iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

House Passes Debt Limit Deal

First Posted: 08/01/11 08:17 PM ET Updated: 10/01/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- The House passed a bill on Monday evening to cut spending by $2.1 trillion and raise the debt ceiling until 2013, just one day before the Aug. 2 deadline by which the government was set to begin defaulting on its loans.

The deal passed mostly on the backs of House Republicans, with 269 votes for the deal and 161 against it. Among the 240 Republicans, 174 supported the bill.

House Democrats were furious, with some members calling the bill a "Satan sandwich" and most of the Congressional Progressive Caucus vowing to vote against it. In the end, however, 95 Democrats voted to support the bill, including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), who is recovering from a gunshot wound.

By approving the bill, which should easily pass the Senate on Tuesday, the House allowed the government to avoid a historic default on the nation's loans. But first, it had to anger plenty of progressives on the left and Tea Partiers on the right, both of whom opposed the deal.

Leadership on both sides insisted that though the deal was not perfect, it made the best of a difficult situation. With the House led by Republicans and the Senate and White House led by Democrats, Congress was gridlocked for months over how to raise the debt ceiling, with congressional Republicans walking away from the negotiating table multiple times.

By Sunday, when a deal had been cemented, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) faced a tough task: selling the bill to his conference, many of whom have opposed raising the debt limit unless tied to passage of a balanced budget amendment. Conservative members of the House GOP conference revolted against a debt ceiling plan presented by Boehner last week, forcing him to revise the bill's provision on the balanced budget amendment at the last minute to win more votes.

The final deal includes a requirement to vote on the balanced budget amendment, making it more like the original Boehner bill. But he insisted to his members that it brought them closer to passage of the amendment than ever before.

"This gives us the best shot that we've had in the 20 years that I've been here," Boehner said at a press conference Monday.

House Republican leaders also said the bill was a "big win" because it does not include revenue-increasing measures, such as tax hikes for the wealthy or closing loopholes for corporations.

"I think the big win here for us and for the American people is that there are no tax hikes in here," House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said.

Democrats, meanwhile, worried the bill was going too far by cutting spending and putting economic recovery at risk. Hours ahead of the vote, scores of Democrats left a caucus meeting fuming about the deal not reflecting any of their priorities, namely preserving entitlement programs and closing corporate tax loopholes.

"We ceded the whole moral ground on billionaires paying their fair share," said Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.).

Engel questioned why any Democrats should vote for a deal that could ultimately "decimate Medicare" and that hands big wins to Republicans while "taking for granted" Democratic votes. The bill will establish a "super Congress" that will be tasked with finding savings from entitlement programs, risking major, filibuster-proof changes to those programs.

"You know what we got? We avoided default. I'm glad we avoided default," said the New York Democrat. "But if you had told me that this would be the package a month ago, I would have asked you what you had been smoking."

Asked what she thinks of the deal, Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) replied, "I don't think. I cry."

Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.) called the bill "terrible" and predicted it would lead to another 1 million private sector jobs lost. The bill cuts $917 billion from the deficit over the next decade, with billions coming in the first two years.

At the same time, Democrats said they struggled with wanting to support Obama's efforts. "It's our conscience versus our president," said Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.). "It's a bitch."

By and large, Democrats headed into the vote ready for Boehner to take responsibility for securing votes since the bill was largely driven by extremist lawmakers in his party.

Even House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said it was up to Boehner to whip his members into passing the bill. Asked if she though the House had the votes, Pelosi told reporters, "You'll have to ask the Speaker. He's in the majority."

In the end, however, Pelosi held her nose and voted for the bill, along with House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.).

In the Senate, many Democrats are expected to do the same.

"It's a very hard compromise for people, but we recognize, I think a majority of us, the alternative is calamitous," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), summing up the thinking of many of her colleagues after Biden made his pitch to them. "I think this becomes a settlement of necessity rather than a settlement of favor."

Still, some members of the caucus remained adamantly opposed even after Biden's visit.

"There is deep disappointment by the American people that at time when the rich are becoming much richer and there are corporations making billions in profits and not paying a nickel in taxes that deficit reduction is taking place on the backs of children and the elderly, the sick and the poor," said Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. "I think that that is a very unfortunate circumstance and I'm certainly not going to vote for it."

