More

California Prison Overcrowding: Report Suggests Need For Legislator Involvement

  First Posted: 08/08/11 10:16 PM ET Updated: 10/08/11 06:12 AM ET

California Prison Overcrowding

This article comes to us courtesy of California Watch.

By Ryan Gabrielson

The Legislative Analyst’s Office is calling on state lawmakers to get more involved in reducing the number of inmates in California’s overcrowded prisons.

In a report released Friday [PDF], the analyst's office recommended that the Legislature start by asking federal courts for more time to bring down the prisoner population. The U.S. Supreme Court in May upheld an earlier ruling that the state’s prisons are unconstitutionally overcrowded, compromising inmate health care.

The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has until roughly June 2013 to shed 34,000 inmates.

The state is behind in its population reduction effort, and the corrections department is requesting an extension -– all of which provides legislators with cause to take a more active role, the analyst's office argues.

“Moreover, as the high court itself noted, how the state achieves compliance with the inmate population targets involves some important policy choices about how to achieve compliance with federal court orders at the least risk to the safety of the public,” the report says.

The report, by analyst Mac Taylor, suggests two ways for lawmakers to exercise their authority:

  • Halt approval of new prison construction until the Legislature has reviewed plans to decide if the buildings will be needed after the prisoner reduction.
  • Continue transferring inmates to private, out-of-state prisons.

The second of those recommendations would require lawmakers to alter Gov. Jerry Brown’s budget plan for this fiscal year, which limits the state to 10,000 inmates held outside of California. By last count [PDF], the state already is paying to house 9,629 prisoners in Arizona, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Michigan.

The governor has indicated that he wants to shrink that number further.

In court filings, the corrections department has said lawmakers already have done plenty to ease prison overcrowding.

Most important has been its passing and funding of AB 109, the prison realignment legislation that takes effect Oct. 1. The law ultimately will shift inmates convicted of offenses deemed non-serious, nonviolent and non-sexual (the “triple-nons” for short) to county jails.

That alone will nearly meet the federal courts’ required inmate reduction, Jay Atkinson, acting deputy research director for the corrections department, wrote in a declaration last month. Atkinson continued:

Currently, CDCR houses in its 33 prisons, 13,371 non-lifers serving a revocation sentence or pending a revocation hearing and 18,597 inmates serving lower level offenses that are non-serious, nonviolent, and non-sex related. As an illustration of AB 109's impact, if CDCR subtracted these 31,968 inmates from its current in-state prison population of 144,237, the population would be reduced to 112,269.

Ryan Gabrielson is an investigative reporter for California Watch, a project of the non-profit Center for Investigative Reporting. Find more California Watch stories here.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SAN FRANCISCO

This article comes to us courtesy of California Watch. By Ryan Gabrielson The Legislative Analyst’s Office is calling on state lawmakers to get more involved in reducing the number of inmates ...
This article comes to us courtesy of California Watch. By Ryan Gabrielson The Legislative Analyst’s Office is calling on state lawmakers to get more involved in reducing the number of inmates ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 66
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nic in daytona
03:59 PM on 08/15/2011
Stop putting people in jail for non violent victimless crimes.End marijuana prohibition.Close all cca prisons,they make a profit on poor peoples misery.That could be a great start.
12:32 PM on 08/14/2011
We need to stop sending prisoners to private prisons; these places are fertile ground for abusive administrators willing to break the law for personal gain, yes it will cost the government more to care for the prisoners; but if we would take the time to overhaul our antiquated and draconian drug laws there would be fewer prisonersto take care of and therefore a cost effective measure would be taken, remeber the people who view drug use as a criminal issue and not a medical one are the very same who run the private prison system, outsourcing the work that criminals do to private corporations is only a means to provide these corporations with a cheap,domestic,unquestioning work force.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Saltine
06:00 PM on 08/15/2011
The fact we allow private for profit prisions should sicken americans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Spike5
Let's go forward, not back to an imaginary past
12:16 PM on 08/16/2011
It can also lead to corruption throughout the justice system. Consider the judges who were recently sentenced to prison themselves for accepting millions of dollars for sending juveniles to for-profit facilities for minor crimes that would otherwise have called for probation.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Veneita
10:29 AM on 08/13/2011
looks like tight packing on a slave ship http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Slaveshipposter.jpg
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
01:20 AM on 08/11/2011
So the "independent" analyst suggests suspending prison construction due to overcrowding? That only makes sense if one has spent their entire life working in a bureaucracy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:11 AM on 08/10/2011
"The Real Solution to Prison Overcrowding?"

Gladiatorial Combat. No, but how about doing right by our prisoners so they don't create more victims when they're released? As it is, they have little to no means to sustain themselves because of the stigma of being an ex-con. What choice do they have BUT to return to what got them in prison in the first place? It should be against the law to discriminate against ex-cons, with exception to sex crimes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
01:22 AM on 08/11/2011
Tell that to business owners and the many unemployed. If you operated a bank, would you hire someone with a history of identify theft and burglary? If you ran a pharmacy would you hire someone with a history of drug use and sales?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:45 AM on 08/11/2011
After extensive review and consideration, yes. Just because someone may not have an official record that reflects their tendency to steal of use drugs doesn't mean they have never done--or still do--either. Regardless, one is still taking a chance in employing a stranger without regard to personal history.

