iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

DREAM Act Students Push For Deferred Deportation Action

Monji

First Posted: 08/03/11 04:35 PM ET Updated: 10/03/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration is quietly halting some deportations of undocumented young people, after a memo in June that directed immigration officials to consider reprieve for students and would-be military members. Meanwhile, young people facing deportation are still forced to jump through hoops to stay in the United States.

Monji Dolon, a 25-year-old born in Bangladesh, is slated for deportation and applying for deferred action from the government, which would allow him to stay in the U.S. legally for another year. He's a poster child for the DREAM Act, a failed bill that would allow some immigrants legal status in exchange for two years of college or military service. Dolon has a clean criminal record and graduated from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 2008.

Dolon's story caught the eye of DREAM Act supporter Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who spoke about him on the Senate floor in June. Durbin is attempting to reignite support for the DREAM Act after it failed in the Senate in December.

"I think he deserves a chance," Durbin said. "Would America be better off if we sent him back to Bangladesh, a country he hasn't been to in 20 years? Of course not. ... We could use people with Monji's talents in America."

WATCH Durbin talking about Dolon on the Senate floor:

Dolon is hoping to be granted deferred action, a status that would allow him to avoid deportation for a year and work legally in the United States. He is a skilled web designer and developer, and a Silicon Valley technology company tried to recruit him for work before they found out he can't be legally employed.

"What's happening right now to so many people is completely unfair," Dolon said. "There's so many really smart, really talented individuals who are in a very unfortunate situation that's resulted from not what they've done."

If he were deported, Dolon would have to go back to Bangladesh and wait a decade to get a green card. Instead of working full time, Dolon lives with his parents and does freelance web design work to make ends meet. He said politicians and the public do not realize how difficult it is to gain legal status or live as an undocumented person.

"It might seem like it's a matter of moral standards, but I don't think they understand it's really affecting our lives," he said. It makes life incredibly difficult to be like this."

Other undocumented young people understand, and have formed a network across the country of DREAM Act supporters.

Erick Velazquillo, 22, was arrested in October 2010 for driving with an expired license, after new laws in North Carolina made it impossible for him, as an undocumented immigrant, to renew his license. He was pulled over while driving home from school because he had his high beams on, a usually minor offense that now could lead to his deportation.

Velazquillo was granted a 45-day reprieve in July so federal authorities could consider whether to allow him to stay in the States. His case was administratively closed last week, and he is no longer facing deportation, but is still awaiting deferred action.

Velazquillo fits the profile of many DREAM Act students who have been granted last-minute relief from deportation: He entered the United States in September of 1990 when he was two years old. He attended Central Piedmont Community College and graduated with an associates degree, then was accepted to University of North Carolina. He has no criminal record.

Velazquillo has spoken out in support of the DREAM Act and has the support of a tightly-connected group of young immigrants who have advocated against deportation nationwide.

"I've been living here for 20 years and I basically grew up as an American," he said. "I should have a chance to contribute back. I'm not a person with a criminal record, I'm a person who has been active in the community and has given back."

His sister, Angelica, who is also undocumented, said she is disappointed that Erick entered removal proceedings in the first place, because he is not the type of person Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials say they are targeting.

"I am very disappointed in what I hear from President Obama and the administration," Angelica Velazquillo said. "Programs that we're being told are to protect the community are being used to criminalize students. ... I just find it extremely frustrating and humiliating to be treated this way, as criminals, when that's not what we are."

"We want the opportunity to study and to work like everyone else," she said.

Even if undocumented young people are eventually granted deferred action and allowed to stay in the United States, the process costs thousands of dollars in legal fees and years of their lives-- partially because Congress has failed to enact the DREAM Act or comprehensive immigration reform.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article stated Velazquillo would face a judge in September after a 45-day reprieve. His case was administratively closed on Friday, without a grant of deferred action. The story has been updated to include that detail.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration is quietly halting some deportations of undocumented young people, after a memo in June that directed immigration officials to consider reprieve for students and...
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration is quietly halting some deportations of undocumented young people, after a memo in June that directed immigration officials to consider reprieve for students and...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,228
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
spytheweb
Black Democrat
11:59 AM on 08/09/2011
Looks like the pool of freebies is drying up.

