More

Clean Water: House Bars EPA From Overruling States On Pollution

Clean Water

By DINA CAPPIELLO   07/13/11 08:37 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- The Republican-controlled House passed a bill Wednesday that would sharply curtail the federal government's role in protecting waters from pollution by barring the Environmental Protection Agency from overruling state decisions on water quality.

The bill passed on a 239-184 vote. Sixteen Democrats joined the majority of Republicans in supporting it. The White House threatened to veto the bill, saying it "would roll back the key provisions ... that have been the underpinning of 40 years of progress in making the nation's waters fishable, swimmable and drinkable."

Under the Clean Water Act, states have primary responsibility for protecting waterways after the EPA signs off on their plans. But the agency can step in if it thinks water resources aren't being adequately protected.

The measure strips the EPA of that oversight authority. Drafters of the bill said Wednesday that the goal was to restore cooperation between the federal government and the states, and to rein in an agency that they argue is running roughshod over states' rights for a political agenda that kills jobs and harms the economy. The bill included a provision requiring the EPA to determine the toll its actions to protect water quality would have on jobs.

Similar arguments have been used to advance a series of measures in the Republican-controlled House aimed at reining in EPA's powers over pollution. There has not been much success in the Democratic Senate.

"By not taking action, the Congress is tacitly giving the EPA authority to do what it thinks is politically necessary," said Rep. Nick Rahall of West Virginia, the top Democrat on the House transportation committee, and a co-sponsor of the measure. "This bill is not about whether we support EPA's ends. It's about whether we should use any means to reach those ends."

Under the Obama administration, the EPA has placed the first-ever limits on nutrient-rich runoff in Florida, where phosphorus and nitrogen have led to harmful algal blooms. More recently, in January, the EPA revoked a crucial water permit for West Virginia's largest mountaintop removal mine.

Critics of the bill said it would have much broader implications. The EPA's role has been crucial, they argue, in the effort to clean up the Chesapeake Bay and to address the dead zone that blooms each year as runoff from Midwest farms flows down the Mississippi River into the Gulf of Mexico. Those pollution problems go beyond a single state.

A Democratic-led effort to exempt multi-state watersheds from the bill failed Wednesday.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- The Republican-controlled House passed a bill Wednesday that would sharply curtail the federal government's role in protecting waters from pollution by barring the Environmental Protecti...
WASHINGTON -- The Republican-controlled House passed a bill Wednesday that would sharply curtail the federal government's role in protecting waters from pollution by barring the Environmental Protecti...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 98
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:15 AM on 07/23/2011
We do not have the right to clean water anywhere in our Bill of rights or Constitution. Thats scary... Clean is a privilege controlled by the rich to be handed out to the poor. They want to charge for clean water and make it a commodity. Hence all the water bottles sold in America. The more we depend on water from a bottle the easier it is to pollute the rivers and natural sources of water. And who cares because they will make a billion on bottled water.
05:44 PM on 07/19/2011
Not to worry: this will produce plenty of jobs in the water purification industry, the pharmaceutical industry, and the litigation industry. And isn't commerce more important than silly things like having clean water to drink and clean air to breathe? Wiht enough money, can't you just buy more clean water from God?
10:03 AM on 07/17/2011
Blue Dogs , Tea-Baggers and good old Regressives....................WTF.
06:25 PM on 07/16/2011
I guess those republicans & 16 democrats don't need clean water.

The GOP's new mantra: "It's a job killer!

How about a job plan instead boys & girls?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:45 PM on 07/16/2011
States right means big money, multinationals find states much easier to control than nations.
photo
jakiew
repugs follow dictators playbook
12:42 AM on 07/17/2011
great point. and why wasn't this on the front page longer, there should be thousands of comments on this. clean water, what is more important? the corporate takeover of our country and others has got to stop.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
01:03 AM on 07/17/2011
Vote for the Progressiv­e Caucus folks in the Primaries: Kucinich, Grayson, Bernie.
http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/
FF
photo
Rasebiho
You're getting tea. Do you want sugar or lemon?
11:44 PM on 07/15/2011
And then if you dig a little deeper you find out the EPA didn't want to tell Florida how to handle their problem, they were sued into it. And the EPA is still trying to give control back to Florida.

