iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Birth Control Coverage Provision In Health Care Law Draws Objections From Religious Groups

Birth Control Coverage Religious Groups

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR   08/ 7/11 03:44 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — They defied the bishops to support President Barack Obama's health care overhaul. Now Catholic hospitals are dismayed the law may force them to cover birth control free of charge to their employees.

A provision in the law expanded preventive health-care benefits for women, and the administration said last week that must include birth control with no copays. The Catholic Health Association says a proposed conscience exemption is so narrowly written it would apply only to houses of worship. Some other religious-based organizations agree.

"I call this the parish housekeeper exemption – that's about all it covers," said Sister Carol Keehan, president of the 600-member umbrella group for Catholic hospitals. "What we are trying to do is make workable the conscience protection the administration says it is willing to give."

Most Catholic hospitals do not cover birth control for their employees, Keehan said, but in some cases they are required to by state law. Doctors caring for patients at the hospitals are not restricted from prescribing birth control.

The Health and Human Services Department is asking for public comment on its proposed conscience clause before making a final decision, expected later this year.

Polls show that Americans overwhelmingly support greater access to birth control, which medical experts say promotes well-being by allowing women to adequately space their pregnancies. For example, a survey earlier this year by the nonpartisan Public Religion Research Institute found that 89 percent of Catholic women favored expanding access to birth control for women who cannot afford it, with 8 percent opposed. Birth control use is virtually universal in the U.S., according to the government.

Women's rights groups are opposed to any conscience exemption, pointing out that it's not specifically authorized by the health care law.

"All women do use contraception at some point in their lives, and we think it should be available to them as a preventive health service," said Judy Waxman, vice president for health and reproductive rights at the National Women's Law Center. That includes women who work for Catholic hospitals and for the church itself, Waxman added.

Conscience exemptions are a common component of legislation that creates tension with religious mores. In this case, the Health and Human Services Department says the administration picked language used by states that require health insurers to cover contraception as a prescription benefit. Spokesman Richard Sorian said the administration is open to considering alternatives.

"We look forward to hearing from the public as we work to strike the balance between providing access to proven prevention and respecting religious beliefs," Sorian said. The coverage requirement doesn't take effect right away.

The administration's proposed exemption defines a religious employer as one whose purpose is to instill religious values, which primarily employs and serves people who share its religious tenets, and which is nonprofit.

Three of those four tests don't work for Catholic hospitals and their 640,000 employees, said Keehan. "Catholic hospitals have never discriminated about employment," she explained. Likewise, the 5.6 million patients they admit annually can be of any religious faith, or none. And while patients might see a crucifix, they're not going to get a sermon.

It's not just Catholic hospitals that would be ineligible for an exemption, said Jeanne Monahan, a policy expert at the conservative Family Research Council. "Any religious group that is not focused on proselytizing will not receive this exemption," she said. "Educational institutions, groups that are focused on serving the homeless, feeding the hungry, they won't receive it."

Law professor Nicholas Cafardi of Duquesne University in Pittsburgh, an expert on tax exempt organizations, said he agrees the administration's current definition is too narrow. He suggested a more liberal standard employed in the federal tax code might be part of a compromise. Duquesne is a Catholic institution.

In the critical final stages of the congressional health care debate last year, Catholic hospitals broke with the bishops to support passage of the legislation. While the bishops contended the bill would open the way for taxpayer-supported abortions, Keehan said her analysis indicated it would not, a view recently seconded by a federal judge.

In an interview, Keehan indicated she still supports the expansion of health insurance coverage under Obama's law.

"I'm not a blast-out kind of person," she said. "I'm saying (to the administration) thank you very much for this exemption, but it's not broad enough. We'd like to talk to you, and we hope you'll listen."

____

Online:

Women's preventive care regulation: http://tinyurl.com/3gojv2m

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — They defied the bishops to support President Barack Obama's health care overhaul. Now Catholic hospitals are dismayed the law may force them to cover birth control free of charge to...
WASHINGTON — They defied the bishops to support President Barack Obama's health care overhaul. Now Catholic hospitals are dismayed the law may force them to cover birth control free of charge to...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,479
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (58 total)
photo
sodisenchanted
oh yea, well don't tread on me either!
07:01 PM on 08/09/2011
Seen on a T-shirt I wish I'd bought, "Jesus, deliver me from your followers."
02:05 PM on 08/09/2011
Let me get this straight. They employ doctors who prescribe birth control for their patients, in their hospitals, and I assume many of those prescriptions are then filled at the hospital pharmacy, and that is okay?

Looks to me like the real belief AGAINST birth control only comes into play when financial profit for the Catholic Church is not interfered with. Do I have that right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:29 AM on 08/09/2011
If employees of Catholic hospitals want their employer to pay for their birth control, then they should speak out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gregj
10:57 AM on 08/09/2011
Where were these so called religious groups when greed raped the wealth of this country. Where are they as the disparity of wealth continues to climb from the poor to the rich. Where are they as Gods chosen are handed the bill for the excesses of and greed of the parents. Where are they as we cut health care for the disabled and the poor. This is not about the teachings of God. It is politics pure and simple. They cheered and overtly encouraged us to vote for conservatives whom were pro-life and yet pro greed. They stumped for those whom stoled from the future for a deal cut with the devil were they got token glances for pro-life if they said nothing of greed. They are the new Pharisee's misplaced priorities as in the days of Jesus.
Drunk on power and corruption. .
realitybaby
Livin in realitybaby!
10:22 AM on 08/09/2011
god only knows if those poor women in the worst parts of our WORLD had birth control thousands upon thousands of children would not BE STARVING TO DEATH! A fate much worse then birth control!
09:00 AM on 08/09/2011
I've said this elsewhere and I'll say it again:
The birth control pill is used for more than just birth control. I started taking it when I was 19 because I had ovarian cysts. My whole argument FOR birth control is that it has allowed me to possibly have children in the future because if I didn't take birth control when I did, it's very likely my ovaries would have become overrun with cysts and tumors and I would not be unable to have children.
I'd like to assume religious organizations that do provide health insurance will at least think of the exceptions to the rule of "birth control" like this, but something tells me they won't see it that way.
Regardless of how they feel about birth control, however, this just seems to boil down to, yet again, a paternalistic group of organizations exercising control over women. Honestly, I'm not surprised at all.
photo
sodisenchanted
oh yea, well don't tread on me either!
06:46 PM on 08/09/2011
I couldn't agree more. I was put on birth control at 13 for severe acne. It worked too and saved me agonizing trips to the dermatologist where he gave me injections of cortisone in the face to dry up the huge pimples I had.

