The Gods of the AGW religion are Marx and Malthus. Everything we are being asked to do to prevent the imaginary horrors are sacrifices to these two "Gods"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Counterintuitive
We'll steer by the beacon of our 100 year forecast
09:36 AM on 07/20/2011
Seems to me that the elephant in the room is where do we find room for the elephants ... and every other species? I know we're great - our culture is predicated upon announcing how great we are. But are we so important that its reasonable to expect every other species to roll over and disappear in our honor?
photo
Wanderland
Barbie arm candy
08:40 AM on 07/14/2011
"Code Green means making America the World's leader in innovating clean power and energy-efficiency systems and inspiring an ethic of conservation toward the natural world, which is increasingly imperiled."
-------------------

Make America the world's leader in innovating clean energy and inspiring an environmental ethic? Has Friedman seen America in the last 20 years?

Our school systems are sinking compared to the rest of the world, our news media is now either right wing propaganda, or infotainment. The House just passed a bill to increase water pollution. All environmental programs are considered communist plots.

Not happening. America is passing on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NJP1
05:55 PM on 07/13/2011
People buy stuff and use stuff. That process creates carbon emissions and carbon emissions heat up the planet. And this question is still open to debate?
In 1800 when the industrial revolution was gaining traction, there were about a billion people living here. Then in 1859, … drilled the first commercial oilwell, and by 1900 we had 2 billion. In 1908 Haber and Bosch introduced artificial nitrate fertilizer and over the next century another 5 billion hungry people showed up. All demanding to do what mankind is good at: eating, having sex, burning oil and killing one another between times; simultaneously heating up the planet and destroying their own living space. But their demands are for more, because the commercial system we have devised for ourselves can only function on infinite growth. We cannot stop, go into reverse, or exist in some kind of utopian equilibrium. Our forward drive has provided an illusion of profit and physical security and comfort, we can only maintain that by burning increasing amounts of coal oil and gas to provide for the extra 80 million extra mouths that arrive every year. Unfortunately that essential fossil fuel is now getting too expensive to burn to provide food. Fossil fuel use has allowed an excess population to flourish over the last 150 years, without it, about 6 billion people don’t have much of a future. Global warming is the least of our worries right now. http://www.yourmedievalfuture.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean land-ocean temperature 1880 to present
01:52 PM on 07/13/2011
givemtheirwish: LOL Yet all of the intoleRANT left socks feel the need (as in cannot help themselves­) to keep responding to my comments. Very telling!!

Well, that pretty much settles that question. Whether he's doing piece work with a bonus for replies, or he's just trying to "boost his flagging self esteem" as StephenBP put it, givem is clearly here only to provoke replies, to fit into its narrative about the "left" whatever the heck it means by that.

Starve The Beast.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimspy
Quod quae operibus sufficit.
12:13 PM on 07/13/2011
WHY is over-population such a taboo subject? Controlling our population would solve SO MANY problems, not just global warming or resource useage. Overcrowding alone leads to crime; lessen the number of people on the road and you lower drunken driving deaths; stress-related illnesses are largely due to just too many damn people interfacing with each other; urban blight; the list goes on. So WHY is it a taboo? Ohhhh, that's right, cuz then we'd have to talk about...BIRTH CONTROL!!! ABORTION!!! FAMILY PLANNING!!! Oh NOOOO!!!
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
01:05 PM on 07/13/2011
I need to add to my statements above, that this is always assuming we are talking Third World which everyone seems to feel consists of non-white pops only and that population control really also includes people like the Duggars with their "quiver full" and their TV show that celebrates overpopulation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rick Fallin
Splitting through the clutter
11:26 AM on 07/14/2011
"that's right" You did inadverently say it in those two words. The right side of the political spectrum.. The Republicans and the Tea Baggers who don't want to talk about population control and try incredibly hard to restrict it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kadellagroove
Left leaning, Jeffersonian Whig.
01:43 AM on 07/13/2011
of course it has a correlation. I was un aware that it was a taboo subject. The problem is that due to technology and our exponential progress in certain areas we are just moving much too fast for ourselves. it takes thousands of years for our brains to evolve to certain changes in environment. (if not millions) and over the past few centuries we have been changing our environment so drastically that we have not been able to catch up and we just don't know what to do. hence, all the fighting and bickering over science and things of that nature.

In my view, the conventional paradigm of human existence (i.e., sovereign independent nation states competing over resources and power) is out dated and doesn't serve the human race as it once did. it is, instead, killing us slowly.

with communications and transportation technologies, and the ever growing population, the globe has gotten to be too small for that paradigm to work or make sense. we need to get past the self serving ideology of nationalism and start thinking in the bigger picture.

we are all human beings stuck on a tiny spec of sand hurtling through space with no thing inhabitable around us. we either come together and grow up or we die out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel Hicks
Science > Your opinion
09:34 PM on 07/12/2011
This just in: FrankLuchan can't possibly believe his own claims if he actually read and understood the recent Robert Kaufmann PNAS paper.

Robert Kaufmann's observations do indeed show no rise in temperature from '98-'08, but there are literally hundreds of other papers using different methodologies that do. In light of this, there is little reason yet to cherry-pick Kaufmann's data.

