iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.N. Condemns Mounting Civilian Deaths In Libya

Libya

First Posted: 08/12/11 05:08 PM ET Updated: 10/12/11 06:12 AM ET

The United Nations is growing increasingly vocal in its concerns about civilian casualties and other collateral damage in the ongoing conflict in Libya.

On Thursday, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon offered some of his strongest remarks yet on the subject, saying through a spokesperson that he was "deeply concerned by reports of the unacceptably large number of civilian casualties."

"The Secretary-General calls on all parties to exercise extreme caution in their actions, in order to minimize any further loss of civilian life," the statement said.

Ban's remarks came just a few days after another U.N. official strongly condemned a controversial NATO airstrike targeting the headquarters of Libyan State TV, in an attack that Libyan officials say resulted in the deaths of journalists and civilians.

"I deplore the NATO strike on Al-Jamahiriya and its installations," UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova said on Monday.

"Media outlets should not be targeted in military actions," she said. "U.N. Security Council Resolution 1738 (2006) condemns acts of violence against journalists and media personnel in conflict situations."

There have been growing calls for caution from the NATO-led military mission in Libya, with some observers saying that the allegedly high numbers of civilian casualties are both damaging to the mission and, possibly, in contravention of the original U.N. no-fly zone resolution.

"It's quite clear that the NATO bombing has repeatedly violated the U.N. mandate," said Hugh Roberts, who until recently ran the North Africa project for the International Crisis Group. "They are killing civilians rather than preventing civilian deaths."

"It's very hard to defend [Libyan leader Moammar] Gaddafi, but good people -- doctors, kids -- are being killed by these attacks, and they have to stop," said Karim Mezran, a Libyan professor of Middle East Studies at Johns Hopkins University.

"I saw Libyan TV recently, and they showed a NATO bombing of a hospital, showed doctors covered by debris, nurses crying out 'Benghazi, come see what is happening here,'" Mezran added, referring to the city in Eastern Libya where the anti-Gaddafi rebels are based. "Of course they are using it for propaganda, which is to be expected, but with every victim there is more hate, more rage, and more distance between the parties. NATO should stop bombing and try to force the regime to get down to negotiations as soon as possible."

One such incident occurred early in the week near the Libyan town of Zlitan, where the Gaddafi regime claimed that a NATO airstrike resulted in the deaths of 85 civilians, including children. Amnesty International has called for NATO to conduct an investigation into the reports.

NATO officials have repeatedly refuted the Gaddafi regime's claims of civilian deaths.

“The allegation of civilian casualties made by the Qaddafi regime was not corroborated by available factual information at the site,” NATO press officer Tony White told Fox News about the Zlitan attack. “The strikes which took place on Monday were conducted following clear intelligence that former farm buildings were being used as a staging point for pro-Qaddafi forces to conduct attacks against the people of Libya and the likelihood of civilians in the nearby vicinity was low. As such, the facilities were a legitimate military target.”

In a follow up to the Secretary-General's remarks, Farhan Haq, a spokesperson for the organization, added Friday that Ban "of course recognizes and appreciates NATO's efforts to avoid civilian casualties."

"He strongly believes there can be no military solution to the Libyan crisis, and he is troubled that there has been no progress in the efforts to find a politically negotiated solution," Haq went on. "He certainly urges all Libyan parties to engage with his Special Envoy to end the bloodshed as soon as possible.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

The United Nations is growing increasingly vocal in its concerns about civilian casualties and other collateral damage in the ongoing conflict in Libya. On Thursday, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-M...
The United Nations is growing increasingly vocal in its concerns about civilian casualties and other collateral damage in the ongoing conflict in Libya. On Thursday, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-M...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 545
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westthea
01:08 PM on 08/19/2011
Has Ban Ki Moon shown some tinge of racism relative to allowing EU nations and the USA to murder people in Africa?

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCLjQhE435g
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OErefwzgt9g
11:37 AM on 08/19/2011
the UN wouldn't have any platform to codemn NATO's actions in Libya had they done something about Ghadaffi in the first place but like clockwork they sit on their backsides waiting for others to take care of the very problems they were chartered to take care of
12:34 AM on 08/15/2011
Ban Ki-Moon and U.N - typical int. organization to encourage or condemn violence. Its not any better than NATO itself - they're all criminals.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris7black
salesmans guide,,,
10:47 PM on 08/14/2011
Dear Huff Post,,,This is the Libya page but yet there is not 1 article on the 1 million people that marched yesterday in Harlem for Gaddafi,,,,the only link is on youtube,,,I thought for a second that you were different but in the end I see your limits also ,,there was an actual blackout on 1 million people in america in 1 location against the war and it did not make any news but youtube,,,wow,,,
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:08 AM on 08/15/2011
Bwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaahahahhahhahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

One million marched in Harlem!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Gee. The ONLY record of it is on YouTube?

