iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Microsoft's Use Of Low-Tax Havens Drives Tax Bill To 7 Percent Of Profit

Microsoft Taxes

First Posted: 07/28/11 09:23 AM ET Updated: 09/27/11 06:12 AM ET

FAIRFIELD, Connecticut (Lynnley Browning) - If you want to know why tax from surging corporate profits isn't making much of a dent in the United States' crippling budget deficit, a glance at Microsoft Corp's recent results provides some clues.

Things were rosy in the giant software company's just-ended fiscal fourth quarter, which produced record sales of nearly $17.4 billion, a 30 percent increase in after-tax profit, and a 35 percent gain in earnings per share.

But for the Internal Revenue Service and foreign tax authorities, things weren't so rosy. Microsoft reported only $445 million in taxes in the U.S. and other foreign countries, just 7 percent of its $6.32 billion in pre-tax profit.

Given the rancor in Congress and in the country about how to tackle the nation's budget deficit and debt, including how companies stash profits overseas and enjoy lucrative tax breaks, it is instructive to see how the top brass at Microsoft's Redmond, Washington, headquarters achieved this eye-popping tax result.

Partly it was because the company had a one-time refund of $461 million from the IRS for previous overpayments and because of its over-estimation of tax rates in previous quarters. There may be increased sales of products to consumers overseas, though it is not clear from company disclosures how much of a factor this might be.

But Microsoft is straightforward about the core reason for its lower tax bill: It is increasingly channeling earnings from sales to customers throughout the world through the low-tax havens of Ireland, Puerto Rico and Singapore.

Microsoft's pre-tax profits booked overseas nearly tripled over the past six years, to $19.2 billion in the fiscal year that just ended, from $6.8 billion in the year ended in June 2006, according to company filings. By contrast, its U.S. earnings have dropped, to $8.9 billion from $11.4 billion in the same period. Foreign earnings now make up 68 percent of overall income.

The change is fueling its shrinking tax bills. According to its 2010 annual report, by keeping a good chunk of foreign earnings away from the U.S., Microsoft has accumulated $29.5 billion overseas -- and that is before the impact of its last financial year.

In theory, the company has saved $9.2 billion in U.S. federal taxes on that figure, though if it brought the entire $29.5 billion back home tomorrow its tax bill would be lower because of credits for foreign taxes paid and other U.S. deductions.

Microsoft's effective worldwide tax rate fell to 17.5 percent in the last fiscal year, down from 25 percent the previous year and 31 percent in the year to June 30, 2006. The company said it expects to owe tax at an effective rate in the next year of between 19 percent and 22 percent.

Few companies, including Thomson Reuters, pay the standard U.S. corporate rate of 35 percent thanks to loopholes and deductions but the Microsoft tax rate is still at the low end when compared with other large technology companies.

In their last reported fiscal years, Google Inc's effective tax rate was 21 percent, Apple Inc's 24 pct, and IBM's was 25 percent.

A TWIN SHIFT

Concern about the use of tax-reducing measures now used by many major U.S. corporations has been a big issue for President Obama and the Democrats as they race to hammer out a deal with Republicans by August 2 that would allow the United States to avert imminent default on its debt.

Some Congressional leaders are calling for a "repatriation holiday" that would allow corporations to bring back money held offshore at a lower rate of 5.25 percent, similar to a one-off deal in 2005 through which corporations brought back $312 billion.

Nearly $1.2 trillion of accumulated U.S. corporate profits, are now held in overseas subsidiaries.

The U.S. government taxes U.S. businesses on income earned worldwide but allows them to defer taxes on the money until brought back to the U.S., so corporations like to keep the money abroad, particularly as they increase investment overseas. Critics argue the U.S. system also encourages businesses to move jobs overseas at a time of high unemployment -- now at a 9.2 percent rate -- in the U.S.

Obama and the Treasury Department oppose a "repatriation holiday" while Microsoft, along with other multinationals, including Apple, Cisco Systems and Pfizer Inc, backs the repatriation idea, through Win America, a Washington, D.C., lobbying group.

Most industrialized nations tax businesses only on income earned within their borders. U.S. corporations argue the U.S. worldwide system is anti-competitive and forces money overseas.

But critics such as Richard Murphy of Tax Research LLP, an anti-poverty and tax research firm based in Britain, argue the U.S. system allows companies to park profits in places where the tax obligation largely disappears. He called Microsoft "a giant tax-planning exercise."

LOWER RATES ABROAD

Microsoft said its lower taxes in the recent quarter were "primarily due to a higher mix of earnings taxed at lower rates in foreign jurisdictions resulting from producing and distributing our products and services through our foreign regional operations centers in Ireland, Singapore and Puerto Rico, which are subject to lower income tax rates."

