iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Boehner Rewriting Debt Ceiling Plan, Faces Tea Party Opposition

DAVID ESPO   07/28/11 12:45 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Crisis concerns rising, House Republican leaders shrugged off a White House veto threat and an outbreak of tensions within their own party Wednesday as they built support for legislation to stave off the government default threatened for next week. Worried Wall Street sent stocks plunging on fears that political gridlock would prevail.

"I can't do this job unless you're behind me," House Speaker John Boehner bluntly told his fractious rank and file in the run-up to a scheduled Thursday vote on the bill, which was hastily rewritten to show deeper spending cuts than 24 hours earlier.

With Boehner facing a major test of his leadership, the While House disparaged the measure he was working so hard to pass. Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada called it "a big wet kiss for the right wing," and all 51 Senate Democrats and two independents pledged to scuttle it if it cleared the House.

The White House has threatened a veto, saying the bill does not meet President Barack Obama's demand for an increase in the debt limit large enough to prevent a rerun of the current crisis next year, in the heat of the 2012 election campaign.

Instead, Obama supports an alternative drafted by Reid that also cuts spending, yet provides enough additional borrowing authority to tide the government over through next year.

For all the bluster, there were hints that a compromise might be near.

"Magic things can happen here in Congress in a very short period of time under the right circumstances," said Reid, the Senate majority leader.

Without legislation in place by Aug. 2, administration officials say the Treasury will not be able to pay all the nation's bills, possibly triggering a default that could prove catastrophic for an economy still recovering from the worst recession in decades.

Two days after Obama and Boehner made unprecedented back-to-back speeches on national television, there was evidence that the debt crisis was becoming a national cause of concern.

Shawn Bonner of Boerne, Texas, said, "I don't think the people who are making the decisions live in the same environment we do." She said of the two sides: "They've both dug in their heels for political statements, and we need them to make decisions to help the country." She was in Tennessee, touring the State Capitol.

The U.S. financial markets posted big losses for the day as political leaders maneuvered. The Dow Jones industrial average fell nearly 200 points and appeared headed for its worst week in nearly a year.

"Confidence in our political system is beginning to fade." said Channing Smith, managing director of Capital Advisors Inc. "As hours pass and the uncertainty builds, I think the market is starting to price in the potential that we might not have a solution by Aug. 2."

In Washington, across from the Capitol, a few dozen tea party activists rallied – and appeared as divided as the conservatives in the House. Some issued an online call for Boehner to resign as speaker, while others said he deserved time to try and strike the best deal possible.

The Republican legislation underwent revisions to increase its prospects of passage.

That meant changes that brought projected savings for 2012 to $22 billion, part of a 10-year cut of $917 billion in all that would trigger a $900 billion increase in the debt limit. The bill also would establish a special committee of lawmakers to recommend additional cuts that would trigger additional borrowing authority if approved.

While the two parties' bills differed in key details, they also shared similarities that underscored the concessions made by both sides in recent days. Reid's bill does not envision a tax increase to reduce deficits, a bow to Republicans. But neither does the House measure require both houses to approve a constitutional balanced budget amendment for state ratification, a step in the direction of Obama and the Democrats.

For Boehner, the House vote shaped up as a critical test of his ability to lead a majority that includes 87 first-term lawmakers, many of them elected with tea party support. Passage was also imperative to maximize the leadership's leverage with Obama and Reid in a fast-approaching endgame.

The speaker was direct in the meeting with rank-and-file GOP lawmakers on Wednesday. "Get your ass in line," he told them. "I can't do this job unless you're behind me."

If House conservatives torpedo the bill, any follow-up would probably require Democratic votes to pass. That, in turn, would mean smaller spending cuts than Republicans are seeking in exchange for raising the nation's $14.3 trillion debt limit.

As Thursday's vote approached, some Republicans seemed to be swinging behind the legislation, however reluctantly.

"Rep. Bill Huizenga, a first-term lawmaker from Michigan, said he was undecided how to vote, but he added, "This is about as good as it's going to get. That's a pretty strong argument."

"Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and President Obama are going to be surprised tomorrow night," said Rep. Allen West, a Florida first-term Republican. "I'll bet my retirement check on it. I'm a conservative. I'm going to support this."

Republicans control 240 seats in the House, compared with 193 for the Democrats, and there was strong opposition from some conservatives.

"I don't know where the votes are today," said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, a leader of the Republican Study Committee, an organization of conservative Republican lawmakers who often have disagreed with the leadership. "I just know that I am against the bill."

But Jordan felt obliged to open a closed-door meeting of the GOP rank and file during the day by apologizing for the actions of two aides. Officials said one sent an email to outside organizations suggesting they lobby some RSC members who were wavering on the debt limit bill. A second aide recounted details of an earlier GOP closed-door meeting in an email he had sent.

As Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., read one of the emails aloud, there were scattered calls to "fire him," referring to the aide responsible. The officials who described the events did so on condition of anonymity, saying they were not authorized to disclose details from a closed-door meeting.

Across the Capitol, Reid played a waiting game, scheduling no votes until Boehner could show he could prevail in the House.

The White House rejected one proposed way out of the crisis.

Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn suggested the president unilaterally raise the debt limit, citing a clause in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution that says the validity of the nation's public debt "shall not be questioned."

Obama said several days ago he had consulted with White House lawyers on that point and they were unenthusiastic about the idea.

At the White House, Carney was dismissive of the suggestion. "There are no off-ramps. There is no way around this. There is no escape," he said."

Lawmakers generally have been assuming they would need to approve an additional $2.4 trillion in borrowing authority to make sure the Treasury could handle the nation's finances beyond the 2012 elections.

Yet a $2.2 trillion increase would suffice, based on assumptions in a letter that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner sent to Congress in April. He wrote that the country's borrowing was increasing by an average of $125 billion a month. Additionally, the government must repay the $237 billion cost of the extraordinary measures it has been taking since May 16 to avoid breeching the $14.3 trillion debt limit.

___

Associated Press writers Alan Fram, Jim Abrams, Laurie Kellman, Stephen Ohlemacher, Donna Cassata, Nancy Benac, Ben Feller, Jim Kuhnhenn and Erica Werner contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Crisis concerns rising, House Republican leaders shrugged off a White House veto threat and an outbreak of tensions within their own party Wednesday as they built support for legisl...
WASHINGTON — Crisis concerns rising, House Republican leaders shrugged off a White House veto threat and an outbreak of tensions within their own party Wednesday as they built support for legisl...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,042
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (29 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Klem
02:52 AM on 07/29/2011
another cave in by the republicans.When are they going to grow some balls, and stand up to this do nothing president.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Klem
02:50 AM on 07/29/2011
why rewrite why not just put it on harry reids desk and tel him he needs to vote on on the budget.Then get on the Sunday talk shows and push the blame on the do nothing president thats acting like a spoiled child. Isn't it great we elected a do nothing spoiled brat to run this grat country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tlcpro
Work is not work when you love what you do.
10:51 AM on 07/28/2011
Why should these Republicans care about cutting anything? They'd cut their own noses off despite their faces. Congressmen don't collect Social Security and they don't rely on Medicare.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tlcpro
Work is not work when you love what you do.
07:55 AM on 07/28/2011
Instead of defaulting on Social Security payments, why don't they default on Congressional salaries? Let's see how they feel about not having any money in their pockets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary Strawley
12:27 AM on 07/28/2011
The gop said the rich should not pay their fair share to help this country!! Their going to lose more
money in the stock market then if they payed their fair share of taxes! But, they should not pay their fair share of taxes!!! They must think they are better then YOU!!!
The rich should knot pay their fair share of taxes!!!
The rich should knot pay their fair share of taxes!!!!
They want to give oil co's more welfare money after they take it away for the middle class!!!
How much loobyist money do U think they are taking to distroy the middle class???
photo
ScreenParty
My other micro-bio was better...
10:59 PM on 07/27/2011
The first thing President Obama needs to do after he manages to pass the debt ceiling is to call in the few remaining moderate(ish) Republicans, along with a few of the more conservative of the Blue Dogs (like Heath Schuler) and have a serious sit-down with them.

