More

Obama Calls Democratic Leaders To White House For Debt Ceiling Talks

Obama Democrats White House Meeting Debt

By ANDREW TAYLOR   07/20/11 01:56 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama is summoning top Democrats from the House and Senate to the White House Wednesday afternoon for talks on raising the nation's debt ceiling.

White House spokesman Jay Carney says the meeting will take place shortly before 3 p.m. EDT. When asked why Obama was not meeting with Republicans, Carney would only say there were no other meetings to announce.

Wednesday's meeting comes as a new bipartisan budget plan is emerging in the Senate. The "Gang of Six" plan would slash the deficit by almost $4 trillion over a decade through a mix of spending cuts and new tax revenues. Obama has praised the plan.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

The top Democrat in the House reacted positively to a new bipartisan budget plan emerging in the Senate, even as a top House GOP military hawk said it would cut defense way too much.

Asked about the budget unveiled Tuesday by the Senate's "Gang of Six" at a brief appearance with reporters Wednesday morning, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said, "It has some good principles in it."

The group's budget, which would slash the deficit by almost $4 trillion over a decade through a mix of spending cuts and new tax revenues, has also earned praise from President Barack Obama and many senators.

But House Armed Services Committee Chairman Howard "Buck" McKeon, R-Calif., blasted the Gang of Six plan in a missive to his panel members, saying it would cut the Pentagon way too deeply and would unfairly curb military health and retirement benefits.

"This proposal raises serious implications for defense and would not allow us to perform our constitutional responsibility to provide for the safety and security of our country," McKeon wrote in a memo to panel Republicans.

The mixed reviews came as an impasse in Washington over how to raise the nation's borrowing cap to avoid a default on U.S. obligations dragged on with less than two weeks to an Aug. 2 deadline.

On Tuesday, the House doubled down on a symbolic vote to condition any increase in the government's borrowing authority on congressional passage of a balanced budget constitutional amendment and a fresh wave of spending cuts. In the Senate, however, many Republicans warmed to a new bipartisan budget plan revealed a thawing in GOP attitudes on new tax revenues.

The plan by the Gang of Six is far too complicated and contentious to advance before an Aug. 2 deadline to avoid a default that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and other experts warn would shake the markets, drive up interest rates and threaten to take the country back into a recession. But the plan's authors clearly hope it could serve as a template for a "grand bargain" later in the year that could erase perhaps $4 trillion from the deficit over the coming decade.

Speaking on the Senate floor Wednesday morning, Democratic leader Harry Reid said he was confident Obama and congressional negotiators could avoid a government default, but the Senate still needed to hear from the House.

"We have a plan to go forward over here so I await word from the Speaker," said the Nevada lawmaker, who also mentioned that he spoke to Obama Tuesday night. Reid was referring to a plan he's working on with GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky to give Obama new powers to obtain an increase in the borrowing cap unless overridden by Congress.

In the House, the 234-190 vote Tuesday to pass the House GOP "cut, cap and balance" plan reflected the strength of tea party forces elected in last year's midterm election. GOP conservatives reveled in their victory, however temporary it may be, since the plan faces a White House veto threat and is a dead letter in the Senate anyway.

"Let me be clear. This is the compromise. This is the best plan out there," said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, head of a conservative House group known as the Republican Study Committee.

The GOP measure would impose an estimated $111 billion in immediate spending cuts next year and would cap overall spending at levels called for in the House's April budget plan, backed up by the threat of automatic spending cuts. But what conservatives like most about it is its requirement that Congress approve a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution – a step that requires a two-thirds vote in both House and Senate – before any increase in the current $14.3 trillion debt limit can be shipped to Obama.

The balanced budget amendment requires limiting the size of government to 18 percent of the size of the economy, sparking a furious assault from Democrats who say it would force Medicare cuts much deeper than the controversial House GOP budget plan that passed in April – which cut spending to 20 percent of the gross domestic product.

"The most elementary budget arithmetic dictates that you cannot limit the federal budget to 18 percent of GDP and continue to sustain Medicare," said Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa.

Now that the House has blown off steam, Obama said Tuesday that he wants to "start talking turkey" with top congressional leaders like House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. A White House meeting had yet to be scheduled, though Obama seemed to hint one could take place Wednesday.

Reid has lined up behind a controversial McConnell plan to allow Obama to order up as much as $2.5 trillion in new debt without approval by Congress, which could only block the administration from issuing new debt if Congress disapproves by a veto-proof two-thirds margin in both House and Senate.

In exchange, Reid wants to attach to the McConnell plan a requirement for a bipartisan panel of 12 lawmakers to negotiate on a compromise that could come up for a vote later this year.

