More

Debt Ceiling: Nearly Half Of Americans Say Deal Makes Economy Worse

Debt Deal

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 08/03/11 08:16 PM ET Updated: 10/03/11 06:12 AM ET

Since President Obama signed a deal on Tuesday to extend the Treasury’s borrowing authority and reduce the federal deficit, it’s become clear that the agreement has left a lot of people unsatisfied.

And while progressives have sharply criticized the deal’s emphasis on spending cuts, many conservatives, particularly those aligned with the Tea Party movement, say the reductions don’t go far enough.

This atmosphere of dissatisfaction is mirrored in the wider population, according to a Gallup poll published Wednesday. The poll found that forty-six percent of Americans disapprove of the deal reached in Washington this week, compared with 39 percent who approve of it.

Gallup also found that 41 percent of respondents believe the deal will make the economy worse, while only 17 percent believe it will make the economy better. Thirty-three percent think the deal will have no effect.

Americans who predict negative economic fallout from the debt deal are in good company. A raft of analysts and commentators have warned that the agreement -- which calls for $900 billion in spending cuts now, with either $1.2 trillion or $1.5 trillion in additional cuts to follow -- will do nothing to promote growth.

The deal makes no provisions for economic stimulus, and it fails to extend emergency unemployment benefits and a temporary payroll tax cut, two measures that have kept a bit of money flowing to consumers.

An economist at JPMorgan predicted that the deal would result in a 1.5 percent decline in GDP for 2012 -- an especially discouraging estimate given that GDP for 2011 has grown at an annualized rate of just 0.8 percent, according to the most recent Commerce Department figures.

And even though the agreement calls for substantial spending cuts, it may not be enough to stave off a credit downgrade of the United States, which would have a fundamental and unpredictable effect on markets.

The deal hews closely to the priorities of Hill Republicans. Yet the Gallup poll found that Republican voters oppose the deal by much higher margins than Democrats.

Fifty-eight percent of Democrats say they approve of the deal, versus just 28 percent who disapprove. Among Republicans, only 26 percent approve, while 64 percent disapprove.

There’s a similar gap between the parties when it comes to anticipating the deal’s effects on the economy. Thirty-three percent of Democrats say the deal will make the economy worse, while 29 percent say it will make the economy better -- a four-point difference. But 49 percent of Republicans say the deal will make the economy worse, and only 8 percent say it will make the economy better.

A number of Republican presidential candidates, among them Michele Bachmann, Tim Pawlenty and Mitt Romney, have criticized the debt deal in recent days.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Since President Obama signed a deal on Tuesday to extend the Treasury’s borrowing authority and reduce the federal deficit, it’s become clear that the agreement has left a lot of people unsatisfie...
Since President Obama signed a deal on Tuesday to extend the Treasury’s borrowing authority and reduce the federal deficit, it’s become clear that the agreement has left a lot of people unsatisfie...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 906
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
den1953 09:46 AM on 08/04/2011
If this government can't get serious about dealing with countries like China and trade  and American jobs going there for cheap labor the debt ceiling problem will be minor compared to Americans working, if the government is afraid to tackle that problem then it is time to look for alternatives to the solution. Now that they have handcuffed themselves by non spending and not pushing for the recall of  Read More...
01:38 PM on 08/05/2011
How can the majority of Americans know this and the Congress does not. Are their heads so far up their butts they don't listen to anyone?
photo
seeksthetruth
Why is my tax rate higher than Romney's?
01:54 PM on 08/05/2011
The GOP wants to crash the economy in the hopes they can blame it on Obama and win in 2012. Lying, cheating and stealing is all they have.
09:06 AM on 08/05/2011
Oh but liberals told me in the comment section for another article that over 80% wanted to raise the debt ceiling.
Mike Rock
Right wingers, prepare to lose debate.
08:25 AM on 08/05/2011
Duh, that's because when you have a depression you have to crank deficit spending up as far as you possibly can and direct it all as low on the economic ladder as you possibly can. The people at the bottom NEED it and have to spend it, so it circulates. The GOP/TP do know this, but they don't care. This is why they're not simply wrong, as Obama thinks they are. They're evil. They want feudalism. They want to enslave people. That's their mentality. Read "The Authoritarian Mind" and you'll sudden recognize all these fascist types for the sick people they are.
06:35 PM on 08/05/2011
My impression of the Tea Party/Republicans is the following: Creation of a Tea-mocracy! Spend nothing, tax nothing, be nothing!
10:21 PM on 08/05/2011
Let's get the debate on then.

http://jobsearch.monster.com/search/truck-driver_5

http://jobsearch.monster.com/search/machinist_5?sort=rv.di.dt

This took me less than two minutes to find these. There isn't a lack of jobs, just a lack of people who want to go to work. Why should they when they can collect 99+ weeks of unemployment or live on welfare while smoking pot all day.