He should suggest that they form a new party - a CONSERVATIVE PARTY.

These GOPers must know that they no longer have a voice or a place at the table that has become the GOP of today. Their party has become infected with an insanity that only grows worse with each passing season. They must know they have NO future in the GOP. For all intents and purposes, the Republican party of Eisenhower, and even Reagan, is dead and gone.

The Blue Dogs must also know that they do not really fit with the traditional Democratic mindset, and would probably be happier working with Olympia Snowe (R) or Richard Luger (former R) than with Nancy Pelosi.

The president should propose to them that the country NEEDS a strong conservative voice in it's politics, uninfluenced by the dangerous and radical voices of the far right.

The political payoff to them for taking such an awesome risk in the next election cycle?

He promises not to run any Democrats against them in the next election......
photo
ScreenParty
My other micro-bio was better...
11:20 PM on 07/27/2011
Why? Well, it would be too easy for him to suggest fracturing his only opposition - and thus weaken their position - so he needs to have some of his own skin in the game. Letting them run unopposed would help the new party get established.

Once this happens, it will no longer be an automatic filibuster in the senate, and the Dems will have a few people who can vote their conscience from the other side of the aisle without fear of losing their next primary race.

It will bring balance to the Republic. (Ha! I always wanted to be able to say that in a post!)
10:58 PM on 07/27/2011
I have the perfect solution to end our debt crisis. No matter how many terms you serve in our government you should only get one pension. It is a big problem that each term that is served as a senator or congress person their pensions multiply. One job one pension, not multiplied for each term I would say the only way you could get multiple pensions is if you held different positions and that's still pushing it. To get a full pension after serving 3 years as a senator is kind of stupid when the average middle class worker has to put in 20 years or more. It should be that you have to be elected for a second term to qualify for 1 pension then you are done 2 term limit. Some of these fools in our government retire with an annual income 5 times more than their annual salary this is what is killing our country and putting us in so much debt. It is also time we start putting a cap on how long anyone is aloud to serve in any part of government. It is giving the same people too much power.
danceswithdata
What if the hokey pokey IS what it's all about?
10:30 PM on 07/27/2011
If I'm not mistaken, there has been a decided dwindling of interest in these topics that have to do with the finances of this country. It just seems that there are far fewer posters than before. Could it be that the American people have had enough Bull _ _ _t? That would be spectacular, and should serve as a resounding caution to all the pompous asses that comprise the House and Senate. Ah, Would that it is so...
09:21 PM on 07/27/2011
What seems increasingly clear is that Boehner boughht off more than he can deliver. The "standard" Republicans were eager to accept the tea bag crowd into the party to bolster their numbers, but now the tail is wagging the dog. Boehner can't deliver.

I wonder, what with all the bad-mouthing the Republicans have been enjoying about Pelosi -- if she needed to deliver under the same circumstances, would she do any better than Boehner is now doing? I*m guessing she had bigger huevos than Boehner has. Strange, hunh?!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhq222
10:36 AM on 07/28/2011
As to the tea partiers, I see them more as the fleas on the tail of the dog wagging the dog.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptainRenault
Here to keep an eye on the rascals.
08:26 PM on 07/27/2011
I just love this excerpt:

**Freshman Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., bristled at the idea that tea party-influenced newcomers are sheep-like ideologues willing to risk default.**
.
.
The Captain is sincerely bemused and thinks that Rep. Gowdy doth protesteth too much.