How do you suppose that would be?

BECAUSE IT NEVER HAPPENED!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:40 AM on 08/15/2011
Ah. A "blackout" on a march of 1 million people protesting Bloomberg's policies?

Snicked.

Did the Nation of Islam manage to get 5 thousand out for their tantrum?

http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/local/new_york&id=8305311&rss=rss-wabc-article-8305311

Oh, and they had their knickers in a twist over Zimbabwe as well. Seems that brutal African dictators can sure find some sympathizers in Harlem!

Possibly as many as 5 thousand.
03:09 PM on 08/14/2011
If you gave these war loving Americans a gun & put them in the middle of this war--they would
not be so happy to shoot their mouth off about how they love war. but I have to admit that
their goverment has taught them that war is a good thing. It creates jobs.
I did not mean to disturb your ranting--proceed..................
12:10 PM on 08/14/2011
NATO claimed to have attacked military facilities held by the Libyans that were a "threat", but you have to check out for yourself by watching this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2d3KaCNs290&feature=channel_video_title. There was even a journalist/cameraman who swiftly passed by the site to evade filming the truth!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:41 PM on 08/14/2011
Gee willackers.

NATO conducted a strike that kil led lots and lots of civilians? Really?

You do know that there are a dozen or more foreign journalists in Tripoli, yes? You know that they can only go where Qaddafi's propaganda machine permits them, yes?

If NATO had committed such an outrage, and there was NO military encampment there, don't you think that Qaddafi's regime would have made a point of getting the press down there, and quick? I know I would.

Here is an actual, first hand, eye witness report from a real, professional, independent, foreign journalist.

"There were about 30. The officials who took international journalists there unzipped perhaps half of them. Inside most were the bodies of young men.
.

Among the bodies of the men, were also those of two children, and two women.

One child, a two-year-old, bore no visible scars. Its skin was clean."

About 30 bodies, of whom two were women, two children. The rest were soldiers.

Cont:
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:41 PM on 08/14/2011
Cont:

"The front line is not far away. From the site plumes of white smoke can be seen rising from where the fighting is taking place. It would make sense that soldiers would need somewhere to rest in the area.

Most of the bodies in the mortuary were men of fighting age.

The government itself also indicated that the area is a strategic one - it said Nato's only reason for hitting the site was to "open the southern gate" to the town of Zliten so the rebels could advance and then from there attack Tripoli.

Civilians were injured - and it seems kil led. The government says 33 of them were children. But they showed international journalists the bodies of just two."

Qaddafi's army was bunking in among the civilians. It was a military encampment. It was a legit target. Civilian casualties are tragic in any case, but this was no crime.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-14486170

You got another report from an actual eye witness?
12:06 PM on 08/14/2011
NATO is doing all the killing, not Gaddafi. There was zero proof provided for the Libyan invasion. It wasn't just a no fly zone as much as it was just straight up regime change attempt. The Libyan rebels are not loved in Libya, they are terrorists or terrorist sympathizers, and the people in Tripoli are marching in the millions against NATO and in favour of Gaddafi. The liberal and conservative media are biased. When Bush did the invasion of Iraq everyone whined and complained that he lied. When Obama lied, it's acceptable? I'm no Republican (or Democrat), but the Libyan attack was based on statements by people with no proof. On the other hand, the people who are doing the killing, the Rebels and NATO, have plenty of dirt against them to put them on trial. Where's the human rights organization when black Libyans get lynched by the racist rebels?
09:23 AM on 08/14/2011
I have said over and over that what the NATO is doing in Libya is illegal. They were authorized with "NO FLY" instead, they took it different without respect to the rule of the UN and begin killing people. I wonder what if someone were to be dropping bomb on family members of those NATO who are doing those illegal bombing and killing other people, how would they feel seeing their own relatives being killed by someone. In short, its not the business of the West to tell another country how to run their country. This greed of oil by these Western countries is not going to get them far with other countries having oil.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:47 PM on 08/14/2011
And apparently you have not yet read UNSCR 1973, which authorized a much more aggressive campaign beyond a basic no fly.

"Authorizes Member States that have notified the Secretary-General, acting nationally or through regional organizations or arrangements, and acting in cooperation with the Secretary-General, to take all necessary measures, notwithstanding paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011), to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory, and requests the Member States concerned to inform the Secretary-General immediately of the measures they take pursuant to the authorization conferred by this paragraph which shall be immediately reported to the Security Council;"

Take all necessary measures.