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) said he'd vote against the bill, arguing that its cuts would inevitably come from programs that help the poor put food on the table and heat their homes, or would be aimed at federal agencies that Republicans don't like, such as the EPA.

"The people who are really in a position where mercy is required … those are discretionary things that will be cut in the next budget cycle," Lautenberg predicted. "To see that as helpful to our country is something I don't understand."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The House passed a bill on Monday evening to cut spending by $2.1 trillion and raise the debt ceiling until 2013, just one day before the Aug. 2 deadline by which the government was set ...
WASHINGTON -- The House passed a bill on Monday evening to cut spending by $2.1 trillion and raise the debt ceiling until 2013, just one day before the Aug. 2 deadline by which the government was set ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12,677
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (202 total)
07:53 AM on 09/26/2011
Thanks to the publisher of this resource for discuss this house passes debt limit deal. After reading your article I collect more information about debt settlement. Really I enjoyed this post. Really debt settlement credits can give new lease on life. Such these loans can assist pay off debts, streamline bills, and help you manage your debit. Nice post.
http://www.debtsettlementhopes.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lonewolfwisconsin
09:05 AM on 08/03/2011
If you are tired of all this, join the "Progressive Patriot Party" ...P3
We have just three Demands: 1.) Tax the Rich 2.) Cut Military 50% 3.) End all Subsidies
This is a zero dollar effort born here on HP and YT. We are the Antithesis of the Tea Party.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5H_Kg6hEHQI
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adartist777
Middle Class Warrior
08:28 AM on 08/03/2011
Why are the Democrats showing remorse for voting for the debt ceiling bill? They voted for it. Nobody said they had to vote for it. Obama could have used his executive powers to pass the debt ceiling. The Democratic Party voted against their constituency. When it comes to Republicans, they voted against their moderate constituency. All in the name of power and greed.

Let's face it, this bill was a power grab by the Republicans and the Democrats rolled over without a real fight. It was all political theater with the American people being the losers.

Our leaders have shown their incredible incompetence by taking us down this road. As Americans, we did not ask for this trouble that our government is responsible for. Poor trade agreements, preemptive wars, lack of regulation for our banking system and the selling of our political system have gotten us into this mess. Both parties should be held responsible for creating the financial chaos our country is presently experiencing. As voters (or non-voters), we also have to take responsibility for the incompetents that we elect to high office. Most of us don't even participate in local or state politics. We always assume that everything will turn out all right, while the schemers plot against our way of life in the background of our political system.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chadizzy
07:22 AM on 08/03/2011
I love this that rich need to pay their fair share when over half the nation pays no taxes. What a joke!
01:41 AM on 08/03/2011
Why not cut the size of the huge bureaucracy of a federal government who is borrowing and spending the USA toward a bankruptcy. Stop spending so much on stupid non critical programs just to appease some academic egghead who has contributed little value added to our country at large. Our federal government never downsizes, it just continues to expand with layer upon layer of bureaucracy all working to justify their existence as they compete for taxpayer money. The debt limit is just a sad indicator of a massive spending cancer that knows no bounds within our political system, and the current "deal" passed by Congress is anemic and will do little to reduce the level of deficit spending that is planned looking ahead, but, to hear the politicians involved, you would think they are sacrificing their Mother's Medicare coverage. It is a shame.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
afgail
Wise and strong.
01:34 AM on 08/03/2011
Obama is a gutless wonder. When will the Democrats stop following him over the cliff?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wsmith9686
12:18 AM on 08/03/2011
a twelve member committee of the dysfunctional, to be part of a super committee, allowed to act in secret.
now there is something, that should cause some sleepless nights
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wlcd
01:16 PM on 08/03/2011
Why loose sleep? Lots of legislation (especially those drafted by lobbyiest) are drafted behind closed doors. The legislation will be voted up or down in public. No one said you have to accept the legislation. Case of no harm no foul.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:34 PM on 08/02/2011
There is no moral high ground in congress - the American taxpayer will continue to loose until we have term limits. You can blame either side for the dysfunctionality - it really wont matter until our representatives vote, without regard of the next election cycle.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trilingual
08:22 PM on 08/02/2011
America ceded more than the moral ground in buying the Satan Sandwich! We also choked off what feeble recovery there was. Jobs? How will they be created when we just took $2T+ out of the economy? The only consolation is that even the plutocrats will be hurt when the across-the-board cuts inevitably take effect. There won't be any money for infrastructure, which they need, or for defense industries, which fuels so much of their wealth and power. That's their reward for backing their little Tea Party Frankensteins! But we're all going to be miserable together. What a great prospect!
06:34 PM on 08/02/2011
Once Bush Jr got his tax cuts and his war, the rest was history.
photo
mollysmomma
God Bless Obama
09:13 PM on 08/02/2011
wow....so true.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
liblizard
Really missing Bill Loney
01:25 AM on 08/03/2011
Yes, CURRENT history.....
photo
Cthulhu On Call
As soon as I'm done with my nap, you're all in tro
05:46 PM on 08/02/2011
House Republican leaders also said the bill was a "big win" because it does not include revenue-increasing measures, such as tax hikes for the wealthy or closing loopholes for corporations.

