iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Delayed Social Security Payments May Prevent Default But Would Cause Disaster

Debt Default

First Posted: 07/29/11 01:24 PM ET Updated: 09/28/11 06:12 AM ET

NEW YORK -- As the Treasury Department prepares to hit the swiftly-approaching debt limit with no agreement to lift it in sight, fears are growing that the government might opt to skip the next round of Social Security payments.

Experts warn that the program is such a vital source of support for so many low-income and elderly Americans that even one delayed payment could trigger a domino effect, sending millions of households into delinquency on a broad range of bills.

"What we are talking about here," said Joan Entmacher, vice president for family economic security at the National Women's Law Center, "is not the financial markets -- not that they are not important -- but the very ability of millions of Americans to buy food, pay their utility bills, their rent or mortgage and to generally function."

If Social Security payments don't come, Entmacher said, "there are a whole series of very serious, deeply frightening consequences that could, and very likely would, follow."

There are about 54.8 million Americans who receive some form of Social Security benefits each month, according to government data (see Table 2). Most payments are made to retirees, disabled individuals and certain dependent children and adults. The first of next month's payments are due Aug. 3. Another 15 million Americans are also due veterans' benefits, federal or postal employee retirement benefits and other payments beginning on that date.

For a substantial share of the people who receive Social Security benefits, that income is essential. About 40 percent of all unmarried individuals who receive social security benefits rely on the program for at least 90 percent of their income, the Social Security Administration's inspector general found in a November 2010 report. About 90 percent of women over age 80 derive nearly all of their income from Social Security benefits.

Losing that income could prove disastrous. Households that don't pay utility bills eventually face shut off. Banks can charge account overdraft fees. And creditors also generally charge late fees for overdue payments. Credit card companies can raise a customer's interest rate due to overdue bills.

"Suddenly the credit card with 19 percent interest goes up to an unmanageable 30 percent interest," said Entmacher. "I don't think it requires too much imagination to consider what happens to American households from there."

Until now, Social Security income has not only been essential for many households but also very reliable. About 88 percent of all Social Security recipients receive their benefits via direct deposit, according to the Social Security Administration. That means government funds begin to appear in more than 47 million recipients' bank accounts or on dedicated debit cards around the third day of each month. For some recipients, the expectation of regular payment has shaped their financial lives for more than a decade.

"Millions of people arrange their household budgets around those payments," said Entmacher. "They know that if they write a check for their rent or their mortgage and put it in the mail on August 1 or 2 then by the time the check clears their Social Security will have arrived. So, they put that check in the mail and make that payment on time."

Others have set up automatic bill arrangements that pay out just before or after the payment date. If payments don't go out Aug. 4, millions of people might overdraw their bank accounts, Entmacher said.

The average bank charges an average of $30 to $35 per overdraft, said Kathleen Day, a spokeswoman with the Center for Responsible Lending.

"We think that it would be more than unfortunate if banks choose to take advantage of people who are financially vulnerable and use this potential situation to generate overdraft fees," said Day. "Of course, we don't know what will happen yet. No one does."

Many of the nation's largest banks have, so far, shied away from public statements about the way that overdrafts would be handled if the government fails to pay Social Security benefits in the event of default.

On Thursday, Bank of America, declined to comment on what its spokesperson described as a hypothetical situation. A bank spokesperson also declined to comment on conversations the bank has had with federal regulators.

The federal agency that regulates banks has instructed financial institutions to use judgment in assessing any overdraft fees that may result from social security benefit delays, the New York Times reported Thursday. The Treasury Department declined to answer questions Thursday about what, if any, limits would be imposed on overdraft fees if social security payments are simply delayed to avoid default.

In a statement emailed to The Huffington Post, the Treasury Department indicated that it is making plans in the event that a debt-ceiling compromise is not reached in Congress before Aug. 2.:

While only Congress has the ability to ensure the government pays all of its bills, Treasury will provide more information as we get closer to Aug. 2 regarding how the government would operate without new borrowing authority if the debt limit is not increased.

There is some debate about exactly how much money the United States would have on hand to pay interest on its debts if a debt-ceiling compromise is not reached in the next few days. According to the Treasury, about $90 billion in debt matures on Aug. 4 and the government must pay more than $30 billion in interest on Aug. 15., Bloomberg reported.

