iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Overdraft Fees Remains Steep At Big Banks One Year After Reform

Overdraft Banks

By CANDICE CHOI   08/ 3/11 07:23 PM ET   AP

NEW YORK -- The country's largest banks are still charging steep overdraft fees.

A survey released Wednesday by the Consumer Federation of America found that the median overdraft fee is $35, the same as it was last year. The highest fees also remain $33 to $37 per overdraft.

The fees can be triggered if customers overdraw their checking accounts by as little as $5. In addition, the survey found that two-thirds of banks continue piling on fees if customers fail to balance their accounts within a set time. For example, JPMorgan Chase charges an "extended overdraft" fee of $15 after each five-day period that an account stays in the red.

The findings come a year after a new regulation went into effect requiring banks to obtain permission from customers before enrolling them in overdraft programs. Previously, it was industry practice to automatically enroll customers without giving them a way to opt out.

Critics said that led to consumers unwittingly racking up overdraft fees. The problem was that customers would often continue using their debit cards, not realizing they could spend more than they had in their bank accounts.

Under the new rule, customers must now actively consent to be enrolled in overdraft programs. If they opt out, their debit card would simply be declined at the register if they didn't have enough money to cover the transaction. The rule does not limit how much banks can charge in overdraft fees, however. There's also no limit on the number of times banks can continue fining customers for a single violation.

The survey by the Consumer Federation of America also found that banks still allow multiple overdraft fees to be charged in a single day. In two cases, banks hiked the total number of overdraft fines that could be charged daily.

In other cases, the survey noted that banks are making changes that benefit consumers. Earlier this year, for example, Citibank said it would start clearing checks starting with the smallest amounts first.

By contrast, consumer watchdogs say a high-to-low check clearing method increases the potential for multiple overdraft violations. But that's how most major banks processed payments last year. The banking industry has long defended the practice, saying bigger checks tend to be fore more important payments that customers want paid first.

The new opt-in rule on overdraft programs applies to point-of-sale transactions; banks can still enroll customers for overdraft protection on checks without their consent.

The Consumer Federation of America survey was based on the overdraft policies of the 14 largest banks as of June. The group noted that all surveyed banks provide lower cost forms of overdraft protection, such as transfers from savings accounts.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 279
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
04:47 PM on 09/01/2011
I think its ok for a bank to have some assurances; they do also get alot of clients who skip out and dont pay their balances, thus leaving the bank short funds HOWEVER when you are being charged 33 dollars for being as little as 1-12 dollars overdrawn they are STEALING. They dont need to take that much out. Unfortunately the poor are slaves and have no voice-- the rich, well they have all the power; suck it up or join forces, unified, if you want change. The government is made up of people, who are fallible, and subject to their humanity, the good the bad and the ugly.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teachone
Knowledge is Power
01:16 AM on 08/06/2011
The Consumer Finanicial Protection Bureau needs to use this issue as their first project!!! These banks simply REFUSE to follow the law, they are NEVER going to change and be honest and ethical, they are GREEDY and so MUST be REGULATED CONSTANTLY, watched, analyzed, investigated, held accountable with massive fines and penalties!! If you want them to STOP and follow the law, ENFORCE IT!! For every instance that is reported slap huge fees with the interest rates and consequences like the IRS charges on back taxes, you have to MAKE these crooks follow the law, they are NOT going to do it willingly, that is why they are crooks!! Most should be sitting in a jail!! These are the facts!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:31 PM on 08/05/2011
Opt Out - you don't have to have overdraft protection. Keep track of your balances and don't let anyone, other than yourself, access your accounts.
photo
Sky Tripp
34 yo gay married hippy dude
10:34 AM on 08/06/2011
lets see it is impassable not to have at least your car insurance auto withdrawaled with certain companies and here in md we are paying 36 dollars more a year for electricity if you do not auto withdrawal..... but if you say so
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
03:35 PM on 08/05/2011
You know, I remember a few decades ago when banks were pushing hard for a "paperless" money system. Everyone was pushed by societal pressures to get a checking account, then credit cards, and finally debit cards. At one time, check cashing services would come to workplaces and hand over cash to employees for a small fee. Then those services were stopped. Then, with the last few jobs I had, you HAD to have a checking account because checks were only distributed by direct deposit. Once they had trapped almost everyone but the poorest of the poor, they start to tighten the chain around our necks and steal our money at an increasing rate. The paperless money system....a scam from the beginnning. Maybe we should consider "retaking" our cash and forget debit cards, credit cards and checks. Life would be more controllable and simpler.
02:36 PM on 08/05/2011
Hard to blame the banks when customers are opting in for the overdraft and are still paying for it. It's a hint and a half.

