Huffpost San Francisco

Circumcision Ban To Be Stricken From San Francisco Ballot, Judge Says

Posted: Updated:
Getty Images/David Furst

SAN FRANCISCO — A judge said Wednesday she intends to strike a ban on male circumcision from the city's November ballot.

Superior Court Judge Loretta Giorgi said in a tentative ruling that the proposed law prohibiting circumcision of male children violates a California law that makes regulating medical procedures a function of the state, not cities.

"It serves no legitimate purpose to allow a measure whose invalidity can be determined as a matter of law to remain on the ballot," Giorgi wrote.

Giorgi ordered San Francisco's elections director to remove the controversial measure from the ballot that would have made the city the first in the nation to hold a public vote on whether to outlaw the circumcision of minors.

The citizens' initiative, which made the ballot in May after supporters gathered the required 7,163 signatures, would have made the practice a misdemeanor offense punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 or up to one year in jail.

The initiative did not offer exemptions for religious rituals such as the Jewish bris or Muslim khitan.

The city attorney's office, which had joined several Jewish organizations in challenging the ban in court, said Giorgi plans to hear arguments on the issue Thursday before making her ruling final.

Backers had argued the ban was necessary to prevent a form of genital mutilation from being forced on children.

Critics contended the initiative posed a threat to constitutionally protected religious freedoms and cited comic books and trading cards distributed by the measure's proponents that carried images of a blonde, blue-eyed superhero and four evil Jewish characters.

The ban's sponsor, anti-circumcision activist Lloyd Schofield, said that he disagreed with the judge's interpretation and deliberately crafted a local ordinance "because for 10 years, no one on a statewide or national level would even consider this."

Even if San Francisco voters will not be able to make their views known, the attention surrounding the ballot initiative has been good for circumcision opponents, Schofield said.

"The mission won't be accomplished until men enjoy the same protection as women from forced genital mutilation, but everything we can achieve on the way to that goal is a step in the right direction," he said. "Just getting people to think and discuss this is very rewarding because people don't think about this, they just do it automatically."

Though state law prohibits cities and counties from regulating medical procedures, two California Assembly members have introduced a bill that would specifically pre-empt local governments from enacting laws regarding male circumcision.

Around the Web

In California, Efforts to Ban Circumcision Gain Momentum -

Circumcision ban to appear on S.F. ballot - Health -

San Francisco: Circumcision Ban and Religious Freedom - TIME

Medical News: City's Proposed Ban on Circumcision Lands in Court ...

Woman Pushing to Ban Circumcision in California City Drops ...

San Franciscans To Vote On Banning Circumcision : NPR

Circumcision Ban? Religious Freedom and Smith, Christian News

Circumcision on ballot in San Francisco: Will voters okay ban ...

Judge moves to block San Francisco circumcision ban vote

Circumcision ban is veiled anti-Semitism

Will circumcision ban wake up Jews?

State Bill Would Trump San Francisco Circumcision Ban

Calif. bill would block local circumcision bans

SF suit says circumcision ban is unconstitutional

Those crazy San Franciscans

City weighs in on proposed SF circumcision ban

Banning circumcision is simply banning Judaism, says cartoonist/blogger

San Francisco Could Ban Circumcision