I don't know why you hysterics continue to make out that this is Guerncia take two, but it is not.
08:52 AM on 08/14/2011
Of course we all know - I mean those who can "read between the lines" as people say in French - the real goal of this war in Libya. Reporter Andrew Simmons showed on Al Jazeera how Nato airplanes first bombed the pro-Gaddafi city of Tawurgha in order to facilitate its conquest by rebels. UNO-NATO are violating their own statements in resolution 1973! And what is going on in Libya is nothing else as political cleansing! Nothing else als big warcrimes!

Josef Goebbels still alive!

Al Jazeera report: http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/08/201181215510690602.html

And my own (picture by picture) analysis of it is available here:
http://foreign-affairs-world-policy.blogspot.com/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:48 PM on 08/14/2011
More exclamation points!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Or we don't believe that you mean it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rae112754
04:46 AM on 08/14/2011
Luckily after the munnitions explode, you cant read the tags of made in the USA anymore.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pooter1
04:42 AM on 08/14/2011
I strongly suggest that everyone use Google Translater to convert the attached report from French to English and then be prepared to be shocked at the level of 'misinformation' that was ginned up to have NATO begin bombing Libya.

The Paris-based International Center for Research and Study on Terrorism and Aide to Victims of Terrorism and the French Center for Research on Intelligence knew something wasn't right the second they realized that the UN didn't bother to send an investigative commission to Libya before passing the U.N. resolution (mandating intervention). The only 'evidence' that was introduced for a UN resolution for NATO to intervene to prevent a humanitarian crisis were just news media reports, news reports that were just repeating what the gov of France, the UK, and the USA was telling the media.

And trust me, it doesn't get any better from that point on for NATO, Sarkozy, Cameron, and Obama.

http://www.cf2r.org/images/stories/news/201106/rapport-libye.pdf
09:30 AM on 08/14/2011
I have been saying over and over that Sarkozy is a SNAKE and Cameron never got a ball to admit the truth. The British spy and intelligence were caught in Libya helping the so called rebel. The British then quickly changed those spies and replaced them. Don't forget the involvement of the USA as well as that of the Italian. It should be made clear that these Western shouldn't get out of other countries with their criminal behavior. Fact is, Libya do not belong to them
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:50 PM on 08/14/2011
Yes. Qaddafi has brutally suppressed countless rebellions over the last four decades, so it is unimaginable that he was doing the same now.

Yeah.
12:56 AM on 08/14/2011
I'm sure the families of the victims can take comfort in the u.n.'s condemnation.
12:06 AM on 08/14/2011
The U.N. is Condemning NATO since NATO is the reason for the civilian deaths. NATO is backing a small group of radicals to attack the Libyan people's society. NATO is guilty
07:45 AM on 08/14/2011
The world movers and shakers have resented Gaddafi's increasing influence in Africa (which has come about by his doing such things as building a continental telecommunications system that people could use for free - to the deep chagrin of major telecom corporations)> They want him gone - and they want his country's resources under their control. They are getting away with their criminal actions due to America being a nation whose average citizen spends 10 times more time watching American Idol and MTV than reading or listening to any serious news discussions.
09:33 AM on 08/14/2011
But are you surprise why US students do so poorly on history and social studies! They don't even try to understand and just come here to post trash. I have said it over and over that this got nothing to with civillian death but the real objective is getting Gaddafi killed and oil so that the capitalist can take over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyNameIsKarsten
...sounds like Chewbacca when he yawns.
11:59 PM on 08/13/2011
I still wonder why NATO even bothered getting involved in Libya. Prior to NATO's involvement, the whole Arab World was wondering how the big-bad West could just sit back without intervening and watch the reports of Gaddafi's troops brutally oppressing his own people.

When NATO eventually decided to get involved, everyone applauded for a day or two, but now we're back to complaining. And all the Arab World sees is that the big-bad West is (yet again) "bombing a Muslim country that has oil and installing another Western-backed regime".

Can't win on this one... should have just let the local population resolve their own conflict, meanwhile saving a lot of money and creating fewer new enemies.
01:15 AM on 08/14/2011
Right on the money.

Why NATO is getting involved in the internal affairs of another country just shows the attitude of the west.

Marty
CT
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:05 PM on 08/13/2011
Good news. The casualty counts will be dropping off in a bit.

The Free Libyan Forces are 30 miles from Tripoli.

Hopefully, Qaddafi will flee. I'm not betting on it.