iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ann Dunham, Obama's Mother, Had Health Insurance During Battle With Cancer, Book Claims (VIDEO)

First Posted: 07/14/11 12:35 PM ET Updated: 09/13/11 06:12 AM ET

A new book about the life of Barack Obama's mother is casting doubt on an anecdote shared by the president during his 2008 election campaign and subsequent push for health care reform, The New York Times reports.

According to A Singular Woman: The Untold Story of Barack Obama's Mother, a biography written by Times reporter Janny Scott, Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, had health insurance during her battle with cancer in 1995, a claim that seems to run counter to the narrative repeatedly described by the president.

Politico relays the key passage from Scott's book:

"Ann's compensation for her job in Jakarta had included health insurance, which covered most of the costs of her medical treatment. Once she was back in Hawaii, the hospital billed her insurance company directly, leaving Ann to pay only the deductible and any uncovered expenses, which, she said, came to several hundred dollars a month."

Dunham filed a claim for those additional expenses with a different insurance company, CIGNA, under her employer's disability insurance policy. It was this claim which was rejected, after insurance investigators determined she had a pre-existing condition, Scott wrote.

During his second presidential debate with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the president offered a slightly different account, saying that insurance companies refused to pay for his mother's treatment:

"For my mother to die of cancer at the age of 53 and have to spend the last months of her life in the hospital room arguing with insurance companies because they're saying that this may be a pre-existing condition and they don't have to pay her treatment, there's something fundamentally wrong about that."

At a town hall meeting in August 2009, during the heat of Obama's pitch for health care reform, the president similarly said, "I will never forget my own mother, as she fought cancer in her final months, having to worry about whether her insurance would refuse to pay for her treatment."

Conservatives have jumped on the differing accounts, Politico notes.

Glenn Beck's website, the Blaze, has tackled the issue with a post alleging the book proves "Obama's story about his mother's healthcare struggle is inaccurate."

The White House did not dispute the account in Scott's book, the Times reports, and stands by Obama's account of his mother's struggles with health insurance providers.

"We have not reviewed the letters or other material on which the author bases her account," White House spokesman Nicholas Papas, told the Times. "The president has told this story based on his recollection of events that took place more than 15 years ago."

"As Ms. Scott's account makes clear, the president's mother incurred several hundred dollars in monthly uncovered medical expenses that she was relying on insurance to pay," Papas told the Times.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
A new book about the life of Barack Obama's mother is casting doubt on an anecdote shared by the president during his 2008 election campaign and subsequent push for health care reform, The New York Ti...
A new book about the life of Barack Obama's mother is casting doubt on an anecdote shared by the president during his 2008 election campaign and subsequent push for health care reform, The New York Ti...
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,993
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (72 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:12 AM on 07/20/2011
It says up there in this article:
"During his second presidential debate with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the president offered a slightly different account, saying that insurance companies refused to pay for his mother's treatment:
"For my mother to die of cancer at the age of 53 and have to spend the last months of her life in the hospital room arguing with insurance companies because they're saying that this may be a pre-existing condition and they don't have to pay her treatment, there's something fundamentally wrong about that.""
That quote doesn't say what that first paragraph says it does. He doesn't say that the insurance companies refused to pay. He's describing a dispute in progress. The article does state, however, that Cigna did refuse to pay for treatment for a pre-existing condition. So what did he say here that all the hooha is about?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:38 AM on 07/20/2011
Of course now I've gone and got it wrong myself: the article says Cigna refused to pay a claim under a disability policy because of a pre-existing condition, not that they refused to pay for treatment. That's still a denial of coverage based on a pre-existing condition, but I'd like to correct myself on that specific point. I still don't see a contradiction to what he said in these quotes here. In these quotes he doesn't say "that insurance companies refused to pay for his mother's treatment".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:08 AM on 07/19/2011
Of course he made it up, it was a good story even though it wasn't true. It had the effect he wanted, so what's the problem?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Samantha Monteleone
You may say I'm a dreamer. I'm not the only one.
04:09 AM on 07/18/2011
Honestly, although I do not agree with President Obama's push for healthcare reform, I do believe that he is telling the truth. He would know the struggles that his mother went through as he grew up, including her battles with cancer and her arguments with her health insurance company.

I will take Obama's account of his mother's life over a New York Times reporter's any day.

I feel very sorry that his family had to endure such a hardship. Insurance companies can be very hard to deal with.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
manntxs
I opted out cause I don't need no stinkin badges.
07:37 AM on 07/16/2011
unapologetics is rampant in our nation and it needs to stop. Demand honesty and accountability even in those you support. Regardless of party. To do so then requires a higher standard of work from those we elect. Don't hold them to that standard and you get what you allow.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
09:16 AM on 07/16/2011
"unapologet­ics is rampant in our nation and it needs to stop."

