More

Michael Phelps, Indiana Teen, Sentenced To 35 Years In Prison For School Shooting

RICK CALLAHAN   08/12/11 08:26 PM ET   AP

MARTINSVILLE, Ind. — A central Indiana teenager convicted of shooting a former middle school classmate was sentenced to 30 years in prison Friday by a judge who told him the shooting just inside a school entrance "stole the innocence of this community."

Just before he was sentenced, 16-year-old Michael Phelps read a long statement, some of it inaudible, where he described his turbulent home life, his mother's frequent drinking and his growing frustrations with life and his victim in the months before the shooting.

"I let it get to my head. I let my anger get the best of me," Phelps told Morgan County Judge G. Thomas Gray, before turning to apologize to his victim, 15-year-old Chance Jackson.

Phelps was convicted of attempted murder in an adult trial last month in the March 25 shooting just inside an entrance to Martinsville West Middle School, about 30 miles south of Indianapolis.

Gray sentenced Phelps to 35 years in prison, suspending five years and ordering him to serve five years of probation after his release.

He told Phelps that the aggravating factors in his case – including that he shot Jackson twice and made a weapon while in jail after his arrest – outweighed the mitigating factors of his upbringing in a chaotic household.

"Mr. Phelps, you stole the innocence of this community. Chance Jackson did not deserve this. Morgan County did not deserve this," he said.

The judge noted that Jackson's wounds have changed his life and will cause him decades of physical problems.

"You have put him in his own prison for the rest of his life," Gray said. "He will be in pain and suffering for the rest of his life."

After Gray pronounced his sentence, Phelps became teary-eyed, lowered his head and pressed his face against his folded hands.

Steve Litz, Phelps' attorney, said after the hearing that he plans to appeal both the sentence and another judge's decision to try Phelps as an adult.

Jackson's mother, Becky Jackson, testified that her son has undergone two emergency surgeries since Phelps shot him twice in the abdomen, damaging several organs, including his liver and a kidney. She said doctors had to remove his gall bladder and that her son faces another surgery in November to reconnect abdominal muscles.

Jackson said her son also suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder.

Reading for a letter she wrote to the court, she recalled her horror after hearing that her son had been shot.

"As I rushed to the hospital with my mother, I was not sure if I would see my son alive again," she said.

In his closing statement, prosecutor Steve Sonnega said the shooting was not just a spur-of-the-moment decision by Phelps, who was 15 at the time. He said Phelps planned the attack, stole the 9-millimeter handgun he used in the shooting from a family friend, and posted on Facebook allusions to his plans.

"This is not a friction thing where a kid loses his cool. This is a planned, premeditated crime," Sonnega said.

Martinsville West Middle School Principal Suzie Lipps testified that three weeks before the shooting, Phelps had been suspended and barred from school property after he blurted out in a class that he "was going to blow up the school."

Earlier in the day, psychologist Jeff Vanderwater-Pearcy and Phelps' four siblings testified about his troubled upbringing, including never knowing his biological father and coping with his mother's drinking. Vanderwater-Pearcy said Phelps felt his mother was choosing alcohol over him and that he had a low self-worth and suffered from depression.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

MARTINSVILLE, Ind. — A central Indiana teenager convicted of shooting a former middle school classmate was sentenced to 30 years in prison Friday by a judge who told him the shooting just inside...
MARTINSVILLE, Ind. — A central Indiana teenager convicted of shooting a former middle school classmate was sentenced to 30 years in prison Friday by a judge who told him the shooting just inside...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 670
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
08:36 PM on 08/17/2011
I'm sorry, but I grew up with no biological father and a mother that not only drinks, but abuses drugs. I have never ever thought that hurting anyone, especially a child, would be okay. This kid cannot blame his upbringing for his horrible actions. He deserves to go to jail for what he did.
08:13 PM on 08/16/2011
We aren't responsible for what we are, but we are responsible for what we do. I can't stand ignorant people that make excuses for the actions of monsters. I hope anyone that is soft on violent criminals has one reach out and destroy their family, because obviously you have no empathy for the VICTIMS of crime.
Ayla87
Don't Delete Me Bro!
03:25 PM on 08/15/2011
People claiming this sentence is too harsh are selectively ignoring the level of violence this kid has demonstrated. Original shooting aside, this kid was placed in a juvenile detention center while awaiting trial for over four months. This means he was in a controlled environment, away from home, where he undoubtably received therapy for his problems.

