'Project Nim' Explores An Experiment To Make A Monkey Human

Project Nim

By CHRISTY LEMIRE   07/19/11 10:22 PM ET   AP

-- The baby was taken from his mother's arms when he was only a few days old and whisked away to a distant place where he knew no one.

Those who surrounded and raised him insisted they had his best interest in mind, even as the fragile relationship they forged with him evolved in a way that made their lofty goals difficult. Eventually he grew up and was dumped – lost, lonely and friendless – back where he started.

Such a life would seem horrific for a child. As "Project Nim" reveals, this was the sad and mixed-up existence of a chimpanzee who was raised as a child – until his animal instincts became too overpowering, and it became painfully obvious that the people in charge of him had no idea what they were doing.

Director James Marsh, who won the documentary-feature Oscar for 2008's "Man on Wire," takes on yet another story of astounding human behavior; while he crafted that film about tightrope-walker Philippe Petit with the thrills of a heist flick, "Project Nim," an animal tale, plays like an engrossing, dramatic biography.

Marsh has interviewed the key players from this bold experiment from the 1970s, most of whom look back with a clear-eyed combination of fondness and regret. You get the sense that their intentions were honorable – at least, at first. You also get the sense that Marsh isn't judging them – that he's letting them tell their version of what happened to Nim, and letting us draw our own conclusions. He includes some period-rich reenactments (for cohesion, perhaps?) but he didn't need them. He's already got an engaging supply of video footage, photos and present-day recollections.

Columbia University psychology professor Herbert Terrace wanted to see what would happen if a chimpanzee were raised among people and taught sign language – whether there would be a breakthrough in the study of communication between humans and animals. If there is a villain to be found in "Project Nim," it's Terrace, who comes off to this day as aloof and indifferent to the damage he's done. And yet, there he is, willingly sharing his memories of those years with great detail.

Terrace got help from various "mothers": friends, assistants and teachers who took care of Nim and worked with him from his earliest days. They changed his diapers and dressed him in cute little polyester leisure suits. They concocted games and ran around the yard with him; the sign Nim made up for the word "play" – a quick, single clap of the hands – was his lifelong favorite. Stephanie LaFarge, the woman who first housed him on Manhattan's Upper West Side with her husband and their seven kids, even went so far as to breastfeed the chimp.

Well, it was the `70s – and the film has plenty of those it-was-the-'70s moments. Bob Ingersoll, who ended up becoming one of Nim's great champions, even acknowledged he'd rather spend time with the chimp than Jerry Garcia.

But like the experiment itself, "Project Nim" morphs from something inspiring and often humorous to a pointed and disturbing portrait of arrogance run amok. Greed and glory end up overriding decency and altruism, and it's heartbreaking to watch.

"Project Nim" ends on a vaguely uplifting note, but not before shaking you up and making you ponder what humanity is really all about.

"Project Nim," a Roadside Attractions release, is rated PG-13 for some strong language, drug content, thematic elements and disturbing images. Running time: 93 minutes. Three and a half stars out of four.

___

Motion Picture Association of America rating definitions:

G – General audiences. All ages admitted.

PG – Parental guidance suggested. Some material may not be suitable for children.

PG-13 – Special parental guidance strongly suggested for children under 13. Some material may be inappropriate for young children.

R – Restricted. Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.

NC-17 – No one under 17 admitted.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CULTURE

-- The baby was taken from his mother's arms when he was only a few days old and whisked away to a distant place where he knew no one. Those who surrounded and raised him insisted they had his best ...
-- The baby was taken from his mother's arms when he was only a few days old and whisked away to a distant place where he knew no one. Those who surrounded and raised him insisted they had his best ...
Filed by Gazelle Emami  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LouiseM
One of the most cynical optimists you'll ever meet
02:21 AM on 07/21/2011
Who edits these articles? Does anyone read them except the author?

"Terrace got help from various "mothers": friends, assistants and teachers who took care of Nim and worked with him from his earliest days. They changed his diapers and dressed him in cute little polyester leisure suits. They concocted games and ran around the yard with him; the sign Nim made up for the word "play" – a quick, single clap of the hands – was his lifelong favorite. " Terrace, the professor, had assistants, mothers, friends take care of him? He needed his diapers changed? Put him in "cute little polyester leisure suits." After three increasingly confusing sentences, I eventually realized that the author was discussing *Nim*. It was just that whoever edited the article did such a exceedingly slipshod job that they released when it was incomprehensible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
8thplane
progression toward unity of mankind!
11:42 PM on 07/20/2011
I'm sorry Mitch that it didn't work out. That explain's it. They forgot the brain!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sensimilla
Lead with your heart, and your mind will follow...
02:05 PM on 07/20/2011
can't believe am the first to say this: Chimpanzees are APES NOT MONKEYS!

more evidence of HP writing and copy editing going down the tubes..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builder101
VOTE!
01:39 PM on 07/20/2011
They renamed Nim to Bachmann and set her free.
photo
papapj
..light as a feather..
06:33 PM on 07/20/2011
Chortle, chortle...guffaw, guffaw!
photo
ProCynic
Those that govern intend to be our masters.
01:13 PM on 07/20/2011
Those who know me, know that I am a lover and supporter of the great apes. I see, in their eyes, the distant kinship and the intelligence that lies underneath. But, they are not human. Their crime is to be too closely related to us to make us think we could do something like this to them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic Tor
08:56 PM on 07/20/2011
And the second crime is never stopping to think "Why would they want to be?". Seems like chimps have it all figured out compared to us, anyway. :-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LisaCACO
someone ate my micro-bio!
12:52 PM on 07/20/2011
I'm already heartbroken. they stole his chimp from his family and placed him with an assortment of human surrogates. wrong, wrong, wrong.
10:03 AM on 07/20/2011
By making a monkey human, do they mean changing its mental mindset or literally, making it human? If the last one, that's pretty simple...unless they can change its DNA, it's not gonna be human.

If they meant changing its mental mindset, I think they would have some problems with that. Some humans act like beasts--or worse than beasts, because they know what they're doing is wrong. Some humans are very good-souled and act better than other people, saying everyone has a spark of decency deep within themselves. Some humans aren't good but aren't terrible either, choosing to be cruel or kind when they want to be. So which of the three I just listed is "being human"? Unless all three are, and a human mindset can fit into different spots.

I'm not trying to be rude or sarcastic...I'm just not quite sure what exactly the people had been aiming for, at the time of this experiment.
07:51 PM on 07/20/2011
Did you really feel that reading the headline was sufficient for you to comment? Read the article. This is not about genetic alteration.