iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Duncan: States Will Get School Testing Waivers

DORIE TURNER   08/ 8/11 07:13 PM ET   AP

The Obama administration effectively gutted the Bush-era No Child Left Behind law Monday, giving states a way out of a decade-long policy that focused on holding schools accountable but labeled many of them failures even if they made progress.

To get a waiver from the program, however, states must agree to host of education reforms the White House favors – from tougher evaluation systems for teachers and principals to programs tackling the achievement gap for minority students.

The federal law, which requires every student to be proficient in science and math by 2014, is four years past due for reauthorization. But it's become mired in the increasingly bipartisan mood on Capitol Hill despite repeated calls from President Barack Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan for changes to be made before the school year starts. Obama sent an overhaul proposal to Congress 16 months ago.

Duncan has warned that 82 percent of U.S. schools could be labeled failures next year if the law is not changed. Education experts have questioned that estimate, but state officials report a growing number of schools facing sanctions under the law – from having to offer free tutoring to being forced to shut down entirely.

Tired of waiting for Congress to act, Obama has told Duncan to move forward with waivers, said Melody Barnes, director of the Domestic Policy Council for the White House.

"We have a federal law that's an impediment, that's getting in the way as a disincentive for the great work states are doing," Duncan said in a call with reporters Monday afternoon. "That just doesn't make sense at a time when we have to get better faster than ever before."

Republicans bristled at the move.

"I share the sense of urgency felt by state and local education officials across the nation. Unfortunately, more questions than answers surround the secretary's waivers proposal," said House education committee chairman John Kline of Minnesota.

Under the law, states were required to show that a higher proportion of students were reaching proficiency each year – approaching the goal of 100 percent by 2014. Many had planned to achieve their biggest leaps in the later years because they counted on the law being rewritten by now.

The law was passed in 2001 and was up for reauthorization in 2007, but former President George W. Bush was unable to get Congress to address the law's problems during the waning years of his presidency. Obama waited a year into his presidency to introduce a blueprint for rewriting the law.

A handful of states had already filed waivers begging for flexibility, while others simply said they were going to ignore the requirements of the law this year.

Recent high-profile cheating scandals in Atlanta, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., have called attention to the heavy reliance on statewide standardized testing. Experts say many districts feel pressure to meet the standards to avoid penalties under the law.

On Monday, states including Montana, Minnesota, Kentucky, Wisconsin, Virginia and Georgia announced their plans to file for waivers.

Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal said the federal law "does not give you a comprehensive view of progress being made."

"I think ultimately the people understood that the more they got into and the more the years passed and those percentages began to escalate, that there were significant structural problems built into it," said Deal, who voted for No Child Left Behind in 2001 while in serving in Congress.

Montana Schools Superintendent Denise Juneau said she welcomes the waiver proposal as long as it offers relief from the 2014 deadline. She said her state isn't afraid of high standards and education reform but needs enough time to reach those standards and the ability to institute change in a way that works for Montana.

"They can set the bar wherever they want. They just have to let us have the flexibility to get there," Juneau said.

Through the waivers, schools will get some relief from looming deadlines to meet testing goals. Details on the waivers will be provided to states next month.

Democrats in Congress lined up behind the White House's plan.

"Given the ill-advised and partisan bills that the House majority has chosen to move, I understand Secretary Duncan's decision to proceed with a waiver package to provide some interim relief while Congress finishes its work," said Senate education committee chairman Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, in a written statement.

Duncan said that the plan for temporary relief from some aspects of the federal law would not undermine what Congress is still discussing in terms of revising federal education laws. The long-awaited overhaul of the law began earlier this year in the House, but a comprehensive reform appears far from the finish line.

"What we do in terms of flexibility can be a bridge or transition," Duncan said. "We all want to fix the law. This might help us get closer to that."

"I can't overemphasize how loudly the outcry is to do something now."