If his family life was really that much of a factor in his actions then putting him in Juvy and giving him therapy should've created a visible change in his behavior. It didn't. Instead he went out and created a shank, which means he was planning on maiming or killing another person.

History of violence
Premeditated his attack
Sadistic -- shot his victim in the stomach, would've been a very slow death, and is currently a very slow recovery.
Unreceptive to therapy

tl;dr He's a sociopath. And he should rot in jail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lauren Kottwitz
There must be some kind of way out of here...
05:43 PM on 08/14/2011
Rough. 35 years is a long time. And his family situation wasn't great. And yes, it's tragic that he won't have a chance to become an adult.

However, he shot some kid over a girl. He stole a gun and shot someone. Over a girl. OVER A GIRL. Any person who has the capacity to shoot-to-kill another human being over a mere trifle is not a person who should be out in society. He needs to be dealt with. He is obviously unstable mentally, and he needs to be dealt with mentally - in a secure location. As much as I enjoy my bleeding-heart-liberal nature, I cannot say with a clear conscience that he shouldn't be locked up. And I might be able to say that he shouldn't have gotten such a dramatically long sentance if the system of rehabilitation in prisons actually worked. At all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
valeskas
catlover/book lover democrat
10:06 AM on 08/14/2011
When he comes out, he is a hardened criminal. He belongs in there until he dies, so he cannot do that to another person again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jerryengelbach
Working class heritage
09:21 AM on 08/14/2011
People from the same backgrounds emerge differently for many reasons.

What it boils down to is that each person is an individual. Some people may be damaged by having had a broken home, others may not. It may not a be a dead certainty that a bad background leads to bad behavior, but that doesn't mean that it can't.

Posters who comment that there are many people from disfunctional families who don't become potential killers, and that therefore this boy is just "bad," miss the point. The direction of one's life is not robotically determined by a specific set of replicable factors, but they may be applicable when evaluating all the influences and reasons for behavior.

It takes more time than the period of a legal trial and more psychological expertise than that of a typical trial judge to truly get to the root causes of anti-social acts. The legal guidelines -- the age of the perpetrator, mitigating factors, and the legal definitions of insanity -- are only generalized and often inadequate approximations of explanations for individual behavior.

Absent a way to get more deeply into a defendant's psyche within a resonable time, we'll continue to have these debates about the degree of culpability of influences outside the will of the perpetrator.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inmyhumbleopinion
Vote third party.
10:54 AM on 08/14/2011
I'm sure the victim's mother could care less what this kid's problems were and while everyone deserves compassion, they also must own up to their actions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jerryengelbach
Working class heritage
08:41 PM on 08/15/2011
I'm not talking about compassion, but about understanding the reasons for antisocial behavior.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:22 PM on 08/14/2011
thank you Dr. Phil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jerryengelbach
Working class heritage
08:42 PM on 08/15/2011
I think explorations into human motivations and genetic and environmental influences on behavior are well beyond the level of a television talk show.
08:11 AM on 08/14/2011
yeah.. and everyone keeps commenting about the sentence.. 35 years.. some say too harsh, some say it's too lenient.. face it.. kid'll probably make parole by the time he's 30.. after learning a wonderful trade in prison, and then back on the streets with a nice, full life in front of him.. THAT, to me is the scary part..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gposner29
07:15 AM on 08/14/2011
Well that should end his olympic career....A shame.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ebuist1825
07:11 AM on 08/14/2011
The responsibility for this tragedy rests firmly upon the shoulders of the young man who fired the gun - twice. His family situation is irrelevant. It was correct to charge him as an adult. This crime was premeditated. He stole a firearm, shot the other young man twice, clearly attempting to kill him, and then makes a jail house weapon while in custody! And all of this apparently because of an argument over a girl?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cbaker2692
05:50 AM on 08/14/2011
I have known many peple in my life who didn't know thier fathers they didn't shoot any body. I have had frieinds whose mom's drank like a fish they didn't shoot anybody. I could care less about his child hood. This is another problem with our courts today, never anybody's fault it has to do with thier parents, teachers, scool in general or upbringing. Bull shirt nobody forced this kid to get a gun aim it and pull the trigger
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ebuist1825
06:58 AM on 08/14/2011
You are absolutely correct on this, and I'm fanning you! :o)
05:43 AM on 08/14/2011
If never knowing your biological father was, in fact, a significant contributor to his behavior, then it might seem that one particular ethnic group that has over 70% of its children born out of wedlock would be in really big trouble.
01:49 AM on 08/15/2011
SYLLCURIE.....70%????
Is that a factual statement, or are you in the Sen. Jon Kyl club???
04:51 AM on 08/15/2011
I am politically independent (if that matters) plus it is a fact. Look it up for yourself if you do not wish to take my word for it.
04:53 AM on 08/14/2011
It sounds like this kid had a messed up child hood. A lot of serial killers usually have bad childhoods that mess them up so they end up killing. I feel sorry for this kid cause he messed up his whole life. And i feel so sorry for the victims who have to deal with all this crap that the shooter did. This kid needed help, and i wish he got it, but its 2 late now. Noone is born to be evil, and children learn from watching others like parents, close ones, friends, etc. This kid really needed someone, a good role model. There had to be something going on at school that must have really upset the kid to go and shoot someone. I wish this kid got the help he needed cause then he might have not done what he did. :(
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sonman68
"Saying what needs to be heard"
02:40 AM on 08/14/2011
The judge was right by saying to the boy "You are the one responsible for this" but I feel there is more than enough blame to go around.