No Papers, No Scholarship: Undocumented Students Could Lose Out.

"TAMPA (2011-8-8) -
Florida students unable to document citizenship for themselves or their parents may lose their Bright Futures college scholarships because of a new paperwork requirement.
Due to a change in the law, students who qualify for the lottery-funded merit scholarship must now fill out the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, or FAFSA. Most students complete the form online – and a valid social security number is required for it to work.
The change has created a chilling effect among undocumented students and stirred debate over whether colleges and universities should be put in positions to scrutinize immigration status. Even students who are here legally say they’re afraid to fill out the form because it might tell federal authorities that their parents are illegal immigrants.
The single sentence requiring the FAFSA was included in a 71-page bill approved in May. It raises SAT and ACT requirements and community service hours needed to qualify for the scholarship."

http://www.wusf.usf.edu/news/2011/08/08/no_papers_no_scholarship_undocumented_students_could_lose_out
08:29 PM on 08/09/2011
Very Interesting......!!!
11:53 AM on 08/09/2011
@ Picosa

Can you define racism for everybody? Since you made the statement that AZ1070 is based on racism, I want to ask you to point it out for everybody the specific parts in the written-down legislation where it is racist WITHOUT making any assumptions. Because one might say that someone making assumptions is the one who's actually a racist.

But first, please define racism. Just first define it, don't go into anything else, we want to do this step by step.
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
02:48 PM on 08/09/2011
Here is the correct link.

Racist roots of Arizona's immigration law

http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/04/27/4210613-racist-roots-of-arizonas-immigration-law
04:54 PM on 08/09/2011
Everyone look at the reply. I asked for the definition of racism, as in define racism, and I asked twice, instead of replying with something like: The definition of racism is...this person gave me a link, somebody's blog (instead of a dictionary definition). In addition, this person started the reply with: Here is the correct link, as if I gave some kind of link, and it was the wrong link so Picosa corrected me by trying to give the correct link (a simple "Here is the link" would do).

You miss spoke and you gave no definition, let me as you Picosa, do you speak English with an accent, a foreign accent?
05:01 PM on 08/09/2011
I take that as your definition, now Picosa, next step.

Now, state in your own words, find it in AZ's sb1070 where a white illegal would not be deported if he's caught in AZ. Ever heard of Ivan Nikolov in Detroit? Google it, see his pale blue eyes? White enough for you? AZ's sb1070 is racist if he was caught in the state of AZ and they would not deport him.

Show every one this specific item in the legislation and I will give you that AZ's sb1070 is racist, or else your are.
11:38 AM on 08/09/2011
@ Picosa

You like to go back in time and pull the Native American thing huh, ok, i'll play along.

1. Without the white men being the Americas ok, you are saying an Apache family, for example, can go live in Mohawk people's land at will, without causing wars or being killed, because they are more civilized than the white men who made immigration laws on the land they illegally took. Maybe the Apache family can cite "we have a Mohawk Dream" so they can just walk over the border and start living there?

2. Why stop at couple hundreds of years back when the white men illegally took the Americas? Why not go back couple thousand when people from Asia walked across Beringia to settle the Americas? So technically, this land we can the Americas belong to China? haha...
Better yet, go back couple of million of years, when the planet Earth only had one single land mass, yeah that belonged to the Mexicans as well huh, wait only monkeys run around back then.

Going back in time is absurd, I can always go back further, at least now all nations have immigration laws.
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
02:55 PM on 08/09/2011
It seems as though you're already back in that time. I choose to remain in this time frame and address that time frame when appropriate.
04:43 PM on 08/09/2011
My 1. is in response to your "Pilgrims as nobles, not illegals", your "overzealou­s exercise of sovereign border powers results in a system that punishes people for moving, for dreaming", ok, so no white men, no pilgrims ok. Now I ask you did Mohawks not have any border to their territory so an Apache family can move in and dream?