You were wrong when you said the "President stated she was fighting for treatment." Will you be apologizing?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
manntxs
I opted out cause I don't need no stinkin badges.
09:40 AM on 07/16/2011
Doc, what part of "they don't have to pay her treatment" did I miss? Did he say that?

Did I also not say "Please note that I do understand what he has done here is to take a fact and blend it with a falsehood." ? Maybe for you that a part lie isn't really a lie but when someone tells me something that is a blend and also is out of context to the debate I consider it a falsehood.

Google the many comments made in relation to this and other stories put forth by the President. Not to mention others on the other side of the aisle. I am not on this to slam the President or his politics, just to hold him accountable for a misleading statement he made many times. Once could be overlooked but a perpetuation cannot.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
09:12 PM on 07/15/2011
The thin distinction appears to be whether disability is a form of health insurance or is it something different. If you go CIGNA's webpage is lists -

Medical, Pharmacy, Dental, Behavioral Care, Vision, Life Accident, Disability and International. I think most would see all of those as insurance related to someone's health. Scott's distinction is false and relies on muddled semantics which should be beyond a professional reporter.

http://www.cigna.com/our_plans/disability/long_term/for_you.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
manntxs
I opted out cause I don't need no stinkin badges.
07:33 AM on 07/16/2011
No Doc, the issue isn't the 'thin distinction' the issue is whether the President stated she was fighting for treatment or she was fighting for reimbursement. There is a difference. He knew that, but to state the later wouldn't have been a point in his debate that truly related. He also didn't state it just one time.

His office even offhandedly admitted his error but referring to a 15 year old recollection. Not good enough. One doesn't forget important issues with someone they are close to is fighting for their life. I know firsthand.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
08:41 AM on 07/16/2011
"No Doc, the issue isn't the 'thin distinctio­n' the issue is whether the President stated she was fighting for treatment or she was fighting for reimbursem­ent."

I'm unaware of Obama ever saying that she wasn't treated. His complaint was that she had to spend her final days arguing with health insurance. Do you have quote where he said "she was fighting for treatment?"
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
05:11 PM on 07/15/2011
Insurance companies put a lot of terminally ill folk through torment trying to wriggle out of their liability to pay, as for Beck seeing this book as some sort of proof, how desperate is he!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BeasleysMom
Liberal Elitist
05:07 PM on 07/15/2011
Hmm. I do not see anything in his statement that says they DID NOT pay in the end. He said their was a fight. Happens all the time. Insurance companies ROUTINELY deny big claims the first time and then pay them when patients start threatening legal action. But, whatever. Anything will do in an attempt to discredit the President.
02:34 AM on 07/17/2011
You are exactly right in that statement of fights all the time going on with insurance companies.
Why will you not look at this with out any blinkers on or blinders. He insinuated over and over his mother fought for treatment. When in fact she did not. Fighting for treatment and fighting to regain a deductible is completely different and to say one is the same as the other. You shamelessly put everyone who is actually fighting for treatment on the defensive.
Maybe when you ever find yourself or a family member in this situation you can bring this topic back up and tell the insurance companies lets consider deductible, treatment and see if it gets you anywhere.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
05:15 PM on 07/17/2011
"He insinuated over and over his mother fought for treatment."

No he didn't. But feel free to quote him for our edification.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lloyd Cata
04:52 PM on 07/15/2011
See the media spin? He never said his mother didn't have insurance. The fact is the insurance company would not pay for her treatment; --- just like they "used" to do before ObamaCare ---

Just like the right built up the "fiction" of Reagan, they want to tear down the "brand" Obama, and what better place to start than with his mother.

Good luck with that - HATERS!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USNDC
Smartest President ever ? ... not even close.
04:37 PM on 07/15/2011
Oh, Barack ... is there any part of your persona that is legitimate ?
06:48 PM on 07/15/2011
Well put!
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
09:13 PM on 07/15/2011
"Oh, Barack ... is there any part of your persona that is legitimate?"

What exactly is false?
10:04 AM on 07/16/2011
Rephrase that; it takes a lot less time to list what isn't.
04:12 PM on 07/15/2011
The criticism is bull---as all of us who actually worry about medical bills know. It may be the case that we have health insurance, but we are aware that if a serious, prolonged illness hits, the uninsured portion of the bill will be more than we can pay. This is even more worrisome if our insurance is provided by our employer to any extent because a long or serious illness will prevent us from working and the entitlement to the insurance will eventually end. This was the context in which Obama commented on his mother's worries about her health insurance.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sahk3
04:02 PM on 07/15/2011
What Obama said is exactly what the biographer said happened. His mother was arguing with an insurance company over "Pre-existing conditions"

Are we trying to generate press to sell a book here?
12:44 AM on 07/16/2011
Though what you say is true what inst true is that Obama projected the idea that his mother did not get treatment because of a preexisting condition not the fact she didn't get reimbursed from a secondary insurance policy for deductibles. There is a major difference here.
His mother did indeed receive treatment and if the author is correct she got very good treatment.
This is where Obama really fails with the truth.
Believe what i tell you not what you find out to be different.
Fairly much the way a tyrant controls.
Trying to distort the truth only puts you in the same boat as Obama. One that has a whole lot of wholes in it.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
08:44 AM on 07/16/2011
"Obama projected the idea that his mother did not get treatment..."

