More

Autism In The Siblings: Chance Of Recurrence Higher Than Previously Thought (VIDEO)

First Posted: 08/15/11 11:06 AM ET Updated: 10/15/11 06:12 AM ET

Given estimates that one in 110 children in the U.S. is now affected by autism, speculation has reached a fevered pitch about what the autism risk factors actually are. New research highlights the possible role that family genetics might play, finding the likelihood that families with one or more autistic child will have another is far greater than previously thought.

The new study, published Monday in the journal Pediatrics, found that nearly 19 percent of infants with an older autistic sibling also developed an autism spectrum disorder (ASD). That figure represents a dramatic increase over previous sibling recurrence estimates, which ranged from 3 to 14 percent.

"For families with an autistic child, this is of high central interest to them -- this question of 'How likely am I to have another one?'" said Sally Ozonoff, Ph.D., a professor at the University of California at Davis' M.I.N.D. Institute and the study's lead author. "Previously the only answers we had were a bit outdated. This gives us a more updated picture."

The authors of the new study found that sex was a major predictor of recurrence, with males at an almost threefold risk of ASD. In addition, having multiple children with ASD seemed to play a key role in whether or not subsequent children developed autism.

"For families with two or more children with autism, the rate of recurrence was 32 percent," said Ozonoff, who admitted she was personally surprised by the finding. "That means there's almost a one-in-three chance that the next infant is going to have autism, which is very high. That does suggest that some families have higher genetic risk than others."

The new study is the largest to look at autism sibling recurrence rates to date, bringing together data collected from 12 sites participating in the Baby Siblings Research Consortium -- an international research effort funded by the advocacy group Autism Speaks.

"It's a very well done study," said James McPartland, Ph.D., an assistant professor of child psychiatry and psychology at Yale's Child Study Center, who was not associated with the research. He said he was not particularly surprised by the overall results, explaining they were consistent with increases in baseline autism prevalence. He cautioned, however, that they should not necessarily be perceived as bad news.

"These kinds of studies raise fears about increasing prevalence," McPartland said. "It's very unclear whether the increase that we see is due to changes in the biology of the world or improvements in diagnostic quality. If these kids were always there and now we're just recognizing them and treating them earlier, that's a positive thing."

Indeed, the authors of the new study suggest that the findings could be helpful in reminding parents of children with autism to closely monitor the development of their infants in order to get them into early intervention as needed. Previous studies have shown that early intervention can be helpful in improving language ability and behavior in children with ASD.

"For parents of children with autism, it's probably emphasizing things they already know -- that they should closely monitor their children and talk to health care providers to better recognize those early symptoms," said Alycia Halladay, Ph.D., director of research for environmental sciences at Autism Speaks. She added that the current study did not address causality, but simply "noticed that a strong family history was associated with a higher risk."

The study's authors also point out that the new figures can help families better assess their situation in genetic counseling and family planning, as it provides them with more accurate risk recurrence estimates.

But Ozonoff said that parents should not necessarily be disheartened by the updated figures.

"Even though these rates surprised and absolutely alarmed us, more than 80 percent of the infants we studied did not meet the criteria [for autism]," she told HuffPost. "For a family that has a newborn and a child with autism, they should absolutely keep that in mind."

WATCH:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

Given estimates that one in 110 children in the U.S. is now affected by autism, speculation has reached a fevered pitch about what the autism risk factors actually are. New research highlights the pos...
Given estimates that one in 110 children in the U.S. is now affected by autism, speculation has reached a fevered pitch about what the autism risk factors actually are. New research highlights the pos...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 115
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:42 PM on 08/17/2011
This study further undermines the unjustified conclusion from a recent twin study from California that genetic factors are less important than previously thought. http://wiringthebrain.blogspot.com/2011/07/environmental-influences-on-autism.html
08:08 PM on 08/16/2011
I don't view high functioning autism / Asbergers as abnormal. It is largely the default personality type of engineering and the abstract sciences - and always has been. The fields select for it. I remember one researcher on Asbergers, who would try to figure out which faculty members had it. In the science and engineering faculties, he tried to figure out which ones did not.

Autism seems to be associated with too much, just as schizophrenia seems to be associated with too much of the genes that drive creativity.