The details of precisely how it does this have not been disclosed.

U.S. companies do not have to break out earnings in foreign subsidiaries, making it hard to determine from financial filings how much tax they are saving through each jurisdiction. "We're in the land of guesswork here," said Professor James Hines Jr., a tax scholar at the University of Michigan.

What is clear is Microsoft's increasingly sophisticated use of the havens. Foreign earnings taxed at lower rates reduced Microsoft's U.S. rate by 16.3 percentage points to 18.7 percent, for the just-ended year. That compares with a lowering by just 4.6 percentage points to 30.4 percent in 2006, according to SEC. filings.

Ireland taxes corporate profits at 12.5 percent. Singapore taxes them at anywhere from 0 percent to 17 percent. Puerto Rico, a U.S. territory but a foreign country in the eyes of the IRS, offers U.S. multinationals an unusual credit for taxes paid there as well as tax credits for production.

Microsoft operates a 123,000 square-foot factory in Puerto Rico that makes up to 80 million disks a year for sale in the Americas, according to its Spanish-language website -- its only company-owned plant in the world.

A Microsoft spokeswoman declined to answer questions on how it records revenue and earnings in certain jurisdictions, adding, "Microsoft complies with the tax laws of every jurisdiction in which we do business."

Legislation introduced this month by Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat, would require large U.S. corporations to report results country-by-country.

The Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this year asked the company to do the same, citing what it called the "disproportionate relationships among domestic and foreign revenues, pre-tax income and tax rates."

Microsoft told the SEC it would supply additional information in future filings. The company says it will provide the requested information in its 2011 annual 10K financial report due to be filed on Thursday.

By finding ways to minimize its taxes, Microsoft can argue that it is only behaving in the interests of its shareholders.

Shifting income to low-tax jurisdictions "is not illegal," said Robert Willens, a tax and accounting expert in New York. "It behooves companies to do this."

(Additional reporting by Dena Aubin, David Cay Johnston, Scott Malone and Bill Rigby, editing by Martin Howell)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
FAIRFIELD, Connecticut (Lynnley Browning) - If you want to know why tax from surging corporate profits isn't making much of a dent in the United States' crippling budget deficit, a glance at Micro...
FAIRFIELD, Connecticut (Lynnley Browning) - If you want to know why tax from surging corporate profits isn't making much of a dent in the United States' crippling budget deficit, a glance at Micro...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,007
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lorili Lee
11:40 AM on 08/04/2011
As a Microsoft stockholder I'm outraged that they're paying any income tax. Going to dump my Microsoft stock and buy GE, a company that has tax evasion down to a science.
farleft1917
Nothing is new but only forgotten.
10:21 AM on 07/30/2011
Divine Rule of Oligarchs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dragonladywaltham
politicians are SUPPOSED to serve Americans
10:53 PM on 07/29/2011
An honest corporation. Are the sheep listening? Do you think Faux will cover this?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Breth
GOTP : Kidnapping the nation since 2009
06:06 PM on 07/29/2011
Microsoft made $17 billion + in 3 months and paid a lower tax rate than I do.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdecisneros
my micro bio is empty because I went to the micro
02:41 PM on 07/29/2011
The answer is obvious. Just get rich ourselves.
maruski
Liberal Lutheran; lean left, save America!
02:34 PM on 07/29/2011
In 2006 only 15% of the USA revenues came from corporate taxes.

http://askville.amazon.com/percentage-revenue-income-tax/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=6872434

They do not float our boats with their money...........
maruski
Liberal Lutheran; lean left, save America!
02:59 PM on 07/29/2011
and if you think about it a lot of our "public" expenses are related to corporate plundering--think of superfund sites...

or the severe strain on the infrastructure when a plant with a bunch of workers overloads local highway systems but the plant doesn't pay any taxes that can be used to build roads---like roads to their plant?

...or the people who were harmed by the chromium in their water that Erin Brockovich represented. How much did all that healthcare cost the public?

it's the old private profits and public losses thing. that having been said MS is pretty responsible and if you get a job there you're pretty lucky...nice benefits etc.

