More

'Harry Potter' Box Office Record: $168.6 Million Opening Weekend, 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2' Beats Batman 'The Dark Knight'

Harry Potter

DAVID GERMAIN   07/17/11 04:55 PM ET   AP

LOS ANGELES — The boy wizard has vanquished the dark knight and a band of pirates with a record-setting magic act at both the domestic and international box office.

Warner Bros. estimates that "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2" took in $168.6 million domestically from Friday to Sunday. That beats the previous best opening weekend of $158.4 million, also held by Warner Bros. for 2008's Batman blockbuster "The Dark Knight."

Overseas, the film added $307 million in 59 countries since it began rolling out Wednesday, topping the previous best international debut of $260.4 million set in May by Disney's "Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides."

International results for "Deathly Hallows: Part 2" included record openings in Great Britain at $36.6 million and Australia at $26.7 million, according to Warner Bros.

Worldwide, "Deathly Hallows: Part 2" topped $475 million in a matter of days, putting it on course to become the franchise's first billion-dollar worldwide hit.

"This will be the biggest `Harry Potter' by far," said Dan Fellman, head of domestic distribution at Warner Bros. "A billion dollars is definitely going to happen."

The current franchise high is $974.8 million worldwide for the first film, "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" 10 years ago.

"Deathly Hallows: Part 2" does have the advantage of 3-D screenings, which cost a few dollars more than 2-D shows. Because of the higher 3-D price, plus regular inflation, "Deathly Hallows: Part 2" sold fewer tickets but took in more money than "The Dark Knight" over opening weekend.

Overall domestic revenue for the weekend totaled $263 million, a record for a non-holiday weekend, according to box-office tracker Hollywood.com.

The "Harry Potter" finale also set a record for best opening day domestically Friday with $92.1 million, nearly $20 million ahead of the previous high for "The Twilight Saga: New Moon" two years ago.

Other records for "Deathly Hallows: Part 2": best domestic gross for debut midnight shows at $43.5 million, topping the $30 million for last year's "The Twilight Saga: Eclipse"; best domestic opening in huge-screen IMAX theaters with $15.5 million, surpassing the $12.2 million for last year's "Alice in Wonderland"; and best worldwide IMAX debut with $23.5 million, beating the $20.4 million for "Transformers: Dark of the Moon" two weeks ago.

"This is just really a monumental event," said Hollywood.com analyst Paul Dergarabedian. "The 3-D component, plus the IMAX, plus it being the last `Harry Potter,' it was just this convergence of things that created this incredible record."

Paramount's third "Transformers" blockbuster, which had been No. 1 the previous two weekends, slipped to second-place with $21.3 million domestically. It remains the year's top domestic hit with $302.8 million.

The latest "Transformers" added $39 million overseas, bringing its international haul to $460 million and worldwide total to $762.8 million. Among this year's releases, that's second only to "Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides" at $1.03 billion.

The weekend's other new wide release, Disney's animated family flick "Winnie the Pooh," got swamped by "Harry Potter" mania. A return to the hand-drawn animation style of earlier adaptations of A.A. Milne's beloved storybook characters, "Winnie the Pooh" pulled in just $8 million domestically, finishing at No. 6.

"Deathly Hallows: Part 2" is the eighth and final film adapted from J.K. Rowling's seven novels about the young wizard's indoctrination into a secret world of sorcery and his epic battles with evil conjurer Voldemort.

Cast more than a decade ago at ages 10 and 11 as Harry and his pals Hermione and Ron, Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint became instant celebrities. They grew up on screen, maturing from inexperienced children to adult actors whose earnest performances contributed to glowing reviews from critics for the finale.

The three now are moving on to adult roles, including Radcliffe's stint on Broadway in "How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying."

"It's just a great way to exit, with the class and style that J.K. Rowling wrote into these stories," Fellman said. "It comes to an end, as all goods thing do. When you have the opportunity to be a part of that, to work on all eight movies over 10 years, to see the kids, meeting them for the first time when they're 10 and 11, and just now going to see Daniel Radcliffe at 22 years old in `How to Succeed in Business' on Broadway. There's a bittersweet part of it."