Try to concentrate on sentences that end with a question mark instead of going into something else.
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
07:16 PM on 08/08/2011
As a society we have let a mass mentality stoked by false perception­s shape our thoughts. We see the Pilgrims as nobles, not illegals, but we see kids of people who have broken an administrative rule as criminals who don't deserve to be educated.

Once again "playing the immigration card" has become the fashion; once again further subordination of the subordinated is in vogue. Scapegoating is in.

Telling you that you are being held responsible­ for what your ancestors did is just as valid as telling Monji Dolon that he is responsable for what his parents did. Glass houses.

Recognizing that the overzealous exercise of sovereign border powers results in a system that punishes people for moving, for dreaming, and for following historical patterns of recruitment demands reflection. Even though the nation has the power to exclude and deport, that power must be implemented morally and ethnically, with a real understanding that we are dealing with real human beings. The accents may differ and their skin hue of a distinct shade, but they are truly the voices and faces of our own immigrant-dreamer ancestors.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
spytheweb
Black Democrat
12:27 PM on 08/09/2011
Here's a line, which side are you on, the American side or the illegal side?
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
02:38 PM on 08/09/2011
The AMERICAN side.

June 29, 2011 The Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) adopted a new immigratio­n resolution at its annual meeting held earlier this month in Phoenix. The resolution called on the government to secure the border and then provide a path to citizenshi­p for undocument­ed immigrants­.
http://blo­g.christia­nitytoday.­com/ctpoli­tics/2011/­06/

05/09/11
New polling shows that by a 3:1 margin, Americans want a path to citizenshi­p for undocument­ed immigrants­.
The poll finds overwhelmi­ng 72%-24% support for a path to legal citizenshi­p for the undocument­ed.
http://peo­ple-press.­org/files/­legacy-pdf­/Beyond-Re­d-vs-Blue-­The-Politi­cal-Typolo­gy.pdf

June 22, 2011
George W. Bush articulate­d his support for policies that would allow illegal immigrants already working in this country to apply for citizenshi­p nearly two-thirds of Americans, 64%, continue to support the proposal.
http://www­.gallup.co­m/poll/148­160/majori­ty-america­ns-urge-go­v-action-b­order-cont­rol.aspx

Rasmussen poll: Most voters in the poll said children brought to the U.S. illegally should get a chance at citizenshi­p if they complete two years of college or participat­e in the military.
http://was­hingtonind­ependent.c­om/98160/r­asmussen-v­oters-supp­ort-idea-o­f-dream-ac­t
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
03:03 PM on 08/09/2011
Re, "According to Picosa every nation is racist because they all require you to have a passport & visa, even the countries these illegals snuck out of. "

The difference between those countries and the USA is those countries require a passport and give a person a way of getting one.

The broken, draconian crumbling immigration laws of the USA require people to get a passport but don't provide a way to get one. LOL!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chevyliddle
what's a micro-bayou?
11:59 AM on 08/08/2011
"a Silicon Valley technology company tried to recruit him for work before they found out he can't be legally employed."

He's 25 years old and the above statement is the only reason he is now trying to obtain a deferment from deportation. Why didn't he come forward sooner? Because he can't get hired in his field as an illegal. If employment in his area of expertise as an illegal was possible, he would still be breaking the law now and into the future.
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
02:15 PM on 08/08/2011
What good would have come out of him coming forward before? He would have been deported at 18 yrs of age when he found out his status was illegal while applying to university.

If these kids have to go then so do all people who are not Native American Indians and want them gone. Non of their ancestors came here legally. They just forced themselves on the Native American Indians and made themselves legal.

The group most vocal about enforcing our immigration laws, the so-called Tea Partiers got its name from an event that defied a legal law.

In 1773, a group of colonists in Boston boarded three English merchant ships and dumped the tea they carried into the harbor, the so-called "Boston Tea Party."

