More

Hydrokinetics: Quest For Renewable Energy Turns Back To Water

By ALAN SAYRE   07/18/11 04:56 PM ET   AP

NEW ORLEANS -- The powerful flow of the Mississippi River, which brought destruction to scores living near its flooded banks this spring, is viewed by a new generation of energy entrepreneurs as a reliable alternative way to generate electricity.

These developers aren't planning giant concrete dams like the ones that brought electric lights to many Americans for the first time. Instead, their idea is to put turbines on the bottoms of rivers or mount them on barges to spin generators.

It's all part of the emerging technology of hydrokinetics – using flowing water to generate power without dams.

"If we're going to control the cost of converting to new forms of energy, hydro has to be part of that equation," said Jon Guidroz, project development director for Boston-based Free Flow Power, which wants to generate energy from the Mississippi River.

Hydrokinetic generation isn't a new idea – but only in recent years has technology made it feasible.

"Water speeds vary and, years ago, generators weren't built and developed for variable speed," said Brent Ballard, chief executive of Olney, Texas-based Gulfstream Technologies. "In the last few years, they make very efficient generators that can operate in a wide range of speeds."

Still, developers are faced with many challenges, such as the current low prices for electricity that have bedeviled other alternative energy forms and a technology that is still in its infancy. Widespread application is years away, and no one is yet willing to predict how much power could eventually be generated nationwide by hydrokinetics.

"I'd say hydrokinetic generators are at the stage where the wind generators were 15 years ago," said Jerome Johnson, research professor at the Institute of Northern Engineering with the University of Alaska at Fairbanks.

FFP is focusing on obtaining federal permits for 25 hydrokinetic projects along the lower Mississippi River between Kentucky and Louisiana. Sites were chosen based on flow volume, flow velocity and the proximity to transmission facilities and potential customers. At each site, hundreds of turbines on pylons at the bottom of the river would spin like propellers and transmit energy to the riverbank.

Each turbine would produce about 40 kw of power, comparable to gasoline and diesel-powered home generators. By comparison, small wind turbines used to power homes and small businesses typically have capacities of 100 kilowatts or less.

Guidroz said FFP's long-term goal is to operate turbines for utilities and for chemical industries along the river. The company began testing one in June at a Dow Chemical Co. plant in Plaquemine, La. The company said that in addition to private funding, it received a $1.4 million grant from the U.S. Energy Department.

The cost of a turbine, for now, is an FFP trade secret.

Ballard said turbines also could be strung below some existing dams to produce additional power.

"Your infrastructure is already there," he said. "It's not like a wind farm where you might to build 200 miles of infrastructure."

And flowing water can be had away from rivers. Gulfstream Technologies began a pilot hydrokinetic project in December 2009 at a power plant on a lake in Texas. The turbine uses the flow of water that comes from the plant following cooling cycles.

Guidroz said he wasn't deterred about the flood of 2011, saying that underwater turbines could easily be designed to handle the raging river.

"If anything, it proves the awesome power of the river and the potential for hydrokinetics," he said.

Some hydrokinetic testing is also taking place in Alaska, where powering isolated villages is a challenge.

Alaska Power & Telephone Co., which provides electricity to 33 communities with populations of 60 to 3,000, hopes the technology can reduce the use of room-sized diesel generators that still account for 30 percent of the power it provides.

Using a $1.8 million federal grant, the company built an aluminum barge mounted with a power turbine that dipped into the Yukon River. Last year, the generator provided part of the power for Eagle Village – population 50. The barge was later pulled back because of drifting wood, and the Institute of Northern Engineering is working on a device to divert debris, Johnson said. Another trial could take place next year.

AP&T believes the technology can be developed for widespread and bigger generation, said Mark McCready, the company's marketing director.

Developers are trying to deal with environmental concerns.

In a study that will be sent to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FFP is assessing whether its turbines would affect shipping or fishing on the Mississippi. The commission will have to approve any large-scale uses of river turbines.

Both FFP and Gulfstream Technologies say their turbines are environmentally friendly. FFP's turbines use no chemical lubricants, Guidroz said. The company also put larger gaps between the turbine blades so large species can pass through safely, at the expense of some generating efficiency. Gulfstream Technologies has opted for a biodegradable lubricant, Ballard said.

But the cost has killed the plans of other developers.

Marine services company McGinnis Inc. thought its proximity to the Ohio River was a natural reason to get into hydrokinetic generation. However, the South Point, Ohio-based company found small-scale generation wasn't economically feasible and a larger operation required development costs that were too high, said its legal counsel Doug Ruschman.

The company tried to get federal help, but was turned aside.