What gave you that impression? I've yet to see a quote from Obama that is anything like that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
denise4925
Faithful Obama Supporter
03:43 PM on 07/15/2011
He never said she didn't have insurance. There's no issue here. HuffPo is grasping for straws for a story. They must have gone through that book with a fine tooth comb to find anything that contradicted something the President said and voila, she fought with insurance companies over "UNCOVERED EXPENSES".

"Dunham filed a claim for those ADDITIONAL EXPENSES with a different insurance company, CIGNA, under her employer's disability insurance policy. It was this claim which was rejected, after insurance investigators determined she had a pre-existing condition."

How does the above "run counter to the narrative repeatedly described by the president" below?

"For my mother to die of cancer at the age of 53 and have to spend the last months of her life in the hospital room arguing with insurance companies because they're saying that this may be a pre-existing condition and they don't have to pay her treatment, there's something fundamentally wrong about that."

There's no discrepancy. Because people assumed that he was talking about her primary insurance? She still had extra healthcare expenses to pay that wasn't covered by her primary health insurance and was denied by a secondary insurance plan for pre-existing conditions.

This is just sad to be this desperate. HuffPo has no shame.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:12 AM on 07/19/2011
Huffpo didn't create the story.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
denise4925
Faithful Obama Supporter
11:50 AM on 07/19/2011
Whoever, then.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:57 PM on 07/15/2011
So, the argument is that NO ONE has ever "argued with an insurance company" or has ever been denied care based upon economics in our country? As long as ONE person has, then ALL of us are susceptible and THAT is the whole point.

What Obama knew or did not know, what Obama's mother did or did not do, THESE are completely unimportant. Alan Grayson's statement -- 'the GOP wants us to hurry up and die' if we are not rich or covered now -- seems a good deal more important.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cookiecat
tired of fake crises and fearmongers
02:47 PM on 07/15/2011
Wow, there sure are a lot more haters posting here. On all topics. It would be awesome if you would check your facts (try Factcheck.org) before spewing your obviously wrong-headed, mean thinking. Be part of the solution !
04:30 PM on 07/15/2011
Factcheck? Bwaaaahaaaaahaaaaa!

Might as well go to whitehouse.org
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cookiecat
tired of fake crises and fearmongers
09:27 PM on 07/15/2011
Did you look at the site? Perhaps you're jaded and don't believe anything anyone says. I don't blame you if that is the case, sometimes I feel so worn down by all the info - is it true? is it false? - that I want to just say, screw it, we're doomed, and make a pitcher of martinis. I'm suggesting one site. There's plenty more fact sites out there. I just want people to get facts before they flip their lids on people. When that happens, it's very counter-productive to the conversation here. We all have to be part of the solution !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
02:18 PM on 07/15/2011
This is the same thing as Romney calling himself "unemployed." It's technically true, but everyone can see it for the puffery it is. Unfortunately, we have for so long been urged and gotten used to putting the best possible spin on everything, that this type of misleading is no longer considered dishonest. Clearly Obama was trying to establish that he felt the crowd's pain, but equally as clearly, his experience was trivial compared to the true hell insurance companies put some families through.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
citizen of the universe
Look! A Shepards Beak Whale
02:53 PM on 07/15/2011
In addition to fighting a deadly disease she had to fight her insurance company as well. Most families including our President lived through that. Where is the "technicality"?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
03:30 PM on 07/15/2011
The technicality was to imply that his mother's life depending on winning that battle with the insurance company. It didn't. Her treatment was never in question, much less in jeopardy. At issue was a disability insurance, which would have paid a few hundred dollars a month at most. Of course if she had the coverage, she should have received the benefit. But it's not as if she never knew from one month to the next if her portable oxygen tanks would still be covered. I saw someone go through that the last five years of her life. Not pretty.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mbcullen
03:16 PM on 07/15/2011
How can you say this is trivial? Obama said his mother was on the phone with her insurance company while battling cancer trying to get things covered? How do you know his mother wasn't put through heck from her insurance company? And it's obvious if she was on the phone with her insurance company, she had insurance. They were just not covering everything her doctors said she needed to fight her battle with cancer.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert SF
04:05 PM on 07/15/2011
The dispute had nothing whatsoever to do with her treatment. In fact, it wasn't even the same insurance company.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
denise4925
Faithful Obama Supporter
01:14 PM on 07/19/2011
Exactly my point above.