^ ^
08:23 PM on 07/27/2011
What’s happening as the congress raises the debt ceiling ? Congress will consider rasing the debt ceiling on our borrowing streak for the 78th time in less than a hundred years and as the debt goes up so does the interest on the debt. No one in their right mind would do this, but Congress does because it’s not their personal money or debt and it allows them to continue to spend and remain in power
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MamamiaT
10:19 PM on 07/27/2011
Annie, do you understand what will happen to the country, including you, if we default? Do you have an idea that doesn't involve us loosing everything? If so I am willing to listen, I admit I will ask many questions and may ultimately disagree with you but just criticizing is as useless as what is currently going on. I don't like raising the debt ceiling either BUT I don't like the idea of loosing my home, any chance of retirement around age 70 (I am 50 now), Medicare, people do NEED that. We must all tighten our belts yes, but it sounds as if you think default is an option.
09:22 AM on 07/28/2011
But many economical experts says it is a farce.....IDK. But I do know I am not willing to tag anymore money on the future youth of America. 56,000 is alot of money to inherit in debt!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
SonicUltimate
04:22 PM on 07/28/2011
You realize that businesses do this all the time right? They borrow in order to grow. However, unlike businesses, the GOP has decided to voluntarily cut the revenue stream off so borrowing paid for less and less growth and more of the day-to-day expenses of running the country. Now, we could have fixed that with the Presidents proposal to increase the debt limit, cut $3 trillion over the next decade, accompanied by $1 trillion in revenue. However, the GOP has opted to go the route of utter insanity which is why their current plan is down to $900 billion (with a B) in solely austerity measures.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bombadillo22
Not all who wander are lost...
08:18 PM on 07/27/2011
""We're interested in answering what we perceive to be the mandate, which is to stop the spending and change the way Washington handles money."'

They perceive the mandate to be 'run America like a business, and tighten our belts.'

American society and our government is NOT a business, as the tea-party would have their followers believe. In business, dead wood or least productive parts of a company are seldom rehabilitated, but dispassionately severed from the whole by unemotional CEO's--who vigorously root out what they consider wasteful spending--to slice it off like a cancer.

You can see what the tea party ideology and further application of their metaphor means to prgrams for the very young, the homeless, the unfortunate, the disabled, the as of yet educated, sick, poor and elderly among our society, whose number only grows each year and who draw heavily on resources through entitlements like Social security and Medicare, Medicaid, safety net programs, etc.

'Belt tightening' may mean 'cut out the waste' but no true American supports a mandate that designates the welfare of people, their needs, health, hopes and dreams as 'wasteful' spending.

The ‘mandate’ is to find ingenious ways to afford them all for a growing population!

(Hint: American jobs, jobs, jobs, entitlement-funding payroll taxes and extinguishing the Bush tax cuts!).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JudgeMoonbox
09:17 PM on 07/29/2011
"They perceive the mandate to be 'run America like a business, and tighten our belts.' "

Picture the US Government as a department store. 10 years ago, a new manager came in and slashed prices dramatically. Now that the promised increased in profits will never materialize, would that store refuse to raise prices?

Anyone who suggests that businesses wouldn't raise prices has never been shopping lately.
HSC55
We will be known forever by the tracks we leave
08:12 PM on 07/27/2011
they are complaining they aren't getting enough tax cuts because of the PRESIDENT!? He was willling to give them $3 of cuts for every dollar they gave him in revenue. Obama wanted $4trillion in cuts which would have meant an extra 1.3 in revenue from the bush tax cuts and closing a few loopholes...for a total of 2.7 TRILLION in cuts. But NO they have all signed their little pledges to Grover and couldn't accept the presidents deal. So now we are left with maybe just a measily trillion in cuts. Are these guys nuts!?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cutglass
08:05 PM on 07/27/2011
Just heard Tea Party congresswoman from Oregon bragging that this is just the first of many gridlock and crisis situations, in order to "clarify where everyone stands before the election." Woman, you said a mouthful.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Czechster
Enough is enough
06:53 PM on 07/27/2011
Wrote my Senators and Congressman whom are all Republicans that they can forget my financial support. I am retired and have had more than enough time to examine the direction the party is taken us. Enough is enough.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptainRenault
Here to keep an eye on the rascals.
08:31 PM on 07/27/2011
-- That is the one message that they will listen to.

^ ^