More

Corporation Culture Wars

Consumerism

First Posted: 07/14/11 11:13 PM ET Updated: 09/13/11 06:12 AM ET

By Nicole Neroulias
Religion News Service

(RNS) When you buy a pair of shoes, a spicy chicken sandwich, or a gym membership, does that mean you endorse everything about the company -- including the CEO's religious beliefs?

It's a question that has long plagued socially conscious consumers, but sites like Change.org now mobilize grassroots campaigns against companies like Curves fitness centers, whose CEO donates millions to anti-abortion groups, and Chick-fil-A, a fast-food chain that supports faith-based groups opposed to same-sex relationships.

While protests haven't stopped those corporate leaders from supporting conservative Christian agendas, the head of TOMS shoes has felt compelled to apologize for agreeing to a June 30 interview with Focus on the Family president Jim Daly.

Blake Mycoskie, 34, an evangelical Christian, founded TOMS in 2006, promising every pair would be made with fair labor and would provide a second pair for a needy child.

The for-profit California-based company, which has given away more than a million pairs of shoes, is popular on the West Coast, particularly with young adults attracted to no-frills fashions and social justice activities.

After gay-rights and feminist groups criticized Mycoskie and his customers threatened a boycott, the CEO apologized on Saturday (July 9).

"Had I known the full extent of Focus on the Family's beliefs, I would not have accepted the invitation to speak at their event," he wrote on his Start Something That Matters blog.

Comments on his blog and Facebook page doubted that Mycoskie was ignorant of Focus' activism against homosexuality, especially since some had warned him when the event was first advertised.

TOMS could opt to block the radio broadcast of the interview, but as of Wednesday, Focus still hopes to air the 45-minute program this fall, reaching up to 2.8 million listeners.

"We approached TOMS because Blake attracts a certain audience and because his story is inspirational," said Gary Schneeberger, a Focus spokesman. "The idea that out of his faith, as a Christian, he created this company, we thought this was inspiring and was something our listeners would like to hear."

Mycoskie has credited faith as inspiring his business, but the TOMS website proclaims the company is nonpolitical and nonreligious.

"While we are happy to work with organizations from all religious and political backgrounds, we prohibit the giving of our shoes from being associated with any religious or political ideology," the website states. In its application materials, the company requires potential partners to agree they won't try to convert aid recipients or require them to participate in any kind of religious activity to receive shoes.

Companies and their leaders are free to support religious or political causes, but Chris MacDonald, a business ethicist affiliated with Duke University's Kenan Institute for Ethics, said consumers should take such actions into account.

"If you have a sense that your money is somehow, even indirectly, contributing to a cause that you find morally problematic, then it seems somewhere between reasonable and obligatory for you to vote with your dollars," he said. "Your individual purchasing decision isn't doing a lot to further the cause of the company's CEO -- maybe just a few pennies -- but there's also symbolic value, and you're responsible for that."

In the past, consumer complaints over gay issues were more likely to come from conservative Christian groups, with organizations like the American Family Association objecting to the corporate policies of companies like Walgreens, Wal-Mart and Proctor & Gamble.

It's one thing to put your money where your mouth is, but it's not practical for consumers to avoid doing business with any companies whose policies or leaders support opposing religious or political beliefs, MacDonald said.

"A lot of people like the idea of companies being socially involved in their community," he said, "but if you want big companies to get involved in social issues, what makes you think they're going to come down on your side?"

Gay rights petitions have achieved limited success in the past year: Apple pulled apps for conservative groups like Exodus International and the Manhattan Declaration from its iTunes store, and Chick-fil-A's president issued a statement that "while my family and I believe in the biblical definition of marriage, we love and respect anyone who
disagrees."

The quick, direct apology from TOMS is an anomaly, MacDonald said, speculating that the company's small size and social responsibility mission made it vulnerable to criticism from its core audience.

In comparison, left-wing protests against Whole Foods, whose CEO came out against health care reform two years ago, haven't had a noticeable impact on the supermarket chain.

Focus on the Family is "not unfamiliar with being protested," but this is the first time that a business leader has felt compelled to publicly apologize and possibly withdraw from its program, Schneeberger said.

