More

Bioplastics Debate: Could They Harm The Environment?

 
First Posted: 08/05/11 08:24 PM ET Updated: 10/05/11 06:12 AM ET

This article comes to us courtesy of California Watch.


Bad news about “environmentally friendly” biodegradable plastics: They may not be so environmentally friendly after all.

According to research from North Carolina State University, biodegradable plastics can release large amounts of methane while decomposing. And methane is a potent greenhouse gas.

The study was funded by Procter & Gamble, a major manufacturer of plastic products.

“Everybody assumes that biodegradable is desirable. This study calls that into question,” Morton Barlaz, one of the researchers who conducted the study, told the McClatchy-Tribune News Service.

Biodegradable plastics, or green plastics, are made from plant derivatives and take a just a few years to decompose.

Traditional plastics, made from petroleum byproducts, can take decades, centuries, even millennia to disappear.

Barlaz and his team say it’s this difference in rate of decomposition that is part of the issue.

Here’s why: Federal Trade Commission guidelines require that any product marked as compostable or biodegradable must decompose within “a reasonable short period of time” after disposal.

But other federal regulations don’t require landfills with gas collection systems to collect methane gas until two years after the waste is buried. That means a quick-decomposing plastic in a landfill is going to release all of its methane into the atmosphere before it can be collected.

Therefore, a slower rate of decomposition may be better for the environment.

“If we want to maximize the environmental benefit of biodegradable products in landfills,” Barlaz told ScienceDaily, a science news service, “we need to both expand methane collection at landfills and design these products to degrade more slowly.”

James Levis, the primary author of the study, is adamant that traditional plastics are not better than biodegradable plastics in terms of their environmental impact.

He says the take-home message is that landfills need to do a better job collecting gas from decomposing garbage.

“One would need to study the entire life cycle of the material to know if it was better or worse than the alternatives,” Levis said. “One should also look at other environmental factors … before making a final judgment.”

The research appeared in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.

Susanne Rust is an investigative reporter for California Watch focused on the environment. Find more California Watch reporting here.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

This article comes to us courtesy of California Watch. Bad news about “environmentally friendly” biodegradable plastics: They may not be so environmentally friendly after all. According to...
This article comes to us courtesy of California Watch. Bad news about “environmentally friendly” biodegradable plastics: They may not be so environmentally friendly after all. According to...
This article comes to us courtesy of California Watch. Bad news about “environmentally friendly” biodegradable plastics: They may not be so environmentally friendly after all. According to...
This article comes to us courtesy of California Watch. Bad news about “environmentally friendly” biodegradable plastics: They may not be so environmentally friendly after all. According to...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 46
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gregstevens
I'm just some guy.
01:55 PM on 09/12/2011
This kind of article, and the argument it makes, is maddening. It's based on the "all or nothing" argument: biodegradable plastics improve the carbon cycle, will reduce the amount of trash that has to be landfilled, will reduce the problem of accumulated plastic waste in the oceans, BUT since it releases methane we can put a big "BAD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT" in the headline. Please.

And given that there is a huge amount of research and development currently going into methane-gathering composting, this isn't even a serious objection in the long term: it's short-term hysteria over the fact that we don't have the right facilities "yet" to deal with bioplastics in an ideal way. How short-sited.

This is ultimately a "chicken and egg" problem: some people say that you shouldn't use bioplastics because there have to be the appropriate end-to-end (lifecycle) mechanisms in place FIRST, but there is no business motivation to put those mechanisms in place until people start using bioplastics.

For more about the problem with "chicken and egg" problems in bioplastics and green technology, this is a good article:

http://green-plastics.net/discussion/61-politics/101-opinion-americas-chicken-egg-problem
photo
Moose Luck 99
Rand Paul is a LIAR!
04:53 PM on 08/07/2011
http://aircrap.org/best-evidence/

Make plastic from HEMP BI-DIESEL!
Hemp BIO-ENERGY
Hemp 6X more BTUS than Corn
Hemp uses less water no herbicides and little pesticides and fertilizer.

Subbituminous coal is common in the US. It has an energy content of about 18 million Btu per ton, and is used mostly in coal-fired power plants

Coal generates about half of the electricity used in the United States. ... Each person in the United States uses 3.8 tons of coal each year.

Some 965 million tons of coal were consumed for the generation of electricity. This amounted to 86% of total U.S. coal production

U.S. soybeans 76.6 million acres

U.S. corn 90 million acres

Half of the acres 83.3 million acres

Hemp yields an average of nine dry tons per acre
(more in southern areas)

749 million tons hemp fiber

Bio-diesel Hempoline can be made from leaves and stalks.

