iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mitch McConnell Called For Rich To Pay Their 'Fair Share' In 1990 Ad

Mcconnelltaxes

First Posted: 08/11/11 01:34 PM ET Updated: 10/11/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- The Republican Party's dogmatic opposition to raising taxes has been a consistent obstacle to patching together a broader deal to decrease the nation's growing debt. And for Democrats with good long-term memories, it's not only causing some irritation -- it's also prompting a bit of nostalgia for days past.

That's because some of the same GOP lawmakers holding the line on taxes today once presented themselves as willing compromisers on the issue in the past. The most recently unearthed example, pointed out Wednesday by ThinkProgress, comes courtesy of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who ended his 1990 reelection campaign with an ad titled "Fair Share." In it, the Kentucky Republican -- in the midst of a increasingly tight contest -- positioned himself as open-minded on the subject of tax rates.

"Unlike some folks around here, I think everyone should pay their fair share, including the rich," McConnell declares in the ad.

The Huffington Post reached out to the University of Oklahoma Political Communication Center, which houses "the largest and most comprehensive collection of political broadcast advertising in the world," for a video copy of the ad. The Center did not immediately have access to the video. McConnell's Senate office, however, did provide a full transcript of the piece, pasted below (emphasis ours):

I'm sure you've been watching this mess in Washington.

I'd like you to know how I feel about it.

I haven't voted for one of these lousy budget packages for years and I won't vote for this one.

It would raise taxes on the wrong people.

Unlike some folks around here I think everyone should pay their fair share. Including the rich.

We need to protect our seniors from Medicare cuts too.

I don't care if the President or Congressional leaders twist my arm. I won't support any deal that isn't a fair deal for the working families of Kentucky.

A November 5, 1990 Roll Call article, found via Lexis-Nexis, reveals that the producers of the ad were Greg Stevens, a longtime GOP operative, and Roger Ailes, currently the president of Fox News Channel, an outlet that has provided a fairly large megaphone for the anti-tax-increase, pro-Medicare reform crowd. For good measure, the man who managed McConnell's '90 campaign, Steven Law, is currently President and CEO of American Crossroads, a conservative group that has routinely chastised Democrats for trying to soak the rich with tax hikes.

Asked for comment, McConnell spokesman Don Stewart argued that there were no inconsistencies between the senator's position in 1990 and his stance today. The "lousy" budget package he railed against in the ad was George H.W. Bush's infamous 1990 'read my lips' budget deal that increased the top marginal tax rates from roughly 28 percent to 31 percent. McConnell "vehemently" opposed that deal, Stewart said. And in the ad, he was simply stressing that "he supports tax reform, he does not support increasing taxes."

"If that sounds familiar, it should," Stewart added, noting that current top income rates stands even higher: 35 percent.

And yet, the 1990 campaign ad still stands out for what it says about the political mood of the country -- specifically the mood in economically depressed areas that usually vote Republican. McConnell is known for being one of Congress' more astute political minds. The fact that he once espoused tax code fairness in the heat of a tight election shows that even people from Kentucky, at one point, applauded lawmakers for asking the wealthy to further subsidize the social safety net for the middle class and poor.

"What has been amazing, watching his career, is it doesn't bother him a bit to say whatever he needs to say to get re-elected. Mitch would just say whatever he needed to say," said Jim Cunningham, a long time Democratic operative who managed the campaign of McConnell's 1990 challenger, Harvey Sloane.

In Kentucky, "there was a time when ... you could poll people on taxes and they believed that if you needed to raise their taxes, especially to take care of education, you should do it," Cunningham said. "Over the years it seems like folks pay less and less attention. At the same time that the Republican Party in our state has helped them buy into this notion that we don't need to tax the rich because they are the ones who create the jobs."

UPDATE: McConnell's office points out that immediately after the 1990 ad aired, the campaign clarified that he wasn't talking about tax rates but tax deductions. From a October 18, 1990 Lexington Herald-Leader article:

Law, was asked why McConnell, who always has said he opposes any increase in taxes, is now talking about taxing the rich.