The parents have played a large role in the young mans life. And not a good one. Societal breakdowns within the family and community are only getting worse. In days gone by many families had both parents to care and discipline a child. Knowing right from wrong was drilled into us. I'm not saying there wont be a rotten egg here and there but if someone saw a kid that needed help they would jump in and do so.

Churches, neighbors, friends and family all contributed to help. But today stepping in is frowned upon for fear of a lawsuit or backlash. Enough is enough. The family unit is the first defense from the unfortunate downward spiral were in.

Its very sad that he will be put away for up to 35 years but there are others that should be given blame. Not just this boy.
08:55 PM on 08/14/2011
I agree with you, sonman68. the family is absolutely the first line of defense. unfortunately many of our families are no longer close and in the lives of eachother..the parents especially with their children..so much bickering and fighting...and for some of these families no talking at all as was my case with my mother...very abusive..but I had to make choices of my own and not make it my mothers problem..especially as I got to be an adult. My heart goes out to both victim and suspect...for both, life will NEVER be the same.
01:53 AM on 08/14/2011
He was once a multi-gold medal olympian. Then he took one bong hit. Now he's shooting up schools? I think we can all conclude that this proves weed is a gateway drug.

He had such a bright future... and such long arms.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jerryengelbach
Working class heritage
09:08 AM on 08/14/2011
A so-called "gateway drug" is one that supposedly leads to higher drug use. This has nothing to do with that.

In fact, marijuana makes people more calm, not more violent, and unlike alcohol and tobacco, it is not physically addictive.
09:57 PM on 08/14/2011
I was being satirical. I smoke a lot of weed, actually.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janeyre
10:02 PM on 08/14/2011
So why are there so many people who use and can't stop? Is it reasonable to say: People go to Rehab for it? I know a person who did. What was the reason then, if it is not addictive? I sure don't know, as I am not a smoker of anything. Please enlighten me. I am not being funny either...
04:49 PM on 08/14/2011
Not the same Michael Phelps! Please tell me you knew that and are being facetious?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gposner29
07:02 PM on 08/14/2011
Fa...what?
09:57 PM on 08/14/2011
facetious indeed. look it up kids.
01:23 AM on 08/14/2011
This is a very difficult sentence to handle; he should be sentenced for sure, but is this sentence too weak? Or maybe too strong?

On one hand, this person is a young adult and does have the opportunity to benefit society in the future.

On the other, though, he has proved that he is currently not fit to currently even live in society, let alone benefit it; the fact that he tried to murder a boy around his age knowing full well the ramifications.

The question to answer then, is this: Is there any future for this person to live and function as a member of society, bettering it either through his profession or other works, or should he simply be executed in efforts to reduce prison overcrowding and the budget that must be used to feed, house, and monitor prisoners?

Of course, this question will never be answered as it is subject to whom is asked, but what does everyone think? Is there enough logic or belief that this boy should continue to live, and what if he should he falter again after his sentence, will someone be willing to step up and pay for the wasted 35 years of funding he took?