Its like smoking. It's bad for you but people still do it. If it is truly that bad, then make it illegal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cowboyHoward
"Party till she's perty."
11:09 AM on 08/05/2011
"The banking industry has long defended the practice, saying bigger checks tend to be fore more important payments that customers want paid first." bs !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alchemy1
10:06 AM on 08/05/2011
Move your money to a LOCAL Bank! What a refreshing relief! Free Check over 50... Free checks... Home town customer service... I was with Suntrust for 23 years... they have no loyality.
11:35 AM on 08/06/2011
I recently had to switch banks. I went to a *big bank* and they have RIDICULOUS checking rules. 10 ATM uses a month for a minimum of 5,000. Unlimited ATM required $25,000 minimum balance. I walked out. Found a smaller bank with reasonable terms/conditions. Why people use the big ones is beyond me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alchemy1
12:39 PM on 08/06/2011
yes... I am saving at least $200 a year on fees and checks. Green Bank also bought my leftover checks and cards back. So I made $25... plus my free cooler and water cooler... lol... ;)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
05:51 AM on 08/05/2011
Amazing!  Did Obama not sign a reform bill and it was it not a waste of time, like all the other reform bills that left the backdoor open for the criminals to steal our money, e.g. speculators. Apparently, most are still defending this do-nothing man who has not even attempted to change anything.  Oh, but blame it on congress, then why do we have a president, is he a push around president?  Did he not get his Libyan War started and then got congress to agree with it.  I get it, he gets some things done!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
03:24 PM on 08/05/2011
Congress writes the legislation. The Prez only signs it. Blame the Party of No, the GOTP for blocking every reform effort attempted by O, and watering down to almost nothing those few they allowed to pass.
photo
effect
The Shadow knows...
03:35 PM on 08/05/2011
Comment falls on deaf ears, but maybe by repeating this fact over, and over, and over, perhaps - just perhaps, a bit of it might begin to trickle through.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USA2Sense
02:07 AM on 08/05/2011
THANK YOU - CONGRESS!!!
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
01:02 AM on 08/05/2011
Maybe there wasn't any reform.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:48 PM on 08/04/2011
No overdraft, no fees. Even an idiot like me can figure that out.

Forest.
photo
rich07
High Hopes Indeed...
06:58 PM on 08/05/2011
It really is that simple...don't overdraw your account and amazingly NO FEES.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
catgrill
09:53 PM on 08/05/2011
I have a checking account with $1000 credit line for overdraft protection. If I become overdrawn my bank moves money in $50 increments into my checking and charges me $2 for each transaction. That's cheaper than the $35 my bank charges without this credit line.

Your comment sounds very judgemental. I'm glad things are so simple for you. For others, it is not. Some people barely have enough to meet their monthly expenses. Therefore, they have to perform some financial juggling. In my case, I set it up so the cost to me would be minimal. Here's an example: My mortgage company decided I was in a flood zone. The annual premium was $333 and had to be paid up front. I sent in the check, overdrawing my account, my bank transferred $350 from my credit line into my checking and charged me a $2 transaction fee. Then I paid my credit line off over time.

But here's the catch. In order to get a credit line with your bank you have to have good credit. If you don't and you also have to juggle things you are at risk of overdrawing your account. For people in this position the fees are just too damn high. The fees themselves can create a vicious cycle of continuously overdrawing your account.

We are not all in the same boat, you know. Some of us are on the cruise liner but alot of us are in the dinghy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angel R1240
Progressive for REAL change
09:51 PM on 08/04/2011
Wait the "reform" law was going to fix this right? No of course not. These banks act like they really need the money when they got billions of dollars in bailout money from us the tax payers and they still are ripping us off. Forget the big banks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbryant80
I am an Independent, not a troll for partisan poli
08:45 PM on 08/04/2011
The government has continued the moral hazard by allowing the banks to go unscathed. What did they expect?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
makebofapay
05:56 PM on 08/04/2011
MOVE YOUR MONEY. Do not let these banking criminals charge you ridiculous fees. They will cascade your fees and rack up hundreds of charges against YOU. There are credit unions and small banks who will be reasonable about service. MOVE YOUR MONEY!!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:49 PM on 08/04/2011
AGREED!!!!
05:50 PM on 08/04/2011
thats cause the bill wasnt written to protect us, it was written to protect the banks. had it been written to protect us they would have eliminated entirely the overdraft fee instead of allowing us to opt in? who would do that. also, why didnt they eliminate or cap the amout that the banks could charge us on atm fees. banks and private owners of atms make billions each year on charging us to access our money. not to meantion all the other bs fees they charge us the consumer for using our money. this bill was nothing more than another way for politicians to pat themselves on the back for sticking it to the working class.