iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Infidelity Linked To 'Sexual Personality': University Of Guelph Study

Sexual Personality And Infidelity

Huffington Post   First Posted: 08/03/11 03:01 PM ET Updated: 10/03/11 06:12 AM ET

Chemistry. Communication. Compatibility. To the list of traits most of us look for in a long-term partner, we might want to consider adding one more, at least according to a new study: sexual "personality."

Robin Milhausen and Kristen Mark at the University of Guelph and Erick Janssen from The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction at Indiana University recently polled 506 men and 412 women who reported involvement in "monogamous sexual relationships lasting from three months to 43 years" to examine the link between our gender, our sexual "personality," and our likelihood to cheat.

What they found was surprising: While the probability of cheating was nearly identical irrespective of gender (23 percent of men and 19 percent of women reported infidelity), the causes for the infidelity differed drastically.

Men who were easily aroused and men who suffered from "performance anxiety" were more likely to be unfaithful. Their sexual satisfaction within their "monogamous relationship" was irrelevant--they'd cheat whether the sex with their partner was good or not.

Conversely, for women, happiness with their long-term sexual partner was paramount--women who felt sexually unsatisfied were more likely to cheat.

The study's researchers refer to those differences as being part of our "sexual personality," which is a broad term describing the range of traits that dictate how easily people become turned on or off by certain cues. To get a better grasp on the nuances of the "sexual personality," we spoke with Mr. Janssen:

Huffington Post: What were your findings?

Erick Janssen: We discovered that there are distinct connections between “sexual personalities” and infidelity. In the past, there has been research on demographic predictors [for infidelity] including whether you’re male or female, married, what religion you are, and some studies have looked at the link between relationships and sexual satisfaction. But there was not much work in terms of what kind of a sexual person you are and to what degree that might have an impact [on infidelity].

HP: What do you mean by “sexual personality” and how is it measured?

EJ: Everyone has personality traits--people can be more or less extroverted or introverted, for example, and the same applies to sex. For over 15 years the Kinsey Institute has explored the role of “sexual excitation proneness” or “sexual inhibition proneness.” Basically it’s about how easily people become turned on or off by certain things. Sexual excitation is about how sensitive people are to different triggers and cues and how easily they become turned on. Sexual inhibition is about how easily you’re turned off by potential dangers or risks or threats.

HP: Can you be both easily excited and easily inhibited? Which is the major indicator of infidelity?

EJ: Whether you become aroused in a situation depends on the balance between those forces. They are independent processes. You could be someone who is very easily turned on at the same time very easily turned off: you could lose your arousal when the phone rings, or, you think of your grocery list, and it’s over. Other people are not as easily inhibited. We’ve done a lot of research on this in terms of sexual risk-taking. People who are turned on easily are high on sexual excitation. People who are low on sexual inhibition are more likely to engage in risky and aggressive sexual behaviors. In this study we wanted to see whether those behaviors are relevant to sexual infidelity, which, in a way, is a form of risky sexual behavior.

HP: But you found that both men who experience “performance anxiety” and men who are “easily aroused” are likely to cheat. It seems like those categories hit both ends of the spectrum. Who isn’t going to be unfaithful?

EJ: If you were [less] easily turned on, you would be less likely to engage in [infidelity]. [But in regards to cheating,] we found that we have two types of inhibition: one [is concerned with] whether social and emotional risks, such as being caught cheating by others, would cause you to lose your arousal. Some people say “yes” and their desire for sex is gone. But for others, the ceiling could come down and they would still be turned on--they are easily aroused no matter the circumstance, [thus the inhibiting risk of unfaithful sex does not affect them]. Another type of inhibition is more relevant to performance anxiety—how difficult it is for you to be turned on because of concerns about your performance and anxieties. Strangely enough, almost paradoxically, that one predicted infidelity.

HP: What about “performance anxiety” prompts sexual infidelity?

EJ: We are not entirely sure what to make of it, but one possibility is that people engage in risky behaviors, including infidelity, to overcome inhibition.

HP: You say, “personality traits are more likely to determine whether a man will cheat than demographic details.” Does that mean there are specific characteristics people should watch out for when seeking a monogamous relationship?

