iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Louboutin's 'Red Soles' Lawsuit: Judge Refuses To Stop YSL's Shoe Sales

LARRY NEUMEISTER   08/10/11 03:20 PM ET  AP

NEW YORK — In a court case that has all sides seeing red, a judge said Wednesday that a French maker of luxury shoes worn by stars such as Sarah Jessica Parker, Scarlett Johansson and Halle Berry will likely fail in its effort to stop other shoemakers from producing high-heeled women's shoes with red soles.

U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero refused a request by Christian Louboutin to stop the sale of women's shoes with red soles by competitor Yves Saint Laurent S.A.S., another French company based in Paris. Though the ruling came at an early stage of consideration of a lawsuit Louboutin brought in April, the judge said it will probably be tossed out.

He said it was unlikely Louboutin could defend an "overly broad" trademark granted in 2008 by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The judge said the office was "perhaps swayed in part by the widespread recognition the red sole had already attained" as the shoes became a favorite of well-heeled famous clients. The trademark notes that the color red is claimed as a feature of the mark, which consists of a lacquered red sole on footwear.

"Awarding one participant in the designer shoe market a monopoly on the color red would impermissibly hinder competition among other participants," Marrero wrote. He said it would be as if Picasso had sued Monet, saying he painted his water lilies with a distinctive indigo that Picasso used on his images of water.

He said Louboutin's ownership claim to a red sole would harm competition not only in high fashion shoes, but potentially in the markets for other fashion articles as well, putting makers of dresses, coats, bags, hats and gloves in fear of lawsuits.

"Louboutin's claim would cast a red cloud over the whole industry, cramping what other designers do, while allowing Louboutin to paint with a full palette," he said.

Harley Irwin Lewin, a lawyer for Louboutin, said he was disappointed with the ruling and believes it was contrary to trademark law.

"He has decided that in the fashion industry, people shouldn't own a trademark that consists of a single color regardless of its use and regardless of the fact the trademark has achieved trademark status with the public," Lewin said. "We made a point of saying it isn't on an article of fashion. It's on the bottom of a shoe."

Lewin said he believes he can appeal the ruling prior to trial but will not decide until speaking with the company.

At the appeals level, he added: "I think we win hands down."

Jyotin Hamid, a lawyer for Yves Saint Laurent, said the company was pleased with the ruling.

"No designer should be able to monopolize a color in fashion," he said. He said the company looks forward to continuing to manufacture red soled shoes, which it has been doing since the 1970s.

Marrero rejected claims by lawyers for Louboutin that the footwear designer only plans to enforce the trademark on high-heeled shoes and only in regard to specific shades of red, saying to do so would invite endless legal challenges and force judges to become "an arbiter of fashion design."

He said upholding the trademark could also set off "imperial color wars in women's high fashion footwear." He suggested Yves Saint Laurent might act on its claim that it pioneered the monochrome shoe design and asserting rights to the single color shoe concept in all shades.

Marrero added: "What about hostile color grabs in the markets for low-fashion shoes? Or for sports shoes? Or expanding beyond footwear, what about inner linings, collars, or buttons on coats, jackets, or dresses in both women's and men's apparel?"

The judge said the trademark was unlikely to survive legal challenges "because in the fashion industry color serves ornamental and aesthetic functions vital to robust competition."

Marrero acknowledged the enormous success Louboutin has achieved since the designer began in 1992 to apply glossy vivid red to the outsoles of his fancy women's shoes, beginning with red nail polish he applied to the black soles of a pair of women's shoes.

At prices up to $1,000 a pair, the shoes became a favorite of celebrities, causing the red outsole to become closely associated with the Louboutin name and leading even Yves Saint Laurent to acknowledge its success, "however begrudgingly," Marrero wrote.

By this year, Louboutin was projecting sales of about 240,000 in the U.S. alone and envious competitors and black-market shoe makers are eager to capitalize on the success, the judge said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST STYLE

Filed by Hilary Moss  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 71
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thetruthhoits
08:10 PM on 08/16/2011
Don't forget how the fashion industry tried to convince us that Osama Bin Laden sells fake LV bags and we all fund terrorism if we buy fakes! Ridiculous!
photo
NormdePlume
"Snark" is a family value
04:48 PM on 08/15/2011
YSL was doing red soles in the 70s. Of all the things to get wigged out about...........
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:01 AM on 08/15/2011
Silly lawsuit. What next, Apple trying to trademark app store?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheBestPatriot
Mitt is President of the first debate
03:26 PM on 08/14/2011
I disagree with the judge.
photo
iRock
and that's all that needs to be said...
11:16 AM on 08/14/2011
As if one could have an embargo on the color red.
10:29 AM on 08/14/2011
The judge is sooo wrong in this case. The red soles are CL trademark. So sad that YSL, an established designer, has 2 copy.
photo
iRock
and that's all that needs to be said...
11:16 AM on 08/14/2011
no one owns a color. you can't trademark a color.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheBestPatriot
Mitt is President of the first debate
03:26 PM on 08/14/2011
Tiffany blue
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cherrypie
unrevealed
12:25 PM on 08/15/2011
Barbie Pink.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheBestPatriot
Mitt is President of the first debate
03:26 PM on 08/14/2011
I could not agree more.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:24 PM on 08/12/2011
They look like a high-heeled version of Dorothy's shoes in the Wizard of Oz.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Shaw
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
12:42 PM on 08/12/2011
Trying to trademark a color?? Outstanding use of time, energy, and that fashion world-ego that makes them look so nice and wonderful...lol.
photo
Highball
In Blackest Night
04:32 PM on 08/11/2011
The judge seems to be talking about something separate from what the mark is actually about. The mark itself seems to say that the red outsole is what is at stake. Not the color red, itself.

