More

Should Parents Lose Custody of Extremely Obese Kids?

Obese Kids Custody

LINDSEY TANNER   07/12/11 10:23 PM ET   AP

CHICAGO — Should parents of extremely obese children lose custody for not controlling their kids' weight? A provocative commentary in one of the nation's most distinguished medical journals argues yes, and its authors are joining a quiet chorus of advocates who say the government should be allowed to intervene in extreme cases.

It has happened a few times in the U.S., and the opinion piece in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association says putting children temporarily in foster care is in some cases more ethical than obesity surgery.

Dr. David Ludwig, an obesity specialist at Harvard-affiliated Children's Hospital Boston, said the point isn't to blame parents, but rather to act in children's best interest and get them help that for whatever reason their parents can't provide.

State intervention "ideally will support not just the child but the whole family, with the goal of reuniting child and family as soon as possible. That may require instruction on parenting," said Ludwig, who wrote the article with Lindsey Murtagh, a lawyer and a researcher at Harvard's School of Public Health.

"Despite the discomfort posed by state intervention, it may sometimes be necessary to protect a child," Murtagh said.

But University of Pennsylvania bioethicist Art Caplan said he worries that the debate risks putting too much blame on parents. Obese children are victims of advertising, marketing, peer pressure and bullying – things a parent can't control, he said.

"If you're going to change a child's weight, you're going to have to change all of them," Caplan said.

Roughly 2 million U.S. children are extremely obese. Most are not in imminent danger, Ludwig said. But some have obesity-related conditions such as Type 2 diabetes, breathing difficulties and liver problems that could kill them by age 30. It is these kids for whom state intervention, including education, parent training, and temporary protective custody in the most extreme cases, should be considered, Ludwig said.

While some doctors promote weight-loss surgery for severely obese teens, Ludwig said it hasn't been used for very long in adolescents and can have serious, sometimes life-threatening complications.

"We don't know the long-term safety and effectiveness of these procedures done at an early age," he said.

Ludwig said he starting thinking about the issue after a 90-pound 3-year-old girl came to his obesity clinic several years ago. Her parents had physical disabilities, little money and difficulty controlling her weight. Last year, at age 12, she weighed 400 pounds and had developed diabetes, cholesterol problems, high blood pressure and sleep apnea.

"Out of medical concern, the state placed this girl in foster care, where she simply received three balanced meals a day and a snack or two and moderate physical activity," he said. After a year, she lost 130 pounds. Though she is still obese, her diabetes and apnea disappeared; she remains in foster care, he said.

In a commentary in the medical journal BMJ last year, London pediatrician Dr. Russell Viner and colleagues said obesity was a factor in several child protection cases in Britain. They argued that child protection services should be considered if parents are neglectful or actively reject efforts to control an extremely obese child's weight.

A 2009 opinion article in Pediatrics made similar arguments. Its authors said temporary removal from the home would be warranted "when all reasonable alternative options have been exhausted."

That piece discussed a 440-pound 16-year-old girl who developed breathing problems from excess weight and nearly died at a University of Wisconsin hospital. Doctors discussed whether to report her family for neglect. But they didn't need to, because her medical crisis "was a wake-up call" for her family, and the girl ended up losing about 100 pounds, said co-author Dr. Norman Fost, a medical ethicist at the university's Madison campus.

State intervention in obesity "doesn't necessarily involve new legal requirements," Ludwig said. Health care providers are required to report children who are at immediate risk, and that can be for a variety of reasons, including neglect, abuse and what doctors call "failure to thrive." That's when children are severely underweight.

Jerri Gray, a Greenville, S.C., single mother who lost custody of her 555-pound 14-year-old son two years ago, said authorities don't understand the challenges families may face in trying to control their kids' weight.

"I was always working two jobs so we wouldn't end up living in ghettos," Gray said. She said she often didn't have time to cook, so she would buy her son fast food. She said she asked doctors for help for her son's big appetite but was accused of neglect.

Her sister has custody of the boy, now 16. The sister has the money to help him with a special diet and exercise, and the boy has lost more than 200 pounds, Gray said.

"Even though good has come out of this as far as him losing weight, he told me just last week, `Mommy, I want to be back with you so bad.' They've done damage by pulling us apart," Gray said.

Stormy Bradley, an Atlanta mother whose overweight 14-year-old daughter is participating in a Georgia advocacy group's "Stop Childhood Obesity" campaign, said she sympathizes with families facing legal action because of their kids' weight.

Healthier food often costs more, and trying to monitor kids' weight can be difficult, especially when they reach their teens and shun parental control, Bradley said. But taking youngsters away from their parents "definitely seems too extreme," she said.

Dr. Lainie Ross, a medical ethicist at the University of Chicago, said: "There's a stigma with state intervention. We just have to do it with caution and humility and make sure we really can say that our interventions are going to do more good than harm."

___

Online:

JAMA: http://jama.ama-assn.org

Pediatrics: http://www.pediatrics.org

___

AP Medical Writer Lindsey Tanner can be reached at http://www.twitter.com/LindseyTanner

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

CHICAGO — Should parents of extremely obese children lose custody for not controlling their kids' weight? A provocative commentary in one of the nation's most distinguished medical journals argu...
CHICAGO — Should parents of extremely obese children lose custody for not controlling their kids' weight? A provocative commentary in one of the nation's most distinguished medical journals argu...
Filed by Amanda L. Chan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
peachfuzz
my favorite color is pinko
10:43 PM on 07/19/2011
If our government was so concerned about rising insurance costs and obesity, they'd do something about junk food ads & ubiquitous processed foods and they'd promote the heck out of vegetables and healthy fats.

The government could have an exercise/healthy food channel running 24/7 if it wanted to. We could do many things before we rip kids away from their families at the terribly acute stage. What happened to PE in schools?

