More

South Sudan Joins UN As 193rd Member

EDITH M. LEDERER   07/14/11 04:47 PM ET   AP

UNITED NATIONS — Newly independent South Sudan became the 193rd member of the United Nations on Thursday, welcomed into the international community amid an uneasy peace with the Sudanese government in the north.

General Assembly President Joseph Deiss banged a gavel signaling South Sudan's admission to the world body by acclamation as diplomats burst into applause.

"Today, we are firmly entrenching South Sudan in the community of nations," Deiss said.

Independence for the country's eight million people on Saturday was the climax of a 2005 peace agreement that ended decades of civil war with the Arab-dominated north and called for a referendum in which South Sudan voted overwhelmingly for secession.

But many differences remain between the north and the mainly ethnic African south over borders and wealth-sharing among other things.

Military standoffs in the contested border region of Abyei and new fighting in South Kordofan – a state in Sudan with many south-supporting residents – already threaten to spark a new north-south conflict.

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon praised Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir and South Sudan's President Salva Kiir for ensuring that the referendum and its results were honored.

"It is imperative that you resolve outstanding differences with the same pragmatism and leadership that you have each shown so far," Ban said. "The well-being and future prosperity of each depends on the other. South and North share a common destiny – they must see a future as true partners, not rivals."

Although South Sudan is now expected to control more than 75 percent of what was Sudan's daily oil production, it has no refineries and southern oil must flow through the north's pipelines to reach market. The young nation is also one of the poorest and least developed countries in the world, with only a couple of dozen miles (kilometers) of paved roads, very low literacy, and a lack of medical facilities.

South Sudan's Vice President Riek Machar praised al-Bashir's for his courage in accepting the referendum and applauded his government for being the first to recognize the south's independence.

"We do not harbor bitterness towards our former compatriots," Machar said. "We remain partners in peace and committed to the principles of good neighborliness. We must work out our differences through dialogue and in a spirit of cooperation."

Sudan's U.N. Ambassador Sudan's U.N. Ambassador Daffa-Alla Elhag Ali Osman didn't address the outstanding issues but said "this is a new page and we hold out our hands."

"We and our brothers in South Sudan have left bitterness and the ruins of war behind us and we're looking to the future," he said. "We will make every effort to bring whatever assistance we can to the Republic of South Sudan."

U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice pledged American support for South Sudan as it works "for an enduring peace rooted in coexistence between two viable states.

After speeches by representatives of all regional groups, hundreds of diplomats and U.N. staff walked outside for another ceremony where South Sudan's flag – including a yellow star symbolizing unity – was raised for the first time, again to loud applause.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

UNITED NATIONS — Newly independent South Sudan became the 193rd member of the United Nations on Thursday, welcomed into the international community amid an uneasy peace with the Sudanese governm...
UNITED NATIONS — Newly independent South Sudan became the 193rd member of the United Nations on Thursday, welcomed into the international community amid an uneasy peace with the Sudanese governm...
Filed by Alana Horowitz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 114
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
09:20 AM on 07/15/2011
Welcome to the UN, now you can have pointless "resolutions" past that never work everytime something goes wrong considering the UN has accomplished so much in the last 50 years. haha.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EdRea
War is organized insanity.
08:40 AM on 07/15/2011
"We do not harbor bitterness towards our former compatriots," Machar said. "We remain partners in peace and committed to the principles of good neighborliness. We must work out our differences through dialogue and in a spirit of cooperation."

___________

This statement, after 50 years of civil war. This is how it's done (Israel and Palestine, I'm looking at you).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
04:28 AM on 07/15/2011
I wish South Sudan all the very best as a new country in Africa, but they have alot to do, but I urge they use the ballot box, not the gun.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cliff Blount
Non Nobis Solum
02:31 AM on 07/15/2011
I know facts aren't popular to most of the trolls on this thread but I'll provide you with some so that on your day of reckoning you can't say you weren't informed.

First let's clear a few popular misconceptions up.

(1) Being a member of the UN does NOT mean you get American aide
(2) The UN is NOT a military pact, meaning that the US and every nation is not obligated to protect fellow members. If that were the case, there would be world peace.

The UN has a yearly budget of approximately 4 billion dollars a year. Out of 4 billion each year, the US contributes approximately 20%. In perspective, the US generates more money in taxes by lunch time, every day, than it contributes to the UN every year.

Furthermore, the UN has a basic stimulative effect for our country. Being that the international hq is in NYC, we have thousands of diplomats and support staff from around the world living, buying, and traveling in the US.

Imagine that, money coming in the US and not vice versa...

