iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Illegal Cash-Back Deals Worsened The Housing Bubble, Drove Up Foreclosures: Report

Housing

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 07/15/11 10:10 AM ET Updated: 09/14/11 06:12 AM ET

It’s a tactic that’s been in use for years: Sell a house to someone at an inflated price, but offer the buyer an incentive to take it -- like a few thousand dollars in cash back.

This maneuver puts extra money in the homeowner’s pocket. But it can make her more likely to experience foreclosure down the line, according to a new report. And because it involves buyers and sellers transferring money without informing the lender -- and exposing the lender to risk they don’t know about -- it’s also a form of mortgage fraud, and therefore illegal.

In a study recently published in American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Itzhak Ben-David, an assistant professor of finance at Ohio State University’s Fisher College of Business, offers a thorough look at how inflated housing prices and cash-back incentives took a toll on homeowners in Illinois’s Cook County, which includes Chicago.

Ben-David examined more than 700,000 home sales in Cook County, spanning January 1995 to April 2008. He zeroed in on suggestive language in the real estate listings -- like “Let's talk about cash back at closing!!!”; “$10,000 back with full price”; and “Free car with full price” -- that indicated price inflation was taking place.

What he found was that these deals represented between 2.9 and 4.4 percent of all the transactions in that 13-year period -- although in the years between 2005 and 2008, they might have accounted for as many as 6.1 percent.

Residents of Arizona, Florida, and California, where cash-back deals were common during the height of the housing bubble, might not be surprised to learn how prevalent this practice was in Cook County. In 2007, a broker at a Phoenix realty company predicted to The Arizona Republic that cash-back deals “will hurt everyone in the industry and the housing market."

The same year, San Diego Magazine reported on the increasing incidence of cash-back deals in California -- and in the country at large. And a few months later, The Palm Beach Post reported that so-called “cash back at closing” deals were “going on in every neighborhood in Palm Beach County,” in the words of one local detective.

In Cook County, the deals didn’t work out so well for homeowners. Ben-David found that among highly leveraged borrowers -- those who’d borrowed more than 80 percent of the home price -- foreclosure rates were between 0.6 and 3.9 percent higher during the first year for borrowers who’d agreed to an inflated price.

Such transactions may have had a ripple effect into other home sales.

A report from the Government Accountability Office, released Wednesday, noted that one of the most common methods home appraisers use to determine the value of a house -- the so-called “sales comparison approach,” in which a value is set based on the prices that other, similar properties have recently sold for -- is sometimes susceptible to a feedback effect.

The GAO report states:

One criticism of the sales comparison approach is that it may perpetuate price trends in overheated (or depressed) markets. For example, the use of comparable sales with inflated sales prices (driven up by factors that increase consumer demand, such as expanded credit availability) can lead to progressively higher market valuations for other properties, which in turn become comparables for future sales transactions.

This echoes a point Ben-David made about the collateral effects of cash-back deals in a press release accompanying his study.

"These inflated price transactions increased the general level of prices in the neighborhood,” Ben-David said, “so that, after the boom, when houses returned to their original values, the crash was more severe.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
It’s a tactic that’s been in use for years: Sell a house to someone at an inflated price, but offer the buyer an incentive to take it -- like a few thousand dollars in cash back. This maneuver ...
It’s a tactic that’s been in use for years: Sell a house to someone at an inflated price, but offer the buyer an incentive to take it -- like a few thousand dollars in cash back. This maneuver ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 313
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
KIampfbeobachter
Misanthropic economic and political shaman
08:39 PM on 08/17/2011
Was heavily and regularly advertized on TV.
11:57 AM on 07/18/2011
Moral corruption on all sides, yet no one is being held accountable for all of this- still.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bradkevans
06:19 AM on 07/18/2011
No word in this article that this practice violates RESPA
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
"I write to make it right, don't like what I see"
08:07 PM on 07/17/2011
For the people who watch Fox News, and like to blame the entire economic crisis on their neighbors, its time for you to start realizing that lenders were doing whatever they could to sell houses to these people regardless of their qualifications,because they knew they could immediately turn around and sell the risk right off their books. Fox news does a great job of turning middle class and low class brother against brother (Unions are killing the economy, etc...) so that the masses will turn a blind eye to the people that are profiting off all of this stuff. Follow the money...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ApprxAm
Oh, dam_…the dam is broke!
11:29 PM on 07/17/2011
Fox viewers are America's last rugged individuals, so they'd have us believe, that obviously needs no help whatsoever from anybody, morally superior, they want to deny help to others. (But don't touch their Medicare and Social Security. Teabagger and RePug voters are either hypocrites, misinformed or both.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
"I write to make it right, don't like what I see"
12:24 AM on 07/18/2011
I would say misinformed by hypocrites. You have their leaders decrying the very social programs that helped them get to where they are with no shame.