---

By "big win" here, they mean it's a big win for corporations.
06:48 PM on 08/02/2011
This is not a big win for anyone except entrenched Washington interests. Our debt is at almost 15 trillion and they go ahead and raise the ceiling another 2 trillion? Shameful.

If people thought that the 2010 election was rough just wait for 2012.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plaidsportcoat
03:44 AM on 08/03/2011
you raise it to what you owe, not above what you owe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
merr7242
OBAMA2012 Liberal/Progressive/Senior
06:14 AM on 08/03/2011
funkapottamus

Did you forget that the 2 wars started by GWB were not added into the debt until after President Obama took over in January 2009? Those wars weren't paid for by the Bush administration. It seems that President Obama is responsible for this high debt but, if you use your brain, you would see what happened. I wish peo ple like you would do your homework before you go on a message board and make such igno- rant statements. Do you understand what would have happened if the debt ceiling hadn't been raised? Did you know that it was raised 7 times under GWB? I didn''t see you squealing over that!
photo
mollysmomma
God Bless Obama
09:17 PM on 08/02/2011
true....which makes a win for repubs.....since the repubs are being sure to take care of their benefactors.......the corporations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nina Platter
,
02:07 AM on 08/03/2011
right! they are out to make President Obama look badly no matter what happens! very big win for them since they were able to power in anything negitive. aarrrrgggg
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ConfuciusSay-
Aglets: their purpose is sinister.
05:27 PM on 08/02/2011
Somewhere fat old men in spats are toasting with fine liquor, and waving their cigars.

The rest of us can grimly shoulder our additional burdens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClevelandLib
Unless
04:33 PM on 08/02/2011
"And the banks -- hard to believe in a time when we're facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created -- are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place," Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) referring to Congress.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/29/dick-durbin-banks-frankly_n_193010.html

Is there any doubt in anyone's mind this debt deal was bought and paid for by Wall Street so that our leaders could get money for reelection?
photo
johngary66
Accused of heresy and decided to go with that.
05:32 PM on 08/02/2011
Why would any real liberal or progressive even consider voting for Obama again? It is time to let the Democratic Party know they are guarunteed to lose if they continue to support a fraud for President in 2012. We have been sold down the river by Barack Obama from before he even took office. If this deal doesn't prove he works for Wall Street to Obamabots, they have to at the very least agree he that he is totally incompetent. Of course he's not, he's very smart. Just like he did with the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy he always waits until the last minute so that he can try to blame the Republicans when he gives them exactly what he wants to give them. He did it with Liz Warren too. There were plenty of opportunities for him to recess appoint her but he didn't because he is obedient to his Wall Street masters. After all they gave him more money than they gave Mc Cain in 2008 and he wants a "cool billion" for 2012. I thought people would be wake up after letting Bush run the country into the ground for eight years. I was wrong. People here won't lift a finger to do independent research so they rely on the corporate owned lame stream media. People, you might as well all just go to Faux Noise, because that's what your getting anyway. We really need a new party altogether after Democrats passed this crap.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whirlpool
founder walnut tree congregation
06:12 PM on 08/02/2011
You will probably have an opportunity to vote for Romney of Bachmann. I am sure you will enjoy the results of that.
06:14 PM on 08/02/2011
Simple fact.

