More

Government's New Electronics Stewardship Strategy Not Strong Enough, Experts Say

Electronics Stewardship

First Posted: 07/21/11 02:28 PM ET Updated: 09/20/11 06:12 AM ET

On Wednesday, the U.S. government launched a new initiative to push for the responsible and sustainable management of electronic products -- from greener design and greater energy efficiency for new products to the increased reuse and recycling of older electronics.

"This is an important effort at an important time," U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa P. Jackson said at a press conference Wednesday introducing the National Strategy for Electronics Stewardship. There are "serious health, environmental and economic consequences of inaction," she warned.

However, some promoters of e-waste recycling don’t think the new federal efforts are enough, especially when it comes to keeping used and often hazardous electronics out of the hands of workers in developing countries.

Announced by Jackson along with other government and industry leaders at ROUND2, an electronics recycling center in Austin, Texas, the new strategy includes voluntary commitments from Dell Inc., Sprint and Sony Electronics to promote environmentally sound management of used electronics, including the expansion of product take-back agreements and assurance that the companies will only use certified recyclers such as ROUND2.

The plan, a collaborative effort that includes the EPA and the General Services Administration, which supplies office equipment and space to other federal agencies, also outlines some specific actions that will be taken by the government, including a movement towards ratifying the Basel Convention, an agreement among countries to control imports and exports of hazardous wastes.

But Barbara Kyle, national coordinator of the Electronics TakeBack Coalition in San Francisco, warned that complying with the convention doesn't go far enough.

"They talk about ratifying the Basel Convention but don't include the most important part: the amendment that says you can't export hazardous waste to developing nations," she added.

Of the nearly 2.5 million tons of electronic waste generated by Americans every year, only about 20 percent is collected for recycling, according to government estimates. At least half of these TVs, computers, cell phones and other gadgets are shipped off to developing countries in Asia and Africa, according to Electronics TakeBack, places where unsophisticated disassembly methods expose workers to lead, mercury and other chemicals that have been linked to a range of health problems.

Kyle also critiqued the strategy's focus on providing incentives and technical expertise to exporters and developing countries to increase the recycling of used electronics.

“It's a myth that we can just make sure it goes to a responsible facility in a developing country and that it will be okay," said Kyle. "The Federal government has missed a huge opportunity to lead by example and promote jobs in the U.S.”

But Kyle lauded parts of the broader initiative, including a GSA commitment to limit the purchasing of IT equipment that does not comply with energy efficiency standards.

"As the country's biggest purchaser of electronics, it is encouraging that the Federal government is using its buying power to promote the right thing,” said Kyle. “If we could marshal the purchasing power of everyone buying this stuff to demand greener products, that would be game-changing."

Kyle was also impressed by the federal effort to promote greener electronics design, an area she calls “hugely under-resourced." In the new plan, multi-stakeholder groups will address key research questions and design challenges to make recycling worn out electronics easier -- and even organize prize competitions to encourage innovation.

“Improved design for recycling is desperately needed in the electronics space,” added Ken Beyer, CEO and co-founder of CloudBlue Technologies, Inc, a Georgia-based e-waste management company that was one of the first electronics recycling companies to receive the e-Stewards certification, a project of the nonprofit Basel Action Network that accredits e-cyclers.

Beyer said that with the previous lack of federal legislation, his company and others had to find alternatives such as e-Stewards to demonstrate to clients that they adhere to high standards of environmental responsibility and worker protection when recycling electronics.

"The federal government had been very difficult to make inroads in," Beyer said. “We’ve been working on this for several years and its great to see the EPA step up with a detailed and tangible plan of action."

While Beyer said he thought the new strategy should be "helpful," he added that it is "not as specific as we'd like to see." Like Kyle, Beyer said that the government's commitment towards ratifying the Basel Convention was too weak.

One key issue is that the government still doesn't have a good grasp on how much e-waste is moving out of the country.

“The fundamental first step in dealing with international waste issues is to get a better handle on what is going for legitimate recycling and for not-so-legitimate recycling," Jackson said during the press conference. She added that the government is working with several nations to better track e-waste.

Poor recycling practices "is resulting in some fairly egregious impacts on human health,” she said, noting that electronics have "the whole periodic table of elements in them."

Jackson also emphasized the importance of procuring these precious metals, rare earth elements, plastic and glass at home. "Companies like ROUND2 can make money by making us more sustainable and self sufficient," she said. "The engines of our economy run best when they run clear."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

On Wednesday, the U.S. government launched a new initiative to push for the responsible and sustainable management of electronic products -- from greener design and greater energy efficiency for new p...
On Wednesday, the U.S. government launched a new initiative to push for the responsible and sustainable management of electronic products -- from greener design and greater energy efficiency for new p...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:23 PM on 07/22/2011
We are insane to waste, to dump our "used up" stuff. eWaste is 3 times richer "ore" than the best natural ores for half a dozen or more precious metals. Human poo along can supply 10% of our energy needs. Waste bio fuels are the key to our green future. We need them to "backup" solar and wind. Dumps are an obsolete concept. Nothing should go to waste.
06:39 PM on 07/22/2011
There is certainly a lack of education on circular economy. Look at a new project that Renault is running based on redesigning the future of mobility: http://ecomobility.tv/2011/07/21/project-redesign-renault-internship-future-mobility/
10:54 AM on 07/22/2011
Mining e-waste for rare earth minerals makes more sense than mining the deep sea for them.
08:01 AM on 07/22/2011
We need smarter design. Did you see the documentary about the barges of electronic waste being shipped to China where they break it down to its precious metals and the toxic waste it is bringing to their waters. We also need to change from being a consumer driven society to a conservation driven one.
09:04 AM on 07/22/2011
"We also need to change from being a consumer driven society to a conservati­on driven one."

