More

Jon Huntsman Climate Change Stance: GOP Candidate Says 'Conservation Is Conservative'

Jon Huntsman Climate Change

By PHILIP ELLIOTT   07/28/11 11:58 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- Touting a record that could complicate his bid for the Republican presidential nomination, former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman challenged his party Thursday to protect the environment and acknowledge climate change as a real threat.

Huntsman, who is trailing in the polls but is working to build a campaign that could deny front-runner Mitt Romney the nod, criticized those who question the science behind climate change and loathe government's role in fighting it. His tough message was unlikely to endear him to conservatives who hold great sway in the party's nominating process.

"We will be judged by how well we were stewards of those (natural) resources," said Huntsman, a veteran of three Republican administrations who until this spring was President Barack Obama's ambassador to China.

"Conservation is conservative. I'm not ashamed to be a conservationist. I also believe that science should be driving our discussions on climate change," he added.

Polling on the issue gives Huntsman little reason to embrace – or promote – his position or his moderate environmental record while governor.

Conservative Republicans have grown more vocal in their doubts about climate change.

Meanwhile, in an interview broadcast Thursday night by Fox News Channel, Huntsman faulted Obama's handling of the debt crisis, saying "the president has shown no leadership. ... He doesn't have a plan on the table."

Of the mounting federal debt, he said: "We've got to get on with this cancer that has taken over this country. We need to cut it out. We need to radiate it."

On the environment, Gallup polling has shown a decline over the past few years in the share of Americans saying that global warming's effects have already begun – from a high of 61 percent in 2008 to 49 percent in March. The change is driven almost entirely by conservatives.

In 2008, 50 percent of conservatives said they believed global warming already is having effects; that figure dropped to 30 percent this year.

During his two terms as governor, Huntsman supported a regional "cap-and-trade" program to reduce greenhouse gas pollution. He has since backed away from that compact with seven other Western states and four Canadian provinces to reduce greenhouse gases, but is still supportive of other environmental policies.

Huntsman's advisers were pitching Thursday night's speech as an opportunity to highlight larger policy reversals involving the other contenders. Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty campaigned for environmental legislation with the Environmental Defense Action Fund but has since revised his support of a cap-and-trade program. Romney and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich supported such programs.

From the podium, Huntsman didn't highlight those changes among his rivals on the environment. Instead, he criticized them for not being more involved in the political fight of the hour just up the street at the U.S. Capitol: a debate over a measure that would raise the nation's debt limit and avoid a government default.

"None of us should be standing idly by during the 2012 election cycle as we are about to hand down, for the first time in our history, a country that is less good than the one we got," he said.

A day earlier, Romney declined to weigh in on House Republicans' deficit-reduction plan. The others opposed Speaker John Boehner's effort to avoid a government default that could happen on Tuesday if Congress doesn't allow the Treasury to borrow more money to pay its bills.

"None of my opponents have supported a plan that would allow us to avoid default," he said. "This is not a time, ladies and gentlemen, to play politics. ... The world is watching."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Touting a record that could complicate his bid for the Republican presidential nomination, former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman challenged his party Thursday to protect the environment and ackn...
WASHINGTON -- Touting a record that could complicate his bid for the Republican presidential nomination, former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman challenged his party Thursday to protect the environment and ackn...
Filed by Alana Horowitz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 959
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (31 total)
07:26 PM on 08/21/2011
Wow... the only Republican I could even think about voting for, and he doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning the primary.... Nice...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:23 PM on 08/18/2011
And no one Republicans will back him
What we need in this country is the return of a certain Bull Moose.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:25 PM on 08/18/2011
And now none* of the Republicans will back him
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
04:05 PM on 08/17/2011
Conservatives tend to have a larger concentration of wealth. More $ equals greater consumption per person in that family and their lifestyles are about anything BUT 'conserving' type lifestyles. And every child one of those monied people has increases their carbon footprint by 20 times. Bigger homes and more energy to run them, more cars, more electronic gadgets, more vacations, boats, jet ski's, snowmobiles, quads, etc.

How many conservatives are big on using public transportation? Or bike or walk to work and stores? Are conservatives the ones screaming for huge investment in clean, truly clean energy? Nope. They're the "Drill, baby drill" crowd.