"Our view right now," said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at IHS, an economic forecasting and market analysis company, "is that the chances of default are very low mostly because the kind of financial meltdown that could occur as a result of an actual default is almost unimaginable."

Without an increase in the debt limit, the Treasury Department will have to make what could be a series of economically disruptive moves to prevent default, Behravesh said. At the least disruptive end of the scale would be a decision to furlough a large number of federal workers for a short period of time until the debt ceiling could be raised, Behravesh said. The government could also delay payments to federal contractors.

"Those are not ideal choices but they could probably be managed for a short period of time," said Behravesh. "If a compromise is reached in a day or two, they're no biggie."

Near the other end of that scale would be a delay in payments due to states for things such as roads, schools amd foster care subsidies. Skipping those payments could lead to additional public worker furloughs and a hold on state and local government spending.

Then there are the millions of social security payments due Aug. 3. President Obama told CBS News earlier this month that he could not promise that Social Security benefits would be issued if a debt-ceiling compromise is not reached.

It is possible that that furloughing government workers and delaying other payments would not raise enough cash to pay interest on the national debt, Behravesh said. In that case, social security benefits would have to be held.

"We think they would try to avoid this at all costs because it would be effectively hari-kari , and by that I do mean political suicide," Behravesh said. "But if that happens, there is no question that the consequences would, almost immediately, be enormous and painful for a lot of households."

Clarification:An earlier version of this article suggested all Social Security benefits payments would be paid Aug. 3. Beneficiaries can receive payments over the course of the month. That process next begins Aug. 3

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
NEW YORK -- As the Treasury Department prepares to hit the swiftly-approaching debt limit with no agreement to lift it in sight, fears are growing that the government might opt to skip the next round ...
NEW YORK -- As the Treasury Department prepares to hit the swiftly-approaching debt limit with no agreement to lift it in sight, fears are growing that the government might opt to skip the next round ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16,290
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (318 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluecatb
FORWARD, the ONLY way to go America!
11:20 AM on 08/02/2011
See the scenario:
Repugs come into your goverment HOUSEs and hold granny up by the throat saying give me her social safety net or I gut her. Well the people say, you can't gut granny, they say if we can't gut her, we got to cut her, and the Dems put their heads together, and intelligiently say, if you must cut something, "cut her toenails."

Have a nice day, our team fights for US, they just don't like doing it with their hands "tied" or granny held up like a carrot. It isn't entitlements as WE the People paid all our working lives and it's our turn to draw our hard earned dollars. Remember, computers weren't around when we had to hand write to earn it. You easy breezy's remember that. Most of the technology to make your lives easier, came from us granny's and grandpa's.
If you call social security a entitlement even after WE paid into it what the heck do you call the 401k's they pay into. It's just a media bumper sticker away, before they say it's also an entitlement. WAKE UP people and don't be "verbalized into debt."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosey7
07:24 PM on 08/01/2011
eulerckt,

