iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Federal Reserve Actively Preparing For The Possibility Of U.S. Default

Federal Reserve Us Default

First Posted: 07/20/11 05:43 PM ET Updated: 09/19/11 06:12 AM ET

The Federal Reserve is actively preparing for the possibility that the United States could default as a deadline for raising the government's $14.3 trillion borrowing limit looms, a top Fed policymaker said on Wednesday.

Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Charles Plosser said the Fed has for the past few months been working closely with Treasury, ironing out what to do if the world's biggest economy runs out of cash on August 2.

"We are in contingency planning mode," Plosser told Reuters in an interview at the regional central bank's headquarters in Philadelphia. "We are all engaged ... It's a very active process."

Plosser said his "gut feeling" was that President Barack Obama and Congress will come to an agreement to increase the Treasury's borrowing authority in time to avert a default on government obligations.

Obama was due to meet with top Republicans in Congress on Wednesday to discuss the latest attempts to end the dispute over raising the country's debt ceiling, a row which has raised the prospect of the Treasury Department running out of money to pay its bills next month.

The Treasury has repeatedly said default was unthinkable and that there was no alternative to raising the debt ceiling, and Plosser's remarks marked the most extensive public comments on the matter from a U.S. official.

One aspect of the Fed's contingency planning is purely operational: the Fed is developing procedures about how the Treasury will let it know which checks will get cleared and which won't, Plosser said.

The Fed effectively acts as the Treasury's bank -- it clears the government's checks to everyone from social security recipients to government workers.

"We are developing processes and procedures by which the Treasury communicates to us what we are going to do," Plosser said, adding that the task was manageable. "How the Fed is going to go about clearing government checks. Which ones are going to be good? Which ones are not going to be good?"

"There are a lot of people working on what we would do and how we would do it," he said.

Plosser added that there are difficult questions that the Fed itself had to grapple with.

The Fed lends to banks at the discount window against good collateral. But what happens if U.S. Treasuries no longer fit that bill?

"Do we treat them as if they didn't default, in which case we would be saying we are pretending it never happened? Or do we treat them as if they defaulted and don't lend against them?" Plosser said. "Those are more policy questions."

Plosser, who was a vocal critic of some of the Fed's extraordinary lending during the financial crisis -- which he said veered into fiscal policy and risked the central bank's independence -- warned it would be crucial for the Fed not to do the Treasury's work for it.

"We have to be very careful that we don't become, that we don't conduct fiscal policy in this context," he said. "That we don't substitute for the inability of the Treasury to borrow in some circumstances."

That said, the Fed, which is charged with ensuring financial stability, would clearly feel the responsibility to step in as a lender of last resort if markets seized up after a U.S. default, he added.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke last week warned that a default could have "catastrophic" effects on financial markets.

Plosser, a former dean of the Simon School of Business at Rochester University, was more circumspect.

"It could be very bad. At some level we don't really know what the consequences could be. It could be very serious. It could be less serious. Do we really want to run that experiment?"

Plosser is a voting member of the Fed's monetary policy-setting committee this year.

(Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The Federal Reserve is actively preparing for the possibility that the United States could default as a deadline for raising the government's $14.3 trillion borrowing limit looms, a top Fed policy...
The Federal Reserve is actively preparing for the possibility that the United States could default as a deadline for raising the government's $14.3 trillion borrowing limit looms, a top Fed policy...
Filed by Harry Bradford  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10,406
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (158 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MirageRF
03:34 PM on 07/23/2011
It'd be a great time (for Democrats) to take an overseas junket,
while the dollar still buys souvenirs.

Let the Repubs run the show and take ALL the blame.
The politics of 2012 seem to be the pot at the end of this rainbow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScaningTheWaves
04:34 AM on 07/23/2011
Federal Reserve Actively Preparing For The Possibility Of U.S. Default

Surprised the Fed. Told us that much!
01:57 AM on 07/23/2011
I'm pretty sure most politicians have forgotten that they serve the people they represent. If we want lower pay for Congressman, that's how it should be. It's become clear that most politicians and those of high status go about abusing their power to serve their own ideas...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bonnie Larkin
Oathkeeper AND NRA member
01:26 AM on 07/23/2011
It's basic math - it's basic logic - it's simple
When you don't have any more money -- you better STOP spending money
It really is that simple.
I guess thats why my credit rating is excellent and obama has put this countries credit rating in the sewer.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MirageRF
03:35 PM on 07/23/2011
It's as simple as discontinuing the wars, medicare, medicaid and social security.
A bitter pill.
07:00 PM on 08/25/2011
Take a way the Bush temporary 2001 tax cuts, for the wealthy, pull the troops out of Afghanistan, Iraq, etc...implement a universal single payer healthcare system(which the rest of the civilized world has), and you have no deficit. I dont understand how ignorant Americans, are that they can be manipulated like this. Do people understand the rest of the world considers America a joke? Because Americans are the most ignorant people in the industrialized world.Your deficit is self-inflicted, and it is easily fixed, but you arent a Democracy. Your government doesnt act on your behalf, but of corporations & plutocrats. America is a Oligarchic Plutocracy.
mooncop1
Impeachment is a beginning, not an end.
04:56 PM on 07/22/2011
Well I hope they have prepared because the democrats have driven the final nail in the coffin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ed Breider
old,useless, and happy
02:46 PM on 07/22/2011
Hit it Julie ! .........