Another piece of illegal law breaking which we revere today was perpetrate­d by British citizens who openly disobeyed the laws of Parliament and king, refused to pay taxes, and formed an insurgent army in 1776. Ironically­, today’s self-style­d patriots who have taken it upon themselves to protect our borders from the illegal hordes call themselves The Minutemen.

Throughout U.S. history, the men who made the laws reflected the dominant prejudices of their day, passing laws that became the infrastructure for slavery, Jim Crow segregation and the internment of Japanese citizens during World War II. Haven't you learned anything from our stupidity and racism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chevyliddle
what's a micro-bayou?
02:44 PM on 08/08/2011
Telling me that I'm being held responsible for what my ancestors did is not a valid point. They might have broken the existing laws but those laws have been changed and I am no longer responsible for their actions. Your "undocumented worker" is illegal and well aware of it. You might not like the law but it still is the law and he's breaking it willingly. There is no excuse for pushing him to the front of the line when there are people trying to do it the right way. when things don't go your way, pulling "racism" out of your bag of tricks won't go far in advancing your argument. I hold no racist feelings towards anyone that enters this country legally but when the laws are ignored until they interfere with your greater goals then I have a problem regardless of where you come from.
03:21 PM on 08/08/2011
By using Native American Indians as an example, you've pretty much said nothing.

I am just going to use Mexico and us as an example for simplicity because I know laws, treaties, agreements exist between any two countries on this planet Earth.

What year is this? 2011? So, in the year 2011 do you think there are laws written down on paper that both the gov of Mexico and US agreed upon that describes exactly how one person would immigrate from Mexico to US or from US to Mexico? How about the year 2010? 2009? The point is that you must acknowledge there is some point in time that nations came together and agreed upon some kind of laws that governs immigration. Did no such laws exist 20 years ago? I am sure they didn't exist during the Age of Discovery when North America was first discovered.

Additionally, do you wish North American was never discovered by the white men? So eventually the Native Americans would start their own industrial revolution and invent engines, machines, cars, internet, computers, google, so that America would still be the number one nation in the world where everyone wants to immigrate to? If no then would you think the natives would try to immigrate to Europe illegally and citing that they have an "European Dream"?
12:44 AM on 08/07/2011
ICE is satanic.
05:01 AM on 08/08/2011
Immigration and Customs Enforcement = ICE?
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
04:33 PM on 08/05/2011
Myth vs. Fact: The DREAM Act
No More Excuses on This Bill

The arguments mustered in opposition to the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act, or DREAM Act, have never been particularly persuasive. It’s hard to make a straight-faced argument against providing kids who lack immigration status through no fault of their own an opportunity to go to college or serve the country through military service.

That’s why dozens of House members spoke in favor of the bill, which passed when it came to the floor on December 8. Only a few hardliners stood to oppose it. The extreme broadsides levied by those House conservatives have been echoed by senators seeking to block consideration of the bill. More than anything, these deceptive arguments clearly expose the moral callousness of the opponents.

It’s important to expose the flaws and blatant misrepresentations in DREAM Act opponents’ most common arguments against the bill. It should be clear that the Senate has no good reason not to pass it.

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/12/dream_myths.html
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
spytheweb
Black Democrat
06:08 PM on 08/06/2011
Unemployment is at record highs, where are these people going to work? This is just another crack in the damn the aim is general amnesty for all illegals. Illegals are using children as a backdoor amnesty. There are over 6 billion people on the planet, how many are children? As of right now they all can come to America and receive a free education no questions asked. We can't educate them all, where does it stop?
02:24 AM on 08/07/2011
The DREAM ACT is JOB SECURITY for ILLEGAL ALIENS.....
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
04:29 PM on 08/07/2011
You come to that conclusion because of all the BS racists are feeding you. Immigration is an important factor in keeping this nation great. Immigrants pay more taxes then we do because they will never receive any of the benefits we can. That money can be used to pay for their children's education and health care for their families. Immigrants receive nothing free.