Don't get me wrong, I have my qualms with the UN. For example:

(1) I'd like an end to permanent seats on the Security Council.
(2) I either want America to join the International Criminal Court or have it disbanded
etc... etc...

But I think I go about my criticism logically and with reason. Which is more than what I can say about some posters
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Veprk
03:07 AM on 07/15/2011
You go girl...
fworfe
Registered Independent; Writer; Thinker.
01:49 AM on 07/15/2011
Lots of words; beautiful words; kind and warm emotions; good will and best of intentions, but none of this translates into success beyond the celebration.
A few days, a few weeks, six months at most, reality sets in. And then it's an oasis fight until the most ruthless rogue of all comes out on top for a while until he's overthrown.
Does even one of the vocal well-wishers think that South Sudan has much of a chance?
Regardless of money spent or plans made, does anyone in the world have any clue how to make this new country function even marginally, let alone with any degree of success?
In the modern world if a country can't feed itself, can't govern itself, can't police itself, can't educate itself, can't medically treat itself, can't house itself, how exactly is it supposed to survive?
01:42 AM on 07/15/2011
Well, aren't we just all luvy and peacy for the UN in here? Lol.
01:29 AM on 07/15/2011
they will wind up another welfare handout for the US to support under the auspices of the UN .. get ready for more tax dollars to be handed out in the form of "foreign aid " while your taxes go up and your country goes to hell ..
01:28 AM on 07/15/2011
Congratulations on a step towards democracy and freedom from oppression.
01:16 AM on 07/15/2011
o_O south sudan? when they do that lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nohopepope2187
Honest † Impartial † Enlightening † Centrist
12:48 AM on 07/15/2011
Smart move - the UN's got your back now, baby!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zutroy
12:10 AM on 07/15/2011
Wow. They haven't asked for a single thing from America, and the mouth-foaming here is already out of control. It's as if you people hold them in contempt for existing and not being a US possession.
12:13 AM on 07/15/2011
Now they are a UN possession and yes they will be asking for money, dont be so naive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zutroy
12:20 AM on 07/15/2011
They were recieving aid long before they were in the UN, and membership will probably have nothing to do with their aid stream. It has nothing to do with naivete, and everything to do with cornball hicks who don't know a single thing about the UN, South Sudan, or the rest of the world in general.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zutroy
12:21 AM on 07/15/2011
"they are a UN possession"

I almost missed that. The UN doesn't "possess" any countries.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jeff081
Cass Tecnical H.S., Detroit, MI, (same h.s. Diana
12:09 AM on 07/15/2011
They said on Fox the other day, they're building a new U.N. building in NYC.
11:58 PM on 07/14/2011
So, what are the benefits of being part of the UN? Oh wait, I remember. Now they get money also from America for joining, and we get to protect them if anyone picks on them. Now I remember..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zutroy
12:11 AM on 07/15/2011
The UN isn't a defense pact, and it isn't a condition of recieving aid either.
12:33 AM on 07/15/2011
So, Tell us exactly what the UN is and what it does besides suck up American Tax Dollars and authorize the butting into another Countries affairs in the name of peace missions.
Cause I'm not seeing the benefit from them to the people that are paying for it to operate.
I just see American Tax Payers getting sucked dry funding it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dwight Alexander
11:44 PM on 07/14/2011
that's great ....how may trillion...billion do they want from us?
11:21 PM on 07/14/2011
"Granting more power to the UN only serves the interests of globalists, who see national sovereignty as an obstacle to their goals. The more we involve ourselves with the UN, the more we entangle ourselves in the affairs of other nations to our own detriment. America has nothing to show for our 60 years in the UN except for tens of thousands of dead soldiers and hundreds of billions of wasted tax dollars. The 20th century - the UN century - was the bloodiest in the world's history. We must stop fooling ourselves that the UN is an instrument of peace. The problem is not that the UN is corrupt, or ineffective, or run by scoundrels. It is but the real problem is that the UN is illegitimate, because supra-national government is an illegitimate concept. Legitimate governments operate only by the consent of those they govern. It is ludicrous to suggest that billions of people across the globe have in any way consented to UN governance, or even the slightest influence over their own governments. The UN is perhaps the least democratic institution imaginable, but both Democrats and Republicans insist on using it to "promote democracy." We should stop worrying about the UN and simply walk away from it by withdrawing our membership and money. We should demand a return to real national sovereignty, and respect other nations by rejecting our failed interventionist foreign policy. By doing so we would make the world a more peaceful place." - Ron Paul
11:59 PM on 07/14/2011
I liked the League of Nations. The best part, allowing Hitler to rise to power.