AMEN!
11:44 PM on 07/21/2011
E-waste is certainly hazardous and ought to be recycled. But I'm not sure how it makes legal sense to make one country (USA) responsible for making sure waste doesn't end up in another (developing nations). Should the US also have jurisdiction over other crimes committed in those countries? Besides, even knowing that e-waste is harzardous, recycling it for the valuable metals provides what precious little income recycling workers in developing nations receive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Organic-Guy
Organic Gardener, Carpenter, Philosopher, Agitator
09:44 AM on 07/22/2011
Seems you've given this article a misread. what we can do and already try and do is not let the stuff leave the country once here. We already have laws against it but enforcement needs to step up. There's corruption involved. Being some one who ships containers and pallets overseas from time to time I can tell everyone first hand that with all the documentation you have to have already it's very hard to slip something through in mass quantities as is happening now. Payoffs to people to so they'll look the other way have to be taking place.
The products in question are full of valuable base materials we should be reclaiming and reusing and if there's enough reselling as raw materials. My dad had a business doing just that back in the sixties and seventies. We took apart everything electronic you can imagine and it was full of gold, silver, platinum, aluminum, steel, copper you name it. Did you know that recycling aluminum cans save 90% of the energy that it takes to make a new one, not to mention it stops all the wasteful mining and environmental damage that goes a long with it.
01:49 PM on 07/22/2011
If there are such large financial incentives for recycling this stuff (and I heartily agree that there are), why do Americans ship it abroad? It must be more economically advantageous to sell it to developing countries, especially if people are jumping through hoops to do it (ie bribing customs officials).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:28 PM on 07/21/2011
Yup. The fed gov could do a whole lot more about this. I worked for a federal conservation agency. Our area office got new computers with flat screen monitors a few years ago. We had about 18 big old CRT monitors. When I asked our state financial officer if we could give these to a used computer store (they would take them) I was told no, they couldn't be given to a business who might make a profit from them. We could give them to schools but schools didn't want them. Employees couldn't even take one home. We were advised to just put one in the dumpster each week. I wouldn't do that. For $25/each there was a company who'd take them for recycling but we couldn't pay that (no idea where they would have gone to). Far as I know these old monitors are still sitting under tables or in the storage room. The fed gov goes through probably more IT equipment than anyone and the recycling effort is pathetic.
photo
Moose Luck 99
Rand Paul is a LIAR!
10:17 PM on 07/21/2011
The good news is lead free speakers are now available and more components are going lead free.

RoHS (Lead Free) PCB Assembly - Screaming Circuits
www.screamingcircuits.com/Home/LeadFree - Cached
Our Lead free pcb assembly service utilizes special assembly procedures to assure compliance with Lead-Free and RoHS pcb assembly standards. ...

RoHS Compliance Impacts PCB Assembly, Electronic Manufacturing ...
www.meccompanies.com/rohs-compliance-pcb-assembly.html - Cached
RoHS Compliance impact on electronic manufacturing services including lead free and rohs compliant PCB Assembly and PCB Design.

RoHS Compliant Lead-Free PCB Assembly PCB Design
www.meccompanies.com/rohs-ledfree-pcb-assembly.html - Cached
RoHS Compliant, Lead-Free, PCB Assembly and PCB Design from MEC
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Shaffer
50 yo US citizen, 25 year resident in Bilbao Spain
04:11 PM on 07/21/2011
Ain't consumerism grand!? They keep making things cheaper and cheaper that last less and less and meanwhile the trash keeps piling up. So we send tons and tons of toxic trash overseas, if that's the most economically expedient way to deal with it, why not, right? Near as I can tell your average american couldn't care less about the misery they distribute throughout the third world. As long as there's a profit or a savings. The USA is building more than an economic debt, it's building a karmic debt, and I don't think it will be longbefore
photo
disporting
Weapons not food, not homes, not shoes
03:03 PM on 07/21/2011
I see places to recycle all sorts of high tech stuff, but what about the other smaller things? Where do I recycle my broken headphones? We have battery, phone, computer recycling and they tell me that they can't recycle headphones or use the pieces from them, that they have to be thrown away. I still put them in the regular recycling, in hopes that someone on the other end can direct it to the proper place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
repetter
02:22 PM on 07/21/2011
With respect, who writes your headlines? "More Action Can be Done"? How about Action being Taken?
02:19 PM on 07/21/2011
Product Stewartship is a very simple concept in the way it is supposed to function. If you sell something, you also have to take it back when it's done being used. Electronics retailers would have to accept back the products sold to consumers. Wholesalers would have to accept back product sold to retailers, and manufacturers accept back product sold to wholesalers. The manufacturers can then reuse or sell the individual components and materials. These responsibilities can be outsourced to a third party, which for instance could then be contracted by Walmart, Target, and Best Buy to handle the collection/recovery of all three instead of each company handling it internally. It's a solution which allows flexibility but makes clear responsibility. Companies would design products which are more easily dismantled if they were responsible for doing the dismantling.

That should be the system employed, instead of half-measures like asking corporations nicely to try to help out for PR reasons.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
johnqpublik
02:14 PM on 07/21/2011
A couple years back, one of the networks did a piece on an E-waste village in China. You can find it online, its pretty sick.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sara Williams
02:20 PM on 07/21/2011
Actually, I think it's on Hulu under Documentaries. Gore's channel did it, whatever it's called.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
johnqpublik
photo
AdobePhsyko
This has to be the disease for you
01:58 PM on 07/21/2011
But , How are the children of Indonesia going to make a living ?