More

Gingrich Says 2006 Climate Change Ad He Starred In Was 'Misconstrued'

Newty

First Posted: 07/26/11 05:55 PM ET Updated: 09/25/11 06:12 AM ET

Back in 2006, Newt Gingrich was a Man Of Ideas. And one of the ideas he had was that he would appear in a PSA with Nancy Pelosi, paid for by the Alliance for Climate Protection, which was founded by Al Gore. In that PSA, Gingrich said things like: "We do agree, our country must take action to address climate change," and "if enough of us demand action from our leaders, we can spark the innovation we need."


Now, most of America saw this ad from Al Gore, climate change champion, and surmised that what Newt was trying to say was that "our country must take action to address climate change," and "if enough of us demand action from our leaders, we can spark the innovation we need." According to Gingrich, however, most of America was wrong!

"I was trying to make a point that we shouldn't be afraid to debate the left, even on the environment," Gingrich said on WGIR radio of the 30-second television commercial. "Obviously it was misconstrued, and it's probably one of those things I wouldn't do again."

Obviously, we totally misconstrued what Newt Gingrich was driving at that time he appeared in a commercial for an organization that considered the debate over climate change to be a settled and non-partisan concern, in which he said words to that effect in the English language clearly and audibly for the entire world to hear, on the teevee.

Since then, of course, Gingrich has teamed up with White House Education Secretary Arne Duncan and Al Sharpton (who, like Gingrich, is an alumnus of those 2006 Alliance For Climate Protection ads), as a part of a campaign to "push cities to fix failing schools." This team-up came about as a result of a "meeting they had with President Obama in May at the White House." Gingrich said, at the time, that he thought that Obama had "it exactly right, that education has to be the No. 1 civil right of the 21st century and I've been passionate about reforming education," that Obama showed "real courage on the issue of charter schools," and that he "strongly believe[d] that when you can find common ground, we should be able to put other differences aside to achieve a common goal."

I look forward to a future announcement from Newt Gingrich that everyone "misconstrued" his involvement with Obama and Duncan and Sharpton, and that what he was trying to do was "make a point that we shouldn't be afraid to debate the left, even on education."

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Back in 2006, Newt Gingrich was a Man Of Ideas. And one of the ideas he had was that he would appear in a PSA with Nancy Pelosi, paid for by the Alliance for Climate Protection, which was founded by A...
Back in 2006, Newt Gingrich was a Man Of Ideas. And one of the ideas he had was that he would appear in a PSA with Nancy Pelosi, paid for by the Alliance for Climate Protection, which was founded by A...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 666
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (29 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cayce58
01:58 PM on 08/11/2011
When McCain had to say "no taxes" to get nominated, that was the end of the republican party. Now you have to say, no taxes and global warming is a lie. Aren't they bible freaks and doesn't the Bible teach free will? Isn't there a commandment about bearing false witness?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cayce58
01:54 PM on 08/11/2011
To all of you that go to mediamatters.com. I read the book "Blinded by the Right" by David Brock and he went on to do mediamatters. The book gives some clues as to how my party died. It's a good read.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aviandonn
My micro-bio is empty
02:16 PM on 08/06/2011
It's really really sad to watch intelligent people prostitute themselves, like some of these candidates are doing, in a desperate attempt to win the votes of people they KNOW are stupid and backward.
09:11 AM on 08/03/2011
I'm stopping short of using the word stupid, but why is it almost always Republicans that lie about things that they say ON TAPE? Bill O'Rielly gets caught almost daily by Media Matters using his own recorded words, Glenn Beck will say that he never incites violence, but roll tape please, and this moro....person saying he was miscontrued? Are they that far in the past that these "moving pictures" don't make real sense to them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
REMEMBER2050
Frikkin' P.O.'d at the GOP's War on Women!!!!!!
01:54 PM on 08/06/2011
Why stop short? It's stupid. When it comes to all of these one-ring circus clowns, being civil merely delays the inevitable.
09:50 PM on 08/02/2011
Mr. Gingrich needs to look at the advertisement as presented. It worries me that he thinks he didn't say what he said. That was the day I stopped supporting Mr. Gingrich, and his excuses make me convinced I was right. He needs to give up the race, and just write books.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris 1
11:26 PM on 08/01/2011
Bad enough HP is a Climate Disinformation SuperHighway but now they censor key and current stories off the main links (again);

The Polar Bear follies being the latest example;

http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2011/07/now-warmist-polar-bear-researcher-ian.html

HP, out of date liberal swill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
REMEMBER2050
Frikkin' P.O.'d at the GOP's War on Women!!!!!!
02:05 PM on 08/06/2011
Everybody's a do-it-yourselfer now that the right wing's taught you to despise science! Congratulations on your entrepreneurship and on your attempt to bring us back to the 1800s or for that matter perhaps earlier centuries, but your dearth of anything factual unfortunately puts you in the hole.

