More

FCC Seeks More Channel Choices In Cable Lineups

Fcc Cable Channels

By JOELLE TESSLER   08/ 1/11 06:09 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- Federal regulators are adopting new rules intended to give cable viewers more channel choices.

The rules, approved by the Federal Communications Commission Monday, aim to make it easier for independent television programmers to get their channels carried in cable system lineups and to prevent cable companies from discriminating against independent channels that may compete with their own networks.

Program carriage disputes have pitted programmers against cable giants. Tennis Network and the NFL Network, for instance, filed complaints with the FCC in recent years accusing Comcast Corp. of discriminating against them by relegating them to a premium sports tier that reaches only a small number of subscribers.

Comcast, the nation's largest cable company, owns some of its own sports networks including Golf Channel and Versus. The company also recently acquired NBC Universal, which owns popular cable channels such as CNBC, Bravo and Oxygen. While the NFL complaint was ultimately settled, the Tennis Channel case is still pending before the FCC.

"Modernizing these rules is essential to ensure that consumers have the ability to view a variety of diverse programming at the lowest possible cost and hopefully to foster more independent production," FCC commissioner Michael Copps said in a statement. Copps is one of the three Democrats on the five-seat commission.

The FCC's existing program carriage rules, which are rooted in a 1992 cable law, prohibit cable operators from discriminating against unaffiliated channels by refusing to carry them or placing them in premium tiers with fewer subscribers. The rules also prohibit cable companies from demanding a financial stake in a programmer in exchange for carriage or demanding exclusive access to channel.

Although programmers can file complaints with the FCC against cable companies that violate those rules, the complaint process has been "woefully ineffective," said Andrew Jay Schwartzman, senior vice president and policy director of Media Access Project, a public interest group. That's because program carriage complaints can take years to resolve and because programmers have limited leverage if a cable company wants to drop a channel once an existing carriage contract expires.

The new rules adopted by the FCC on Monday would impose deadlines to ensure that most program carriage complaints are resolved within about a year. The rules also allow the FCC to require a cable company to continue carrying a channel while it considers a complaint, even if the existing carriage contract has expired, if the programmer can show that it is likely to win the case and meet other requirements.

The agency is also seeking comment on a number of other possible changes to its program carriage rules, including permitting damage awards in disputes and clarifying that cable companies that retaliate against a programmer for filing a complaint with the FCC could face charges of discrimination.

Comcast said the new rules are "not justified by any record and will result in additional regulatory burdens."

"Today's video programming and distribution marketplace is highly competitive, and the vast majority of carriage deals are successfully negotiated without any need for government involvement," the company said in a statement.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:09 PM on 08/02/2011
All I want ala carte is comedy central, espn, and versus. I don't have cable now, and would gladly pay ala carte for just these three channels. Now, the real quesiton is, why don't cable channels offer ala carte prices for their own channels online? I'll pay 5 bucks a month for specific channels each, cut out the cable operator, pay for internet, and come out way ahead.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Isac C
My Micro-bio is empty
04:01 PM on 08/02/2011
A la carte. That is what I want.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptainObvvious
Calling me a liberal is a compliment!
11:43 AM on 08/02/2011
I don't have cable anymore.

I have my computers connected to my TVs and watch whatever I want. Some are legal and some aren't but I was being robbed by the cable companies for years and I justify it by not caring if I rob them.

I don't this isn't popular and most wont admit it but whatever.

I watch like three stations but pay hundreds a month... Outrageous.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Was you ever bit by a dead bee?
10:20 AM on 08/02/2011
How about a realistic monthly rate?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
raven119
10:20 AM on 08/02/2011
Tennis Network and the NFL Network.

Yep, there just isn't enough sports on cable...or religious programming...or shopping channels...or reality shows...or, indeed, right wing pundits. Let's make cable TV a true wasteland and add more.

I wonder whether the FCC has thought about a regulation that requires...i don't know...good programming, perhaps.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CDRUSNret
10:00 AM on 08/02/2011
When "regulators" make cable companies offer "a la carte" choices to consumers so we can choose which channels we wish to subscribe, I'll take them more seriously.
10:26 AM on 08/02/2011
That's pretty much it right there. And you know what? I'd pay a much higher per channel rate just to do that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaxPowerXP
02:01 PM on 08/02/2011
When "regulators" make cable companies offer "a la carte" choices to consumers, a lot of channels sold to cable companies as part of a package will disappear entirely. It's not as great as you think.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
CDRUSNret
02:15 PM on 08/02/2011
If no one is watching them....so what? Let them find a market online if they can't compete. As the poster above said...I'd be happy to pay a little more for the channels I do want than having to pay for a bundled service with 10 God channels I can't get rid of in my tier. Many systems charge extra for sports packages....so non-sports fans are insulated. Make those who want to hear from God 24/7 pay for a religion package.