When you conservatives are living like 3rd world people, then I'll believe a statement like that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:14 PM on 08/17/2011
My experience in the 2nd reddest state is exactly as you describe. The right is conservative only in the sense that it wants to preserve an identity founded on unexamined lives. Exceptions are too few to note.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ruth1966
No PC, no apologies.
06:25 PM on 08/18/2011
"Exceptions are too few to note. "

==Well I am sorry to see that I am unworthy of note; I am a conservative on most issues but am also an environmentalist, and will never vote for anyone
who believes we should plunder the environment, drill in ANWAR, minimize or rationalize oil slicks, support aerial wolf hunts (as Obama's sec of Interior does) condones shark finning-among other things.==
(as certain California politicians do).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wanderthewest
macrobiologist
04:06 PM on 08/18/2011
I would argue that it is bimodal where I live (Kansas). If you are wealthy, you are likely to be conservative, but as you move below 80k in household income, you're more likely to be conservative too. Somehow the latter group is compelled to vote against there economic interests again and again.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:42 PM on 08/15/2011
Modern Burke conservatism was founded to "conserve" the pre democracy Republic days of the richest families ruling over us serfs.

Just what the Locke liberal founders were fighting against.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:11 PM on 08/17/2011
Bingo!
photo
Joemama54
These freaks make Richard Nixon look good
12:13 PM on 08/02/2011
Oh come on!
Huntsman will never ever ever be the Republican Presidential Candidate in 2012.
Huntsman has a better chance of finding a worm hole to another dimension.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:07 AM on 08/02/2011
Wow, when was the last republican to say something like this? Teddy Roosevelt? But it was Nixon who signed the legislation to establish the EPA, but likely under pressure he couldn't fight. In today's denial conservative/tea party/republican party Huntsman doesn't have a chance. But it's half way refreshing to see one say what he's saying. Supporting science!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cayce58
03:00 PM on 08/11/2011
Don't diss Nixon. He did a bunch of things for the good of the country that modern corporate repugs would hate him for. He was flawed but he thought of the country first.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wanderthewest
macrobiologist
04:11 PM on 08/18/2011
Right on. Conservatives think science has a left-wing bias when really they have a bias against science when it would interrupt the consolidation of wealth. The'll cherry pick science though, when it is to their advantage. Huntsman's intellectual honesty should be our expectation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeWebster
Always happy.
11:12 PM on 08/01/2011
Huntsman is right. Conservation is a conservative position. Unfortunately, the meaning of the term conservative in the US is no longer related to the origin of the term. Nowadays those who call themselves conservatives are usually radical right wingers.

A real conservative is cautious about change, and wishes to protect parts of the status quo. Clearly conserving nature is an obvious conservative value.

In America though, where the politically centrist are though of as extreme left by many, and any rational evidence based debate is also thought of as leftwing, the whole political spectrum is moved so far to the right, that the best candidates for being "real" conservatives - according to the definition - are Democrats.

Because there is an association between rational conclusions from the evidence, and the left wing, the climate scientists are also smeared as being left. In fact the science of climate change (global warming) is non-ideological.
02:53 AM on 08/01/2011
He has no chance in the Republican Party
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
01:54 PM on 07/30/2011
Gov. Jon Huntsman has a shot to capture the Republican nomination with this line of thinking. And make man-made climate change a winner for him.

Think of where some important early primaries are. Particular­ly South Carolina. Unrestrict­ed Free Trade has really hurt South Carolina they have lost 25+% of their manufactur­ing workers many that worked in textiles or supported textiles.

All Gov. Huntsman has to do is show that Unrestrict­ed Free Trade is the Engine Driving Climate Change.

Compare coal usage; the industrial world and the developing world usage from 1980-2001 was close to the same at 48 quadrillio­n btu's. But from 2001-2007 the fast developing world doubled their use of coal. While the industrial nations basically reduced their usage. Coal is growing so fast that it will once again replace oil as the fossil fuel of choice before 2015.

http://www­.eia.gov/o­iaf/ieo/co­al.html

Gov. Huntsman runs on a platform to add a tariff on imports based on the environmen­tal impact of manufactur­ing, transporta­tion, and sustainabi­lity of those products. And a tax on domestic products also based on the same criteria. It will increase manufactur­ing here not only on consumer goods but non fossil fuel sources of energy also!

The question is he serious about climate change and if he did this how would progressiv­es vote when a real solution is presented?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Living ECO
01:46 PM on 07/30/2011
Every time I hear a so called conservative talking about their conservatism, they are usually talking about being a fiscal conservative, but if you give it even a few seconds of thought, you can see that there is no such thing as a 'fiscal conservative' who supports big oil.