"People have to make their buying decisions based on their own values and consciousness. That's America," he said. "(But) that is a little bit troubling and kind of chilling as we look ahead, because we have to wonder what people will say we're not fit to do next, if we're not fit to put shoes on the feet of impoverished children."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By Nicole Neroulias Religion News Service (RNS) When you buy a pair of shoes, a spicy chicken sandwich, or a gym membership, does that mean you endorse everything about the company -- including th...
By Nicole Neroulias Religion News Service (RNS) When you buy a pair of shoes, a spicy chicken sandwich, or a gym membership, does that mean you endorse everything about the company -- including th...
Filed by Jahnabi Barooah  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 128
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
joeyfoto
“Écraser l'infamie!”
08:46 AM on 07/19/2011
I suspect not very much will come of this Christianization of activism in a post-Christian culture.

However, it is good to keep zealots in the public eye, so that we can watch for the tipping point where religious insanity turns to evil. As Voltaire noted: "Those who believe absurdities, commit atrocities." It is not a question of "If" religious fanaticism turns to evil deeds; it is a matter of when.

This is a pattern oft repeated in history. The essential elements (absolute faith in ridiculous tennets [eg. Biblical Inerrancy & "Creation Science"]; rage at the evil of the "secular" world; greedy leaders obsessed with power; etc.) are all in place. It would be foolish not to watch judiciously for the dangerous consequence of crusades, in America.
de-meme-ing
Buying USA Feeds USA, Supports/Preserves USA
11:27 AM on 07/18/2011
I would still buy TOMS shoes. Putting shoes on childrens feet is important to me, as are civil rights for anyone, including Gays, and TOM's shoes. I don't agree with FOF, but I respect their right to Freedom of Religion/Conscience/Speech. Perhaps by example they will finally get that, and follow suit, perhaps not.

As the Gay and Lesbian minorities speak out, intelligently and rationally, others will be attracted to their cause, especially Christians, when they wake up, and will join them. The law will change and no one's civil rights will be violated, and children will get shoes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
12:59 PM on 07/16/2011
What's curious is that a Xian starting a socially responsible business is newsworthy. Shouldn't they all be socially responsible like their leader directed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zilo
Independent/Republicans hate freedom
10:36 AM on 07/16/2011
You know..I rag on the types of inane articles that often fill the religion section..but this article is actually a good one. It's an interesting topic, and it poses very relevant questions (for once).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nigel Patel
People who are against government, govern badly
10:02 AM on 07/16/2011
I've gone past "Which corporations are evil" to just "Corporations are evil".
photo
Terminal1
One mans religion is another mans belly laugh -
06:54 PM on 07/15/2011
I still don't buy Exxon gas and have even added BP to that list.
I don't shop at Walmart AT ALL.

There are a few others but I definitely spend my money with conscious decisions on where that money could go.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JPETERB
04:53 PM on 07/15/2011
For the transnational and national corporations this is an ALL FRONT WAR on all non-commercial values on the customer citizen's national, local and social culture.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wbthacker
Can YOU pass the Turing Test?
04:01 PM on 07/15/2011
Let me suggest a way to solve moral dilemmas like TOMS shoes, one that lets you do the right thing without boycotting.

Try a self-imposed "sin tax." Shop where you want, then make a donation to offset any social ills you think you funded.

For shoes, feel free to buy a pair from TOMS, and then send a buck to a gay rights organization to offset any benefit your purchase gave to AFA. (A penny would probably cover it.) Or shop at a competitor that doesn't support AFA, and buy TWO pairs of shoes -- one for you and one to donate to a charity for poor kids, since the competitor doesn't do that.

The beauty is that the final decision is the same, selfish economic math we all do constantly. You ponder the moral issues first and estimate their costs, and the rest is easy.
photo
LintLass
"When you can balance a tackhammer on your head...
08:33 PM on 07/15/2011
Companies that claim to be progressive, then send money as well as whitewash to hate groups like FOF and the AFA don't deserve our business.

Just cause they do other things for social cover doesn't mean they aren't attacking my rights and spreading hate and defamation. I wouldn't want to be seen in such a brand.
photo
chaya
Another proud veteran
03:31 PM on 07/15/2011
"Chilling"? I would have said it was chilling when conservative rightwing Christians began their boycotting crusade back in the 70's. They never let up, and their efforts have been at least partially responsible for unbelievably high levels of culturally-endorsed bigotry, the loss of much freedom of speech, and even a breakdown in the quality of journalism.