I didn't actually NEED the pill until I was almost 18.
ILuvFla
Feminist, Dem, Nerd
08:41 AM on 08/09/2011
This attitude is why I left the church 45 years ago. If choices are removed for healthcare for women, we will return to the day of the coat-hanger abortion. When will a girl have to disappear for eight months till the baby bump goes away? This insanity must be stopped. The religious must be - but they must NOT be allowed to impose on others. I don't care how evangelical they are.
photo
sodisenchanted
oh yea, well don't tread on me either!
06:47 PM on 08/09/2011
The problem is there are not enough women left who remember those days. I do and don't want to see them return.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ibreathe4u
you call me a heretic like it's a bad thing
08:09 AM on 08/09/2011
If they don't like it, they certainly don't have to take it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IFany
move forward or die
07:33 AM on 08/09/2011
The press has this habit of renaming Republicans, religious groups, Tea Party. when they all the same people, Republicans
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:34 AM on 08/09/2011
I know this has been posted a thousand (at least) times before, but it is so obvious that those who oppose abortion should be wildly in favor of all birth control methods, and making them as widely available to as many people as possible.

I hope somebody who is both anti-abortion and anti-birth control will tell me why.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ibreathe4u
you call me a heretic like it's a bad thing
08:09 AM on 08/09/2011
You make too much sense, they can't understand you.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
08:43 AM on 08/09/2011
Don't try to understand: it is impossible.
Just obey the man in the red prada pumps.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RitaS
02:11 AM on 08/09/2011
If the Catholic Health Association is SO against any & all birth control for Women, does this mean that they'll provide 100% care for ALL the Catholic Women, & the children they didn't want to bore???

Ah, does this also include any future care of those children??? I think not...
01:19 AM on 08/09/2011
Why are we still using our employers to get HC. When will people learn to just buy it privately. That is the cause of all of our problems.
bichn
There ain't no rest for the wicked.
05:52 AM on 08/09/2011
Most people can't afford to buy it privately and THAT is the cause of all our problems.
10:17 AM on 08/09/2011
Most people do not realize they can. I pay less for my HC than I do my cell phone each month, it is better than my employers, and that is why I opted out.

PS if a company pays100 per month towards your insurance, why couldn't they give you it to pay for your own premium instead. Zero sum game.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
catbyte
Anishinaabe in MI
09:02 AM on 08/09/2011
How much is your health insurance, liberty? If I was to purchase private insurance, the premiums would be $2000/month. I suppose I should just curl up and die?

Schmuck.
10:21 AM on 08/09/2011
It has been going up since Obamacare, but it currently costs $132 per month. I suppose your Health Insurance is keeping you from curling up and dying, but I assume you have some preexisting condition?

It is impossible for me to have a preexisting condition, since I have had my same insurance for the last 3 employers. Preexisting doesn't exist in my world.

\
12:07 AM on 08/09/2011
Religions are very nasty, dirty things.
10:22 PM on 08/08/2011
Why aren't Religious and Catholic hospitals and schools which get tax free status for being religious in nature getting their government funds cut? I've never understood how religious schools and hospitals not to mention churches themselves receive public funds.

The amount of money they receive by being tax exempt combined with the federal grants churches receive is totally astounding.

That needs to end immediately. Right alongside the oil subsidies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jennifer Mead
Girls dig unix
11:32 PM on 08/08/2011
Any time a church does ANYTHING political they need to lose their tax free status, otherwise they are a legitimate religious organization and deserve their status. PERIOD.
12:14 AM on 08/09/2011
Except, let's face it....in practice MANY churches, left and right are highly politcal and almost unabashedly so.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JMullen3
Eternal vigilance, the price of freedom
11:57 PM on 08/08/2011
I agree in principle, but in practice, these outfits are providing services to the community. As long as they do so without a requirement for religious observance, I think the money should continue to flow. Time are hard out there and the last thing we need is to cut back on aid to the poor. That said, they need to be watched and every time a preacher, voodoo priest, or whathaveyou stands up and starts mixing politics with religion, the tax man needs to pay a visit.
07:21 PM on 08/08/2011
It is really none of my business as to who chooses to use condoms, birth control, drugs, alcohol, tobacco etc etc. Just don't expect my tax money to pay for it. With the exception of the TRULY deserving, I don't think my tax dollars should have to pay for the baby factories which are simply producing for government entitlements. Like it or not, our liberal entitlements have largely contributed to the economic fiasco we are currently in. But they buy votes.
11:17 PM on 08/08/2011
And as a true GOPer you missed what the article is all about.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:37 AM on 08/09/2011
As long as i am the one who gets to choose who is truly deserving, i agree. but I don't, and neither do you, so i do not agree at all.