More relevant, though, is the fact that FrankLuchan cannot be so fanatically dedicated to this point without believing it to be evidence that anthropogenic global warming does not exist. (Please, tell me if I'm wrong.) Funny then, that he appears to ignore repeated claims and conclusions in the paper that:

"The finding that the recent hiatus in warming is driven largely by natural factors does not contradict the hypothesis­: 'most of the observed increase in global average temperatur­e since the mid 20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropoge­nic greenhouse gas concentrat­ions.'"

Dr. Kaufmann very much believes in AGW, and is only trying to find a rational explanation for why his data suggest a pause in it. FrankLuchan either does not want you to know this, or does not recognize it himself.

www.pnas.o­rg/cgi/doi­.10.1073/p­nas.110246­7108
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
11:09 PM on 07/12/2011
Excellent. FrankLuchan is one of the regular deniers that passes through here, working from the Hearltand model of sowing confusion and disruption. I doubt that he understands any of the science.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel Hicks
Science > Your opinion
11:20 PM on 07/12/2011
It's the least someone with access to the journal can do for anyone reading this who doesn't. I'd like it known exactly how ill-informed he is.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
05:32 PM on 07/12/2011
One of the HuffPost regular detractors of climate science references one Willie Soon. Here is a look at the alternate life of Willie Soon:

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/polluterwatch/koch-industries/CASE-STUDY-Dr-Willie-Soon-a-Career-Fueled-by-Big-Oil-and-Coal/

This is the sordid case of professional denier for hire Dr. Willy Soon. Soon has an extensive history of accepting payments from Big Energy interests, and in return he has a record of producing findings that are somehow favorable to the Big Energy postion on climate. That is, AGW has little merit, according to Soon. Soon cheerfully misrepresents the situation to a Congressional committee. Take a look at the greenpeace work. They did an excellent investigative workup on this. What a bunch of fine fellows the denier campaign chooses as their spokespeople. Soon is up there in a class with Monckton as a hoaxster who also misrepresents science to congress. No wonder Inhofe seeks these guys out.

No wonder givemtheirwish loves this guy. He is one of the family, practically.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
10:56 PM on 07/12/2011
And here is a close look at how Soon cooks data:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2011/07/how-soon-is-now/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eaarth2
“An era ends when its illusions are exhausted
03:57 PM on 07/12/2011
There is a connection- and the two are star crossed in their apocalyptic outcome.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
02:48 PM on 07/12/2011
Unfortunately, according to the paper recently published by Robert Kaufmann and reported here on the HP, the Global Warming part of this story has been missing since 1998.

But hey, why let real science and real facts get in the way of a good alarmist headline.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eaarth2
“An era ends when its illusions are exhausted
03:59 PM on 07/12/2011
what you say is truth is nothing but insightful cherry picking at best

I suggest you look to see the ice meltdown this September in the arctic- if it goes to the 2007 minim or worse- did warming really stop in 1998?
04:22 PM on 07/12/2011
So you are DENYING published science?

Wouldn't that make you a 'DENIER'?

It would. And it does.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dardedar
Not here to play patty cake...
06:40 PM on 07/12/2011
If you've misplaced your warming, observe each decade, in this chart, since 1950:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2009/warmest-decade
photo
canuckhoser
Don't mind the man behind the curtain
02:13 PM on 07/12/2011
It's interesting to glean at some of the post by these tro//s. You have to wonder if they are getting anything out of throwing their integrity out the window...Is Koch getting his monies worth though? The tro//ing isn't even up to the standard of 2nd grade science....I mean, why would you come here and not argue anything in good faith against the science, but just slander, distort and l ie...it's really embarrassing to read quite frankly. Like reality television, there are people that just love publically humiliating themselves, I get that, but there's any extra spicy ingredient of cowardice displayed by these tro//ing denialists...
photo
AGooglyMinotaur
Ahh, Theseus. It appears you are out of thread.
02:18 PM on 07/15/2011
There are a couple pretty good ones I suspect of being professionals. The rest are just contrarian rabble with a proclivity towards conspiracy theories.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tygartman
Hoping for Change in 2012
01:54 PM on 07/12/2011
THE END IS NEAR. THE SKY IS FALLING.

Why are liberals so into doomsday prophecies?
photo
canuckhoser
Don't mind the man behind the curtain
02:43 PM on 07/12/2011
They aren't. Why does the media is where your consternation is buried...

And yet, the better question is, why are cons so susceptible to talking heads with inherent conflicts of interest, PR firms that defended tobacco, and outright fraudulent petitions al la Oregon Petition which are parroted still to this day by the right even though they have been debunked to the point of absurdity....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eaarth2
“An era ends when its illusions are exhausted
04:01 PM on 07/12/2011
If we have a nation left by 2050- can we thank conservative flat earthers?

Will the arctic be free of ice by 2020? If so what are the climatological Outcomes of this?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tygartman
Hoping for Change in 2012
04:35 PM on 07/12/2011
"If we have a nation left by 2050....." See, there you go again...such pessimists.
What do you propose to use to act as a thermostat for the world?
01:34 PM on 07/12/2011
Does tr0lling really pay that much? I don't get it...

You need a license to have a pet, but not a child. That will change.