iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

FAA Shutdown Cost Could Exceed $1 Billion (VIDEO)

First Posted: 08/02/11 09:24 AM ET Updated: 10/02/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The congressional standoff that has partially shut down the Federal Aviation Administration has some curious math.

Lawmakers risk losing more than $1 billion in revenue from uncollected airline ticket taxes in a quarrel between Senate Democrats and House Republicans who are demanding a $16.5 million cut in rural air service subsidies.

The shutdown is less than two weeks old and already the government has lost more than $250 million in revenue because airlines' authority to collect ticket taxes has expired. The entire annual budget of the rural air services program is about $200 million.

"I'm a fiscal conservative," Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, told the Senate on Monday. "I'm trying to make the cuts that are necessary, trying to do the things that are right, but ... that just doesn't add up."

The Senate, with the federal debt crisis resolved, is expected to leave by the end of the week for its August recess. The House has already left. Unless the Senate accepts the House bill, lost revenue from uncollected airline ticket taxes could exceed $1.2 billion before lawmakers return to work a month later, senators said.

The FAA's long-term operating authority expired in 2007. Since then, Congress has been unable to agree on a long-term funding plan. The agency has continued to operate under a series of 20 short-term extensions.

The latest extension expired at midnight on July 22 after Senate Democrats rejected a temporary extension bill passed by the House that contained the subsidy cuts. Senate Republicans blocked a Democratic extension that didn't include cuts.

The lost ticket tax revenue is costing the government an estimated $200 million a week. The FAA has furloughed nearly 4,000 employees and issued stop-work orders on more than 200 construction projects.

Air traffic controllers have remained on the job. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has vowed that safety won't be compromised and travelers won't be inconvenienced.

Democrats say the subsidies fight is actually a ploy to get them to accept a GOP labor provision in a separate, long-term FAA funding bill passed by the House. Republicans deny that's the case.

"Senate Democrats are also arguing that the House-passed extension is about a labor provision, but the fact is there is no labor provision in the extension," Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee chairman, told colleagues in a letter last week.

Three times in the last 10 days, senators' efforts to pass a bill to end the shutdown without making air service subsidy cuts have been blocked by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah. Each time, Hatch has focused his remarks on the labor provision.

"I've been asked by our leadership to make these objections," Hatch explained Monday night. "What is important here - and it's not some itty-bitty little thing - is that you have labor regulators out of control."

To end the shutdown, he said, the Senate must agree to the House's labor provision. Then, the shutdown "would be solved in a nanosecond," he said.

The labor provision would overturn a National Mediation Board rule approved last year that allows airline and railroad employees to form a union by a simple majority of those voting. Under the old rule, workers who didn't vote were treated as "no" votes.

Republicans complain that the new rule reverses 75 years of precedent to favor labor unions. Democrats and union officials say the change puts airline and railroad elections under the same democratic rules required for unionizing all other companies.

The White House warned in March that President Barack Obama would veto an FAA bill containing the labor provision.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The congressional standoff that has partially shut down the Federal Aviation Administration has some curious math. Lawmakers risk losing more than $1 billion in revenue from unco...
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The congressional standoff that has partially shut down the Federal Aviation Administration has some curious math. Lawmakers risk losing more than $1 billion in revenue from unco...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 729
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
From the Raft
07:35 AM on 08/04/2011
It's time the American people figured out what to do when their government no longer works for them!
10:39 AM on 08/03/2011
The Dems can gain $1 billion in taxes and loose only $17 million? They should jump at this. Where are their brains?
09:34 AM on 08/03/2011
Lawmakers could lose one billion in revenue? In other words, they will not be able to skim a billion dollars worth of productivity out of the economy? I like it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladymcbeth45
09:31 AM on 08/03/2011
don't just feel anger...do something...Move to Ammend...google this group and then join it. We must overturn Citizens United and take back our democracy. Its our only hope...join today or start your own group...Move to Ammend...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
2Patriotic4U
IN GOD WE TRUST!
08:18 AM on 08/03/2011
UPDATE: LaHood's effort fails to end FAA furloughs

A last-ditch effort to avert a monthlong, partial shutdown of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was grounded before it could take off Tuesday, despite efforts from Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood.

LaHood, in a marked shift from his earlier pronouncements on the FAA shutdown, tried to convince the Senate Democrats to accept a House version of a short-term funding bill for the agency.

But Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) put a stop to those plans when he insisted on a “clean” bill from the House, which will not return to Washington until Sept. 7.

