More

Afghanistan Drawdown: First U.S. Troops Hand Over Battlefield And Begin Packing

Us Troops Afghanistan

By HEIDI VOGT   07/13/11 03:34 PM ET   AP

BAGRAM AIR FIELD, Afghanistan -- The first troops to leave Afghanistan as part of the U.S. drawdown handed over their slice of battlefield Wednesday to a unit less than half their size and started packing for home.

When the 650 members of the Iowa National Guard's 1st Squadron, 113th Cavalry Regiment arrived in Afghanistan in November 2010, bases didn't have enough housing, translators were in short supply and chow halls were packed. Commanders were using a buildup of 33,000 extra troops for a major push that they said would turn the tide of the war against the Taliban insurgency.

Nine months later, it's still unclear if that push has succeeded, but the pullback has begun. Although major combat units are not expected to start leaving until late fall, two National Guard regiments comprising about 1,000 soldiers in all are withdrawing this month – the Iowa soldiers from Parwan province in eastern Afghanistan, and the other group from the capital, Kabul.

U.S. President Barack Obama announced last month that he would pull 10,000 of the extra troops out in 2011 and the remaining 23,000 by the summer of 2012.

Three hundred soldiers will take over from the 650 departing troops who oversaw security in Parwan, including the area outside the main U.S. military base at Bagram.

In a ceremony at Bagram marking the transfer, a speaker read out a list of the 113th's accomplishments: 14 high-value targets killed or captured, the largest homemade explosives lab in Parwan discovered and dismantled, 52 consecutive days of keeping insurgent fire out of the Bagram base, 3,800 combat missions completed, 400 Afghan police officers trained and a coordination center built. She also read out the cost: One soldier died when a team helicoptered into a firefight to aid a downed pilot.

The commander of the outgoing unit said he expects his successors will be able to build on their accomplishments.

"They may not be as robust as us, or have as many as us, but they certainly will have the ability to secure the Bagram security zone," said Lt. Col. David Updegraff. He said he felt he could have completed his mission with a smaller force, but that the extra numbers made it significantly easier.

"I was very happy to have the size of task force that I had because it allowed me a lot of flexibility," Updegraff said.

Some in the 113th said 650 soldiers were barely enough.

"Most of our platoons were short-manned quite often. We were running with the minimum amount that we safely can. And they were running long missions, long days," said Staff Sgt. Brian Pals, 34, of Hartley, Iowa.

Outgoing soldiers said they needed all their numbers to do the type of intensive training and mentoring called for by a strategy focused on building up the Afghan forces. They had to spend extra time demonstrating techniques to Afghan police officers who were illiterate and had to teach Afghan soldiers basic map-reading skills, said Staff Sgt. Doug Stanger, 42, of Urbandale, Iowa.

"It takes a lot more of us to mentor them," Stanger said. The 113th also spend a lot of time working with local communities – building wells, schools or other infrastructure projects.

Though commanders have said their mission in Afghanistan has not changed, manpower-intensive activities such as these are likely to lessen with smaller forces. The current push appears to be for more quick-strike missions that eliminate insurgent leaders while the Afghan security forces are left to keep the peace.

And while the Afghan army and police have improved drastically, there's still a long way to go.

"You've got to pull teeth to get the ANP (Afghan National Police) to do anything," said Pfc. Scott Silverblatt, 22, of McHenry, Illinois.

As the soldiers go back, they all say they're prepared for the same question: Should we be over there? Pals says yes, because the training is helping. Stanger also says yes, because most Afghans really want the help. Silverblatt agrees, because a too-quick departure could throw the Afghan economy built up around bases like Bagram into a tailspin.

"If we leave, we've just messed up the whole country all over again," Silverblatt said.

A fourth soldier – Staff Sgt. Jesse Ross of Des Moines – says he isn't sure given the strong words coming from Afghan President Hamid Karzai about how Americans risk becoming occupiers.

"Does Afghanistan need help? Yes. Do they necessarily want it from us? I don't know," Ross said.

The troops that were originally slated to replace the 113th in Afghanistan have been reassigned to Kuwait. The guardsmen just found out a few weeks ago and had to scramble to find units to take the extra guns and equipment they were suddenly leaving behind.

The ceremony marking the handover was held in a tented-over basketball court that sometimes serves as a film-screening site. Soldiers in camouflage sat in metal folding chairs as their successes were read out.

A color guard raised the flags of both units and then stowed the Iowa flag away in a camouflage sack for the journey home. As the troops stood to sing the Army song, a jet buzzed overhead, drowning out the chorus of soldiers below.

____

Array

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BAGRAM AIR FIELD, Afghanistan -- The first troops to leave Afghanistan as part of the U.S. drawdown handed over their slice of battlefield Wednesday to a unit less than half their size and started pac...
BAGRAM AIR FIELD, Afghanistan -- The first troops to leave Afghanistan as part of the U.S. drawdown handed over their slice of battlefield Wednesday to a unit less than half their size and started pac...
Filed by Curtis M. Wong  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 321
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ligligl
feelthy liberal! ...and not just a pretty face!
10:33 PM on 07/21/2011
“ALL THE 'EXPERTS' ON THE STANS ARE STUPID
Somebody should sit BO down and make him watch 'Company 9', a great Russian film about the Russian experience in Afghanista­n in '89. It is almost 'Restropo Part 1'. Same cast, the Afghanis who have been fighting and winning against foreign invaders since BEFORE Alexander the Great. He too thought it would be easy and slunk out of there with his tail between his legs. Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it...
Afghanista­n broke the Russians and now it is breaking us...”
02:44 AM on 07/16/2011
The journey from the Great Game to end-game is very quick and the endgame will be a game-changer. Militants may end up owning half the world after the draw-down comes to an end. Emboldened by the end-game (read: US defeat), they will have South and Central Asia to themselves and will have the lever too. And they have proved that they can fix the lever wherever they want. They will move and shake the whole world at will and with incredible ease. South and Central Asian region will not be the only candidate for destabilization. The instability has the inherent tendency of travelling faster than the bush fire. Read more at: http://pksecurity.blogspot.com/2011/07/from-great-game-to-endgame-militants.html
traceymarie
Independent to Dem in 2007
12:17 PM on 07/14/2011
weeweedup, I also fanned you but with this failure of a huff experiment for comment orders I am unable to respond directly to anyone
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lensman3
11:56 AM on 07/14/2011
Maybe if the US defaults on loans August 2, the soldiers won't get paid. The soldiers will stop work and come home faster.