Now who exactly have you chosen as the villain, and why?
10:57 PM on 07/15/2011
The Republicans will claim 'states rights' and thier gullible followers will buy it hook, line and sinker...Baloney, they can corrupt states invidually easier than the federal government as a whole and considering how much of the Republican Party in Washington is owned by lobbyist, that is saying a lot. Our government "of the people, for the people" is under assault on all fronts. Go back 20 - 30 years and look at what they were saying. The plan was always to either elect or appoint 'friendly judges' and corruptable officials on all levels, from local governments to the Whitehouse. The push to allow industry to do away with safety and enviromental regulations was beginning then and now is in full steam ahead mode before the electorate has a chance to realize what is really going on. Just look at states like Wisconsin and the rush to change the state as fast as possible. No debate, no chance for the citizens to become familiar with the results of such changes, just shove bills through while you can. We saw the same thing on the federal level between 2000 - 2006. Bills were pushed through that were actually written by the interested lobby(s) without anybody, even the supporters of the bills, reading them and they occassionally would slip up and admit it on camera...When our forefathers wrote "by the people, for the people", they did not foresee the lobby industry that would eventually replace "the people" and threaten our democracy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynxAlexiaBlack
To all the world I am but one to me that is enough
01:46 PM on 07/15/2011
Can anyone else see the era returning where rivers and bays are so polluted the WATER catches fire?

Oh but think of all the jobs that will be created to clean up the waterways /sarcasm/
12:02 PM on 07/15/2011
"...requiring the EPA to determine the toll its actions to protect water quality would have on jobs," but contaminated water has far-reaching effects that take a toll on LIVES. There is a cost either way. Not sure what the answer is, as small and big government can be at the hands of corporations...I was just at the premiere of Mann v. Ford, an HBO documentary about the Ringwood, NJ, Superfund site that was re-listed (a first) by the EPA, which is considering capping the mines Ford dumped toxic waste in for years. The Ramapough Mountain Tribe, inhabitants of the area, have suffered innumerable ailments as a result of toxic paint sludge infiltrating their land and water supply, which is part of one of the biggest reservoirs supplying Northern New Jersey. The newspaper I work for did some great investigative journalism that inspired the documentary...but this problem has been going on for decades: Ford retains no culpability and government agencies can't seem to move the cleanup forward. Anyone interested in the story can read more here: http://www.northjersey.com/news/071311_Upper_Ringwood_residents_environmental_battle_showcased_in_HBO_documentary.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deckercat
change the world
04:17 PM on 07/14/2011
do they understand we need water to live?
03:23 PM on 07/14/2011
I am sure they will say that it is what the people wanted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Organic-Guy
Organic Gardener, Carpenter, Philosopher, Agitator
02:33 PM on 07/14/2011
As far as I know Federal Law always trumps state law. It's in the constitution. As usual, the greedy among us decide to revere the constitution as a hallowed, even religious document until such time as it says and makes them do something they don't like. We can't cherry pick the constitution. It's there to protect all of us, not just corporations and those who reap huge profits from Wall Street trading their stocks. Maybe the Supreme court decided corporations are people, which is absurd, but they didn't say they are people who could do whatever they wanted to anyone or anything without consequences. All citizens are responsible to one another for what they do whether they are fake corporate citizens or real people. I can't go next door and pollute my neighbors well and not get in big trouble for what happens next so why is it okay for corporations to pollute that same well and get a pass?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lambdin1
What's this?
01:52 PM on 07/14/2011
Only Republicans are "brown"! They hate anything that is green or might cause one of their corporate sponsors to loose money. When corpotations loose, Republicans loose!
01:37 PM on 07/14/2011
Rick Scott, governor of Florida, is extremely pro pollution industry. Curtailing the EPA would be a disaster for Florida. Rick Scott as governor is one disaster too many as is.
01:35 PM on 07/14/2011
As usual,, self interest trumping common sense: water is life.