In the modern technical economy, aspies can and are reproductively successful. But to the extent they marry one another, the number of kids with full autism is likely to increase.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EmilyRose2010
.Today is a new day!
06:35 AM on 08/16/2011
one child has autism, after that 2 other children were born; the second one has serious learning disabilities, and the third has been diagnosed with autism; if other children in the family are lucky enough to escape autism; living with a sibling(s) with autism, they will start acting like they have autism, i.e., meltdowns, poor interaction with others or no interaction with others; poor behavioral habits and so on. autism is a terrible disease for a family to have and if the parents are not involved, it makes the nightmare even worse.
08:48 AM on 08/16/2011
There is no such think as "acting like they have autism". In families where some children are afflicted and some are not, there is a stark difference between the two; even if they've been raised together in the same environmental and familial environments, those who are afflicted are nothing like those whe are not. Even in mild cases, and I'm not even mentioning severe cases. If a child acts like they have autism, they are either faking it or they do indeed have it. You either can communicate with the outside world or you can't, within a range of degrees. It is a clinical condition, so "acting like it" has nothing to do here.
04:27 AM on 08/16/2011
There are several factors which determine vulnerability regarding toxins. The vaccination aspect should have been considered.

The fact that unvaccinated rarely become autistic is indisputable.
08:15 AM on 08/16/2011
What is also indisputable is the large number of vaccinated people who never become autistic, ergo most of the population.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
11:08 PM on 08/17/2011
Yet they refuse to research unvaccinated populations.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
10:22 PM on 08/15/2011
This is no surprise to those of us who have ASD in the family. After my nephew was diagnosed with ASD around 15 years ago, it became clear that those bachelor uncles, cousins and other relatives who were "different" (but very much like him, and high functioning) would probably have gotten diagnosed with ASD if it was known then. And remember, so many of today's children would have never made it to their 5th birthday if we didn't have all these medical interventions that we have now! Delivering babies very premature will lead to many more medical problems and learning problems in the general population.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:51 PM on 08/15/2011
Premature and low birth weight babies would be more vulnerable to neurotoxins with toxic exposure measured by weight such as thimerosal and aluminum containing pharmaceuticals. The synergistic toxicity of the two substances often given in combination may also be more profound in smaller infants.
photo
NYnotLiberal
Don't crush that Dwarf, hand me the pliers.
06:55 PM on 08/15/2011
I have an observation and some questions: It appears like we seem to have more and more kids with this and other ailments these days. Is it because 1. It's actually increasing?, or 2. Technology allows us to diagnose this now, where it may have been mis-diagnosed as something else (say as retardation) back in the day? 3. Are we actually regressing as a species, and becoming weaker or is this a reaction to environmental influences that didn't exist years ago?
For example, I have several friends who work in education, and all I hear about is these kids with peanut allergies, and what they have to go through to protect them from exposure. I never remember hearing about this when I was a kid in school (and I was an "army brat type" that moved from school to school regularly each time we moved). What the heck is going on here?
photo
NYnotLiberal
Don't crush that Dwarf, hand me the pliers.
07:01 PM on 08/15/2011
P.S., I'm not a scientist, and I don't play one on TV.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
07:15 PM on 08/15/2011
No one can say for sure the answer to your question, but most researchers in the field say that it is both a real increase and an increase due to improved diagnoses and modified definitions.

I would not go so far as to say we are regressing, but certainly we are in a society where people with high-functioning ASD (what used to called Asperger's) can live productive lives. I work in academia, and I know of a few. I'm told that certain other fields are also somewhat ideal for those who (through no fault of their own) don't have optimal social skills due to ASD. Now, take one male and one female with high-functioning ASD who meet at said jobs and (according to this article) they're going to have an elevated chance of having a child with ASD. I have a friend who teaches special ed at a high school near a very prominent university and he sees this all of the time.

And with peanut allergies, it's also a bit of society affecting biology over time. 60 years ago, you'd probably have died with your reaction to peanuts. Nowadays, you'll be carrying (hopefully) an epi pen. So, you'll age and have kids and potentially carry on genes that make peanut allergies more likely.