It's about time Americans in general--just us plain 'ol Americans--began to use our conscience when we buy. It just might balance out the highly organized Christian hate-groups.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ira Meyers
Blogger,Proud Liberal
03:25 PM on 07/15/2011
Keep corporatee money out of politics. I can still vote with MY dollar.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wbthacker
Can YOU pass the Turing Test?
03:16 PM on 07/15/2011
"When you buy a pair of shoes, a spicy chicken sandwich, or a gym membership, does that mean you endorse everything about the company -- including the CEO's religious beliefs?"

How about this?

"When you put money in a church collection plate and call yourself a member, does that mean you endorse everything about the church, including its' leaders' political agendas?"

"When you vote for a politician, does that mean you endorse all of his beliefs and actions?"

Is "endorse" really the right word? What if you said "tolerate" instead of "endorse"? If I buy a product from a company whose CEO donates to causes I oppose, I'm not endorsing his position, I'm just tolerating it - the way I tolerate a friend whose politics differs from mine.

Now, think of this more chilling analogy.

"When you give someone money, does that mean you endorse their political views?" If it's bad to give money to a corporation because their CEO will spend his cut to oppose my political goals, what can I say to a Republican who opposes Welfare just because most of the people who receive it vote Democrat?

At some point, this thinking becomes petty. I'm not sure where that point is.
photo
french queen13
my beloved is mine and I am his
04:24 AM on 07/16/2011
Very good post. "Endorse" didn't seem the right word to me, either. I'd go further than "tolerating" though. "Supporting" is the word I use. One might not support them in the "endorse" sense but one is giving _practical support_ by putting money in their pockets.
03:07 PM on 07/15/2011
I had never heard of TOMS and just checked out the website. They look like overpriced cheap canvas or fabric shoes and are manufactured in China. The shoes they give away are manufactured in Argentina and Ethiopia. I would rather buy shoes manufactured or partly manufactured in the US (when I can find them), save my money and make a donation to charity. I wonder if the shoes for the poor is mainly a marketing ploy to get people to buy wildly overpriced canvas shoes. Take a look:
http://www.toms.com/mens/new-styles?view=all&icid=us-home-062011_15
photo
Ytrus
''it's a map''
02:10 PM on 07/15/2011
The more powerful corporations become, the harder it will be to "vote with your wallet" in this way. Just ask the serfs living in feudal Europe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Van Der Putten
05:26 PM on 07/15/2011
But at least don't eat at Chick-Fil-A at the foodcourt in your local Mall.
photo
Ytrus
''it's a map''
06:47 PM on 07/15/2011
I don't. The moment I heard they weren't open on Sunday I knew something was up. Then I read about them and realized they're basically wearing their Christianity on their sleeve.

I don't have a problem supporting Christian business owners. I do have a problem supporting explicitly Christian businesses, as Chick-Fil-A appears to be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zilo
Independent/Republicans hate freedom
10:06 AM on 07/16/2011
I know I don't, even though they are always around where I live and work. The thing is, there are people (like my mother) who purposely go there when they find out what bigots the people who run the place are. Which makes people like my mother bigots as well (she hates gays and is a god-fearing "Christian").

I guess there's no avoiding that, you can only choose how *you* act. But man is that sad. It's people like that that will keep places like Chick-Fil-A going regardless of other people boycotting them. There are simply a LOT of bigots in the U.S.
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
12:02 PM on 07/15/2011
"It's one thing to put your money where your mouth is, but it's not practical for consumers to avoid doing business with any companies whose policies or leaders support opposing religious or political beliefs, MacDonald said."

Not practical ?! I don't care about practical ! Aren't all these business oriented people always saying people can and should vote with their dollars ? I buy my food from a local famers market even though it sometimes costs more and requires a slightly longer drive during specific hours, but I strongly believe that we MUST all do an effort to eat more local grown food, and I don't care how unpractical it is.
11:51 AM on 07/15/2011
I forgot to include this in my last post about leaving PM. I had many people at work and at church tell me after I had decided to leave the company that I was basically wrong. I was not thinking about nor caring about my family. Their thinking was that the money was so good that you had to just forget what you do and how you affect other peoples lives.