iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

John Boehner Debt Ceiling Plan Unveiled Monday

John Boehner Debt Ceiling Plan

First Posted: 07/25/11 08:56 AM ET Updated: 09/24/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- In a blunt challenge to President Barack Obama, House Republicans drafted legislation Monday to avert a potentially devastating Aug. 2 government default - but along lines the White House has already dismissed. U.S. and world financial markets shrugged off the uncertainty.

"This is a city where compromise is becoming a dirty word," Obama lamented as congressional leaders groped for a way out of a looming crisis.

In stinging remarks a short while later on the Senate floor, the Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, urged the president to reconsider his position rather "than veto the country into default."

According to a GOP aide familiar with the emerging House bill, it would provide for an immediate $1 trillion increase in the government's $14.3 trillion debt limit in exchange for $1.2 trillion in cuts in federal spending.

The measure also envisions Congress approving a second round of spending cuts of $1.8 trillion or more in 2012, passage of which would trigger an additional $1.6 trillion in increased borrowing authority.

White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer called the proposal "not a serious attempt to avert default because it has no chance of passing the Senate."

While the bill marked a retreat from legislation that conservatives muscled through the House last week, the two-step approach runs afoul of Obama's insistence that lawmakers solve the current crisis in a way that avoids a politically charged rerun next year in the middle of the 2012 election campaign.

Without signed legislation by day's end on Aug. 2, the Treasury will be unable to pay all its bills, possibly triggering an unprecedented default that officials warn could harm an economy struggling to recover from the worst recession in decades.

That deadline has set off an epic clash between the two parties, each side maneuvering for public approval and political leverage in advance of next year's elections with the White House and control of Congress at stake.

House conservatives, many of them backed by tea party organizations, have provided the political muscle for the Republican drive to cut spending deeply in return for raising the debt limit.

But two rank-and-file Republicans said their constituents were voicing concerns other than the rising federal debt.

Rep. Tom Rooney, R-Fla., said his office is getting calls from constituents saying, "If I don't get my Social Security check, it's your fault."

Rep. Tom Reed, a New York freshman, said many of his constituents are telling him to stand firm in his drive to cut spending. "But I will admit there's some anxiety in the district" about Social Security and other programs, he added.

As House Speaker John Boehner readied his legislation, Senate Democratic leaders called a news conference to announce their own next steps.

The Democrats' measure would cut $2.7 trillion in federal spending and raise the debt limit by $2.4 trillion in one step - enough borrowing authority to meet Obama's bottom-line demand.

The cuts include $1.2 trillion from across a range of hundreds of government programs and $1 trillion in savings assumed to derive from the end of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The legislation also assumes creation of a special joint congressional committee to recommend additional savings with a guaranteed vote by Congress by the end of 2011.

"We shouldn't let these extremists dictate" the direction of the country, Reid said of the tea party-backed Republican lawmakers.

Yet in the maneuvering it appeared another of the president's long-held conditions appeared to be in danger of rejection.

Neither Boehner's measure nor the one Reid was drafting included additional revenue, according to officials in both parties.

In remarks during the day, the president renewed his call for a balanced approach to cutting deficits that includes both spending cuts and higher revenue.

The wealthy and big corporations have to "pay their fair share, too," he said.

In addition to a two-step approach to raising the debt limit, the House measure would require lawmakers in both houses to vote later this year on a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced federal budget.

An earlier bill, passed in the House last week but then scuttled in the Senate, would have required Congress to approve an amendment and send it to the states for ratification.

That same bill would have made $6 trillion in spending cuts in exchange for raising the debt limit.

Obama promised to veto that bill even before the House voted on it.

The day's developments followed a weekend that veered between brinkmanship and bipartisan negotiations.

After Boehner broke off compromise talks with Obama late Friday the president called the top four congressional leaders to the White House for a Saturday morning session.

That set the stage for fresh negotiations involving leadership aides - talks that Republicans later said had neared agreement on a two-step process that Obama has rejected.

Those efforts evidently were set back when Reid and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi met with Obama at the White House Sunday evening, and the Senate leader issued a statement saying talks had broken down over a Republican insistence on a short-term bill.

___

Associated Press writers Andrew Taylor, Donna Cassata, Alan Fram, Ben Feller and Jim Kuhnhenn contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON (AP) -- In a blunt challenge to President Barack Obama, House Republicans drafted legislation Monday to avert a potentially devastating Aug. 2 government default - but along lines the White...
WASHINGTON (AP) -- In a blunt challenge to President Barack Obama, House Republicans drafted legislation Monday to avert a potentially devastating Aug. 2 government default - but along lines the White...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,179
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (77 total)
10:46 AM on 07/27/2011
* I meant under 250,000 per year on that first part...sorry.
10:41 AM on 07/27/2011
This is great! Now, let me see if I understand this; You cut 1.2 in spending but, you raise the government's spending ability to 1 trillion. So, we save 200 billion? Smoke and mirrors. Saving 200 billion vs. being in debt nearl 14 trillions is nothing!! A billion sounds like all the money in the world to Joe Blow. But, we must remember that a trillion is 1,000 billion. Americans are sooooooo stupid!!!
photo
SocialistBoy
No pix no reply
10:25 AM on 07/27/2011
Someone was sure bending over for the Bush guy not to long ago:

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/04/14/158424/republican-leaders-debt-limit-hypocrisy/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
08:46 AM on 07/27/2011
Being downgraded was something Obama and Guithner already knew a long time ago. Surprise?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
08:44 AM on 07/27/2011
MagicActor: are you still in a cloud?
04:50 AM on 07/27/2011
"Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, urged the president to reconsider his position rather "than veto the country into default." McConnel, goscrewyourself.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
08:48 AM on 07/27/2011
Now I see it, you all have jumped on the wagon to make sure anything the conservatives have put forth as a solution ----to fail. Just like you claim the other side wants you to fail. But you have nothing for show and tell that is tangible.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
09:47 PM on 07/26/2011
bellmotor: oh, yes there are, but they don't tell us about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sportsguy56201
09:22 PM on 07/26/2011
What you aren't hearing is this! We need to stop the spending, as you will read next!