You would also have the hemp seeds as a food source too.

U.S. annual anhydrous ammonia 22.90 million tons used.

U.S. ROUND-UP use100 million pounds
Contaminated with 1,4 dioxane

HERO-INSECTIDE SYNGENTA INSECTICIDE Soybeans and corn
03:00 PM on 08/07/2011
This study was funded by proctor and gamble. Ummmm...
photo
janie@atthelake
Keep Austin Weird
10:57 PM on 08/06/2011
"Study Finds Bioplastics May Harm Environment"......duh...you think?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trickish Knave
Both sides suck, but neither will admit it.
10:06 PM on 08/06/2011
Didn't we already know this? There were water bottles a few years back that weren't supposed to be good for us either. REI took them off their shelves.
04:10 PM on 08/06/2011
Why bury trash? If it will compost then do so. If it will burn and produce power for the processing plant do so. If it will recycle then do so. There should be near nothing left. Methane fast methane slow - carbon fast carbon slow - you know in the scheme of things 500 or 1000 years - I think this is silly. Landfills are likely to polllute the aquifier - just use your brain. How to get rid of trash save space. Consider less packaging - a la Europe. USA uses packaging to discourage theft - make shop lifting a non long term jail thing -huge immediate fines or chain gang like short term jail. Store doorways that slam shut when the alarm goes off. People who throw trash in the gutter ?? Photo - work release pulling weeds by the road breaking rocks - we live on a small planet I am tired of 3rd world people putting trash out of their car in the gutter before my house. Enslave them for a while,(work detail release) examine legal presence, deport as necessary.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
03:48 PM on 08/06/2011
"The earth plus plastic!" - George Carlin
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Wilkes
Poet/Stage Actor
12:43 PM on 08/06/2011
C'mon, they just found this out!
12:18 PM on 08/06/2011
None of this if made from hemp!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alessandro Ambrossio
My middle and last name.
03:41 PM on 08/06/2011
Cheers mate.
08:53 AM on 08/06/2011
One molecule of methane has 20 to 25 times the heat absorbing capacity as one molecule of carbon dioxide.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trespanieli
08:15 AM on 08/06/2011
So frack the plastic, get to the methane and burn it for fuel. Cue the sarcasm.
photo
Moose Luck 99
Rand Paul is a LIAR!
04:50 PM on 08/07/2011
You can microwave plastic into diesel fuel..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bbrecht
"pray for the dead, fight like hell for the liv
07:58 AM on 08/06/2011
Gotta love industry propaganda!
06:40 AM on 08/06/2011
Plastics shouldn't be in landfills, they should be recycled. Simple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
04:41 AM on 08/06/2011
OMG. i want to post something really clever, wicked smart or pithy but i just noticed i have 666 fans and that's all i can think about.

sidenote: this biodegradable stuff most likely needs sunlight and oxygen to decompose. image this - in a landfill, do they have a special spot to place this stuff because it was sorted or something? doubtful. garbage at a landfill gets bulldozed OVER. so it's not really degrading all that quickly anyhow.

the whole biodegradable plastic line is a SHAM. well, unless you're tossing your stuff on the side of the road, anyhow.
photo
MissinAmerica
Reinstate Glass-Steagall, End Lobbyists' control
07:32 AM on 08/06/2011
I wanted to up you to 667, but you're sort, um, wrong. The biodegradable stuff can decompose when exposed to sunlight, but also in water/dampness, or by bacteria & enzymes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
02:52 PM on 08/06/2011
what i am saying is it TAKES sunlight, air and exposure to biodegrade. entombed under other garbage that was bulldozed over it negates this process.

"As long as oxygen is present, HED bags will biodegrade, though the process is longer in colder temperatures. If HED bags are placed in a landfill rather than recycled, they will biodegrade in approximately 400 days in an aerobic (one where oxygen is present) landfill. If the landfill is anaerobic (no oxygen) the bag will be entombed and will not degrade -- the same as other items such as newspapers, leftover food and paper grocery bags." http://www.prweb.com/releases/2008/01/prweb653061.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
05:25 PM on 08/06/2011
Tossing stuff IN the road is paradoxically one of the best disposal methods because the combo of constant mechanical reduction and solar irradience breaks it down much faster. Not that I am suggesting this as a disposal method.

I'll take the plant based polymers over the petrochemical ones any day though. Just as long as they are being used responsibly and not as a replacement for more lasting solutions. Like carrying your own water bottle around with you. It's amazing how hard this is for most people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:06 AM on 08/06/2011
Let's face it... we s*ck.