The first "Harry Potter" film shown in 3-D, "Deathly Hallows: Part 2" continued a downward trend for domestic revenues derived from the 3-D format.

Some earlier hits took in 70 percent or more of their domestic cash from 3-D shows. But "Deathly Hallows: Part 2" did just 43 percent of its domestic business in 3-D, with most fans choosing cheaper 2-D tickets.

That still means a healthy $72.5 million in domestic revenue from 3-D screenings, but it also shows that American audiences have lost much of their fervor for seeing movies in three dimensions.

Overseas audiences remain eager for it, with 3-D tickets accounting for 61 percent of international income on "Deathly Hallows: Part 2."

Woody Allen hit a milestone as his romance "Midnight in Paris" pulled in $1.9 million to raise its domestic total to $41.8 million, a personal revenue record for the filmmaker. The Sony Pictures Classics release beat Allen's previous high of $40.1 million for 1986's "Hannah and Her Sisters."

Factoring in today's higher admission prices, "Hannah and Her Sisters" and other earlier Allen hits such as "Annie Hall" sold far more tickets than "Midnight in Paris."

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to Hollywood.com. Where available, latest international numbers are also included. Final domestic figures will be released Monday.

1. "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2," $168.6 million ($307 million international).

2. "Transformers: Dark of the Moon," $21.3 million ($39 million international).

3. "Horrible Bosses," $17.6 million.

4. "Zookeeper," $12.3 million.

5. "Cars 2," $8.3 million ($12.4 million international).

6. "Winnie the Pooh," $8 million.

7. "Bad Teacher," $5.2 million.

8. "Larry Crowne," $2.6 million.

9. "Super 8," $1.92 million.

10. "Midnight in Paris," $1.9 million.

___

Online:

http://www.hollywood.com/boxoffice

___

Universal and Focus are owned by NBC Universal, a unit of Comcast Corp.; Sony, Columbia, Sony Screen Gems and Sony Pictures Classics are units of Sony Corp.; Paramount is owned by Viacom Inc.; Disney, Pixar and Marvel are owned by The Walt Disney Co.; Miramax is owned by Filmyard Holdings LLC; 20th Century Fox and Fox Searchlight are owned by News Corp.; Warner Bros. and New Line are units of Time Warner Inc.; MGM is owned by a group of former creditors including Highland Capital, Anchorage Advisors and Carl Icahn; Lionsgate is owned by Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.; IFC is owned by Rainbow Media Holdings, a subsidiary of Cablevision Systems Corp.; Rogue is owned by Relativity Media LLC.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ENTERTAINMENT

LOS ANGELES — The boy wizard has vanquished the dark knight and a band of pirates with a record-setting magic act at both the domestic and international box office. Warner Bros. estimates that ...
LOS ANGELES — The boy wizard has vanquished the dark knight and a band of pirates with a record-setting magic act at both the domestic and international box office. Warner Bros. estimates that ...
Filed by Jordan Zakarin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 346
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
03:32 PM on 07/19/2011
loved this movie!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
12:24 PM on 07/18/2011
With 3D its all about box. Fewer actual movie goers but withy a bigger box. 

"Deathly Hallows: Part 2" does have the advantage of 3-D screenings, which cost a few dollars more than 2-D shows. Because of the higher 3-D price, plus regular inflation, "Deathly Hallows: Part 2" sold fewer tickets than "The Dark Knight" over opening. Same thing happened in the Resident Evil Trilogy. The third film had the biggest box but thye fewest patrons.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:15 PM on 07/18/2011
"Deathly Hallows: Part 2" does have the advantage of 3-D screenings, which cost a few dollars more than 2-D shows. Because of the higher 3-D price, plus regular inflation, "Deathly Hallows: Part 2" sold fewer tickets than "The Dark Knight" over opening weekend."