The senate has a small majority of democrats, the house now has a quite large advantage because of the 2010 election. 193 democrats to 243 republicans to be exact. A fifty vote difference is large. The senate difference is 57 dems to 41 republicans with 2 independents. Laws have to start in congress before they go to the senate. Also, some dems are blue dogs and might as well have an R behind their names. While, no republican in congress that i know of, has liberal leanings
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:04 AM on 08/01/2011
without recieving a check many people have no money to buy food
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Trahan
08:30 AM on 08/01/2011
We need to get all of those idiots out of Washington. Dems and Replicans alike. We also need a real president. He is threatening seniors. I bet he and all the others in Washington get their paychecks without a problem. The sorry thing about all this is that Americans seem to forget too easily. In 2012 when it's time to vote they will forget what's happening now. Obama will make things seem better for us all and run his campaign on that. WAKE UP AMERICA. LET'S LEARN TO STAND TOGETHER AND NOT DO AS THEY DO IN WASHINGTON. GET THE IDIOTS OUT OF OFFICE AND SOON. LET'S NOT FORGET WHO IS THREATENING US NOW. EVEN IF IT DOESN'T HAPPEN WE NEED TO REMEMBER WHO IS WANTING TO DO THIS TO SENIORS. I HOPE CHILDREN AND GRANDKIDS OF THESE SENIORS STAND UP AND FIGHT. IT'S MONEY THESE FOLKS HAVE PAID INTO AND WASHINGTON STOLE FORM THEM.
03:05 AM on 08/01/2011
The man at the helm has now played his hand. We need real change for this country. You can't tell the rich to give you their money just because you vote a socialist in. it doesn't work . Sorry.
Move to Brazil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jan Howell
11:41 PM on 07/31/2011
Folks, till we find a common man to elect into office we're at the mercy of all the jackasses who don't care for those of us commoners. We need to find somebody who's willing to remember where they came from and run this country the way they were brought up: the hard way. Have all the pork taken away and replace it with the leaner things that are actually better for us. I don't know where we'll find such a group of people but God knows we've got some upcoming folks we can look at, i.e. Marko Rubio, Allen West just to name a couple. I'd even throw Bobby Jindal in there for good measure but then I'd hear more of the naysayers come out to flog me. But for sure in 2012 we can vote to put a halt to this garbage that's already in Washington.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:47 AM on 08/01/2011
I'm not flogging you. I'm praising you. West and Jindal know how to manage things, unlike the pampered elitist community organizer in the WH.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peakprfmr1
12:49 AM on 08/01/2011
thumbs up
09:12 PM on 07/31/2011
I paid ALOT into SS for years, a ton in taxes, I don't see getting social security as a gift or charity. I saw it as a forced savings account for decades I worked, now people in Washington think it's fair to put it on the table as a poker chip? For those of you far from retirement who are paying into the system, hey, I understand. I did it for a LOOOONG time thinking it was sacred, that my retirement ss would be there. Now I'm supposed to smile and say that's oooookkkk, you take it, have fun, and while you're at it, give yourselves a raise (which they can do)! I don't think so. Remember when Obama campaigned on he was going to go LINE BY LINE on the budget? I remember that. Well, it doesn't seem that he'll be the one with a crayon.....particularly since Congress is now getting Super Powers. I feel like only the rich are going to prosper, as always, only to continue to do so, it'll have to be more and more on the backs of the middle class and those on S.S.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peakprfmr1
12:50 AM on 08/01/2011
Obama threw us to the wolves
08:20 PM on 07/31/2011
So many people won't be able to pay their rent/mortgage, buy food, or pay for utilities but there is a larger problem that I am concerned about. So many businesses make a large percentage of their money from the 1st to the 10th of each month. With the economy the way it is, many businesses are just holding on for dear life and this could push them over the edge. One delay could have devastating affects on the economy. If you don't believe me, take a ride around the town you live in on the 1st and the 3rd? Also, the federal government and military retirement checks (where the really nice money is) come out around that time. It is like a monthly Christmas (on a smaller scale) for many restaurants, department stores and other retailers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Brock
07:22 PM on 07/31/2011
Political Suicide, Hari Kari......You better believe it! Just let them try it !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USA2Sense
06:30 PM on 07/31/2011
How the hell can they even talk about this - when we've been told for decades - that Social Security funds are invoilable and untouchable - and in a separate fund - SET ASIDE FOR ONLY SOCIAL SECURITY................

BECAUSE - WE - WHO HAVE WORKED OUR BUTTS OFF FOR DECADES - HAVE PAID INTO THE SOCIAL SECURITY FUND - AND NOT INTO THE CONGRESSIONAL SALARY FUND - OR THE MILITARY DEFENSE FUND - OR THE DEPT. OF THE INTERIOR FUNDS......OR ANY OTHER FUNDS....

THIS IS OUR MONEY - ENTRUSTED TO OUR GOVERNMENT - TO BE RETURNED TO US IN A TIMELY MANNER.................

