More

Mumbai Explosions Don't Derail India-Pakistan Talks

Mumbai Explosions

RAVI NESSMAN   07/15/11 10:31 PM ET   AP

NEW DELHI — India brushed off speculation tying the Mumbai bombings to Pakistan and said Friday it remained committed to recently renewed peace talks with its rival neighbor.

The moves showed how little appetite New Delhi has for escalating tensions in the region while it focuses on maintaining economic growth in the South Asian nation of 1.2 billion people.

While future revelations about the culprits in the blasts that killed 17 people Wednesday could still sabotage relations between the countries, the Indian government so far has rejected opposition demands for a heavy response against Pakistan.

On Friday, India said it was working out dates for the next round of negotiations expected this month between top officials from both countries.

"The talks with Pakistan are on schedule," foreign ministry spokesman Vishnu Prakash said.

Pakistan's leaders had quickly condemned the blasts and have welcomed India's measured response. In a statement Friday, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani "expressed satisfaction at the resolve of both Pakistan and India to continue with their bilateral dialogue, and not get deterred by terrorists' designs to derail the dialogue once again."

The coordinated triple bombings were the worst terror attack in India since 10 Pakistan-based militants rampaged through the city in November 2008, killing 166 people.

Investigators examined forensic evidence and footage from closed circuit cameras Friday for clues about who orchestrated the blasts.

"People are being questioned on the basis of our previous database and known linkages. We also have identified the scooter in which one of the bombs was planted," India's Home Secretary R.K. Singh told reporters in New Delhi.

He also said investigators had intercepted an email sent from outside Mumbai but declined to give details.

Intelligence analysts say the attack bore the hallmarks of the Indian Mujahideen, a shadowy Islamic militant group.

A former top Indian intelligence official told The Associated Press that Pakistan's Lashkar-e-Taiba militant group has been providing ideological and physical training to the Indian Mujahideen since 2004.

Leaders of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party strongly criticized the government of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for not taking a harder line with Pakistan.

"Manmohan Singh, sir, what is the nature of your relationship with Pakistan?" BJP spokesman Ravi Shankar Prasad asked angrily at a news conference Friday.

Government officials have refused to take the bait. Home Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram said Thursday that investigators were not ruling out the possibility the attacks were aimed at scuttling the talks.

G. Parthasarthy, a former Indian ambassador to Pakistan, said it would have been counterproductive for the government to overreact, especially on something as important as peace talks, before a culprit was named.

"If concrete proof emerges, I have no idea what the government will do," he said.

The talks, though unlikely to produce concrete results because of political weakness on both sides, at least will lower the temperature between the nations, said Ashok Mehta, a retired Indian army general and leading strategic analyst.

"They've tried both talking and not talking, and the experience has been that talking is the most viable option," he said.

In addition, cutting off talks would be a politically damaging admission of failure for Singh, who is already fighting off a raft of corruption allegations against his government.

"The prime minister has staked his reputation and his political fortune on being able to change Pakistan's behavior and get them to live as peaceful and friendly neighbors," Mehta said.

India and Pakistan, nuclear powers that have fought three wars since independence in 1947, had been engaged in reportedly fruitful negotiations before the Mumbai siege nearly three years ago.

India quickly broke off the peace talks, demanding Pakistan crack down on those accused in the attack, including Lashkar-e-Taiba. Last month, a Pakistani-American testified in a trial in Chicago that Pakistani intelligence was directly involved in plotting and funding the Mumbai siege, a charge denied by Islamabad.

Though India remained unsatisfied with Islamabad's tepid effort to bring those responsible for the attack to justice, the two countries decided in February to restart a full-fledged peace process and have since held talks about the disputed region of Kashmir and the continuing threat posed by terrorism.

Pakistani political analyst Khaled Mahmood said India has in the past been quick to suspend talks or consider military options, but that they "didn't gain anything out of it."

This time, "the government's approach has been more mature," he said. "It's a good development. The process is already on. If this would be interrupted, then it would take a lot of time and effort to resume it."

But Parthasarthy, the former ambassador to Pakistan, said India's patience has limits.

"Tensions will flare if there is one more terrorist attack," he said. "I don't think next time around our response will be as Gandhian as it was in the past."