The Gang of Six plan promises almost $4 trillion in deficit cuts, including an immediate 10-year, $500 billion down payment that would come as Congress sets caps on the agency budgets it passes each year. It also requires an additional $500 billion in cost curbs on federal health care programs, cuts to federal employee pensions, curbs in the growth of military health care and retirement costs, and modest cuts to farm subsidies.

It also requires a major influx of new tax revenues as Congress overhauls the loophole-choked U.S. tax code. It calls for getting rid of myriad tax loopholes, preferences and deductions and using the savings to sharply lower income tax rates. But $1 trillion to $2 trillion would be skimmed off the top and used to reduce the deficit, depending on who does the calculations.

House GOP leaders were muted in their criticism and pointed to promised reductions in income tax rates rather than the net increase in overall tax collections.

"On the positive side, the tax rates identified in the Gang's plan – with a top rate of no more than 29 percent – and the president's endorsement of them are a positive development and an improvement over previous discussions," House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., said. "That said, I am concerned with the Gang of Six's revenue target."

The tax reform outline would set up three income tax rates – a bottom rate of 8-12 percent, a middle rate of 14-22 percent and top rate of 23-29 percent – to replace the current system, which has a bottom rate of 10 percent with five additional rates, topping out at 35 percent. It would reduce but not eliminate tax breaks on mortgage interest, higher-cost health plans, charitable deductions, retirement savings and families with children.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,949
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (75 total)
  1 of 6  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Bumpkins 02:21 PM on 07/20/2011
Man the Republicans will throw a party, after what I read in the story........The ploan as it stands now, cuts all social progtams, including Social Security and Medicare. It gives the wealthy and corporation a 6 per cent tax cut. The tax cut reduces the tax per cent from 355 to 29%. The other 300 million get nothing. More, stick it to the people. If you want to raise taxes on the uber wealthy, it will take  Read More...
04:24 AM on 07/22/2011
The president should be given the power to increase the debt limit to any extent he wishes, then we should vote Obama out of office and a Republican into office.

Interesting how the Democrats would howl.
RSK1177
Concerned
11:30 PM on 07/21/2011
yozampj.....The numbers you provided, if correct, are for the eight years that Bush was in office. I'll bet that you don't have numbers for Obama's travel in the two and a half years that he's been traveling at taxpayers' expense! He's probably on a pace that will exceed Bush's travels and in only four years!
photo
sus2222
My micro-biology is FULL
11:08 PM on 07/21/2011
I see Republicans OBSTRUCTING the American People's PROGRESS.
I see endless chatter about JOBS ( but I do NOT SEE any jobs, except in China ).
Lots of accusations.
These guys want to keep THEIR Health Insurance but NOT YOU.
They want vacations and big salaries and do NOT care about you.
If Ron Paul can BALANCE the DEBT ( without destroying Social Security & Medicare
plus decriminalize pot, he gets my vote
09:10 PM on 07/21/2011
The ultimate grandstanding President. Above the fray... above the politics that have corrupted Washington, PLEASE!!! This guy sees a political opportunity and tries to make it his own. Calling meetings everyday until a deal is reached? Get outta here!! If he was so inclined to do anything about the debt, where was his call to action during his State of the Union address?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CTtransplant
"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we gro
04:55 PM on 07/21/2011
I am getting upset by those who continue to say that Social Security and Medicare are 'entitlements' paid for by our taxes!  They are NOT!  Educate yourself!  Social Security and Medicare are NOT 'entitleme­nts'...we pay for them out of OUR GROSS SALARIES..  They are NOT part of the budget.  They are NOT part of the deficit.  They are NOT part of the revenues (which come from TAXES, by the way).  And they are NOT part of the debt ceiling!

WHY  do people believe everything they hear without questionin­g it? And many of you are being mislead because you do not question these falsehoods!
12:34 PM on 07/21/2011
Social Security and Medicare is something EVERY American should be able to depend on.