___

Turner reporter from Atlanta. Associated Press writers Donna Gordon Blankinship in Seattle and Mark S. Smith in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

The Obama administration effectively gutted the Bush-era No Child Left Behind law Monday, giving states a way out of a decade-long policy that focused on holding schools accountable but labeled many o...
The Obama administration effectively gutted the Bush-era No Child Left Behind law Monday, giving states a way out of a decade-long policy that focused on holding schools accountable but labeled many o...
The Obama administration effectively gutted the Bush-era No Child Left Behind law Monday, giving states a way out of a decade-long policy that focused on holding schools accountable but labeled many o...
The Obama administration effectively gutted the Bush-era No Child Left Behind law Monday, giving states a way out of a decade-long policy that focused on holding schools accountable but labeled many o...
Filed by Kia Makarechi  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,080
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
12:56 PM on 08/10/2011
"Through the waivers, schools will get some relief from looming deadlines to meet testing goals as long as they agree to embrace other kinds of education reforms such as raising standards, helping teachers and principals improve, and focusing on fixing the lowest performing schools."

The devil, as usual, is in the details. And the way Duncan has usually defined "school reforms," the changes he'll require to avoid the problems of NCLB will likely be just as bad as NCLB.

Fire the idiot, and put someone qualified in as Secretary of Education.
02:54 PM on 08/09/2011
Of course they should get waivers. We need more Wisconsin State Fair type melanin enhanced teens.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ugotabkidnme
02:11 PM on 08/09/2011
Was at the grocery store when a fight broke out. A man requested a cashier to break two one dollar bills for quarters. The cashier first refused, but it came down to her inability to make the change. He called the assistant manager and explained the situation and the Assistant Manager didn't understand what the problem was. Then the man asked to speak to the Manager... The cashier is a high school graduate. We have a problem, Houston.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ugotabkidnme
02:02 PM on 08/09/2011
No Child Left Behind begins at home with telling parents not every child is exceptional. Education begins at home. Training your child to sit down, shut up, listen and be prepare for class is the fundamental theory to YOU not leaving your child behind . How about instead, Your Child Will Be Left Behind, if he/she can't pass a high school entrance exam and doesn't respect the right of others to a safe and stable classroom.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissingAmerica
01:56 PM on 08/09/2011
This ridiculous program was yet another of W's useless ideas. It has provided us with fewer quality teachers and left many otherwise good students out in the cold. We need to put money into education, not testing parameters. This was yet another one of W's attempts to separate the classes which instead succeeded in eliminating not only teachers but schools. We need to stop with the stupidity, stop funding stupidity like this program and start funding true education. We can't expect our children to pass through metal detectors at school every day, pass empty classrooms and security guards and still pass a test designed to pigeonhole them. Under W's "No Child Left Behind", we are leaving an entire once-respected educational system in the dust.
12:58 PM on 08/10/2011
Wasn't Bush's idea. He just jumped on board.

Of course, it was a bad idea, much like most of the ideas that Bush had or supported. But he wasn't totally responsible for this one, even though he should certainly share in the blame.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ugotabkidnme
01:56 PM on 08/09/2011
Reforming No Child Left Behind? What a joke. How about reforming the Office of the United States Attorney General and begin prosecuting the criminals who are responsible for the greatest Grand Theft in the world's history?Wall Streeters and banksters are the most powerful criminal enterprise in the world and Obama wants to reform No Child Left Behind. How about No American Left Behind? Now there's a program I believe all Americans can agree on supporting.
photo
Gestas
Mountain Man
12:21 PM on 08/09/2011
Obama better watchout...He's messing with one Bushs best tricks ever...Military Recruiters fishing for kids , find that the "No Child Left Behind" was created just for them. Anyone who thinks the Republicans give a Rats Axx about poor peoples kids education is nuts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mimssandi
11:49 AM on 08/09/2011
An unfunded program which ends up spending dollars the school systems can't afford to spend on non-child teaching programs. Teachers refer to it as every child left behind.
09:01 AM on 08/09/2011
Does this law allow for the Sec. of Education to grant waivers? If not congress should investigate this move. Any president and his cabinet members do not get to pick and choose if laws are valid or not.
08:56 AM on 08/09/2011
This lady from Montana makes no sense. First see says they need a waiver from 2014 deadline (12 years after this became law) then follows it up with "We can definitely meet any bar they throw at us."

