iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

David Vitter Introduces Bill To Make Super Congress Campaign Contributions Transparent


First Posted: 08/02/11 07:28 PM ET Updated: 10/02/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Immediately after voting against the debt limit deal, Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) introduced a bill to require the real time disclosure of campaign contributions to members of the so-called "super Congress."

According to a press release from Vitter's office, the bill would require all contributions over $1,000 made to either the member's campaign committee or their leadership PAC to be disclosed within 48 hours of receipt.

"Given the important work this committee will be doing over the next four months, it’s just plain good government for the public to know what special interests are trying to influence the committee,” Vitter said in a statement. “We’re talking trillions in cuts, and there are already threats to increase taxes on many job creators. We need to see full transparency and accountability because these committee members will be making huge decisions with a lot on the line.”

The super committee is already facing questions about its openness. On Tuesday, transparency advocates told HuffPost that the yet to be formed group will need to be more transparent than the normal standing committees.

John Wonderlich, the Policy Director at the pro-transparency Sunlight Foundation, called for real time disclosure of campaign contributions to super committee members in a Tuesday morning blog post. "If you're among the few people deciding the country's future, then the public deserves to know who is donating money to your campaign at the same time," he wrote.

Wonderlich responded to Vitter's bill in a statement to HuffPost, "We're glad to see Sen. Vitter is recognizing that real-time disclosure of campaign finance is necessary to keep our politics accountable, even if the $1,000 thresshold is higher than it should be."

The Project of Government Oversight also endorsed real time disclosure of campaign contributions to super committee members in a blog post Tuesday afternoon.

The Vitter bill would institute a system of disclosure that mimics the campaign finance rules for the final days before an election. Candidates are required to disclose their contributions every 48 hours during the twelve days before both a primary and a general election.

Public Campaign, a campaign finance nonprofit that aims to reduce campaigns funded by special interests, believes that members of the super committee should go even further than the Vitter bill calls for them to do.

"The Vitter bill would certainly be a step forward, but we would go two steps further. We would urge the members appointed to the commission to forgo political fundraising during their appointment to the committee," Public Campaign President & CEO Nick Nyhart told HuffPost.

Few precedents exist for either the proposed Vitter bill or the forgoing of fundraising. One past example occurred when Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) refused to accept political action committee (PAC) contributions from the health care industry while he crafted the health care bill from 2009 to 2010.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Immediately after voting against the debt limit deal, Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) introduced a bill to require the real time disclosure of campaign contributions to members of the so-calle...
WASHINGTON -- Immediately after voting against the debt limit deal, Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) introduced a bill to require the real time disclosure of campaign contributions to members of the so-calle...
WASHINGTON -- Immediately after voting against the debt limit deal, Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) introduced a bill to require the real time disclosure of campaign contributions to members of the so-calle...
WASHINGTON -- Immediately after voting against the debt limit deal, Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) introduced a bill to require the real time disclosure of campaign contributions to members of the so-calle...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:06 PM on 08/07/2011
Here's an idea - why not make all campaign contributions transparent all the time? What public interest is served by allowing members of Congress to delay reporting of campaign contributions?
And why not expand this immediate transparency to all forms of "goodies" that elected representative receive. If a lobbyist buys you dinner, or even a drink, you must report it within 48 hours.
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
10:15 AM on 08/03/2011
This is downright painful, I actually agree with a republican and not just any republican but one who I personally believe should have been forced to resign long ago. Of course I don't think the transparancy should stop with this committee, I think every PAC, every campaign contribution and every lobbyist effort should be open and out there for everyone to see. If they aren't doing anything wrong, what are they hiding?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rakrobn
09:35 AM on 08/03/2011
But Mr. Vitter, what if they pay in diapers?
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
10:15 AM on 08/03/2011
Good one! LOL!
08:32 AM on 08/03/2011
It's business as usual in Congress....Our so-callled elected officials are "bought and sold" to do the bidding of special interest lobby groups for cash contributions.....we need to reform our government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djaikins
07:43 AM on 08/03/2011
Would Mr. Vitter's bill include contributions from ladies of the evening?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cjsimp80
06:48 AM on 08/03/2011
This standard of disclosure should be for ALL members of Congressd!!! cjsim
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZeraLee
A Citizen's View from Main Street
05:57 AM on 08/03/2011
Of course, there is no mention of nudge-nudge wink-wink independent political spending.
04:37 AM on 08/03/2011
OMG ! I just reread the posts here. PEOPLE, WAKE UP !!!!! IT IS ILLEGAL AND YET YOU ARE ALREADY MAKING ALLOWANCES FOR ITS' FUNDING? Do not say you agree with the funding practice that will be such a sham on its "tranparency". Tell them to go to H**L ! You won't give up our Constitutionaly guaranteed right to representation.
04:34 AM on 08/03/2011
This Super Congress is so obviously illegal that I am sure it's very existance will be brought to light and disbanded. Yet they are already "shopping" for the businesses and special interest groups that will bankroll them? Wow! Talk about selling votes right at the polling station !!!
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
10:16 AM on 08/03/2011
Why is it illegal?
03:19 PM on 08/03/2011
Because the Constitution guarantees us representation. With this abomination in place, they can impose cuts in services (legally voted in ones). They can impose taxes or give tax cuts (again, voted in ones). So even in its' mildest form, this is taxation without representation. Thusly, it violates the Constitution of The United States.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Pasterczyk
Banned!
03:08 AM on 08/03/2011
Fine, just as long as you wear transparent pants, Diaper Dave. And it's not just the campaign contributions, it's also the investments such as Cantor's shorting US treasuries so he'll gain if the country loses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScottWhite
01:40 AM on 08/06/2011
Smart/aware people up in here...
02:55 AM on 08/03/2011
This is a great idea from Vitter (I feel strange typing that) and I really hope it goes through. Since nobody who has something to hide (most of them) would risk the blowback from having their dirty laundry aired there's a good chance of getting people in who want to improve the country rather than having a political career.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:32 AM on 08/03/2011
"If you're among the few people deciding the country's future, then the public deserves to know who is donating money to your campaign at the same time," he wrote.
******************************************************************************************************
Never thought I would say anything complimentary about Vitter.
Perhaps he doesn't realize it, but what he said has a barely hidden message. I will translate.

We know you are being bought, we just think this might be a good time to know who the purchasers are.
11:40 PM on 08/02/2011
I simply don't care how you dress up the "Super Congress"

I't's illegal and quite frankly the heart of what the constitution was designed to protect us from.

This whole "super Congress" thing is nothing more than a bloodless Coup d'Etat.
photo
Otherday
Chief Imperial Sage, Earth, Milky Way Quadrant
10:19 PM on 08/02/2011
Why not make it a condition for membership in such a "super-congress" that such "contributions" (legalized bribery to the rest of us) are banded? All these members will be appointed, not elected by the people. Keep the process clean and money-free.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dawn Castle
A liberal is your fellow American not your enemy.
09:48 PM on 08/02/2011
really? there has to be a bill to do this? sad.