15 Trillion Dollars
$15,000,000,000,000- Unless the U.S. government fixes the budget, US national debt (credit card bill) will topple 15 trillion by Christmas 2011.

United States national debt passes 20% of the entire world's combined GDP (Gross Domestic Product). In 2011 the National Debt will exceed 100% of GDP, and venture into the 100%+ debt-to-GDP ratio that the European PIIGS have (bankrupting nations).

$114,500,000,000,000. - US unfunded liabilities
$114.5 Trillion dollar is the amount of money the U.S. Government
knows it does not have to fully fund the Medicare, Medicare Prescription Drug Program,
Social Security, Military and civil servant pensions. It is the money USA knows it will not
have to pay all its bills.

If you live in USA this is also your personal credit card bill; you are responsible along with
everyone else to pay this back. The citizens of USA created the U.S. Government to serve
them, this is what the U.S. Government has done while serving The People.

The unfunded liability is calculated on current tax and funding inputs, and future demographic
shifts in US Population.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DigESource
01:59 PM on 07/26/2011
The way I see it is clear. If the rich do not have to pay tax, then neither should the poor or middle class. The President should put a proposal in front of Boehner that ends all taxation to the middle and poor, then see what he has to say about it!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
09:48 PM on 07/26/2011
The poor don't and should not, but the middle class is going to disappear. That's what the elitists want to happen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DigESource
02:33 AM on 07/27/2011
It's not smart to have the middle class disappear because at that point the opposites meet, and when that happens, the revolution begins, and all the wealth gets transferred in the process. This is the basic principle of duality and the law of the vacuum.
10:50 AM on 07/27/2011
I thin you are right. Regardless what other historians say, the middle class really began back when the assembly line was first introduced. That is what has made this country so strong. And, unfortunately what also made the government so big.
10:45 AM on 07/27/2011
Well, he basically has a similar plan. He says anyone making over 250,000 per year will not be effected by tax increase. The ones making over 250,000 basically don't even have a tax increase, they just go back to what their taxes were before GW Bush cut them (during good times), not asking too much.
01:47 PM on 07/26/2011
All the REP need is just one time at a shot at our entitlemen­t benefits and that will lead to the end of entitlements in the future. I am 100 percent for the Democratic way this time!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Douglas Day
07:52 AM on 07/26/2011
boehner's ideas...lemme guess..fight tooth and nail not to end the tax cuts for those who dont need them, and let those who need help pay for them..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wesley Holbrook
Retired-Marine
02:49 AM on 07/26/2011
Boehner's plan is to kick the can on the budget down the road just before the 2012 elections with the hope that it will affect the President's chances for reelection. LOL!!!! Hey Boehner and the GOP, drop dead...your defense of taxcuts for the rich will ensure your defeats at the polls next year, and deservedly so, since most Americans are sacrificing and hurting. Just look at the polls, they are of a hugh majority that want spending cuts balanced with raised revenues. Clinton did it and we had a rather good economy with a 5.6 trillion dollar surplus, or did you all suddenly contract dementia or alzheimer's??? Oh, I forget, you all have to be told what to think and what to say from those who are in charge of you; you can't think for yourselves, you're not allowed. Blind leading the blind. By defending the rich, you make it a culture war; go ahead, they're in the minority. Independents have already fled your wing-nut Party. LOL!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
09:52 PM on 07/26/2011
And Obama is the one who got us here and he is somehow not accountable, right? Clinton, yeah there WAS a surplus, but when he left office it somehow got bad. You are wrong about the independents leaving the republicans. On the contrary, many are becoming republicans. Your party is full of social progressives and communists.
Katchalater
America wants jobs not witch hunts
01:21 AM on 07/26/2011
Isn't it odd that the Repubrobots have to go to Rush Limbaugh or Grover Norquist to find out what they are supposed to think.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tresluv
01:54 AM on 07/26/2011
Odd is one word for it, but I'd lean more toward "terrifying".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
01:52 PM on 07/26/2011
Yeah, and who does this president seek advice from: Trumka, Stern, Sunstein, Holdren, Soros.
Katchalater
America wants jobs not witch hunts
01:20 AM on 07/26/2011
So sad, that he had to get the approval of Rush Limbaugh before he could do anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wordenreport
Expert Analysis
11:56 PM on 07/25/2011
Boehner's absolute refusal to raise revenue from the rich does not seem to be in line with the public interest. Are the wealthy in the social contract, or just selectively so? In presiding tonight, Obama pointed to what this means--the rich getting a break as entitlement benefits are cut for the poor. What does this say about the USA in terms of cultures and priorities? See ... http://t.co/75ztwUN
Katchalater
America wants jobs not witch hunts
01:22 AM on 07/26/2011
I don't think he is even pretending to care about America is he?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
01:52 PM on 07/26/2011
You are talking about the wrong guy.