Obama did not loose the Presidency.

Democrats lost control of the house last fall, making Republicans the majority.

What more can a President do with out enough party power in the house?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Sta
04:14 PM on 08/02/2011
Some of the postings are ridiculous, can we all agree that everyone has to pay their fair share? The uber rich dorporate CEO, should pay more than the owner of the local laundromat? Why is this so hard.

Banks and WS owe a massive debt to the middle class, we are waiting for Govt. waiting and waiting. We have a right to equal protections under the law both Obama and Reps believe the mega corporations, banks and WS are immune from responsibility of their actions.

Other than tax breaks for the rich, they're not that different.
07:04 PM on 08/02/2011
Well Paul, the truth is that the rich do pay more. Did you know that the bottom 50% paid no income tax last year?

And what would the govt do with more money from higher taxes? Would they use it to pay down the debt and closer the deficit? Or would they just tax and spend as usual?

P.S The Banks and Wall St. already paid back their portion of the stimulus but the govt turned around and poured it back into Freddie and Fannie.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
irishradical
Descended from the Donegal Dochtaraighs and still
07:18 PM on 08/02/2011
The bottom 50% pay a higher percentage of their overall incomes in taxes than the top 1% do. They pay all state taxes, sales taxes, FICA, property taxes, etc, all the regressive taxes. If you to have a great many more people paying taxes, create more jobs and pay higher wages. Many people are too poor to pay federal income tax, and many rich people pay no income tax at all because their money is paid to them in dividends and interest, which is taxed at 15%
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Sta
07:50 PM on 08/02/2011
The biggest fallacy is that banks and Ws paid back even a fraction of the endless bailouts, bailouts of FNMA, Freddie QE which was just a massive revenue stream for big banks.

Banks caused the losses of 7 TRILLION in homeowners equity time for some shared sacrifice. Why should Main Street shoulder ALL the burden?

I am not talking about taking someone who makes 200,000 per year, i.m talking about the mega corps and oligopolies that run the country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nina Platter
,
02:17 AM on 08/03/2011
I agree with your disgust withthe rediculous coments, but I dont agree that Pres. Obama is anything like the Repubs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VANDERGRAAFK
Teacher
04:12 PM on 08/02/2011
What a dog and pony show! This legislation should never have passed, let alone pass by a wide majority. Pshaw to all the Democrats who refused to change their votes and let this pass. I guess it's only fitting that Gabby Giffords was trotted out as a distraction to the disgrace that was about to go forth.

Obama needs to grow a spine and ask himself the question: What would Roosevelt do? Teddy or Franklin, I don't care. Instead, we get the sweatered Jimmy Carter asking us to turn down thermostats.
06:19 PM on 08/02/2011
Funny, I met Carter in the military. And I do remember being asked to lower the thermostat.

I still keep it lowered and wear sweaters.

Sheesh, I remember everyone had them cranked up to 85 degs back then anyway.

On Obama, what more can any president do when their party looses the house as they did way back last fall.

Problem is, the progressive dems vote people into office and then do not stay active contacting their reps.

In this case, the Republicans had tones of mail and phone calls from their party and keeping the pressure up. This is really the accumulation of 20 years of effort from the Republican Party with help from active Tea Party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VANDERGRAAFK
Teacher
06:32 PM on 08/02/2011
What reason did Democrats have to vote for Obama's Congressional candidates in 2010? Oh wait, it must have been caving in to Republicans before negotiating with them (health care single payer). It must have been the failure to close Guantanomo. Oh wait, it was the continuation and deepening of a senseless war in Afghanistan. And, let's not forget the media who want to present a balanced viewpoint. Oops. I guess there is no counterpart to the Tea Party on the left.
11:57 PM on 08/02/2011
Where was the Republicans receiving all that mail and those phone calls keeping the pressure up when Obama and the Democrats got elected? Shipping jobs overseas and too busy to call in?????? Besides, with all that pressure being applied to the Republicans and the best they could do was create a deal like this one with many many Republicans and Tea Party people very unhappy with the outcome. Was this the best the GOP/TP could do with all that male and phone calls???????
Dude, I'm not impressed.