Hmmmmmm! I hope that the Senate democrats enjoy their 5 weeks vacation while the FAA endures a partial, but expensive, shutdown.
Dealerdeb1
Conservative Libertarian truth
08:25 AM on 08/03/2011
The democrats hopnestly only care about themselves. If they were so concerned about "JOBS" they would take the short term deal keep these guys working. unfortunately the spin it so the fools blame the republicans.
08:10 AM on 08/03/2011
When 70 some odd members of the legislature are able to take control of the government because they are willing to destroy the economy for the sake of their ideology, then, people, we've got a big problem. If anyone thinks the antics of the Tea Party are what the founding fathers had in mind then they don't know much about the founding fathers.
09:40 AM on 08/03/2011
I disagree. The people who elected the Tea Party candidates have have finally given themselves a real say in government. We live in a Republic, not a Democracy. Big and intrusive government is what is wrecking the economy, not the other way around. If we continue the status quo, all the bad things that happen when an economy collapses are going to happen anyway. Don't you get it?
03:26 PM on 08/03/2011
Read economic history from 1920 to 1945 and see what history teaches us about what works and what doesn't work in times of economic distress. Hint: corporate rule doesn't fare very well when it comes to supporting a healthy society. I get it; the tea-party does not want a healthy society, but an extreme version of every man for himself / survival of the fittest.
07:29 PM on 08/04/2011
Why is it that people in the Tea Party think they haven't previously had a say in government? They've had the vote even though many chose not to exercise that right until recently. Plus, I'd still like to know why it's okay for 70 members of House to force their view of government and of economics on the rest of us. It hard to justify that whether it's in a Democracy or a Republic.

Of course, what you've written begs the question, when the shoe's on the other foot, and the Democrats control the House again, which they will sooner or later, won't the Tea Party folks be singing a different tune. They sure did in 2009 and 2010.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:20 AM on 08/03/2011
If we would get rid of the unions or limit their powes, than there would not be this problems. It seems to be that a lot of the problems that the United States have right now that are job related, are related to the unions. Illegal obama is for the unions just as he is for everything that will distroy the USA.We need to get rid of obama, the unions, get God back in the USA and then the USA can be the country that the legal Americans want it to be again.
01:35 AM on 08/03/2011
why this video need to tell 1 blah blah currency for..
better keep secret and not need to inform about currency number
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptMike65
01:29 AM on 08/03/2011
Thank od and Greyhound y6our gone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slsimpson
12:43 AM on 08/03/2011
This is all part of the Citizens United decision. No sooner did our allustrious right-heavy Supreme Court remove restrictions on corporate and union contributions then the GOP began it's systematic attack on unions. Their intentions are to so weaken unions financially that our elections will soon be monopolized by money (corporations).Coming next, the funeral of unions, decent pay for the middle class, OSHA and everything else unions have gotten for us. Long live lower tax rates for dividends and capital gains. You gettin' yours?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slsimpson
12:54 AM on 08/03/2011
BTW at this rate we will not have to worry about the debt we leave our children. When the GOP and the likes of the Koch brothers are thru with our enviroment, there will be no life sustaining earth left.
photo
indiethinker
Don't believe everything you think
12:31 AM on 08/03/2011
The new Republican math - lose a billion dollars in revenues to save 16.5 million. I'm so glad they're hard at work on reducing the national debt - we should have it under control in no time...
12:29 AM on 08/03/2011
The republican house is in recess for 5 weeks, no jobs bills as well as the lost tax revenue from this FAA mess. Well they actually don't take a recess so Obama can't appoint anyone, more jobs then ever before are vacant because of their arrogrance. This is all about bringing working Americans to their knees and costing each and every one of us more money. Now they can once again complain and put people out of work to raise the debt ceiling in 2013. If we keep electing the republicans we need our heads examined. America must stand firm, don't listen to the millions of dollar in attach adds and vote every last republican out of office so we can once again bring sanity to our congress. The republicans don't need anymore power.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
irishlion7
12:22 AM on 08/03/2011
Tea Party blooper in all its glory. By failing to refund the FAA. We lose twice would it cost us,
but the republicans can say they did not raise taxes on the Flying public, except the airlines are still collecting it, just not giving it ovet to the goverment, Now remeber the Republicans said they wanted to creat jobs but they put 4,000.00 prople out of work. Will one of them explain to me how that is creating jobs! Also locally a big Pharmacutical company is laying off 3,000 people locally after there net profit went up 25% another Republican jobs pregram HuH?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barry Clarke
Retired Air Traffic Control Aviation Meteorologist
12:06 AM on 08/03/2011
I wonder if this deal was an understanding between airline CEO‘s and our government. It appears that the airlines are keeping the extra fees as revenue for themselves and the government could care less!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:01 AM on 08/03/2011
since they are, or will be shortly, in recess obama should make recess appointments of all his judge choices that are being held up by repubs. and then order them back into session unti the faa thing is settled. ,