Or perhaps they can flip the professions matching the crime: so the bank hires the prior drug addict, and the pharmacy hires the other guy.
03:54 AM on 08/10/2011
I feel blessed to have lived in California for two decades before it became the over taxed high tech police state that it is today... I am not even sure the weather is enough to entice me again. NO MAS. The "So Cal" dream is now a nightmare.... unless your mommie and daddy are loaded.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
04:38 PM on 08/09/2011
Let's do this -- free everyone who is in prison for marijuana and other drug use. Legal marijuana and sell like beer.

Put anyone who sold a subprime mortgage to some poor sucker who did not understand he was being defrauded in prison and make them pay the government for their upkeep. We should start with all the executives of Countrywide and then all the executives of Bank of America. BofA can afford to make the prisons very nice place and relieves us tax payers of the cost.

The sentence for selling subprime mortgages? on your third mortgage, you get 25 years to life.
12:21 PM on 08/13/2011
I think the District Attorneys and police should have to go through about five years of prison before they can begin their careers of putting fellow citizens away with these heinously punitive sentences for "serious" offenses against society that are neither serious nor offenses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
04:33 PM on 08/09/2011
The Ramparts Scandal which put the LAPD under a justice department consent decree was due to drugs being illegal. Officer Perez was taking too much coke from the evidence locker and was not leaving enough for his buddies to sell and/or use. When they finally arrested him to bring Perez into line, he squealed on his buddies on a variety of matters.

Prohibition always creates a criminal under class and it always includes the cops.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
04:22 PM on 08/09/2011
Legalize a marijuana. we all know the reason it is illegal is that keeps the drug profits high.

MS-13 and White Fence strongly support the criminalization of the possession of any amount of marijuana for any reason, and their stooges in the government always do their bidding.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Baileygk
homosexual socialist, and proud of it!
04:03 PM on 08/09/2011
Surprisingly, the only police union to support the legalization of marijuana is the prison guard union.

I wonder why?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
01:23 AM on 08/11/2011
Because it actually would not lower prison population by that much. Since possession isn't even a misdemeanor and almost every sales/distribution case is prosecuted on the federal level, there really aren't that many pot offenders in state prison.
03:08 PM on 08/09/2011
legalize marijuana. that alone will almost solve the entire problem. also, resisting arrest? this is used all the time if you even ask what the problem is? If you try to find out what is going on.. this should not be the case, but if you are poor is it more times then not the case...police should be held to account for making numerous unwarrented arrests or at least better trained to handle what is real cause for arrest.
chemistrydoc
There are some things so serious you have to laugh
03:36 PM on 08/09/2011
Not too many folks in prison where resisting arrest is the highest charge on the sheet....but so true about marijuana.
11:52 AM on 08/09/2011
stop sending people who have served there time and are out on parole or on probation back to prison for smoking marijuana or drinking alcohol.

everyday they send people back to prison for months just for failing a marijuana drug test or an alcohol test. its rediculous.
chemistrydoc
There are some things so serious you have to laugh
03:37 PM on 08/09/2011
You hit the nail on the head....California and several other states have "life on the installment plan" - aka a very punitive parole system whereby even the slightest infraction (especially ticking off the P.O.) will have you sent back in a heartbeat. Stupid use of public resources.
photo
Footwarrior
Progressive Apparatchik
05:23 PM on 08/09/2011
The system was designed to maximize prison populations. The appropriate penalty for most technical parole violations is to increase the amount of supervision. For example, fail an alcohol test and you go on daily alcohol tests. Stay clean for a few weeks and testing become less frequent.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
09:46 AM on 08/09/2011
The Real Solution For Prison Overcrowding?

SCREW THEM.....I don't care how crowded and uncomfortable they get....they've earned it.
photo
Marioth
Artist, Scientist, Musician
11:51 AM on 08/09/2011
Prison and the courts do not exist for you to engage in your personal revenge fantasies.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
01:44 PM on 08/09/2011
No problem Marioth...... I'm okay with you PAYING and building a new resort for them.
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
01:58 PM on 08/09/2011
Regardless of what you think, even this SCOTUS disagrees.

Even for your own self interest, does it really make any sense to create this type of situation for people who may be in your neighborhood after their release?

Short sighted and counter productive at best.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
02:27 PM on 08/09/2011
Great for you sitting in your living room.....go spend a few weeks in prison with these lovely people and then talk to me....
09:08 AM on 08/09/2011
Drug crimes are what is filling well over half of all of our prisons. De-criminalization for non-violent drug crime would easily solve this problem. I
chemistrydoc
There are some things so serious you have to laugh
03:38 PM on 08/09/2011
Yes - no time for possession, and only very hefty fines for dealers.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
04:27 PM on 08/09/2011
No fines for dealers. We want to removed all criminals from the trade and anything that makes the drug trade risky creates room for criminal. It's the same as high taxes on cigarettes in NY and low taxes in N. Carolina. It creates a market for bootlegged cigarettes.

Legalize marijuana so that the cost is low. That's how to keep out the gangs and that is the reason the gangs want marijuana to be criminalized.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
05:33 PM on 08/13/2011
You sound like a drug addict doc.....
09:07 AM on 08/09/2011
Easy - no more low-level offenders, especially no jail time for simple possession.
03:29 PM on 08/09/2011
You got it ace!