EJ: No, I don’t think it’s that simple. You might think that if you are with someone who doesn’t care about sex to begin with, that person might be less likely to cheat on you sexually. But even that we don’t know for sure.

HP: So what makes people more likely to cheat? Are there differences between gender?

EJ: We looked at whether age, marital status, the importance of religion, but also happiness and sexual satisfaction in the relationship had an effect on infidelity—none of which proved to be very relevant. Although, for women, general happiness in the relationship was an important predictor of infidelity. We also asked people to indicate if they felt compatible with their partner in terms of how often they had sex, wanted to have sex, and their sexual values. And for women, how compatible they felt with their partner in shared sexual values was also a predictor [for cheating]. With men, none of those things mattered as much as their own sexual personality traits. They could be happy and sexually satisfied in a relationship and still might say they cheated. The sexual excitation proneness in males is important. In men, more than women, being very easily turned on is a contributor to infidelity.

HP: Are couples with similar sexual personality traits more likely to maintain monogamy?

EJ: What people said about compatibility was not that relevant. For men, infidelity was unrelated to whether they said that they their partner shared similar sexual values. If women had similar sexual characteristics to their partner, they were more likely to engage in infidelity—but that may mean that they both have very liberal sexual values. For women, though, similarity in sexual values was relevant to their sexual satisfaction.

HP:Do you have any final thoughts on infidelity as a whole?

EJ: There’s one thing to keep in mind. Men are [slightly] more likely to [cheat] than women: But both men and women engage in these types of behaviors. This type of woman or this type of man might be more likely to commit infidelity, and yes it can be because you’re unhappy in your relationship, but this research shows that it’s not necessarily due to how happy or unhappy you are.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DIVORCE

Chemistry. Communication. Compatibility. To the list of traits most of us look for in a long-term partner, we might want to consider adding one more, at least according to a new study: sexual "persona...
Chemistry. Communication. Compatibility. To the list of traits most of us look for in a long-term partner, we might want to consider adding one more, at least according to a new study: sexual "persona...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,058
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimsit
= rghts r not spcial rights
07:53 AM on 08/23/2011
I personally think the real cheater is the liar. There is a form of respect for a Partner who always tells me the truth and doen't agree to monogamy. I like the Fenchman. So many are ignoring the comment he made about believing in commitment, but not in monogamy. That's my way and since the respect is never brokernby a lie, the playing with another is also respectful, as my Patner and I tell our incidental affairs that we are in commikted relationships and unavailable at that level, and we do it on our time, as whentravelling alone, or in the course of the workaday schedule when my Partner and I can't be together anyway. I know this makes many crazy to hear, but it works for us..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edogg62
10:08 AM on 08/12/2011
We're animals folks. Sorry. ALL of us. We keep trying to apply an artificial system onto an organic system... it is destined not work. Which should be PAINFULLY obvious by now. This is one of the many reasons man invented religion... of course there are obvious inspirations such as giving people a means of grasping mortality (an "afterlife" filled with rewards material and otherwise), but one of the other major reasons for the development of Santa Claus in the Sky is to keep people in line for fear of unimaginably horrific repercussions.