LIARS................
10:52 PM on 08/01/2011
very well put they are all liars and theifs up at the big ole whitehouse they have raped and pillaged the country for too long
when they took the money from social security they should have been jailed how can you take from the elderly who have paid in all there lifes
there ponsy scheam is bought to un ravil and i hope it takes the people at the white house out
let the top dogs go with out food and medicen and see how long it takes to put s#it right
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Shastid
sleeps well with others
09:17 AM on 08/02/2011
Stole your spelling ability also I see.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Villano
American Patriot
04:36 PM on 07/31/2011
The tax the rich crowd thinks that taking away money from people who make over 250,000 is a moral obligation of those who earn more then most others...how about the moral obligation of those who do not pay anything which is about 40% of Americans. You want fairness then include everyone in the mix...not just the productive of our society.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:24 PM on 07/31/2011
Fairness means a hedge fund manager making 2 million an HOUR pays at least the same rate as his secretary - NOT less than half that. Your so called "productive" have been scamming everyone else blind. Could that have something to do with those who pay nothing??? Apparently special tax breaks for scammers and con artists is what you consider "fairness."
10:54 PM on 08/01/2011
seek nicly put
08:00 PM on 07/31/2011
Poor people usually pay more of their income in taxes than most rich people! Capital gains taxes are capped at 15%, which is most of the income for rich folks!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Villano
American Patriot
04:09 PM on 07/31/2011
I will blame this administration if SS checks are not sent out.....enough already!! SS is self funded..if the govt needs to cut some depts and stop the growth of govt so be it. We have agencies that duplicate other agency functions...attrition of depts would aid in cutting cost...elimination of agencies that are non functional or lack relevance should be done. There is plenty of wiggle room...if the politicians had some backbone.
photo
Bettaman
Former Republican - now sane
01:54 AM on 08/01/2011
I've looked back at your posts. You'd blame President Obama if you got a hangnail. Who do you think you're kidding? "Patriot"? HA. You folks don't even know what the word means.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Trahan
08:37 AM on 08/01/2011
You must really be a blind one. I'd suggest you start reading and listening to what's going on here. I guess it's Bush's fault again.
10:57 PM on 08/01/2011
the only problem with cutting these redundent programs is the loss of jobs
haha i say let em try and live on welfare cut the s#it outa them programs and loose all foreign aide while were cutting
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oftenon
cartoons are the best explanation
03:15 PM on 07/31/2011
first - wow! 16,000+ comments on this and counting -

second - for any remaining Tparty enthusiasts, here are the explicit goals of your corporate overlord sponsors - re-purposing tax dollars into private banking pockets. Get a clue, please.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peakprfmr1
12:56 AM on 08/01/2011
that is bs tea party is tired of the government taking so much and wasting it and buying votes with it and where do you think obama is getting his billion dollars for campaign poor people
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oftenon
cartoons are the best explanation
10:27 AM on 08/01/2011
Congratulations, your anger has been managed. Feels good to be absolutely certain what you're angry at, doesn't it? The clear goals, the hypocritical enemy, the resolute and righteous path - everything fits. There is of course a transactional fee for this therapy.
photo
Bettaman
Former Republican - now sane
01:55 AM on 08/01/2011
True but I doubt seriously that the tbags are even smart enough to understand that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Trahan
08:38 AM on 08/01/2011
You apparently aren't smart enough to understand anything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karelh
When fact is fiction and TV reality
03:11 PM on 07/31/2011
Here are a couple of ideas to manage your checkbook until we get a new credit card:
1. Members of Congress and the President's office will not be paid during this time? Though most of the congressman/Senators and President don't really need the paycheck, when the staff starts jumping ship because they are not getting paid, then maybe they'll actually do something for the good of the american people.
2. Contractors in Irag and Afganistan will not be paid by US tax payer money
3. Stop all foreign aid payments

Just food for thought...
11:02 PM on 08/01/2011
perhaps one beter would be if they had to repay there monthly wage month by month untill they get the soulition then and only then would they get paid
then all that money could go to fund our elderly geting there social security
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karelh
When fact is fiction and TV reality
11:32 PM on 08/01/2011
BINGO! I like it
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DigESource
03:07 PM on 07/31/2011
All of this is centered around the National Debt's Interest. Isn't it about time we

paid this thing off so we don't have a problem meeting our citizens needs anymore?

What about our children?

How are they going to get this debt under control?

We can't keep putting this thing off. That's like the person who doesn't pay their

household responsibilities.

What is more important to spend money on? The Rich's toys, gifts, breaks, and vacations, or shelter, food, utilities, and transportation?
11:04 PM on 08/01/2011
problem is the top paid 1/3 of the country are sucking the bottem 2/3 dry when will the white house get it NEVER