DEBATE OVER.
Mike Rock
Right wingers, prepare to lose debate.
10:14 AM on 08/08/2011
Oh my goodness. If you think the debate is over because you found two job listings in a country of 307 million people, you need to go back to grade school. People like you get hoodwinked into supporting the billionaires' puppets because they trick you into looking down, looking at the lazy, the incompetent, etc., in the lower classes. Of course there are such folks. But the SYSTEMATIC problem is at the top, where the power is. If you're not a billionaire or nearly so, you need to wake up and try to shake off the FOX talking points. So, here's the real debate-ender: Name one policy of the GOP/TP since Reagan not aimed at enriching billionaires. You can't. Now the debate is actually over.
05:19 AM on 08/05/2011
Half of Americans voted for Obama.
09:06 AM on 08/05/2011
How manny of that half are happy now?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MLukhman
To err is human to screw up takes a Republican min
01:48 PM on 08/05/2011
manny?

Many more than the Republicans wondering who their alternative going to be.
05:17 AM on 08/05/2011
Our legislators should have used Paul Ryans blueprint to get us out of this mess.
01:38 PM on 08/05/2011
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
superjoe
The wise man walks the middle path
04:19 AM on 08/05/2011
half of American would statistically also be considered below average intelligence. correlation? it's not going to affect the economy a whole lot. It will affect people of the middle class and below disproportionately to how it will affect the upper-income tier, and that's why it's crap.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:28 AM on 08/05/2011
Half of americans couldnt fing Iraq on a map if it were circled.
photo
kapalabhati
Lokah Samasta Sukhino Bhavantu
11:22 AM on 08/05/2011
Thank you. Half of Americans couldn't find Ohio if it were circled.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USA2Sense
02:14 AM on 08/05/2011
THANK YOU - CONGRESS!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:14 PM on 08/04/2011
I belong to the group who feels that this legislation will hae not effect on the economy. IMO, ending our involvement in Iraq, Afghaistan, Yemen, Libya, Israel, and Egypt will bring ourtroops and treasure home where they can be used to rebuild OUR infrastructure, provide health care for OUR citizens, and bolster OUR manufacturing industries. India and the Phillipines can keep the customer service jobs.
photo
TomTheSeal
Represent our wishes; best interests are arguable
11:03 PM on 08/04/2011
who38, BINGO ! You are right on target.

Bringing the troops home, ALL of the troops, from 900+ military bases abroad and from theaters of war and conflict, IMMEDIATELY, and keeping them on active duty will both save money and stimulate the economy at the same time.

Further, as Commander-In-Chief ( C-I=C ) , Obama should be attuned to the fact that after 10+ years of warfare our troops and their families are tired and worn out and have earned some stateside duty. Additionally, Obama can do this alone, all by himself, without Congress because he is C-I-C and can depoly the troops and military bases as he and he alone sees fit.

Can you imagine ? Around ONE MILLION TROOPS and THEIR FAMILIES deployed at home in America in our desert southwest along the Mexican border ? This means a secure border.
This means a mission they can handle. This means economic stimulus ( roads, military bases, housing, power grids, hospitals, towns, schools, universities, water transmission lines, etc.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
06:46 PM on 08/04/2011
Americans are smarter then the GOP they know you don't cut during a recession...hope they pay back the clueless GOP in 2012.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:16 PM on 08/04/2011
The last three years have shown that it doesn't really matter which political party is in power. None of them have answers, ideas, or know how to think creatively.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ztck5356
11:18 PM on 08/04/2011
You are wrong. One party has obstructed absolutely everything. No government can function like that. This is a few men, he!! bent on destroying a president. Period.

The American people have no idea the length this small band of politicians will go to destroy Obama. To he!! with us, the economy, the country, they just want rid of Obama. And we the voters need to turn on these traitors and vote them out. But, I doubt that will happen, because most voters who put them in are too ignorant to understand that this is all about color.
12:04 PM on 08/05/2011
You're far to quick to lump the democrats in with the Republicans. The Dems have tried in vain to pass legislation - unfortunately the Republicans have gone fillibuster nuts and blocked any and everything they have done. It is a brilliant move on their part, because at the end of the day, people like yourself will look at the Dems and think - "hey, they are no different! They haven't done squat!" When in reality they have tried, but been denied due the Republicans who have blocked everything.

This debt ceiling is a perfect example. The agreement is basically the Republican plan, but because Obama signed it (to stave off a default), he has somehow taken ownership. When this deal hurts the country,the Republicans, who got what they wanted, will point the finger back at Obama, and say, look at this crappy deal Obama signed!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ann Starke
Progressive old broad
06:08 PM on 08/04/2011
Here is what happened.
The emphasis because of the (I truly don't know how they managed to get it in a sane world) power of the Tea Party, became cut, cut, cut. Their mantra was that "spending" got us into this mess was pounded into the heads of the gullible until they believed it and, like obedient lemmings, marched off into the sea of insanity called CUT without revenue coming in.