People do all sorts of things that would be considered "wrong" by general consensus without examination of the subtleties/grey areas etc... adultery being one of the more topical "sins." But there are sooo many others that are just as "bad" if you will. How about showing little respect to your spouse? Taking them for granted? Not addressing their needs? Anyone with a smidge of self-respect won't sit tight for TOO long if they're not getting their needs met. Sorry. Stop listening to "Dr." Phil or the almighty Oprah. WOMEN need to cater to the needs of their husbands JUST AS MUCH as MEN need to cater to their wives' needs. Sorry to burst the bubble of misandry.
10:05 AM on 08/09/2011
Here is the real answer: lack of self-control and being selfish.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saira Jabbar
advisor
09:24 AM on 08/08/2011
I wonder if military men cheat more? I am dating a military guy and am so confused lol.
AllyCat7
Snarks need not reply.
05:13 AM on 08/06/2011
Where is my post about correlation not being causation? Why can't you post an opinion that disagrees with the article? Fascist much?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladywiccan
a wife, mother and grandmother
02:34 PM on 08/05/2011
Tom, did your fingers get tied in a knot typing that? I have my opinion and you have yours, but if there is one thing that really gets to me is the rudness of the younger generation but then again they have a valid reason, their parents didn't teach them doodly
06:03 PM on 08/10/2011
I think that how a person is raised has a great deal to do with it; the formation of their morals and values and what they consider important would definitely affect their ability to get turned on (and their inability to turn themselves off) and cheat. But, mainly, I'd say our culture encourages men to cheat. And, voila, they do. No big freakin mystery.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
11:54 AM on 08/05/2011
Could it be that in a global culture with the multiple stimuli, stresses, and blandishments of this one monogamy is outmoded?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
11:48 AM on 08/05/2011
Monogamy is artificial.
04:48 AM on 08/05/2011
I'm easily aroused. I cheated on my first husband because he became a boring, unambitious person. I'ld have left the marriage sooner but we had a young son. He was ok in bed but I avoided sex with him because I felt trapped with someone I'd lost all affection for.

I divorced and married my second husband when my son was 10. We met at work. He had a reputation for bedding everything that walked. I was as active as he was but very good at keeping my laisons secret. A few hours before a work-related cocktail party, I hadn't decided which admirer to let take me. He was going single and avoiding women who expected to be his date. To solve our dilemma, we decided to go together. I told him he was wasting his time if he thought he'd get me in the sack. He told me not to worry as he'd plenty of ladies and didn't need another. We were both smartalecky, letting the other know we were "the best that's ever been" and wouldn't be impressed anyway. End of story, we did get together and both admitted it was the best we'd ever had. We've never cheated and get a kick teasing each other if we see someone coming on to them. I think we don't cheat because we both know the other can easily get someone else and don't want to risk losing the only person who's truly satisfied us in every way.
AllyCat7
Snarks need not reply.
02:16 PM on 08/05/2011
Uhh yeahh. Good luck with that lasting long-term.
photo
littlestar
What is life without dessert?
03:03 PM on 08/05/2011
Yeah. That was quite bizarre, hey? Oh well, to each their own I guess.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen1e
03:05 PM on 08/08/2011
If either of you does cheat is it a deal breaker?
11:06 PM on 08/08/2011
We married in our early 30s, had our child when I was 37 and he 36 and are now in our mid-60s so if he were to cheat now, I'd just get all his money. Our connection's more than just in the bedroom. Even though we've slowed down quite a bit, we're both high energy people, on the same intellectual level, have the same political views, agreed on child-raising and since I'm the more fiscally responsible one, he agreed early on to let me handle the money. As far as housework, we always clean the house and do yard work together on Saturday. Since we both like to cook and hate to clean up the kitchen, we take turns. If you cook, the other cleans. We've always basically been joined at the hip.