did I say EVERY? Republican, Democrat, Independent, Libertarian, Socialist, Vegetarian, Agnostics....
02:24 PM on 07/21/2011
as a supplement- not their total income
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CTtransplant
"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we gro
03:22 PM on 07/21/2011
Unfortunately, with the recent Wall Street debacle, many have LOST their retirement funds...so that this IS their total income...
12:21 PM on 07/21/2011
The CCB legislation passed by the House should be sent to the Senate to start the process of negotiation leading to a version that can be passed by both houses of Congress. Putting constraints on the ability of the federal government to grow and continue this uncontrolled borrowing and spending is absolutely essential to beginning the process of fixing this financial mess our elected officials have created for this country. What is really irritating, even with this CCB legislation, is that our legislators are only focusing on reductions in PLANNED spending and no cuts in the size and cost of our existing bloated federal government. How wrong is that? There is so much duplication and overlap in our current government bureaucracy that could be eliminated which would quickly cut costs and improve the efficiency of government service. Government just adds, never really cuts, the size of the bureaucracy and that is a root cause issue in our debt crises.
12:14 PM on 07/21/2011
Entitlements spending on food stamps, unemployment, housing assistance, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security was 58% of 2010 budget of $3.77 trillion
58% = $2.19 trillion. Total revenue brought into federal coffins including payroll tax’s was $2.15 trillion.
Entitlements our not controlled by the president. It takes and act of congress.
Our future, our children’s future, and our country is in trouble. All we get out of Washington,
is name calling, false accusations and rhetoric.
Elected officials need to vote, in what they believe will help this country. Not by what their party tells them to.
02:25 PM on 07/21/2011
I don't think keeping america dependent on govt handouts is helping anyone
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CTtransplant
"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we gro
03:26 PM on 07/21/2011
Educate yourself!  Social Security and Medicare are NOT 'entitlements'...we pay for them our of OUR SALARIES..  They are NOT part of the budget.  They are NOT part of the deficit.  They are NOT part of the revenues (which come from TAXES, by the way).  And they are NOT part of the debt ceiling!

WHY  do people believe everything they hear without questioning it?  And your comment tells me you believe and do not question these falsehoods!
11:32 AM on 07/21/2011
W are currently paying .42 cents on every dollar borrowed. Stop the madness. Get this bill Cu tCap and Balance through. A small first step but it is solid on middle class businesses, The elderly on our war heros!
photo
baldwjo
Rehabilitating Liberals..One by one!
11:13 AM on 07/21/2011
If only there was a way to harness all of Obama's hot air .. Instant energy independence!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
noknrc
happy to be retired
12:28 PM on 07/21/2011
This could account for this countries present heat wave!!
10:40 AM on 07/21/2011
Can't find ways to reduce the national debt? Look at this:


Members of Congress are set to pay themselves $90 million to increase their franked mailings for the 2010 election year.[32]
Congress has ignored efficiency recommendations from the Department of Health and Human Services that would save $9 billion annually.[33]
Taxpayers are funding paintings of high-ranking government officials at a cost of up to $50,000 apiece.[34]
The state of Washington sent $1 food stamp checks to 250,000 households in order to raise state caseload figures and trigger $43 million in additional federal funds.[35]
Suburban families are receiving large farm subsidies for the grass in their backyards -- subsidies that many of these families never requested and do not want. [36]
Congress appropriated $20 million for "commemoration of success" celebrations related to Iraq and Afghanistan.[37]
Homeland Security employee purchases include 63-inch plasma TVs, iPods, and $230 for a beer brewing kit.[38]
Two drafting errors in the 2005 Deficit Reduction Act resulted in a $2 billion taxpayer cost.[39]
North Ridgeville, Ohio, received $800,000 in "stimulus" funds for a project that its mayor described as "a long way from the top priority."[40]
The National Institutes of Health spends $1.3 million per month to rent a lab that it cannot use.[41]
Congress recently spent $2.4 billion on 10 new jets that the Pentagon insists it does not need and will not use.[42]
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CTtransplant
"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we gro
03:29 PM on 07/21/2011
Not to mention the monies appropriated to 'save azaleas'!!!  What are these people thinking????  Or are they thinking!!!!


photo
baldwjo
Rehabilitating Liberals..One by one!
10:34 AM on 07/21/2011
Just more hot air from the most inept, corrupt, scoundrel to ever occupy the white house!

Jimmy Carter sleeps much better now days!
10:53 AM on 07/21/2011
And he gave americans something they wanted....peanuts!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
noknrc
happy to be retired
10:25 AM on 07/21/2011
Obama's plan for increasing revenue will be a negative for many working middle class families. Removing the mortgage interest deduction alone will not allow families to use the availability of itemized deductions. This will increase the taxes that the middle class pays much more then most people think. This move will also kill the housing market. What would the purpose of buying a home at this point. It would be just as easy to rent.
10:30 AM on 07/21/2011
exactly! i hope all these middle class folks who pay no taxes (probably bc of the itemized decutions) pay attention bc maybe they soon will pay taxes
10:41 AM on 07/21/2011
"Churchstreet you are my fan"...But I am middle class self employed. I pay 42 per cent of my income between Federal and my state income tax..So you cannot generalize
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lowrodiay65
01:25 PM on 07/21/2011
I believe you are misleading people with your post about losing mortgage interest deduction . I believe it is for multi-million dollar and second homes.
photo
baldwjo
Rehabilitating Liberals..One by one!
10:13 AM on 07/21/2011
The president calls members of the Democratic party of "YES" we can bankrupt America to white house meeting! I am thrilled!
10:42 AM on 07/21/2011
Settle for nothing less the what the people want! Congress passed bipartisan The Cut Cap and Balance Bill! It protects seniors and vets from cuts by exemption!