According to estimates released in 2007, the fertility rate in the United States is projected to fall below "replacement" level by 2015 to 2020, declining to 1.91 children per woman (lower than the 2.1 children per woman rate needed to replace the population). By 2010, 77 million baby boomers will begin to retire and, by 2030, one in every five Americans is projected to be a senior citizen.

The combination of a need for workers and an inadequate immigration system has caused an unacceptable status quo.

By not creating adequate legal avenues for hiring foreign workers and not addressing the status of workers already here, Congress and this administration are not fully safeguarding the economy for the future. While there are fluctuations in employment rates, the long-term threat of a shrinking labor pool lingers in the United States.

Creating paths to permanent residence for immigrant workers coming here, when appropriate, and providing a way to earn legal status for undocumented workers who have been here supporting our economy for the last decade or more would strengitan our economy.
02:42 PM on 08/05/2011
•The DREAM Act Does Not Require That an Illegal Alien Complete Military Service As A Condition For Amnesty, and There Is already A Legal Process In Place For Illegal Aliens to Obtain U.S. Citizenship Through Military Service

•Despite Their Current Illegal Status, DREAM Act Aliens Will Be Given All The Rights That Legal Immigrants Receive—Including The Legal Right To Sponsor Their Parents and Extended Family Members For Immigration

•Current Illegal Aliens Will Get Federal Student Loans, Federal Work Study Programs, and Other Forms of Federal Financial Aid
02:41 PM on 08/05/2011
FACTS about the DREAM ACT:


•The DREAM Act Is NOT Limited to Children -- Applicants can be up to the age of 29

•The DREAM Act Will Be Funded On the Backs Of Hard Working, Law-Abiding Americans -- CBO failed to assess costs for education, increased levels of unemployment due to the addition of workers to the workforce, and increases in potential applicants because of loopholes.

•The DREAM Act PROVIDES SAFE HARBOR FOR ANY ALIEN, Including Criminals, From Being Removed or Deported If They Simply Submit An Application -- Burden of proving inaccurate information on a DREAM Act application is on the Department of Homeland Security.

•Certain Inadmissible Aliens, including those from high-risk regions, Will Be Eligible For Amnesty Under The DREAM Act

•Certain Criminal Aliens—including drunk drivers—Will Be Eligible For Amnesty Under The DREAM Act -- The DREAM Act allows applicants be convicted of 1 felony or up to 3 misdemeanors.

•Conservative Estimates Suggest That At Least 1.3 Million Illegal Aliens Will Be Eligible For the DREAM Act Amnesty. In Reality, We Have No Idea How Many Illegal Aliens Will Apply

•The DREAM Act Does Not Require That An Illegal Alien Finish Any Type of Degree (Vocational, Two-Year, or Bachelor’s Degree) As A Condition of Amnesty -- The applicant only has to complete the equivalent of two years of college.

(cont'd)
01:31 PM on 08/05/2011
"Dolon is hoping to be granted deferred action, a status that would allow him to avoid deportation for a year and work legally in the United States. He is a skilled web designer and developer, and a Silicon Valley technology company tried to recruit him for work before they found out he can't be legally employed. "

************

Only after he graduated from college is he willing to face he can't be legally employed?

But at no other time - was he willing to try and become legal? What about becoming a US citizen?

So as an illegal alien, he and his extended family have been provided FREE SERVICES?

Well that is a good deal to start a life in their own country - and apply like other people who followed the proper procedures to enter the USA.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
spytheweb
Black Democrat
06:13 PM on 08/06/2011
They don't need skilled web designers and developers in Mexico?
07:27 PM on 08/06/2011
Exactly........the illegals should be grateful for the education - and Free Services - acquired off the backs of US taxpayers.......deport themselves and apply like other legal immigrants, and those seeking US citizenship.