Douglas Meffert, executive director of Tulane University's RiverSphere, a planned hydrokinetic testing facility along the Mississippi River in New Orleans, said the technology will need federal support for commercial development.

"Every renewable energy source that has moved into commercial use, such as solar and wind, has always had to depend upon that initial subsidy," he said.

A small amount of federal money in tight budget times is now available, but that support depends upon matching funds from other sources, including private investors, Meffert said.

"This economy is slowing down the development of an industry that shows so much promise," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 48
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:31 AM on 08/16/2011
"Still, developers are faced with many challenges, such as the current low prices for electricity that have bedeviled other alternative energy forms and a technology that is still in its infancy."

Isn't that just awful - cheap plentiful energy!

The free market kicks into high gear when scarcity rears its head. But we don't have scarcity in oil and gas - so the left wants to artificially raise prices to FORCE change. Truns out it's not such a great investment - just look at First Solar, you know the money pit our government put money into - filed bankruptcy.

As the old saying goes - want to make a small fortune in green energy? Start with a large fortune.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws
No owning ideas. Limit only commercial use.
03:40 PM on 08/19/2011
"The free market" stinks at basic research. When a technology is ready to go, the private sector often does ok at the final R&D. But real innovation comes from government and from public/private partnerships.

The playing field is far from level, when all the external costs of fossil fuel use remain external. Green energy will soon be competing anyway, though.
08:53 PM on 08/01/2011
With a series of turbines, the Mississippi could power a lot of the cities along its banks. The Gulf Stream could power the whole east coast.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
11:08 AM on 08/02/2011
With an average flow rate of 20,000 tons per second, dropping only 200m from cairo to the gulf of mexico, the power available from the mississippi is much less than 80GW. Maybe you could extract 5GW from it?
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
06:31 PM on 08/02/2011
On the gulf stream - the mass flow is 100 million tons per second, with no drop, but its slow speed of only about 2 meters per second, means its power in kinetic energy is 200GW. How much could be tapped? Surely no more than about 10GW. Owing to slow speed, it's not able to make a big contribution to US energy demand.
04:13 AM on 08/03/2011
Water is heavy and 100 times thicker than air. A slow moving propeller would generate lots of power. A large turbine would be geared to turn at any speed desired. The Gulf Stream is very large and very large turbines would be used.

http://inhabitat.com/underwater-power-generating-ocean-turbines/
10:45 PM on 07/23/2011
I suggest also that there are 100s of 1000s of falls up and down the fall lines of the Appalachians, the Rockies and the Sierras, not to mention other ridge systems. The fall line of the Appalachians powered the Industrial Revolution. There are uncounted millponds, grist mills, millraces, small dams, etc. left over from that Revolution up and down the fall line going to waste. Wonder why nobody ever even thought of it. And then there are the canals. All custom-made for local generation of hydro power with small local turbines.

Also, this technology has been around for 40 years or more. So much for "progress."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
I DO NOT pity the fool
06:07 PM on 07/23/2011
It is difficult to get investment money during these tough times. Flowing water hydro is a very promising power source, with many areas that have the resources for it. Ocean currents are another place for these machines. Driving Ocean Energy Innovation in Scotland | Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine Article
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
05:32 AM on 07/22/2011
I'll bet that if we build an interractive grid that recognizes network
protocal numbers from solar pannels plugged into it that one panel
in the top of every car plugged into parking meter type feeds to the
grid times millions pluss rooftop stationary panels on garages and
houses identified the same could power this nation. Add wind and
water power to the mix and we do not need a centralized powered grid.
Switching and battery storage stations much like telephone switching
centers in every town could control transfer of grid power between areas
automatically.
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
06:25 PM on 07/21/2011
A major advantage of this type of approach to energy generation is that it does not rely on a large and localized reservoir of potential energy which can cause great damage if suddenly released.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
11:57 AM on 07/21/2011
Any sailor can tell you that with proper tacking of the sails that
a ship can sail against the wind. This is not perpetual motion.
It is using known laws of physics and getting a positive result.
What could that ship do if you add solar and warer prop generators
to the mix?
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
11:25 PM on 07/21/2011
It is not perpetual motion. It is wind power.