Paul Ryan and SS

Mitt Romney and Bailouts when with Bain

Michelle Bachmann with farm subsidies

Clarence Thomas with Affirmative Action

the list goes on
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
10:30 AM on 07/17/2011
What is described in this article is illegal, and apparently contributed to the housing meltdown.

Yet the same process finances our election system.

Large corporations donate a small percentage of their profits to politicians to have laws written that favor them. In return they receive large gains in profitability and deregulation. They MORE than get what they pay for, otherwise they would stop the practice. Business doesn't do anything that isn't profitable to them.

Seems to me that the same thing that is illegal in the mortgage industry, SHOULD be illegal in political finance.

In a fair, ethical system........................................it would be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katherine Guidry
Real Estate Appraiser & Environmental
10:05 AM on 07/17/2011
This comes as a surprise to no one. Trying to talk about the practices at the time it was going down had many blacklisted. I joined a real estate company in Santa Fe that actually had their own mortgage company and title company. The usual weekly meeting, my second, a finance specialist from California was asked to speak to the group.
He started by telling the realtors that if a loan was denied, they would be asked to come back with "made up" rental properties the owner might have forgotten he had. I jumped out of my chair at this and told the young people in the room this was fraud. I couldn't leave fast enough...it must have been more normal than I knew...no one else thought it was a bad idea.
Califishing
I work smart
04:42 AM on 07/17/2011
To hell with the details, where do I sign? Tell someone they will get $10,000 for buying something they dram of..they will take it..One other big scam going is college tuition. You pay $25,000 plus to get a job that pays probably a straight salary of $35,000 and after about 20 years of working you go to maybe $45-$50,000 with major debts..
11:59 AM on 07/16/2011
And this tells us something we didn"t know?
11:12 AM on 07/16/2011
The thing is the government, through the new home buyers program. TOLD the banks to loan the money. A fact alot of people seem to forget.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ApprxAm
Oh, dam_…the dam is broke!
11:35 PM on 07/17/2011
But when has the government been in a position to tell the banks anything? Since the Saving & Loans scandals, the federal government has ceded oversight and command over banks. All of a sudden BOA couldn't find a loophole to government demands?

Look let's all take turn blaming the consumer because they are to blame, but this wasn't armed robbery and I don't buy, nor have you convinced that the banks are victims of an activist government, in spite of Fanny Mae.
02:30 AM on 07/21/2011
I will not even try to convince you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MSROADKILL612
love auto biographys. any appS to write mine?
01:32 AM on 07/16/2011
A common ? variation is say a car on credit & you get $500 cash back, or a tv or a couch or free gas..

Only difference is technically they are not fraudulently trying to pump the market arguably.

Its a tough problem when people buy a car they cant afford & double up w/ a couch they cant afford.

