iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Elizabeth Warren Challenging Scott Brown Would Have Voters 'Thrilled': Massachusetts Democrats

Warren

First Posted: 07/18/11 06:20 PM ET Updated: 09/17/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- In the most overt sign of political courtship to date, a spokesman for the Massachusetts Democratic Party said on Monday state voters would be "thrilled" to have the consumer protection advocate Elizabeth Warren take on Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) in 2012.

“Many Democrats in Massachusetts are proud of the fight Elizabeth Warren has waged for consumers and would be thrilled if she decided to take on Scott Brown," Kevin Franck, a spokesman for the Massachusetts Democrats, told The Huffington Post. "No question she would make an exciting addition to an already rich field of Democratic candidates who know how to energize voters and build on our grassroots successes in 2010.”

The statement, which comes on the same day that the White House formally announced it would not be nominating Warren to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, is noticeable for a variety of reasons. Until now, the party has generally kept its encouragements for a Warren Senate run to private channels. Warren, a Harvard Law professor who has spent the past year staffing and building up the CFPB, has been frequently discussed as a potential challenger to Brown, but party officials have not wanted it to appear that they are drawing her into the race.

The statement also underscores the sensitivities that come with having a largely national figure run for a statewide election. Still smarting from Attorney General Martha Coakley's failed run for Ted Kennedy's seat, party officials are wary of giving off the impression that they are clearing the field for any individual candidate.

“Regardless of who emerges as the Democratic nominee," read the rest of Franck's statement, "Scott Brown’s major opponent will be his own voting record in the Senate, where he has gone along to get along with D.C. Republicans nearly 90 percent of the time and consistently put the interests of Wall Street and big banks ahead of Massachusetts consumers.”

Still, it doesn't take a degree in behavioral science to recognize that Democrats are excited about the prospects of a Warren Senate bid. A top national Democrat involved in 2012 strategy called her ability to raise money, create a strong contrast with Brown, and withstand GOP attacks invaluable attributes for what promises to be a bruising campaign.

"No one has gone and taken the worst Republican fire head-on like she has over the last couple years, and no one has taken on the most complex financial issues in the country and boiled it down to why it matters for every day Americans like she has," the official said.

Warren, for her part, seems increasingly tempted by the idea of serving in the Senate. As Roll Call reported several weeks ago, she has met in person or spoken with some of the most prominent campaign officials in the party, including: "Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray, David Axelrod, Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Massachusetts Democratic Reps. Barney Frank, Stephen Lynch and John Tierney."

On Monday, much of Warren's time was spent heaping praise on the man who has been nominated to head the agency she helped create -- Richard Cordray, former Attorney General of Ohio -- as well as touting the importance of the CFPB itself. In between, however, she gave off the slightest of hints that Massachusetts politics were on her mind.

"Massachusetts does beckon in the sense that it's my home, and I need to go home. And when I go home, I'll do more thinking then. But I need to do that thinking--not from Washington--but I need to go home," she told MSNBC.

"I think it's important to stay up with all the teams all the time," she added, playing off Coakley's memorable failure to cater to her home state's devotion to its baseball squad. "My husband makes sure -- he's the one who's 15 generations of Massachusetts, he keeps up with the Red Sox and every other team."

And in a conference call later in the day, organized by the White House, Warren again hinted where her political future lies. "Let me put it this way," she said, "I'm saving all of the rocks in my pocket for the Republicans."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- In the most overt sign of political courtship to date, a spokesman for the Massachusetts Democratic Party said on Monday state voters would be "thrilled" to have the consumer protection ...
WASHINGTON -- In the most overt sign of political courtship to date, a spokesman for the Massachusetts Democratic Party said on Monday state voters would be "thrilled" to have the consumer protection ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,761
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (37 total)
04:20 AM on 08/17/2011
The vision is most clear.Voting for S.Brown is more,more Gov.of the Rich,by the Rich,for these Greedy Courpt Leech's.Will never change ! BROWN is raising HOARDS of CASH from Wall Street...If you want more of the same. your choice is clear...? If you want a fair solution for working class people to prosper,and make a better life for every day Americans . THEN VOTE for ELIZEBETH WARREN.A beacon of light to advance to the vanishing MIDDLE CLASS !!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flabingo
04:20 AM on 07/31/2011
We democrats should :MAKE A DEAL WITH OBAMA, No Warren for Vice President , No support for you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
06:59 PM on 07/29/2011
I hope that Elizabeth Warren runs for Senator of Massachuse­tts in 2012. She deserves to be elected, and I'm sure she will be able to carry the seat.