The Hill is alive, ... with the Sound of Madness ...........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Scott
Micro bio? Are you making fun of little dogs?
02:43 PM on 07/22/2011
rccthatsme
59 Fans
Become a fan
20 hours ago (6:18 PM)
I can't attack you too much when you use spome Jewish slang, but I must defend my comment.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now I know that discussion about the Federal Reserve and the Banks and lending will no doubt generate, from some of our visitors, the usual drivel about the Zio.nisst conspiracies, control of the banks, the Rothchilds, and the Elders of Zion pamphlets thrown in for good measure.

While this stuff has always been around, glenn beck managed to turn some of his ultra-right wing blackboard ready Jewish conpiracies into fodder for our Tr0//sters.

But, looking at this comment, I don't see why they always have to get so personal....creeping up as close to it as they can, without actually saying directly what they want to say.
Dog Whistles. Coded language for the brethern.

Whatever you want to call it, I just call it offensive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
McGyver1
Big Fan of Mr. Bojangles
05:01 PM on 07/22/2011
Why do you try to discredit the truth by turning it into racial thing? No one here mentioned anything about Zionist except you. Historical facts speak for themselves. Be offended when it's convenient.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Scott
Micro bio? Are you making fun of little dogs?
06:15 PM on 07/22/2011
The truth? These things are the truth? You can't be serious, can you?

"Historical facts speak for themselves." Well, no they don't. They are interpreted and discussed, but I can only understand you to mean that you believe in these conspiracies?

Please, do elaborate on the truth about the Elders of Zion, and the bad Jewish bankers you seem to have historically located.

Other than that, since there's nothing else in the post, I have no idea what Truth you are referring to...why not just come right out and say what you are trying to say.

It seems to me if it's "truth" it will stand the light of day. And we'll certainly be able to understand you.

Lastly, this issue is not "racial," it's "ethnic."
And I certainly not offended conveniently....no, you have to go out of your way.
You certainly do seem like you'd want to give it a try.

So, please, speak plainly. Tell us about "the historical facts."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tarpon22
02:18 PM on 07/22/2011
FEDERAL reserve Plans Strategic Default of U.S. Economy and was instructed by the Elite Families such as Rcokefellers and Da Rothchilds and Goldman Sachs and others that OWN the Federal Reserve.

Accoumplished by Devaluing the U.S. Currency and flloding the Market with PHONY FIAT MONEY.

A Engineerd DEPRESSION.

Ron Paul 2012
The REAL President
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
McGyver1
Big Fan of Mr. Bojangles
04:57 PM on 07/22/2011
Im with you on Ron Paul. Most honorable statesman in Washington.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Robert Masters
To take my property is to take my means to live
08:07 PM on 07/22/2011
Yes - Yes - Yes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
McGyver1
Big Fan of Mr. Bojangles
01:06 PM on 07/22/2011
Heres the thing I dont get. 40% of our debt is to this private banking cartel, for some reason called the federal reserve. This amounts to a daily interest payment of around 2 billion dollars. Why doesnt the US Treasury have this same power? Isn't that what we have a government for?

If the federal reserve is private, who owns them? And more important, who do they own?
Those around Obama are former Fed and wall street folks, including the Secretary of the Treasury.
The presidents assistent and advisor to the treasury secretary (Geihtner), Elizabeth Warren who created and overseen the banking bailout (TARP), now is stepping down to run for Congress. I don't know...just sayin...
Seems like a lot of banking interests there in Washington. Maybe someday the Capital will be at the Federal Reserve.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mwilbur137
Political Junkie/Intellectual Elitist
11:10 AM on 07/22/2011
I wanted to compare today’s tax code to Reagan’s famous two-tier tax code…what I discovered was that, in 2011USD, the cut-off point between the 15% and 28% tax brackets was approximately $57K in today’s dollars. Today, the cut-off for the 28% tax bracket begins at $139K. That means that today, anyone earning between $57K and $139K pays less in taxes than they would under Reagan’s tax plan.

That’s making everything equal, adjusting the 1988 USD to 2011 USD.

That got me thinking. What if we adjusted the Federal Budgets for inflation?