I'll be interested to see where this goes on appeal, actually.
05:55 AM on 08/12/2011
The judge has a valid point. If they win the trademark case, no other companies can use that shade of red (who knows if they'll go after other shades) on the soles of their shoes. YSL has been using the color since the '70s. Preventing other companies from using a specific color on any part of a design limits creativity and their ability to produce a full range of items. If Lb had a specific logo, pattern or image stolen, they would have a case, but monopolizing a color and its placement is ludicrous. That's taking advantage of the meaning of a trademark. As the judge said, what would be next? Trademarking the color of a jacket's collar or lining? It's bad for competition and consumer choice.
photo
Highball
In Blackest Night
12:27 PM on 08/12/2011
Look, I didn't read the entire decision or anything. But from what was reported here, the judge didn't address the fact that YSL had been using the same thing for years. He *seemed* (and again, just from the quotes here) to be talking about the color itself, as if it were the trademark, not the specific use of the color.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Konnie
GOP = GOLDEN CALF OLD PARTY
03:43 PM on 08/13/2011
you might want to check with a lawyer. priates do it all the time. take a colllege logo as an example - the pirate can sell anything with the logo in it as long as the colorrs are just a shade different, or the deminsion a milimeter off in one direction of the other - both indestingishable by the buyer. but quite legal. don't know how it works in europe but that's how it works here. seems L's mistake was not copywriting his "red" soles when he started making them. and in my opinion petty and unoriginal for YSL to try to cash in now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pcplz
Children, children....think before you speak!!
04:13 PM on 08/11/2011
IM humble O.......paying the amount of $$ for uncomfortable SHOES just because they have red soles is a sign of bad taste. Shoes are shoes....I can see paying more for better shoes that are more comfortable but..........they are still just shoes. Today's style will be next season's outa style. Then you have to wait years and years until they are 'vintage' and can be worn again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
traceymarie
the President is black, deal with it
06:41 PM on 08/11/2011
Buy the right size and they are very comfortable.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Cynth
[Your ad here.]
01:20 AM on 08/12/2011
Yes, I find that a 1/2 size up for high heels, with added cushioning makes dreamy looking and feeling shoes. :-)
10:32 PM on 08/14/2011
There's no way those shoes feel comfortable if you have weak ankles.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jced
I'd love to kiss ya...but, I just washed my hair!!
06:50 PM on 08/11/2011
With all due respect ..it's much more than "Shoes are Shoes"!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pcplz
Children, children....think before you speak!!
10:25 PM on 08/11/2011
Until next year and the new marketing campaign......maybe chartreuse soles?
photo
Aabby
2nd Term: Signed. Sealed. Delivered.
02:16 PM on 08/11/2011
you cant trademark red. On the other hand YSL is not acting in good faith. Everyone who cares about this kind of stuff knows who the red bottoms belong to and YSL should be more original instead of stealing ideas. personally, i find that kind of excess distasteful so would never buy either - but fair is fair.
photo
beadingchef
creativity is the spark of intention
05:03 PM on 08/11/2011
YSL used the red soles i the 70's, I have a pair of pumps from then.
10:30 AM on 08/14/2011
oh they did?!? never knew that. then I guess, the judge is right!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheBestPatriot
Mitt is President of the first debate
06:08 PM on 08/14/2011
Why did they stop using it and all of sudden start back?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hardyman1966
The antonym of liberal is INTOLERANT.
01:52 PM on 08/11/2011
Logo, fine, I get that.  Colors, however, for a specific part or area, is pushing the limits of a reasonable ego.  I don't think anyone holds a patent on a men's black dress belt.
photo
Highball
In Blackest Night
04:34 PM on 08/11/2011
It wouldn't be a patent. It would be a trademark. And since companies have been making black dress belts for hundreds of years, there's no way someone could get a trademark on something like that now.
01:37 PM on 08/11/2011
This is nonsense. The trademark laws were never intended to protect the color of a part of an item that every other one has - namely, the sole of the shoe. It might qualify for a design patent or protection as "trade dress" such as the color scheme of packaging that was too similar to a popular brand that it misleads purchasers. But a trade mark? Gimme a break!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrtinnc
Iz zhat made of chocolate too?
03:34 PM on 08/11/2011
Well...actually...Coca Cola red is patented...

...just sayin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giverny
Truthiness
04:33 PM on 08/11/2011
It sure is and YSL knows what hey are doing. It brings them down a notch in the Ultimate design world. If they can't come up with their own gimmick, now they steal one? shame on YSl. Yves is rolling in his grave.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giverny
Truthiness
04:34 PM on 08/11/2011
correction*** they are doing
12:14 PM on 08/11/2011
Counl;ess suit are filed everyday by large corporation under ther same line of thinking .
this case is made unique by the fact that now bootleg merchandise from china and other part of the world can be sold in the USA just by altering just a bit ther design and they will be fully legal on the shelves from Software to team shirt , simple as that .
12:08 PM on 08/11/2011
Interesting ruling , MC DONALD take note now there is a precedent you no longerb have exclusivity of colors and words for that matter . nor are any large corporation.