More

Aaron Swartz, Reddit Co-Founder, Charged With Data Theft (VIDEO)

JAY LINDSAY   07/19/11 10:35 PM ET   AP

Aaron Swartz Data Theft

BOSTON — A Harvard University fellow who was studying ethics was charged with hacking into the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's computer network to steal nearly 5 million academic articles.

Aaron Swartz, 24, of Cambridge, was accused of stealing the documents from JSTOR, a popular research subscription service that offers digitized copies of more than 1,000 academic journals and documents, some dating back to the 17th century.

In an indictment released Tuesday, prosecutors say Swartz stole 4.8 million articles between September 2010 and January after breaking into a computer wiring closet on MIT's campus. Swartz, a student at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, downloaded so many documents during one October day that some of JSTOR's computer servers crashed, according to the indictment.

Prosecutors say Swartz intended to distribute the articles on file-sharing websites.

Swartz turned himself in Tuesday and was arraigned in U.S. District Court, where he pleaded not guilty to charges including wire fraud, computer fraud and unlawfully obtaining information from a protected computer. He was released on $100,000 unsecured bond and faces up to 35 years in prison, if convicted.

"Stealing is stealing whether you use a computer command or a crowbar, and whether you take documents, data or dollars," U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz said in a statement. "It is equally harmful to the victim whether you sell what you have stolen or give it away."

A call to Swartz's attorney wasn't immediately returned. Swartz is due back in court Sept. 9.

A spokeswoman for JSTOR said Tuesday that Swartz had agreed to return all the articles so the company can ensure they aren't distributed.

"We don't own any of this content. We really have to responsible stewards of it," said spokeswoman Heidi McGregor. "We worked hard to find out what was going on. We worked hard to get the data back."

Swartz is an online activist who founded the website Demand Progress, which says it "works to win progressive policy changes for ordinary people."

The site describes Swartz as "the author of numerous articles on a variety of topics, especially the corrupting influence of big money on institutions including nonprofits, the media, politics, and public opinion." It said he and another researcher once downloaded and analyzed more than 440,000 law review articles to determine their funding sources.

Demand Progress's executive director David Segal said on the website that the charges against Swartz don't make sense.

"It's like trying to put someone in jail for allegedly checking too many books out of the library," he said.

A Harvard spokesman said Swartz was placed on leave from a 10-month fellowship after the university learned about the investigation. He said the fellowship ended last month.

Swartz had legitimate access to JSTOR through Harvard, but the company has usage restrictions that would have prevented such colossal downloads.

The nonprofit JSTOR, founded in 1995, enables libraries to save space, time and labor by digitally storing centuries worth of academic journals. Its oldest publication is a Proceedings of the Royal Society of London from 1665.

Its annual subscription fees can cost a large research university as much as $50,000.

According to the indictment, Swartz connected a laptop to MIT's system in September 2010 through a basement network wiring closet and registered as a guest under the fictitious name, Gary Host, in which the first initial and last name spell "ghost." He then used a software program to "rapidly download at extraordinary volume of articles from JSTOR," according to the indictment.

In the following months, MIT and JSTOR tried to block the recurring and massive downloads, on occasion denying all MIT users access to JSTOR. But Swartz allegedly got around it, in part, by disguising the computer source of the demands for data.

In November and December, Swartz allegedly made 2 million downloads from JSTOR, 100 times the number made during the same period by all legitimate JSTOR users at MIT.

The indictment also alleges that on Jan. 6, Swartz went to the wiring closet to remove the laptop, attempting to shield his identity by holding a bike helmet in front of his face and seeing his way through its ventilation holes. It said that he fled when MIT police tried to question him that day.

An MIT spokeswoman said the school had no comment on the apparent breach.

McGregor said JSTOR recognizes it's very difficult for any institution at any level to protect its data.

"Hacking is rampant," she said. "Protecting systems is a huge challenge right now for any industry, and in the academic space it's especially challenging because we all want to be as open as we can and have policies that promote use."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

BOSTON — A Harvard University fellow who was studying ethics was charged with hacking into the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's computer network to steal nearly 5 million academic article...
BOSTON — A Harvard University fellow who was studying ethics was charged with hacking into the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's computer network to steal nearly 5 million academic article...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:06 PM on 07/21/2011
"It's like trying to put someone in jail for allegedly checking too many books out of the library."