What is doable,is to regultate the rates - 300% is legal I hear in another HP story (car hocked to pay $700 dormitory bill) - anything is legal? late fees?.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katherine Guidry
Real Estate Appraiser & Environmental
10:09 AM on 07/17/2011
If the bank knew it was going on (the appraisers duty to inform), it is not a problem. When it is done and the real understanding of the appraisal value is known to everyone, it is legal. It is called a buydown or such. When the underwriters do not know this inflated house value covers the perk (car, cash or special finances), it is illegal
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MSROADKILL612
love auto biographys. any appS to write mine?
11:37 PM on 07/17/2011
Ta 4 the constructive input - should be more of it.

In short, if an asset appraiser is involved, its a no no

bottom line on small debts remains - outrageous fees - should be regulated to protect those society hasnt done its duty towards educationally
08:56 PM on 07/15/2011
1980 Congress deregulated Savings and Loan
80’s thru 90’s 1,043 S&L’s fail. cost to US Gov. 87.9 Billion
Several politicians, both R & D involved in scandals of inappropriate deals, including Neil Bush, the son of Bush 41st President.
1989 Recovery & Enforcement Act $124 Billion
poppie0144
use our natural gas
07:08 PM on 07/15/2011
Unfortunately we find ourselves once again seeing well after the fact that all of these acts which were illegal. We have absolutely no one going to jail, I think even at this late date after the fact someone should go after these crooks before the statute of limitations is over. We should see people going to jail from the banks the real estate companies in every part that was involved in this scheme. If we actively seek to correct this. People would be much less likely to perpetrate these frauds again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Docdearth2
06:00 PM on 07/15/2011
Greed, uncontrolled borrowing and the death of common sense in this country continue to be the main reasons for the housing fiasco and it's ongoing aftermath. Interestingly enough, none of the major perpetrators of this mess, including those unconscionable Wall Street "wise guys" and politicians who actually caused the the housing "fiasco" have gone to prison. In the meantime, the economy of the country continues to suffer the fall-out. It seems that the only thing holding up this economic house of cards is the ability of this country to print more and more money. Otherwise, it would be even more apparent that global economics and the monetary system of the planet is based solely on smoke and mirrors.
05:05 PM on 07/15/2011
The real issue is that banks loaned money they did not have to people that could not afford to pay it back. They did this knowing that the loans would default. Why, you may ask , would a bank do a thing like that? Because the bankers knew that they would be geting something of real value, which is the reposessed home, in exchange for the fiat money loaned to the buyer. This is legal as long as the bankers do not get caught. It is the same reason bankers hate true audits by independent auditors, the truth is exposed that banks lend more than they have in assets. They are loan sharks with the blessings of the Fed. The same kind of people they condem when they are doing street level deals.
08:53 PM on 07/15/2011
"This is legal as long as the bankers do not get caught" I'm sure they realized it was illegal and were hoping they'd never get caught.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katherine Guidry
Real Estate Appraiser & Environmental
10:18 AM on 07/17/2011
Working with many banks over the years, I could tell who was on the up and up...they wanted true values and all issues affecting the values...buydowns and such.
After the savings and loan crisis of the late eighties many saw getting into mortgage banking a way to move from illicit activities into legitimate businesses.
If an individual had a felony on his record, he could not buy or work in a casino. These same individuals could sink a few dollars into a mortgage company and found many buyers for subprime mortgages. It became clear that this was a way for those in lets say, the mafia, could go legit and launder a hell of a lot of money...the returns were off the charts.
These people were so obviously not true business people. Only people on the up and up would want "real" appraisal numbers. I was fortunate to have clients that did only want the truth.
04:23 PM on 07/15/2011
The entire Community Re-Invesment Act was a disaster from Day 1! Some revealing details on it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GetRealSoon
Finding Fraudster
05:14 PM on 07/15/2011
We are way past 2008 debunked theories. Catch up.

Inside Job-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFfTcAcGjcU

Meltdown - The Secret History of the Global Financial Collapse.2010.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWU65Zbka4E
11:54 PM on 07/15/2011
This makes a great companion video, William K. Black saying it's not too late to take the big banks apart and resolve them - and if we don't we will struggle along without economic recovery. Video is multiply posted, but this one runs well for me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Kp07aLCP4