The answer: from the solar panels, have LED lights on at night, from the drag from the underwater turbine, lose the race.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
04:55 AM on 07/22/2011
Do not use the water turbines while sailing. Charge batteries
when the boat is idle. Run your electric motor from them when sailing.
Bet you could charge all night and fish all day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Herren
"Human action is purposeful behavior."
07:29 PM on 07/20/2011
Ah, yes, those bedeviling low energy prices. We must put an end to those.
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
08:32 PM on 07/20/2011
They are leaving on their own, due to market forces, we don't have to do a thing to bring it about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Herren
"Human action is purposeful behavior."
12:14 AM on 07/21/2011
I was just quoting the article's description of energy prices.... yes, with advances in technologies costs are coming down naturally, but the subsidies continue through both grants, mandates of use and taxation policies on energy sources deemed 'bad' ... those are hardly market forces.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
01:17 AM on 08/11/2011
If they are the cost of pollution and disasters from fossil and nukes, yes.

fortunately solar wind waste bio fuels and underwater turbines are cheaper and ready.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
02:04 PM on 07/20/2011
The cumulative power of constant flow has got to be better thai intermitent wind
and half day sunlight. The torque of water weight against propellers ought to be
able to be geared to turn generators at faster rates. If that weight against the prop
can generate enough torque to excede the resistance of the boat against the surface
of the water like a hydroplane, then it might be possible to do the theoreticaly impossible
and move upstream. Wouldn't that be a whoot?
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
02:49 AM on 07/21/2011
I'm afraid you need to check for updates again. Perpetual motion is not real.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
11:36 AM on 07/21/2011
It is not perpetual motion. It is using known laws of physice and
getting a positive result. But then it doesnt come out on the balance
sheets of priffit takers as a positive result for them, so it must be
impossible. Now that is the hoot.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
12:43 PM on 07/20/2011
Feel free, but remember the power extracted scales as flow speed cubed, and so typical river flows are highly unsuitable for substantial power extraction.

2 m/s flow, with a 1-square-meter turbine could generate only a few kW. A 40kW turbine either needs a faster flow, or to be big. Cost scales as weight, so natural flow hydro is looking to be very expensive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
08:40 PM on 07/20/2011
New, proprietary technology, ends this problem. Generators have been designed that are 90% efficient at any speed.

They will deliver constant voltage and constant frequency. Only the current varies with the speed.

The physics is conventional. Proof of concept has been completed. A 5 kW prototype program is planned. That will be followed by scaling to a Megawatt.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
02:08 AM on 07/21/2011
Mr Perpetual Motion! I'm so glad you're here. What would we do without you?

Generator efficiency is not the problem. It's the low kinetic energy density in natural river flows, and the high cost of marine engineering. A megawatt river turbine would need to be 20-m in diameter.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckjr2000
been there done that & tired of it
11:39 AM on 07/20/2011
These are the sort of ideas that deserve to be investigated and subsidized as R & D by our Government. Not spending 9 times as much for a Solar Generating Plant as oppose to an equivalent Gas Generating Plant. If they were really interested in developing "Green Energy" they, the Government and the Activists, would put the money into R & D not over priced pet programs that will not cover our needs as a Nation.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
01:57 PM on 07/20/2011
If you think solar's expensive, you can't have costed dangling your turbine in the river.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
I DO NOT pity the fool
07:42 PM on 07/23/2011
Might want to update the rhetoric. GE Sees Solar Cheaper Than Fossil Power in Five Years - Bloomberg
 Since it takes years to build a power plant for fossil fuels, by the time it is ready it will not be economical.
  Cost of Wind Power — Kicks Coal’s Butt, Better than Natural Gas (& Could Power Your EV for $0.70/gallon) | CleanTechnica
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckjr2000
been there done that & tired of it
10:16 AM on 07/25/2011
GE Solar, CleanTechnica? Let me guess. You must ask the Unions on how best to control the Unions!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
11:11 AM on 07/20/2011
Wish they had discussed more about wildlife (fish etc.) and how to avoid kills-putting screens up?
And are they deep enough that watercraft won't crash into them?
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
10:57 AM on 07/20/2011
Seems to me that a generator muck like an outboard engine in reverse
can be developed. Retreivable docks in the back of semi's could have
many of them hanging off the sides. Hook then to th grid and sell the
power to the electric company. Could a couple guys with some mechanical
knowhow run their own portable rig. Move it around as conditions dictate.
I'll bet it would work like a charm.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
02:55 AM on 07/21/2011
That seems to be what the alaskan power utility did with a barge.

It's possibly viable if there's a fast river, and a small remote community. The worry is that the ropes break, and the guys lose the $200,000 of equipment that generates 10kW. You can get the same power from a $2000 portable generator.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
11:27 AM on 07/21/2011
I am talking about supplying new energy to an intelligent grid system for a profit.
I beleive that consumers can both supply and use the energy that we need without
central power systems, if the grid is designed for it. Solar, Wind, and Water can
all be used by an immaginative population with the entrepreneurial desire to do so.