More

Atom Smasher Closes In On Elusive Higgs Boson Particle

Atom Smasher Higgs Boson Particle

JOHN HEILPRIN   07/25/11 05:29 PM ET   AP

GRENOBLE, France — Scientists will find a long-sought theoretical particle – or rule out that it exists – by the end of 2012, the director of the world's largest atom smasher predicted Monday.

Rolf Heuer, director of the European particle physics laboratory near Geneva, said his confidence was based on the latest findings from the $10 billion proton collider under the Swiss-French border.

"I would say we can settle the question, the Shakespearean question – 'to be or not to be' – end of next year," he told reporters at a major physics conference in Grenoble.

The Higgs boson isn't just any particle. It's the linchpin of the Standard Model of particle physics theory that explains the Big Bang, and is believed to give mass to other objects and creatures in the Universe.

Heuer said these are "exciting times" for particle physicists because of the latest findings among two separate teams of scientists at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research near Geneva, that he directs.

Scientists are starting to pinpoint the precise level of high energy where the Higgs boson is expected to be found. Smashing atoms at higher energy increases the likelihood that scientists has made it easier to examine the smallest particles and forces within the atom to reveal more about the make-up of matter and the universe.

"They have tested the Standard Model very well," Heuer said of CERN scientists. "They are now ready to bring us into uncharted territory. We are still missing the most wanted particle, the Higgs boson."

Fabio Zwirner, a physicist at the University of Padua, Italy, said there is "considerable excitement because of the many new results" at the conference, but physicists were still unsure whether they were seeing "hints" at finding the particle, or were running into statistical errors.

Ultimately, the collider aims to create conditions like they were 1 trillionth to 2 trillionths of a second after the Big Bang – which scientists think marked the creation of the universe billions of years ago.

Physicists also hope the collider will help them see and understand other suspected phenomena, such as dark matter, antimatter and supersymmetry. Dark matter has been theorized by scientists to account for missing mass and bent light in faraway galaxies. Scientists believe it makes galaxies spin faster.

Physicists once thought protons and neutrons were the smallest components of the atom's nucleus, but colliders showed they are made of quarks and gluons and that there are other forces and particles.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 415
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
geneandeddie59
Internationally unknown
12:53 PM on 07/27/2011
What would Dr. Evil do with the "God Particle"?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:49 AM on 07/27/2011
Waiting for Higgs.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
10:46 AM on 07/27/2011
Atom Smasher Closes In On 'God Particle'.... I reject this.....

Why do they have to call it a GOD PARTICLE?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cuoi
The obstacle is the path
09:15 AM on 07/27/2011
The 10 Billion Dollar Question...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RobertFromMN
Fiercely secular Luxemburgist
06:30 AM on 07/27/2011
By the end of 2012?... The Mayans predicted this!
Mr. President, we must not allow a mineshaft gap!!
photo
Progress2342
Liberal, Atheist Science Teacher
08:39 PM on 07/26/2011
I posted this explanation yesterday and got a good reception:

This article doesn't do a very good job at explaining the Higgs. Physicists have deivsed a theory called the Standard Model that successful­ly describes every single particle interactio­n. Because particle interactio­ns are what cause all forces and matter, this theory is very important. It accounts for all of the little subatomic particles and three of the four forces (electroma­gnetism, weak interactio­n, and nuclear force are all described by the SM, but gravity isn't). However, the SM doesn't account for mass: it has no way of explaining how particles get their mass. In the 1960s, British physicist Peter Higgs came up with a solution.

Higgs thought that there was a new type of particle, called the Higgs boson, that generates a field (area of influence) that covers the entire universe. Any particle within this field would acquire mass. When scientists entered the Higgs boson into the Standard Model equation, they discovered it fit in perfectly. I'll use this analogy to describe the Higgs: imagine President Obama walked into a room full of reporters. All of the reporters would abandon the people they were talking to prior to the president'­s arrival, and immediatel­y swarm around Obama. Imagine that the reporters were the Higgs field, and Obama and the others were particles. Obama would be the heaviest, because the Higgs field "conglomer­ates" around him. The other people (particles­) in the room would be light, because they aren't popular with the "reporters­".
06:57 PM on 07/26/2011
I'd really appreciate if no one drops the friggin thing allright. Aaaaaalthough.......Mmmhhhhhh......the thought of being instantly vaporized along with the friggin world does sound appealing!! On the bright side we would not know it, Just a shini big light and thhhhhhaaaats it!!!!!!
06:13 PM on 07/26/2011
More properly it should be referred to as the Most Holy of Hollies Particle. This comes with a word of caution. What if it turns out to be something entirely unexpected, like a tiny bit of Smurf fluff? Then what? Worse, what if it IS the God particle and it ends up getting really mad? I recommend we stick to less potentially volatile particles. The Friendly Pink Particle gets little attention. Why don't we investigate that one?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
abuckley23
Visit me at Planet Kibi!! Google it!
04:44 PM on 07/26/2011
If it caused the Big Bang which essentially was a massive explosion causing the genesis of our galaxy....maybe we shouldn't screw with it? What if someone drops it?!
12:46 PM on 07/26/2011
I hope that the answer won't be a huffpo answer. Headline reads, "Conclusion for the Search of the Elusive God Particle," Article reads, answers inconclusive come back in 6 months.
11:49 AM on 07/26/2011
This is something that I really dont agree with these guys doing.

Ana Mancini
12:30 PM on 07/26/2011
and you a physicist?
01:23 PM on 07/26/2011
Never even hinted that I was. Its just something I dont agree with them doing. Its my Opinion as it were.

Ana Mancini
12:51 PM on 07/26/2011
To the primitive mind, any sufficiently advanced technology would be indistinguishable from magic.

What's not to agree with? This is science that can lead to a whole new level of understanding of the universe. Imagine if one day we could have unlimited energy thanks to discoveries like this. I could imagine 50 years ago people like you would think you'd be mad making a phone call across the country on a device that fits in the palm of your hand and could play Angry Birds. It must be the devil's handiwork.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Insanity rules
01:38 PM on 07/26/2011
Who said Devils handy work??? Scientist can become myopic when working on a theory and ignore the unintentional consequences in order to find "truth". You can't prove that something doesn't exist, you can just say they don't exist or work like they thought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GhostOfFDR
You're on the slippery slope to socialism
11:14 AM on 07/26/2011
I hate the term "God Particle". There's at least some chance the Higgs exists.
12:25 PM on 07/26/2011
I like the alternate term "Pod Garticle".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Auracle
I'd rather be anything but ordinary, please
12:45 PM on 07/26/2011
Sounds rather sci-fi-ish :)
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
07:09 PM on 07/26/2011
I prefer "iPharticle"

I think it's available in the Genius section of iTunes
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tone67
Read the whole story
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hayduke1969
I warned you.
09:33 AM on 07/26/2011
Another poorly written, non-informative science article on HP. 93% of HP science pieces are published only for the purpose of creating a tantalizing yet misleading headline.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chipchuck
Rethink that...
09:40 AM on 07/26/2011
Awww, they should hire you, then. That way a guy with a Tim the Enchanter avatar can educate the masses.

WHAT....is your favorite color?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hayduke1969
I warned you.
12:56 PM on 07/26/2011
Who are you who are so wise in the ways of science?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tone67
Read the whole story
09:06 AM on 07/26/2011
wow, just in time for the mayan 2012 prophecy