But what I really want to see is Elizabeth Warren elected President in 2016.
10:43 AM on 07/28/2011
I've been watching Ms Warren for over a decade now. I've read her books, listened to her talk about bankruptcy law, and seen the reactions of the right wingnuts over her possible nomination to the consumer protection agency. What an awesome intellect, combined with a huge dose of human decency. She'd make the best ever chief justice of the supreme court, but getting her approved by the senate would take a veto proof majority.
Perhaps it would be better if she were to run for very high office. At least that way, no amount of filibustering or posturing by faux news lackeys would hold her back after they got wacked at the polls.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Holly Smoke
Humor is the best defense for absurdity.
07:03 PM on 07/27/2011
Warren will be more effective if she become the VP and President 2016.

Elizabeth Warren is acknowledgeable, smart and tough to level the playing field.
We need to put her into a position of importance ASAP.
http://www.elizabethwarrenforpresident.com/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flabingo
01:39 AM on 07/21/2011
Elizabeth Warren would be an excellent Senator, but I would prefer if she was the President. She has the courage, capacity and character that is missing with Obama
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
01:36 PM on 07/20/2011
antipod: well didn't you liberals do the same to Bush, Bush, Reagan and others?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chabuka
04:55 AM on 07/22/2011
"us liberals"..so now we are a different species...? Read the latest...? they now have evidence that your President Bush has never won an election..he lost Florida in 2000 but was appointed by the Supreme Court...appears he also actually lost Ohio in 2004...there might be charges of real election fraud (that you on the right are always trying to prove) but, perpetrated by a Republican Governor, forthcoming....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
antipodal2u
Just say NO to hypocrisy
01:08 PM on 07/20/2011
Go Warren!
01:03 PM on 07/20/2011
If she does run and win would have at least one Democratic Senator in DC. As opposed to all those democratic senators.( Serious adults get capital letters. ) She has shown she knows how to fight. She speaks so it is clear what she means and when she says something she backs it up. Two traits that are seriously missing at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in DC.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
12:29 PM on 07/20/2011
cinnamonbrown: sorry I didn't see the email. It must have been deleted. I am not a republican.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chabuka
04:57 AM on 07/22/2011
Not a Republican..but you have their talking points down so well..a Libertarian..perhaps..?
photo
me again
I'm not wrong....
12:25 PM on 07/20/2011
Brown had a weak rival to gain a caretaker seat. He's chasing ambulances after the next election.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spoonbill1963
12:01 PM on 07/20/2011
We simply do not need this woman in Washington in any capacity.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chabuka
04:58 AM on 07/22/2011
Blow it out your right cheek, sonny
12:34 PM on 07/30/2011
Does Warren scare you, facist.
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
11:22 AM on 07/20/2011
Since she seems to 'irritate' the 'right' side of the aisle so much, maybe the Senate is a good place for her.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spoonbill1963
12:01 PM on 07/20/2011
and maybe not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
antipodal2u
Just say NO to hypocrisy
01:09 PM on 07/20/2011
And maybe definitely
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sherzie
Former Republican
11:21 AM on 07/20/2011
I'd contribute to her campaign . . . all the way from California.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flabingo
04:16 AM on 07/31/2011
Bravo. There is a website setup for you right now
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
09:17 AM on 07/20/2011
GHopepa: raise them, I never said I was against it. This is what Roosevelt did in the 1930's.