but generally our policy toward large corporations is overly generous when it allows these tax havens and pretends that corporations are pure good for the economy and they owe nothing toward the society that cradles them and provides for them
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
oldngrumpy
My micro-bio is no longer empty
03:20 AM on 07/30/2011
The jobs at MS are enviable. Since the lion's share of that profit comes from within the US one would think that most employees would be US citizens. MS is probably the leader in sponsored visas in this country. They don't just recruit for the cutting edge developer stuff overseas either. The grunts are largely foreign as well. Considering the number of out of work tech workers in this country MS should be asked to step up and set an example. Hiring and training citizens in this country would also cut back on knock off software being so readily available to our competitors.
photo
Captain Hindsight
Seeking the truth is my only agenda.
01:38 PM on 07/29/2011
The taxpayers have just experienced another "General Protection Fault"!
Shutdown and reboot....
photo
Captain Hindsight
Seeking the truth is my only agenda.
01:35 PM on 07/29/2011
Every publicly traded company has the fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders to use every legal means at its disposal to maximize profits. We need to change the laws to prevent tax avoidance.
maruski
Liberal Lutheran; lean left, save America!
02:30 PM on 07/29/2011
absolutely there is not choice of not taking advantage of all they can, it is completely without emotion and simple arithmetic.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
oldngrumpy
My micro-bio is no longer empty
03:22 AM on 07/30/2011
But RayGun said they would play nice if we just let them do whatever they want. Did he lie to us??? Say it isn't so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SimianNation
Progressive NOT Regressive
01:34 PM on 07/29/2011
Lynix!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
oldngrumpy
My micro-bio is no longer empty
03:27 AM on 07/30/2011
Not ready for prime time in the consumer market. Already dominates with techies and server apps tho. If we could break the hardware/software symbiosis and get mfgrs to write drivers to something besides MS then Linux would take off in the small office and school market. People will use what they are comfortable with and MS, in spite of it's buggy nature and bloated demands, is what most people know. I know secretaries that couldn't plug in their own computers that know how to use Word and Excel expertly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SimianNation
Progressive NOT Regressive
05:11 AM on 07/30/2011
So true!

"If we could break the hardware/s­oftware symbiosis and get mfgrs to write drivers to something besides MS then Linux would take off in the small office and school market. "

That is what we need!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brandon20678
Corporations have 99 problems and I'm 1
12:39 PM on 07/29/2011
Cheating the System Blame our politicians for this shame on Microsoft.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PapaPac
Not Democrat or Republican I'm American
10:53 AM on 07/29/2011
I seem to recall reading an article about Ireland lowering it's corp. tax rates to encourage business to move there. I guess it worked.
maruski
Liberal Lutheran; lean left, save America!
02:32 PM on 07/29/2011
Yeah that was the strategy--give this worldwide low rate and everyone would flock to Ireland and they'd boom....

but their economy is bust. You can't host these corps for free and if they onlyhave a fake presence there they don't put your people to work.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
oldngrumpy
My micro-bio is no longer empty
03:31 AM on 07/30/2011
The problem isn't that US businesses are moving there. They just move numbers around on spreadsheets and report their income there. It's called tax shopping. You move your costs to high tax countries and your profits to low tax countries. What we need is better auditing capabilities or simplified regulations that taxes money "leaving" the country. States do this all the time for people who live in one state and work in another. Between the two they make sure that the tax is extracted.
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
10:50 AM on 07/29/2011
Don't like it....don't buy their products.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bynddrvn5
My Micro-bio is unwritten...
10:32 AM on 07/29/2011
The current Republican party would like for them to pay 0% apparently. Anyone who supports this behavior doesn't have the slightest grasp of basic economics or they want our country to be run like a kingdom.
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
09:15 AM on 07/29/2011
So the SEC allows them to publish these earnings, and yet they lie to the IRS. They talk out of both sides of their mouths. Perhaps we should simply have a flat tax on their published profits? If they are going to publish profit statements like this for the investing public, perhaps that's what they should be taxed on?
photo
Jimserac
ONE from Many ...
08:56 AM on 07/29/2011
I think by now we've all had about ENOUGH of getting "the business" from "BIG business".

The Repubs and some Demos seem intent on creating neo-feudalism society in which they are the "masters" and everyone else are serfs.

We learn that Microsoft is engaging in various tax avoidances. GE earned billions in profit and yet somehow paid no taxes.

We have been fed Republican neo-CON nonsense, under the guise of "globalization", wars fought in nowhere for terrorists who are sitting at home in one of our "ally" countries, increasing job creation and other utterly absurd fantasies while they ruin our economy, corrupt or gridlock our government, and sell out to their corporatist masters for that lucrative "consulting" or other industry job after the term in congress ends.

These are the same people who told us not too long ago that it was OK to export our manufacturing industries overseas because newer high tech jobs would be created and the unemployed manufacturing workers would "upgrade" to these jobs.

The Republicans and some Democrats, have evolved a preposterous bordering on the theatre of the absurd series of economic and socio-political enchantments, exhortations, explanations and explications designed to lull us into a false sense of stupidity, telling us nonsense that the lower taxes and special tax "breaks" for the wealthy and big corporations would create jobs.

This represents a subversion of our government and democratic process, as the activities of the Wisconsin governor, and others, in my opinion, clearly demonstrate.
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
09:16 AM on 07/29/2011
Both parties have ceased to represent the taxpayers. They represent their donors.