I think if you try to check books out of a library without a library card, that's just stealing. Flippin' Harvard kids! Don't you have your own access to JSTOR? Why break into MIT? The punishment might be related to the fact that he breached MIT security, and illegally accessed the servers which probably have quite a bit of classified information.
tonybfine
fractional reserve lending is counterfeiting
09:17 PM on 07/20/2011
I think our justice system is crazy. This guy faces 35 years in prison and a million dollar fine and is being prosecuted by the Feds no less. Another guy in this town when challenged by the owner of a car he was breaking into cut the throat of the owner and the owner could have died. Made a plea bargain and got off with probation only. We get madder when property rights are threatened than someone's life. Great when you have library with subscription or firm big enough that $50,000 subscriptions to numerous electronic libraries not big annual expense, but for little guy trying to do research on the net, apart from Archive and Citeseer, so many of these articles are behind the "green door", requiring payment between $12 and $40 for an article that can be as short as 4 pages. The other problem is the opacity - you often don't know by the abstract whether the article will be any use to you. I spend such a big proportion of my search time looking for preprints or other free articles. And Google, knowing I sometimes buy them, does a good job of hiding the free ones. I would warrant that this green door costs US productivity considerably and there should be more free access - a National on-line library paid for by taxes. Aaron got a little over-zealous here but has settled with JSTOR The matter should end there. Maybe there are political reasons for prosecuting him.
07:31 PM on 07/20/2011
"Stealing is stealing whether you use a computer command or a crowbar, and whether you take documents, data or dollars," U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz said "It is equally harmful to the victim whether you sell what you have stolen or give it away."
and what about replication, or freedom to disseminate information and knowledge?, or perhaps the roster allocated Ms Oritz for her outstanding work with the Economic Crimes Unit at Middlesex County before nomination by President Obama on Ed Kennedys nod to the US attorney office in Massachusetts.
Academic intellectual data in the public domain . ..wow they 'are' setting their sights high in support of DRM,
JSTOR is the public database, no telecoms used to break the wire act (he left the laptop), and the educational nature of the documents copied have intrinsic value to society in general, being held in trust with the specific requirement that they are freely available for study, if our esteemed representatives are foolish enough to deregulate the financial sector to a degree it starts to speculate on our fuuture information quotent to the detrement of critical thought and reason, the least we should do is try to circumvent their stupidity.
02:45 PM on 07/20/2011
Here's a copy of the indictment against Mr. Swartz:

http://documents.latimes.com/usa-v-aaron-swartz

If the indictment is factual, Swartz did a lot more than dload a lot of data.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
"I write to make it right, don't like what I see"
02:39 PM on 07/20/2011
Harvard must have an excellent ethics program
05:09 AM on 07/21/2011
Veritas.
01:32 PM on 07/20/2011
I actually read that you guys posted that JSTOR should be in jail, not AAron? The quote was: "HUFFINGTON POST: JSTOR's the one that should be in prison, man, for locking up knowledge." in an email from demand Progress.

Okay. So no one read the indictment, this is obvious. Aaron went to great lengths do download millions of research articles that are in a database available to institutions and public libraries for a fee. I can get it for free from my public library, or from my school. He downloaded too much, shut the servers down, blocked the campus of MIT from access because of his security breach. He put a switch into the network to allow him access. He was not a student there, but on campus using resources.

Are you all blind? The information from Demand Progress just did what I hate about all the media outlets. I went to them to try to get an open view on certain things, but now I realize that they just deceived the audience with choice words and made omissions that further their cause. I hate that. Huff Post is guilty of the same if they don't see this.

I like freedom of information, and this particular information is available if paid for, or you can go ask your county librarian to get you a copy. He or she can, free of charge.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nappyman
Hatred is gained as much by good works as by evil
08:07 AM on 07/20/2011
What's his motive? He wanted to make the journal info free? This article is poorly written.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dngrwill
The Past, by definition, must lose
09:50 PM on 07/19/2011
"attempting to shield his identity by holding a bike helmet in front of his face and seeing his way through its ventilation holes. It said that he fled when MIT police tried to question him that day."

that kinda says it all.....
01:33 PM on 07/20/2011
I agree. This article as presented by Demand Progress is getting me mad because he did do something wrong. I know why he did it, but there are better legal ways. We all have access to this information. He was wrong.
09:30 PM on 07/19/2011
That is most unfortunate, you know I am a member of demand progress, and I think its an excellent community tool. With that little bit being said, it seems that he got a little too zealous in this attempt, wouldn't it have been better to maybe have done the downloading at a slower rate? Free information is great, however, some people do need to live on small earnings from their works so, its a tough spot, especially for an ethics student i'd guess. anyway, i hope he fairs well in the legal system, maybe just probation. Its not murder.
photo
gomezrules
Why Don't We Do It In The Road?
03:52 PM on 07/19/2011
This guy has a career awaiting him in the Dem Party! He's their kind a guy!
photo
Kalie
Left of Center
06:03 PM on 07/19/2011
Not. Maybe this guy can teach the other inmates about ethics, while he is in prison.
07:20 PM on 07/19/2011
flagged for off-topic.
02:33 PM on 07/19/2011
From Alexis Ohanian (REAL co-founder of Reddit) tweet: ATTN @nytimes Steve Huffman & I founded @reddit. We acquired Aaron Swartz's company infogami 6mos after we launched.
(source: https://twitter.com/#!/kn0thing/status/93374221685755904)
02:21 PM on 07/19/2011
They should do more research before posting articles. Aaron Swartz isn't a co-founder. His company merged with Reddit and then he was subsequently fired after Reddit was purchased by Conde Nast.
photo
Vintage59
Reading is still the warp drive of IT
02:09 PM on 07/19/2011
Once you leave cyberspace you are actually within the reach of the law. Several years of adolescent disobedience can get you worldwide attention.

This attention was probably not what he had in mind.