The DREAM ACT is JOB SECURITY for Illegal Aliens.
photo
CelticMajic
The answer lies in each of us individually
01:08 PM on 08/05/2011
Please take this up with those that broke the law. Not the taxpayer. Their parents are the accountable party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Haun
the first 374 fans are always the hardest
01:16 PM on 08/05/2011
so right! the parents broke our laws and put their children in a terrible position. the parents took a risk and now the children are paying for it because of their parent's short-sighted attempt to circumvent our immigration laws. it is not our problem to fix
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
05:02 PM on 08/05/2011
In civilized societies when parents are to blame for any negative predicament that a child is suffering the community steps up to the plate to save them, unless they are savages then they demonize them. You do know a 3, 7, or 12 yr old child has no clue as to how to become legal, don't you? If you know some way these dreamers could remedy their situation let us know -- as there are thousands of Dreamers out there that would also like to know.

If these children have to pay for the sins of their fathers then I hope that every anchor baby who is of European decent is ready to repatriate themselves to their homeland to pay for the illegal immigration, illegal genocide, illegal murder of American Indians, illegal land theft, illegally breaking treaties sins of their fathers.
photo
CelticMajic
The answer lies in each of us individually
07:37 PM on 08/05/2011
How is it "paying for the sins of their fathers" to return with their parents to their nation of birth? I was under the impression that many of the dreamers were from Mexico and proudly carried that flag in demonstrations. What is the punishment in returning to a place you are proud of?
photo
CelticMajic
The answer lies in each of us individually
09:16 PM on 08/05/2011
Do you always dodge the questions? And when you are at a loss for an answer do you always personally attack those that you disagree with? I will refrain from responding in kind. If one is a legally here then you are exactly correct you have every right to wave any flag. If you are illegal and demanding to stay while proudly waving a foreign flag, you still have that right to wave the flag but then again one can ask, what is the punishment in returning to the nation of your birth and legal citizenship? Can you answer that simple question without disrespecting me personally?
11:18 AM on 08/05/2011
Did you not hear the story of 29000 children died of hunger in Somalia? Shouldn't their parents have brought all of them here illegally before they died? Why not? Are you god enough to tell that they don't have an American Dream? Or their parents don't want better lives for their kids and their future?

Com'on tell me something birdlives2­010, there must be something that these 29000 kids are not, thus prevents them from coming to this country illegally. Maybe they are not the poorest or the most violent country in the world, because that was the reason cited by the Mexicans for being here illegally right? If their parents had brought all of them here illegally, it wouldn't be them who had broke the laws right? When they all grow up, they all can cite each and every one of your excuses and demand the gov to pass Dream Act II, maybe Dream Act III? IV?
photo
iuriggs6
Sure thing. Shoot, Timmy.
08:38 AM on 08/05/2011
Another sob story....
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
spytheweb
Black Democrat
05:57 AM on 08/05/2011
These students are in fact citizens of another country. Any dream act/amnesty will make them US citizens along with alot of other felons. Illegals end up using their children in one way or another.
10:00 AM on 08/05/2011
I love going through all these comments and reading posts by all the haters, the ignorance is amusing. The DREAM Act has provisions to keep felons from being eligible. Keep spreading lies like a good little ignorant political tool though.
12:06 PM on 08/05/2011
There are no background checks - w The Dream Act.
12:40 PM on 08/05/2011
According to the Farlex Legal Dictionary the word Felony is defined as follows:
n. 1) a crime sufficiently serious to be punishable by death or a term in state or federal prison, as distinguished from a misdemeanor which is only punishable by confinement to county or local jail and/or a fine. 2) a crime carrying a minimum term of one year or more in state prison, since a year or less can be served in county jail. However, a sentence upon conviction for a felony may sometimes be less than one year at the discretion of the judge and within limits set by statute. Felonies are sometimes referred to as "high crimes" as described in the U. S. Constitution.

Under this definition crossing the U.S. Border illegally could be considered a felony per Section 1325 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Yet the DREAM Act does not keep them from being eligible.
12:05 PM on 08/05/2011
The DREAM ACT legislation also provides VOTING RIGHTS within 24 hours - and have illegals registered as Democrats.
01:21 PM on 08/05/2011
Know what's funny? I googled "DREAM Act Voting Rights" to find a source for this non-sense you're spewing, and guess what? The ONLY thing that popped up in google was YOUR COMMENT. There is absolutely no source for what you just said. You must be a United States Citizen to vote, the DREAM Act offers temporary residency and, over 5-10 years, legal permanent residency.