Our government wants us to consume, and so we have.
12:10 AM on 07/16/2011
I think this good work and research that needs to be done.

But removing a child seems like a temporary solution to the long-term problem of cheap, addictive, easily accessible junk food.

Blaming parents who work multiple jobs instead of ag businesses and our government who make this cheap food possible seems unfair. Parents shouldn't have to decide between buying their kids healthy food and buying their school supplies. That's a terrible decision to make.

Does anyone in the distinguished research community ever talk about advising the government to require fruits and vegetables be cheaper (subsidies) or junk food more expensive (taxes)?

This would make corporations and politicians go crazy, but wouldn't it make for healthier families?  
02:13 PM on 07/14/2011
Yes, in extreme cases, the state might have to intervene. Unfortunately, however, any time a message such as this filters down to the rank and file of society, it tends to respond with personal judgement and sanctimony at every turn. In increasing numbers, people seem to think everything is their personal business. Lack of proper fact or education is irrelevant. Our moral duty is to get as many people under our officious little thumbs as possible.
KarasudaJay
My micro-bio is empty.
10:31 AM on 07/14/2011
Let them keep the kids, but yank any public assistance from the family. I don't care if you want to kill your kids, but be committed and don't expect me to pay to artificially lengthen their miserable existence.
photo
stape45
Spin this!
11:15 PM on 07/13/2011
"Smaller government"?
photo
JBDenver
1% - Not just for milk anymore
05:46 PM on 07/13/2011
With all the fat, fat, fatties in government jobs...no way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aztmblweeed
05:17 PM on 07/13/2011
I don't believe most of these articles from so-called medical experts. I think they are bought and paid for by our government, as a means to parrot their thought, ideas, and agenda. The government will not be happy until they have 100% say in raising our children!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raven1970
Do not be a pre-checked box, opt out
04:45 PM on 07/13/2011
It is all the words like "extremely obese" and "imminent danger" that block us from curing this epidemic, why do things need to get so far for there to be any intervention? Before a 12 year old girl becomes 400 lbs, she was 200..then 300...if the child is in the US and attending school she is required to have a physical by a doctor, children who are obese are not healthy, they are sick and they will continue to get sicker, just like a child who is under nourished, how long would a doctor wait to report a starving child (even if the child was starving herself!)? We need family health intervention programs and we should make the companies that pay $.03 to make an unhealthy food product and $.97 to market it pay for these programs ...this country allows grossly misleading labels and marketing of junk food and many of these parents honestly don't know anything about nutrition, they need help, and if nothing changes at that point, then just as in any case where negligence continues larger measures will have to be taken.
04:23 PM on 07/13/2011
Do doctors and the government ever warn about street drugs?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raven1970
Do not be a pre-checked box, opt out
05:01 PM on 07/13/2011
Unfortunately twinkies and ding-dongs are like the new street drug...they will kill more young Americans through health related issues (heart, diabetes, liver damage) than all the street drugs put together....but if we caught parents lighting up a doobie with their four year old there would be no question that they would lose custody.
05:38 PM on 07/13/2011
Parents do that. No warnings about street drugs. That's my point.
04:08 PM on 07/13/2011
I think this country runs on junk science and the doctors are acting like mad scientists. Who died and made them boss? People are already avoiding doctors. I dont hear the doctors talking about germs which are pathogens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Johnny Fruckles
Drive-by Commentator
02:20 PM on 07/13/2011
16-lb baby born in texas...A BABY BORN OBESE...now that's what i call a childhood obesity problem
12:57 PM on 07/13/2011
No. Obesity can be caused by a slow thyroid, for example. This is really meddling.
How about getting criminals off the streets instead?
04:14 PM on 07/13/2011
Exactly. My father was murdered in an alley in Chicago in 1970. Who cares what he ate smoked or drank? The government and the doctors need to butt out of our private lives unless we break the law. Are they going to make it illegal to feed a child? The child is not finished growing long bones yet.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HotelDrama
06:47 PM on 07/13/2011
I'm assuming you won't be complaining when your medical insurance keeps getting higher and higher because of the strain on the system from all these obese people.
photo
thereisonlyoneparty
more amazing than you
11:23 AM on 07/13/2011
Yes.

This is child abuse if obesity is allowed and negligence if it occurs without endorsement of parents.

Fatties cause a huge burden on society and they are not pleasant to look at.
10:43 AM on 07/13/2011
Can parents lose custody of their anorexic or bulimic kids? Should parents lose custody of their latch-key kids? Should parents lose custody of their kids for making them wear clothes of their choosing? If we're going to get to pick and choose which kind of parents should lose custrody, then lets give it a total round-up of ills done against the kids, not just the prejudicial ones!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raven1970
Do not be a pre-checked box, opt out
04:54 PM on 07/13/2011
Or we can leave their fashion alone and stick to the facts that if parents are negligent to the point they are damaging and/or risking their child's health and life, we can go ahead and call it what it is...and yes, a parent could lose custody of an anoreix or bulimic child if they are not seeking professional help for that child.

So, you may not have liked those yellow and brown striped bell bottoms that your mom may have made you wear, but I am afraid it cannot be classified as abuse.
TryToBeFlexible
MENSA, Gay, Atheist, Believer in justice
09:34 AM on 07/13/2011
How about removing kids from parents that are forcing kids to be brainwashed into a particular religion? We have freedom of religious belief in this country, yet kids are forced to believe in their parent's particular religious addiction.. Causing untold pain, heartache, suicide, and brain damage.
02:17 PM on 07/14/2011
Yeah, I know. I'm an atheist. What country do you live in though? I live in the United States, where my neighbor's religious persuasion is none of my business, and where Richard Dawkins is not a founding father.