___

Associated Press writers Ashok Sharma in New Delhi and Nahal Toosi in Islamabad contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

NEW DELHI — India brushed off speculation tying the Mumbai bombings to Pakistan and said Friday it remained committed to recently renewed peace talks with its rival neighbor. The moves showed h...
NEW DELHI — India brushed off speculation tying the Mumbai bombings to Pakistan and said Friday it remained committed to recently renewed peace talks with its rival neighbor. The moves showed h...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:57 PM on 07/16/2011
Yes. Don't derail talks with these fine people

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c4_1310684156

Pfffft!
05:44 PM on 07/16/2011
These talks are more like Deepak Chopra trying to talk peace with Hitler (disguised as a peace & stability seeker!)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
11:35 AM on 07/16/2011
Because India knows it was not Pakistan, but the CIA who was behind the attacks in Mumbai.
01:51 PM on 08/04/2011
Yeah? It is usually the one who says "I didn't do it" that did it. But somehow I have a feeling it was a conspiracy like everything else is these days. I am just not sure which group of 100 million people were involved in it. Was it the CIA? I thought they were staying low after the orchestrated the election attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan by John Hinkley (who they controlled using a wireless brain chip device) which was funded specifically by the Anti-American Jewish league of pro-Muslim members of the Republican Self Destruction Club of America and Mexico and Canada, with auxiliary funding from Al Qaeda, the Yale Club, the Knights Templar, and NYC Mayor Bloomberg.
10:30 AM on 07/16/2011
IF this far left govt does not act, people will eventually take law into their hands and act!

So its important for this govt to do its job and protect its citizens... There is only so many lies you can tell your own people. Eventually they will be on to you.
04:21 AM on 07/16/2011
The headline, and the number of times P@k|$tan is mentioned here would make one think they already know who did this....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VictorLudorum
Chrysler .The 100 Year Contract..
03:11 AM on 07/16/2011
Both countries have open wide licenses for International Crime and Open Border Trade .At Washington ,borrowing amounts like 250 /650 Ml[Congress BJP respectively India] and 600 Mil[Pakistan] ! However the Bhutto s took 160 Mil one time deal and moved independent ..Both are Federated and in a Regional Conference.A Conference means that member state can interrupt another at time of some serious decision making and they do.. They are both members of The Third World and Islamic Conference too.And often blamed each other for State Sponsored Terrorism! But visibly the governments that have recently been traced in ordering killings of citizens are also sponsors of Terrorism/Guerilla Activity in thier neighbourhood like Dehli in Nepal and Pakistan at Afghanistan .The leaders are all victims of serious corruption cases and wound up behind the Pakistan Army... While the Indians took the Havala tactic and promoted 5 Million USD International Crime relaxation around! .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stoopid American
Trooth, justice, and the American way ...
10:52 PM on 07/15/2011
Good news. Let's hope they make progress at these talks.
Bernique
Solar is clean, cheap and plentiful
08:53 PM on 07/15/2011
Who are behind these attacks any way? They are always so "opportune".
photo
LogicalMathMan
Math, Finance, English, Business Instructor
12:49 PM on 07/15/2011
I am pretty certain that the Indian Secret Service, ranked among the best in the world, already decided that this horrific act was home-grown terror. the Indian mujahadeen is a small, splintered group of Muslims. Most of its members might have signed up after the killing of over 2000 Muslims in Gujarat State in 2001-02, and the ensuing sham of an inquiry by the Indian government.
03:24 PM on 07/15/2011
Based on what you said - we have to line up 72 Indian Virgins for those mastermind Indian terrorists....
05:20 PM on 07/15/2011
And that somehow justifies the terror attacks? I am sure some Muslims were also harmed day before yesterday. Wonder how the Mujahadeen explains the killing of people of its own religion. Maybe the hatred is so rampant - "Hey if we can take out a couple of Hindus or Christians along with some innocent Muslims....". Somehow that doesn't relieve me one bit. Quite the opposite in fact.
photo
LogicalMathMan
Math, Finance, English, Business Instructor
06:25 PM on 07/15/2011
There was no suggestion of justification in my comment. That the Indian government merely glossed over the inquiry to afford this, and other extremi$t%^* groups an opportunity to recruit, was my point.