We have lost this war. Save US lives and get out ASAP.
11:44 AM on 07/14/2011
"We are in a life-and-d­eath struggle, but not our whole country," he told the crowd. "One percent of Americans are touched by this war. Then there is a much smaller club of families who have given all."

He spoke of the anger that some combat veterans feel toward the war's opponents. "They hold in disdain those who claim to support them but not the cause that takes their innocence, their limbs and even their lives," he said.
-Lt. Gen. John Kelly

"If anyone thinks you can somehow thank them for their service, and not support the cause for which they fight - our country - these people are lying to themselves­. . . . More important, they are slighting our warriors and mocking their commitment to this nation." -Lt. Gen. John Kelly
photo
ewldest
I don't care "whose" war it is - end it now
10:55 AM on 07/14/2011
The 'draw down' is meaningless unless complete withdrawal of US troops - which could and should be accomplished within 6 months.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:09 AM on 07/14/2011
The Afghans have become too dependent on the U.S. for security and help. Too dependent on our troops doing the work while their police and military wait in the background. Hopefully their government will light a fire under these groups and they will take on the duties they are supposed to fulfill.

Our troops have done a great job and deserve the credit for their actions in Afghanistan. Not only have they fought the Taliban and al Qaeda, but have also had to fight a corrupt government. Would that change if we stayed? Not likely.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:47 AM on 07/14/2011
American involvement in that war must end this year, not in some distant year.
photo
leftLibertarian
reefer+java=groovy
07:51 AM on 07/14/2011
Bin Laden is dead, time to get out, no more excuses. Let the Afghan citizens sort it out.
07:43 AM on 07/14/2011
Smoke and mirrors, as usual. The US has no intention of ending the occupation of Afghanistan. At this current rate of drawdown, "1000 soldiers in all are withdrawing this month", it would take until the end of 2019, more than eight more years, to leave completely.

And that doesn't count the "contractors". For all we know, 1000 contractors have just been hired to replace these soldiers. We don't know, because Associated Press is very careful not to talk about anything as off-message as that.

At any time (like right after the 2012 elections) the president can reverse this decision, having only drawn down a few percent of the total forces.

Why the US won't leave Afghanista­n
http://eng­lish.aljaz­eera.net/i­ndepth/opi­nion/2011/­07/2011711­1217209396­55.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:11 AM on 07/14/2011
I, too, depend more on al Jazeera for news.
photo
fairwayhill
1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians
05:43 AM on 07/14/2011
A "drawdown" is not enough. Obama should get out of Afghanistan completely.
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
03:44 AM on 07/14/2011
Ready or not, here we go, time to stand on your own two knees!

The fat lady was singing in the graveyard before this adventure began, but the hawks refused to listen, and now we've gone the way of other nations. What a waste of good men and women!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Angie Tyne 1
I want my disagree button!!
02:25 PM on 07/14/2011
There's good reason why they call it the graveyard of empires. If only Bush had not invaded Iraq and had gotten Osama when he could have. Instead he chose to line the pockets of his cronies by spending the lives of the men and women in our military.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PitBull6
10:15 AM on 07/15/2011
a small fringe element of the left was singing in that graveyard. Most of us were optimistic and many of us remain so.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:22 AM on 07/14/2011
The Taliban have already won the war, Obama is Lyndon B Johnson Steroids, 14.1 trillion dollar debt, interferin­­g in 5 Muslim civil wars, Borrowing Money from from the Chinese to Fund a war that is lost Borrowing money from the Chinese to fund a Corrupt Government­­( Karzai) that will fall, Social cuts, Military Cuts, a Government that's a puppet show fighting over stupid things, while that's happening Americans are more worried about , Gossip, Hollywood, etc etc the Real winners of this will be China and Pakistan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGTDBK
you don't much look like a steer to me
02:52 PM on 07/15/2011
Bombs aren't falling on D.C....Hows Tripoli looking today?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
01:07 AM on 07/14/2011
At one time a condition for withdrawl was the training of an 80,000 man Afghan Army and National Police.

Who will fight for Karzai once the US soldiers are gone? Karzai will most likely make a deal as soon as he can with the Taliban. Moral within the Afghans to fight the insurgency, negligible. The Drug Lords are enjoying record harvests. Profit, power and weapons. At one time the Taliban cut off their heads. For the first time since the British introduced opium, there was no opium coming from Afghanistan.
Now they share in the profits and weapons. Thye know the US will leave now. They are just waiting for better odds.
09:54 PM on 07/13/2011
Of course they are not ready; find one credible report that suggests that they are.

We have constructed a society built on bribed war-lords, corrupt administration officials, ballot box-stuffed elections, and allied private militias. It is a society that thrives on narcotics trafficking, weapons smuggling, and pallets of shrink-wrapped U.S. dollars. That is the society that we are leaving behind when we depart.

If nothing else we should have learned that the Taliban are focused, motivated, well-funded, and quite capable of hanging in for the long haul. They handed the Northern Alliance their butts in the '90's, and they will very likely do it again.

And none of this is America's business....