I found the results to be astounding.

Since 1982 (Reagan’s first Fiscal Year Budget):

Unadjusted, Republican increases to the Federal Budget equal 2.385 Trillion Dollars.
Adjusted, it rounds down to 1.843 Trillion Dollars.

Unadjusted, Democratic increases to the Federal Budget equal to 0.754.
Adjusted, it rounds down to 0.29 Trillion Dollars.

Unadjusted, Republicans have increased the budget by a 3 to 1 ration to the Democrats.
Adjusted to 2011 USD, that ratio becomes nearly 6.3 to 1.

Increase to Budget by President in Billions (Adjusted to USD2011)
Reagan – 465.59 (397.96)
H.W. – 265.69 (119.64)
Clinton – 453.67 (172.93)
W. – 1654.5 (1326.35)
Obama – 301.14 (117.74)

Republicans – 2385.77 (1843.95)
Democrats – 754.81 (290.67)

It’s not surprising that Republicans are so clearly the bigger spenders; what is astounding is the ratio by which they are.
10:39 AM on 07/22/2011
I wonder Has president Obama, VP Biden, or any member of congress recommend that they take a cut in pay and benefits to help balance the budget?
I know they all agree that Disabled Veterans, the elderly, sick, and the poorest among us should.
photo
TexasTreader
Fluffy, the yard dog
10:32 AM on 07/22/2011
I was wondering what that smell was. It's the Fed's paper-shredders in overdrive.
09:38 AM on 07/22/2011
The Republicans are once again being totally unreasonable,just as they were during the Bush years, when they would not even tell Democrats where meetings were being held! now, the wacko tea party, straight out of Alice in WONDERLAND, is holding the entire nation hostage! Read the polls, the people want taxes on the wealthy, who are having it their own way! If we allow these Draconian cuts, without a reasonable increase in revenues, the economy will crash, Wall Street will drop by hundreds of points, and then the Republican Mad Haters will have to answer for what they have done. of course Rush Limbaugh, and the rest of those who carry water for the nutty tea party will find a way to blae the Democrats, and the President.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Scott
Micro bio? Are you making fun of little dogs?
09:12 AM on 07/22/2011
tdsding
37 Fans
Become a fan
16 hours ago (4:56 PM)
husseinpos­t, how do you let this guy say in his intro, trolls are like mosquitoes on acid? Allow his post saying my judgement stinks and tell me I am a joke? The husseinpos­t and this moderator are the jokes. What is a moderator anyway, should I be afraid? is he like an organizer? This site is a joke and like I said before, a playground for the Dem's.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are the people complaining about fairness.....? The Husseinpost?
The dog-whistle language of his earlier posts was worse.

We've had more of this on the economic issues, just inundated.

But, interestingly, on Rupert and that scandal, the shock troops are so in shock they can't even respond. One or two try, and then just slink off in sadness and dejection.

One day, they will wake up and Fox News will be a blank screen on their box, and then what? What ever shall they do??
07:47 AM on 07/22/2011
When will Obama grow some ball like Kennedy. Kennedy saw that the Federal Reserve (World Bank) was killing the country financially. Kennedy did away with the Federal Reserve Bank, and with paying their insane interest rates. Instead he had the mint start printing Silver Certificates against our reserve. Within a few months, billions in revenue was coming in. So the Federal Reserve (World Bank)wasn't making money from the United States any more. Shortly after singing that into effect, Kennedy was assassinated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BamafanNJ
10:07 AM on 07/22/2011
Well Rick your kinda right, Kennedy did issue an executive order, 11110, which ordered the treasury to issue notes (Mostly 1 dollar coins) against the remaining silver held by the US Federal Reserve. Since the price of silver rebounded to about $1.29 in the 60's, most owners of the minted coinage melted it down for the the extra 29 cents and it quickly consumed the silver remaining in the Federal Reserve and the end of the currency. You have a much bigger problem with silver and gold coinage in this day and age. 1st you couldn't mine enough Gold or Silver to support the worlds economies. There just isn't that much in the ground and if you did the size of a coin would be about the size of a grain of salt for a 1 dollar standard reserve coin at todays prices, why in the heck do you think we went off the gold standard in the 1st place. It's fluctuations required our economy to expand and contract so often that the economy couldn't forecast the gains and loses accurately enough or maintain a safe haven that was large enough to house the metals needed to support our economy and that of the worlds investments. We would need another army to guard the bullions of metals alone and it would not be practical at all. But I give you "Standard" bearers credit, you do try to inject that outdated and uncontrollable method of currency control all the time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
McGyver1
Big Fan of Mr. Bojangles
12:16 PM on 07/22/2011
So if our dollar supply is 3 trillion and gold is worth 1500 and ounce, how much gold will we need to back our dollars?