Dark Knight still sold more tickets. With theatres jacking up the price every 6 months, it's no wonder they made more money. In 10 years ticket prices will be so high, Big Momma's House 7 will end up beating this record.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VA RT
12:13 PM on 07/18/2011
Emma looks like she wishes she were anywhere else but there. I think she is very over the Potter movies and wants to move on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mokachyna
Ready for the zombie apocalypse...if it comes.
01:42 PM on 07/18/2011
I think that she was just really sad at the premiere...she even cried at one point.
11:43 AM on 07/18/2011
Horrible picture - "Ron's" hair is greasy and makes him look like he is still playing Ron- and Emma?- She looks strung out
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
verashula
Everyday for us something new
11:35 AM on 07/18/2011
So who will get another job first, the red haired kid from this film, or the kid/old man (Finn) from Glee?
11:20 AM on 07/18/2011
Emma looks atrocious in this photo. Like some kind of raccoon stuck in a tan tube top.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:19 AM on 07/18/2011
The amount of money movies bring in show that there is a need to place a federal surtax on all movie tickets. A federal tax of 10% would add just about $1.50-$2 per ticket, hardly an amount that anyone would feel or be effected by.

A 10% tax would have brought in more than almost $17 million dollars to the federal coffers to help pay for our childrens education, health care, or helping the environment. By the time this one film stops running in theaters, it could fund close to $10 billion in aid for the people with very little effect on the public.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gabe A Davis
11:24 AM on 07/18/2011
Speak for yourself. Our tickets are $10 a pop. Which is why I hardly ever go to the movies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:31 AM on 07/18/2011
$10 is cheap compaired to other markets where tickets are between $15 and $20 per seat.

You're just greedy and someone who likes to see children die and the elderly starve.
anne1stoftwo
American Woman
10:56 AM on 07/18/2011
I read all the books, I've seen all the movies! This movie was wonderful and totally worth seeing. I turned my small grandchildren onto the movies and books and have made all four of them voracious readers and the loved the movies.....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Hare
One day closer to Utopia
10:59 AM on 07/18/2011
I'll pass, I know what you mean, my grandkids got into reading thanks to the books. I rather read than watch. SO tell me what happened in the end. Did Harry live?
anne1stoftwo
American Woman
11:25 AM on 07/18/2011
LOL I can't say that in here. But it was a GREAT ending and I might have had tears but they were of joy! Harry Potter and Jenny are darling together and that made the ending even better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whoozthaboss
I just be chillin.
10:55 AM on 07/18/2011
and you can bet your bottom dollar The Dark Knight Rises is going to shatter this one.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Hare
One day closer to Utopia
10:52 AM on 07/18/2011
I read all the books and took the grandkids to watch a couple of the films. By now I forgot if Harry was able to get rid of Voldemort or did he go the way of his parents? I don't think I will watch the film and I don't plan to read the book ending again, I don't even know what happened to the books maybe I donated them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lendmeanear
10:04 AM on 07/18/2011
Batman was 10x better movie.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peanutsintexas
it's hard work being poor
09:58 AM on 07/18/2011
We need to make sure that Warner Bro's pays their fair share in corporate taxes for this record breaking weekend performance.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
cinemaven
Mom, wife, social & political activist, writer...
09:28 AM on 07/18/2011
It was bittersweet for me... my 18 yr. old son and I went and I spent the whole movie thinking that it would be the last one we'd see together in a theater. He's at the age that going to the movies with mom isn't a thrilling prospect but we've seen all the HP's together so he felt obligated and I made him do it. He loved the movie and so did I. It's been an amazing ride since he was a little guy.

I'm happy for them that they beat records but those records don't really indicate whether a movie is good or not. This one was great for a blockbuster though
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kimberly Owsley
When Justice is blind, you have to call out for it
08:50 PM on 07/20/2011
That's a sad sentiment. I still go with my mother and father to movies every once in a while and I'm in my early twenties. Just try asking him to go see a movie with you if you think it's something you'll both like.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
cinemaven
Mom, wife, social & political activist, writer...
08:53 AM on 07/21/2011
Kimberly, my 24 yr. old is happy to go to movies with me and my youngest will get over his 18ishness eventually. The only problem for me is that my oldest lives too far away to make movie going easy and my baby is away at school most of the year so I can't see any time in the immediate future I'll be seeing a movie with my kids. You all grow up so fast!!
It's wonderful that you still go to movies with your parents.. I know they appreciate it :)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustinP213
I dislike all political parties.
09:27 AM on 07/18/2011
The Dark Knight is still a better movie and it was never released in 3D.