Here's how all climate change deniers need to approach their prospective arguments: every time you come up with some new hare-brained theory (with which 97++++% of all scientists in the world will vehemently disagree), go to this site first: http://www.skepticalscience.com/

Let me show you how it's done. You want to talk polar bears?? Search on the left for your argument so that you can see the peer-reviewed and published research that proves you're completely wrong: http://www.skepticalscience.com/search.php?Search=polar+bears More than 15 types of blog entries are now shown which address "polar bears." Click on any one to see the actual research that refutes everything you were going to say. In your case, I suggest you open all of them.

Now my suggestion will only be effective if you cooperate. See, you make up an argument and you check out why it's wrong BEFORE your post. However, with minimal help from you, this will keep you from posting anything and save the rest of us buckets of time.
fredgladys
Your Micro-bio is empty, I know, stop nagging.
02:11 PM on 08/01/2011
There seems to be a lot of misconstruing and misreporting going on, as the wind changes and politicians views change with it their past words and comments seem to do a u turn.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
11:34 PM on 07/31/2011
I am just here for the Gingrich jokes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
REMEMBER2050
Frikkin' P.O.'d at the GOP's War on Women!!!!!!
02:07 PM on 08/06/2011
Good god, man, why look for seconds when you can go to the source?? He IS a joke, and in no particular need of amplification.
photo
mpk1028
Annoy a conservative...support American workers
01:26 PM on 07/29/2011
For almost two decades, Gingrich has been promoting himself as a serious, thoughtful, pragmatic expert in public policy. Yet every single time this man makes the news it is a story about him tripping over his enormous stupidity.
photo
bart4u
Concerned Citizen
09:44 AM on 07/28/2011
Will this pumpkin head clown just go away. Go buy your gold digger wife some more of that shinny jewelry.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Json
Cynical dreamer, sarcastic idealist...
09:10 AM on 07/28/2011
Well back in 2006 he wanted to look moderate, so he could get as many speaking gigs as possible. Now he wants to appeal to the GOP base, so he has to repudiate anything he said previously that might deviate from conservative dogma even slightly.
Once he figures out that he has no chance of winning and drops out of the race, he will suddenly become 'reasonable' again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
REMEMBER2050
Frikkin' P.O.'d at the GOP's War on Women!!!!!!
02:08 PM on 08/06/2011
I fanned and faved you for everything but the last sentence!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reader110
08:56 AM on 07/28/2011
Newt is so yesterday's news.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
REMEMBER2050
Frikkin' P.O.'d at the GOP's War on Women!!!!!!
02:08 PM on 08/06/2011
Only if yesterday was nineteen years ago.
photo
richj45
politically correct linux vegetarian
06:08 AM on 07/28/2011
Whats worst for newt isn't the bad things people say about him but the fact that people have stopped commenting about his stands and he has become irrelevant...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
armchairpickleback
"Truth is treason in the empire of lies" -Ron Paul
06:07 AM on 07/28/2011
Hey Newt, it is just getting sad. seriously.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris 1
12:18 AM on 07/28/2011
Speaking of "misconstrued" take a look at the so called "consensus" makers;

http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2011/07/27/how-the-ipcc-defines-distinguished-scientist/

Garbage in, garbage out. The story of alarmism and eco-puff science.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
11:35 PM on 07/31/2011
Trying to hijack a thread again Chris1?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
REMEMBER2050
Frikkin' P.O.'d at the GOP's War on Women!!!!!!
02:12 PM on 08/06/2011
Hohoho. Everybody's a clown! Chris1 is just our one-ring circus du jour. If it doesn't get deleted, I have attempted to fix his wagon a few posts up.