The U.S. spends something close to 12 trillion dollars on oil each year. Spending the same amount a year on renewable energy would get us off oil very quickly, and is _actually_ fiscally conservative because and we wouldn't be spending it again. That's what 'renewable' means... it means you really only spend the money once and you have the energy forever instead of having to buy energy continually forever and ever. Politicians that call themselves fiscal conservatives at the same time they support big oil are either liars or extremely stupid.

To outfit the average home with enough solar panels to power the average family currently costs about $50k. That means with $12 trillion (the money we spend on oil each year) you could put solar panels on over 200 million homes in a year. I'm not even sure there are 200 million homes in the U.S.,... get the point? We could easily be off oil for the money we spend on oil and we'd never have to spend it again.

There's no such thing as a Fiscal Conservative who supports big oil.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
12:12 PM on 07/31/2011
Solar is not so good for transport, though.

Not yet, and probably not soon.
photo
Monk Monkey
Watching probability clouds precipitate
03:56 PM on 08/01/2011
Very true. However, it's time we change the way we live, rather than change the fuels which power our passenger vehicles. Localize, reduce energy consumption, become self-reliant communities.

Transition towns should spring up everywhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeWebster
Always happy.
11:14 PM on 08/01/2011
Solar could be good for charging your own batteries for transport - at least I would have thought so.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
01:01 PM on 07/30/2011
Gov. Huntsman,

I have been following your career recently with some interest. You are one of the only members of a Republican caucus anywhere that I could conceive of voting for. In the interest of honesty, sir, I will be extremely unlikely to vote for you in a matchup against Obama. However, I admire your attempts at retaking the GOP from the zealots who are driving its agenda at present. I welcome the idea that I might be able to choose between two adults for President, rather than being presented a choice between an adult and an infant, which was my experience during the last round.

I wish you fair sailing and following winds, sir, and I hope that you are successful in shifting the debate onto rational grounds.
storeysound
Zippy the Patriot?
12:32 AM on 07/30/2011
I have long held that the only thing conservatives want to conserve is their ability to make and keep a buck NOW, no matter the consequences for others - including their own children and grandchildren.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:53 PM on 07/29/2011
Conservation is conservative? Imagine that! What an intellectual giant Huntsman is turning out to be...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
"I write to make it right, don't like what I see"
09:11 PM on 07/29/2011
He already had no chance by coming off as reasonable. Now he will be run out of the party for listening to facts
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ruth1966
No PC, no apologies.
08:34 PM on 07/29/2011
I am glad to see a Republican who is not hostile to the idea of protecting our environment>
This issue more than any other has kept me from enthusiastically supporting the GOP
after the Democrats declared a jihad on marriage, the family, and Christianity.
right now divided government suits me just fine.

To get my one vote:

Democrats need to abandon their hatred of Christianity, adopt traditional moral values, abandon PC pandering to groups, and protect our country from the Islamists.

The GOP has to resolve to protect the environment from ruthless financial interests who cannot be trusted to voluntarily restrain their natural inclination to pollute and spoil. And they also need to accept that a *reasonable* social safety net is a good and necessary thing.

barring any of these miraculous epiphanies, I may not vote at all.
storeysound
Zippy the Patriot?
12:17 AM on 07/30/2011
Democrats do not hate Christianity and never have. A large percentage of us ARE Christians. Democrats oppose the injection of Christianity or any other religion into government or public education. The Constitution prohibits it. What you term "PC pandering" is not pandering at all, but upholding the Constitutional concept of equal protection under the law for all (or if this makes more sense to you - WWJD). As far as "traditional moral values" go, what many conservatives consider traditional moral values may be traditional, but are certainly not moral. Again, WWJD.
And which Islamists do we need to be protected from? You don't believe the Beck/Fox/Limbaugh crap about Sharia law coming to America, do you? If so, I've got a bridge in New York I'd like to sell you, relatively cheap.

It may be best if you don't vote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Lahanas
Republicans: Robin Hood in Reverse
01:41 AM on 07/31/2011
You are so backward, it's truly incredible. You know, I've felt let down and abandoned by a government that cared more about money than the people under their governance. But you changed all that. You came in here spouting some of the craziest BS I've read on this site to date, and that's saying something, and you made me love my government all over again.

Your bologna about a "jihad on marriage" (obviously a commentary on gay marriage) makes you a bigot, your nonsense about "Islamists" (not a word, by the way) makes you a racist, and your idea that your vote matters to any of the numerous SANE people in the running for office around this great country makes you an idiot.

And "No PC, No Apologies" means that you're proud to be all those things, and I can't even tell you how comforting it is that you aren't in a position to affect any type of change.