“He has said everyone should pay their fair share, including the rich,” Law said during a news conference in the Capitol. “While he’s not talking about an increase in the rates, he thinks there may be some tax deductions that should be looked at that were created during the 1980s and possibly eliminated.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The Republican Party's dogmatic opposition to raising taxes has been a consistent obstacle to patching together a broader deal to decrease the nation's growing debt. And for Democrats wi...
WASHINGTON -- The Republican Party's dogmatic opposition to raising taxes has been a consistent obstacle to patching together a broader deal to decrease the nation's growing debt. And for Democrats wi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,602
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (42 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deebastet
12:07 AM on 08/21/2011
Mitch, please, please go back into your shell and stay there!
10:23 PM on 08/20/2011
You are absolutely correct. EVERYBODY should pay income tax. Everybody who has any income should pay a portion to support our way of life. The more you make the more you pay.
OR. Every time you buy something no-matter what it is you pay a tax on it and this goes to the government to pay for education, military etc. This is called a goods and services tax. Then there would be no income tax. The more you buy the more pay. This way the rich pay a lot and the poor pay very little.
08:56 PM on 08/12/2011
As Bobby D once said: "The times they are a-changin'." Once upon a time, Barack Obama stood for a public option, and was against a mandate to purchase insurance from the health insurance corporations. It's called political expediency. And we, the public, get duped again and again and again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Corbett
It's all hearsay.
07:22 PM on 08/12/2011
He was for it before he was against it? Where have I heard that before?
07:13 PM on 08/12/2011
He looks like the uncle that gives you a christmas card with $5 in it every year.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sophie M
ANTI WAR./animal rescue
05:26 PM on 08/12/2011
then came Grover Norquist.........
the puke of the repubs.
photo
imusintheevening
With,without,who'll deny it's whatthe fights about
05:18 PM on 08/12/2011
that was before he was given millions as a gift by his CHinese father-in-law
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
eddw88
03:25 PM on 08/12/2011
republicans will be republicans, they say what they need to get into office. Once there it is all about anchoring in at any cost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dairykween
THE POWERFUL OZ HAS SPOKEN
04:42 PM on 08/12/2011
I believe you...seems John McCain did the same thing not to long ago.
smo1111
President Obama - The greatest One
03:08 PM on 08/12/2011
Ahhhhhhhh..............those were the days.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dadfirst
Reasonable comments in an unreasonable world
02:50 PM on 08/12/2011
He was clearly wrong in the 90's.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Hoosierbrad
I know it when I see it.
05:39 PM on 08/12/2011
I guess the tax hikes by the George H. W. Bush administration, and the frugality of the Clinton administration, which produced record surpluses, proves you very, very wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dadfirst
Reasonable comments in an unreasonable world
11:54 PM on 08/12/2011
What do those two periods have in common? Nothing! Bush had a free-spending D Congress and Clinton had a fiscally responsible R congress. Remember, Congress writes and passes the budgets, the President signs them.
photo
treemonkey
Illegitimi non carborundum
02:32 PM on 08/12/2011
Until the black guy agreed with him. Then it was time for a quick 180. How come these guys are never really held accountable for their positions and flip flops?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldcliche
03:03 PM on 08/12/2011
Accountability isn't a political strong suit for many in Congress.
04:28 PM on 08/12/2011
because the MSM has a short attention span
and they are paid by the same corporations
the republicans...

so to point out these contradictions point would
be a conflict of their collective interest!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gurinder Dhillon
Federal Reserve is as Federal as Federal Express
01:59 PM on 08/12/2011
Someone should really introduce these two guys, they have so much in common save for one GIGANTIC exception, but I'm sure they'd get along.
photo
demisfine
Often correct, NEVER right.
01:28 PM on 08/12/2011
Do not allow this message to fade!!!
McConnell is on tape promoting exactly what the country needs and what the President has been calling for from Congress.
But, that was before we had a democrat in the WH.
McConnell is a snake, and we need to drive this point home. He is intentionally NOT doing what he knows is needed just to hurt the President. Country be d@mned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldHick
12:35 PM on 08/12/2011
McConnell talks out of both side of his mouth. Re-electing him is to approve of the US-China trade. If you are for that, vote for Mitch. If you are serious about recovery, vote against him.

Full bore trade, without constraints and without control over China's wayward conduct, is to invite damage and destruction to us. We need to protect aspects of our economy, and because of strong pro-Chinese ties, this is not being done.
photo
studioh!
bridging the snarchasm
12:14 PM on 08/12/2011
time for
summer.reruns.