I think the reason it's worked for so long is we see each other as equals who'd rather make love not war and others as not on our level. We've always had a cavalier attitude about others who could interfere with our relationship, especially when we were younger. We'd humorously say things to each other like "So and so wants to get it on with you." or "Have you seen how so and so's looking at you?". I think acknowledging that others found our mate sexually attractive diminished the need to find affirmation outside our marriage. We didn't just fall in love with the sex but with the attitude.
02:34 AM on 08/05/2011
It's quite amusing that Cheaters stand up for eachother saying everybody does it yet these people are never single you see they know that if they were honest about anything nobody would have them so everything about them is a lie so if they really are so right about what they believe stand up and tell it straight from the beginning and lets see how right you are when your all alone instead you hide behind somebody who wouldn't do it because 1 you couldn't handle your own behaviour returned to you and 2 your too weak to stand on your own you need someone to hold your hand now who is pathetic
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BabaLou7
Insignificant, yet eternal God Fractal
11:51 AM on 08/06/2011
great points - a lot of people work their primary commitment as a Wing Man to their exploits, just like a lot of people might take a dog or baby that's not theirs on a walk to meet potential sex partners
09:38 PM on 08/11/2011
Ta
01:48 AM on 08/05/2011
People cheat for their own reasons, I'm not sure that anyone can say "men and women mostly cheat because of this and that." Cheating is not my thing, nor will it ever be. I am too emotionally invested into the sexual aspect of my marriage to share that with someone else. Also, having been cheated on myself, I wouldn't wish to put someone else through the grief. If a couple wants to be swingers, that's their choice (please wear a condom!!). If someone doesn't want to be tied down and is honest with their partners, great (please wear a condom!!). I wouldn't be in a relationship where I was dating someone who was dating someone else, but hey, that's just me.
10:15 PM on 08/11/2011
Sounds to me you have self respect for yourself and for others.
01:47 AM on 08/05/2011
People cheat because they don't love themselves and have a harder time loving their mate well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tazirai
Society is not your friend.
06:39 PM on 08/05/2011
No people cheat because they CAN. I know alot of cheaters who love themselves. BELIEVE me they love themselves. They even love their mates. They just can;t keep in their pants, or their legs close.
It's why I wont marry. I know how I am, I love the companionship of Women. I'm honest with them, They know I see other women, and I place no pressure whatsoever on them. I leave whatever happens between us up to them. The only standing rules I have is, Condom always, and I dont want a girlfriend. I prefer being single. I ALWAYS leave it up to them to decide, once I let them know What I want and don't want.
06:51 PM on 08/05/2011
You are talking about narcissists sex addicts, that is a sickness. But people often stray from their mates because of their own insecurities. Cheaters can't love themselves because to love is to trust and if they can't trust themselves, how could they love and trust another person?
01:09 AM on 08/05/2011
Of course then you must remember that you're only as faithful as your options...sad, but true.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aero56
06:28 PM on 08/09/2011
You are as faithful as your integrity allows you, not your options.
StevenRussell1
Christian Pilot
12:46 AM on 08/05/2011
Hogwash!

There is no such thing as "Sexual Personality". Otherwise all would be cheating, as the Bible tells us that; "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23). Here is another case of somebody believing the devil's lie, and trying to get others to swallow that lie as well.

Jesus died on the cross for a world of sinners, (John 3:16,17), so that anyone who turns to Him will not have to spend an eternity in Hell, but instead will be able to spend eternity with the King of kings and Lord of lords in Heaven.

Unfortunately, the Bible tells us that the vast majority of people are on the broad path to destruction, and people try to excuse away sin, as they do in this article.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Armijo
01:44 AM on 08/05/2011
Oh, shaddap.
photo
littlestar
What is life without dessert?
03:04 PM on 08/05/2011
Haha fanned!

Still hard to believe that people now a days still believe in all that bible nonsense.
12:29 PM on 08/06/2011
sim john eu estou shadap muito obrigado senhor
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tazirai
Society is not your friend.
06:40 PM on 08/05/2011
I don't believe in your bible. So it's moot who quotes what and who did whatever.
BUUUT even your Solomon had a ton of wives.. whats up with that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:45 AM on 08/05/2011
This is very dangerous route to take politically--and it's the kind of thing that radical feminists love because it paints a certain kind of male as innately "bad." It also begs the question of identifying, if not monitoring, those males who seem to exhibit the designated "bad habits" of sexual arousal. (I'm reminded of the 1960s Scottish study that attempted identity [for possible monitoring] male babies with the abnormaility of YYX chromosome constructs. Thankfully, the research was aborted as the psychological implications of creating deviant males in a self-fulfilling prophesy arose.) Conversely, according to this study, women cheat when the marriage ceases to satify. Again, it's party-time for radical feminists as women encumbered by the status quo shackles of traditional marriage liberate themselves through their expressions of infidelity. So, for men, infidlity is an act of psychological or even genetic weakness, while, for women, infidelity is an act of empowerment. I find this study to be weak, biased and, basically, unnecessary.
photo
shieldvulf
Forgive our debts as we forgive our debtors.
04:17 PM on 08/09/2011
It doesn't say any of those things.

RIF!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:10 AM on 08/11/2011
You are not thinking.