You're full of filth and lies, how do you live with yourself?
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
05:40 PM on 08/05/2011
LINK?
08:28 PM on 08/04/2011
Those kids didn't decide to immigrate illegally. All too often they are brought to the United States as babies or toddlers, where they grow up like any other child in this country: speaking English, playing basketball, reciting the Pledge of Allegiance, and even watching The Simpsons. Just like you and me, they go to the Homecoming Game and worry about their Prom Date.
10:33 PM on 08/04/2011
Agreed, but how do you plan on discouraging illegal immigration by the parents who bring their child illegally to the United States? If the Dream Act passes I propose that if you want a path to U.S. citizenship for your child the illegal parents must self deport to their home country and are permanently ineligible for a visa or citizenship to the U.S. for their actions.

The problem with the Dream Act right now is that once the child obtains U.S. citizenship they can turn around and file a petition for their parents and siblings to obtain legal residency as IR-5 and F-4 immigrants. So in reality, the parents who entered the U.S. illegally have just created a path to citizenship for their family while others have had to wait legally in their home country for years. What incentive is there to follow the rule of law if you reward people who enjoyed the privileges of the United States while others patiently waited in their home country for the legal right to immigrate to the United States? Why not just immigrate illegally immediately if in the end your are going to be awarded citizenship? There should be some consequences to detour illegal immigration and encourage legal immigration.
10:02 AM on 08/05/2011
Please read on up the DREAM Act before making assumptions, IndyinDC. I like you because you're remaining open minded on the issue, I think if you read more into the DREAM Act you'd support it.

The DREAM Act (the newest versions anyway, such as the one introduced last December) does have provisions so that those eligible for the DREAM Act can't petition for their parents.

Also, more illegal immigration will NOT be encouraged. It clearly states in the DREAM Act that you must have come to the United States before a certain age (I believe it was somewhere in the very early teens) and before a specific date BEFORE* the DREAM Act is passed. You must also provide proof of the aforementioned in order to be eligible. Therefore, the incentive for more illegal immigration simply won't be there as a result of the DREAM Act. Incentive to come here will remain the same as ever regardless if it passes or not, other acts must be passed to lower illegal immigration rates, this act is merely for giving those that were brought here at a young age a fair chance that they deserve.
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
05:48 PM on 08/05/2011
Myth: The DREAM Act would trigger large-scale “chain migration.”
Fact: It would be at least 10 years before a DREAM Act beneficiary could sponsor their spouse or child for permanent residence and at least 13 years before they could sponsor their parents or siblings.
Another claim rolled out with monotonous regularity is the “chain migration” excuse. Opponents falsely suggest that the nation’s immigration system authorizes sponsorship of extended family, conjuring up hordes of great-aunts, step-uncles, and third cousins immigrating to the United States once the DREAM Act beneficiary gains legal status.

The reality is that our immigration laws only permit sponsorship of immediate relatives. And the soonest these youths would be able to sponsor their spouses or minor children to come to the United States would be 10 years after enactment. They could not sponsor their parents or siblings until after they became U.S. citizens, which is a minimum of 13 years after gaining legal status. Moreover, if their parents or siblings were in the United States unlawfully they would be required to leave the United States for 10 years before becoming eligible for sponsorship.

A 23-year wait to bring your parents to the United States doesn’t square with the chain migration menace promoted by opponents.

http://www­.americanp­rogress.or­g/issues/2­010/12/dre­am_myths.h­tml
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
spytheweb
Black Democrat
05:52 AM on 08/05/2011
undefined
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
spytheweb
Black Democrat
12:22 PM on 08/09/2011
"reciting the Pledge of Allegiance" does not count if you are not a US citizen.