In any sane economy, one must have revenue in order to have prosperity. Even with Social Security which is self-sustaining. Everyone WHO WORKS donates to Social Security every paycheck. No exceptions, except those who work for the governments (?) and opt out.

Ronald Reagan, the patron saint of the Teapublicans raised taxes three times during his administration because even HE realized that the country had to have revenue coming in in order to have a healthy economy. He started out by CUTTING, and quickly realized that it was a Terrible Mistake. Fortunately he was charismatic enough to raise taxes without too many
problems.

The stock market is diving to the bottom today, and people are all over the place in shock because they are just now realizing that there is NO REVENUE coming in because of this deal. And since Social Security depends on jobs...well, it is not the fault of people on ssa, it is the fault of people who promised jobs and did not deliver.

I wish I was a pundit because
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rysagr
whip me beat me just don't bore me to death
12:13 AM on 08/05/2011
reagan raised taxes because he was promised 2 dollars in cuts for every dollar raised. the dems failed to keep their word.
05:47 PM on 08/04/2011
Never send an inexperienced community organizer to be President.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:17 PM on 08/04/2011
Exactly, let's send only actors and baseball team executives.
photo
kapalabhati
Lokah Samasta Sukhino Bhavantu
11:24 AM on 08/05/2011
Correction: bad actors, failed baseball team executives, and draft dodgers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MLukhman
To err is human to screw up takes a Republican min
01:33 PM on 08/05/2011
And yet a MBA graduate done the greatest harm any President ever done.
photo
alan2a
Actual Progressive
04:51 PM on 08/04/2011
The gallup poll numbers are incredible. Almost unbelievable. The vast majority of Democrats support the deal. It is beyond understanding. What do they think it means to be a Democrat??? No matter what Obama does they continue to support him. It passes beyond all belief except that these people must see this as synonyms with rooting for a sports team. But it isn't. These decisions put a lie to that it would be a disaster if a Republican was elected in 2012. You'd have to jump through hoops to argue that they aren't already running the country. In fact it appears that about 60 or so tea party house members might as well inhabit the office of the President as it is clear they are in charge. I wold venture to say that there is not a single Democrat that could provide a convincing argument why it is in the interests of Democrats to claim it was a Democratic victory or good for the country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:20 PM on 08/04/2011
F/f. And did you read that Debbie person's response to the MSM "score card" on this legislation. Another delusional Democrat and she is the head of the DNC.
02:54 PM on 08/04/2011
Do you still think Obama is a Democrat? He certainly is a gutless wonder.
photo
alan2a
Actual Progressive
04:52 PM on 08/04/2011
N o!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 He's a Republican except for his party affiliation.
Fanned
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ConsensusReality
RootenTootenZooten
05:41 PM on 08/04/2011
betcha bin laden wouldn't say that
02:26 PM on 08/04/2011
Well duh, we've not gotten even remotely close to a balanced budget, much less a surplus.

Yeah indebtedness!
12:19 PM on 08/05/2011
Explain how cutting everything while creating nothing in order to get a balanced budget will:

1) Create more and better paying jobs
2) Improve your way of life in terms of health care, education, crime

I'd love to hear why you (and so many others) think that the solution to everything is a balanced budget? I can easily tell you why cutting social security, medicare, education, gutting the EPA, etc, etc is BAD. I'd love to hear an intelligent counter argument that says why it is good... other then of course to, you know... have a balanced budget.

The reality is, if you have to cut everything that makes the US the great country it is - while not creating anything new, you'll have lost everything and gained nothing.
02:12 PM on 08/05/2011
My point is not is not to cut everything. It is to only have gov't pay for what we're taxed...if you'll recall that is supposed to be the way gov't works. Whole lotta hubris going on in the US regarding its fiscal and economic disposition. The rest of the world is only barely putting up with it because they don't currently have a viable option available to the USD, but that won't last...at least not the way we're behaving.
The point is to not just have a balanced budget, but a surplus to pay down existing debts. What's the benefit? Well 1) taxpayer's no longer need to pay taxes just to service the debt, 2) our FP will be less entangled by to whom we owe billions (or is it trillions now?) of dollars to. 3) Politicians will have less of need to attempt to inflate away existing debts (as is being done currently, and has been done many times previously in lieu of tax increases) by printing money and keeping rates low. Inflation is very much a hidden tax and hurts all of us, but hurts the poor the worst, because unless wages rise to meet new prices, then real purchasing power decreases, especially with 100+% propensity to consume.

Surely you're not suggesting that that gov't handouts and jobs makes (or made) America a great country?