So why do you need a waiver?
photo
mw21
flyfishing, education, grandkids
01:25 PM on 08/09/2011
Let me educate you on this one. A waiver is needed because according to the schedule this is a year that requires unrealistic increases in student performance levels. Schools are often improving but not at the rate the law requires, and thus become labeled "failing schools" when in fact they are improving greatly. In fact, by 2014, the law will require that 100% of students reach the standards. That means that every special education student, every student who doesn't speak English, every student who simply doesn't care, must all meet the standards. That is simply not possible. It is more likely that Iraq had WMDs than that schools will meet the requirement. Once again the Bush legacy rears its ugly head.
08:54 AM on 08/09/2011
I realize that AOLers beleive that everythign is Bush's fault but let's look at history of this act.

It passed the DEM controlled senate June 14 2001 (91 - 8). The late Ted Kennedy guided this legislation through the senate.

I realize that Mr Bush introduced the legislation and ultimately signed it into law but to make it seem as though the Dems had nothign to do with it is BS.


How can an "unfunded" program cause education spending to increase as much as it has under this bill?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mimssandi
11:53 AM on 08/09/2011
Spending is required at the state and local school level. Its like a tax from the feds, paid for by the local schools. If the feds wanted this program to not tax the schools, they should have given the schools money to put the plan in action. It is comparable to the govt requiring everyone to get a commercial drivers license because those drivers are safer because they have more training. The govt won't pay you to get the license and it costs about $4,000 to get it.
heckmepitus
Truth, justice and the American way
06:33 AM on 08/09/2011
The teachers unions don't like no child left behind so their lapdogs Obama and the Democrats will change it to protect the union.
photo
mw21
flyfishing, education, grandkids
01:27 PM on 08/09/2011
Just another uninformed post. As a school administrator and not a member of the union I can tell you that your post has no merit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tauna Rogers
08:31 PM on 08/09/2011
You are quite correct. A very uninformed comment. In public education, Obama and Duncan are lapdogs not for the teachers' unions but for the corporate pirates who are savaging and pillaging our nation's public schools. Currently, a few billionaires like Bill Gates and Eli Broad are literally engineering (buying) public education policy. And the teachers' unions, rather than growing a pair, are capitulating right and left to retain a seat at the billionaires table.

For all the years that I taught I was not a union member. But I'm well aware many citizens have swallowed the 30 year corporate narrative hook, line, and sinker. Distort and repeat something with only a small grain of truth over and over for years and... it becomes accepted as fact.
03:55 AM on 08/09/2011
Just like obamacare waivers. That's the way the obama regime works. Everyone is equal, but some are more equal.
03:07 AM on 08/09/2011
I dont want my tax dollers spent on teenagers going to the army...they should raise the age to 24 to join the army its not fair for kids to die for nothing...i wish my tax dollers would go towards education..we need kids to go too college and to universitys paid by the people for the people..who can be against that everyone benefits.. One way or the other...
02:30 AM on 08/09/2011
The education system in the U.S. has lowered the bar so far down that any attempt to raise it will result in failure. In order to be compassionate, we lowered the standards and now we see the result of our actions. The only people that benefited were the labor union and its members; the children were collateral damage.
photo
mw21
flyfishing, education, grandkids
01:43 PM on 08/09/2011
Actually, and I'm sure you are so brainwashed you will have trouble believing this, American schools are continually raising the bar--and very successfully. When students in comparable socio-economic situations are tested anywhere in the world, the U.S students finish first. Haven't seen that one in the news?

"American students in schools with less than 10% of students on free and reduced lunch averaged 551, higher than the overall average of any OECD [Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development country. Those in schools with 10% to 25% of students qualifying for free and reduced lunch averaged 527, which was behind only Korea and Finland." http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/research/how-poverty-affected-us-pisa-s.html
03:48 AM on 08/11/2011
The Huffington Puffington Post claims otherwise. We are rated as average to below average in reading, science and mathematics according to the article; our PISA report is dismal (for a developed nation) to say the least. Therefore, I am not as brainwashed as you are let to believe. As far as your comment is concerned: I am at a loss because your reference to poverty and lunch programs as it relates to PISA scores is off base.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/07/us-falls-in-world-education-rankings_n_793185.html
01:02 PM on 08/10/2011
Uh, teachers' unions have consistently been the ones opposing the dismantling and destruction of the education system. They protest against the lowering of standards and the institution of bad ideas like NCLB, and then when they're proven right and these things make problems worse, people like you blame the teachers.

Really, it's sort of ridiculous. I don't see how someone who "thinks" like that can actually manage to string together an intelligible sentence.