But there are possibly other factors as well.
photo
NYnotLiberal
Don't crush that Dwarf, hand me the pliers.
07:31 PM on 08/15/2011
Interesting...thanks for the reply. I'm still stumped by the peanut thing though. I'm sure I would have heard that "little Tommy is no longer with us" because some kid next to him was eating a PB&J sandwich in the cafeteria. (I'm talking early 60's elementary school....I still remember the stupid "duck & cover" drills).
photo
BettyBoop200
Left is right
09:11 AM on 08/16/2011
My son's pediatrician in the SF Bay area speculated the same thing. His wife was a physical therapist in Silicon Valley, where many high functioning ASD folks life and thrive as computer programmers. They are getting wealthy, and, instead of being shunned from the gene pool are increasingly part of it because of their financial success.
06:43 PM on 08/15/2011
My physician husband says the growth and spread of autism does not reflect a genetic pattern. Genetic oriented researchers looking at autism have pretty much concluded that the genetic markers for autism are too complex to pursue. Don't waste your time and money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
07:16 PM on 08/15/2011
Yes, currently too complex to look for specific markers to give any information, but not too complex for population-based studies (such as this one) that just give very basic information.
85Percent
Southern Liberal & Michigander
09:07 PM on 08/15/2011
So true! I had already done my own population-based study in my own family. There are just too many of us with autism spectrum disorders for there to not be a genetic link. I am still glad to have my observations verified, genetic markers or not, and this study will give valuable help to couples planning their families.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patsijean
08:58 PM on 08/17/2011
I am related by marriage to a family that includes four children that I know of with autism (three sibling boys and a cousin).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EmilyRose2010
.Today is a new day!
06:40 AM on 08/16/2011
this has to be his opinion and not fact; look at a family with one child with autism and see how the others develop (poorly). not to mention the fact, the school system are not on top of this and it is still a guessing game in the medical field.
05:40 PM on 08/15/2011
Oh please, "higher genetic factors?" Yes the "genetic" factors are those who are much more prone to the adverse effects of vaccines. All of the adverse reactions that our children with autism are suffering are all listed in the vaccine makers literature as well as Autism as an adverse effect. How many more lives need to be destroyed before they finally admit to it publicly?
85Percent
Southern Liberal & Michigander
09:21 PM on 08/15/2011
There are at LEAST three members of my family who never had any immunizations, and have ASDs. Looking back at family stories, there were very likely several generations of men with spectrum disorders in my ex-husband's family. No immunizations back then, either.
08:21 AM on 08/16/2011
Why continue pounding this? What's the point? Does it make people with ASD feel better to think that a vaccine caused their condition?
01:34 PM on 08/15/2011
I have two sons. One was slow to mature and had to substitute learning for inutitive abilities. He became a physicist. The other was unable to develop alternatives for his lack of people skills and remained autstic.

A Few Impertinent Questions about Autism, Freudianism and Materialism

http://30145.myauthorsite.com/
01:28 PM on 08/15/2011
Autism is a personality type. The defects probably have many causes, but defective children with a non-conformist personality will enhibit autistic symptoms. I've reead autism is less prevalent among Amish and Mennonite populstions, highly conforming cultures.

A few Impertinent Questions about Autism, Freudianism and Materialism

http://30145.myauthorsite.com/
05:47 PM on 08/15/2011
I think under current circumstances I would ahve to call them today's non-confomists.,,seeing as how they very rarely vaccinate and in years past did not vaccinate at all. Do you really believe autism is a personality-type? What is your background? reference point?
07:23 AM on 08/16/2011
Of course it is less prevalent among Amish and Mennonites - they remain completely undiagnosed.

Also, they likely descend from a very small group of people, so the genetic makup is less variable than in the general population.
01:17 PM on 08/15/2011
I am sure vaccines that have high amount of Mercury have NOTHING ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with any of this.
01:20 PM on 08/15/2011
Mercury has not been used in these vaccines for many years.
05:49 PM on 08/15/2011
Actually it's still there in quite a few and the ones without are more mercury-lite as I like to say. Even when they supposedly took it out the doctors were not forced to throw out what they ahd. The shelf life for the vials is several years and we were finding mercury vaccines even 4 years after the supposed pull of mercury from the shelves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nogggin
06:14 PM on 08/15/2011
Mercury's still in the vast majority of flu shots. And the 'support' organizations like Autism Speaks and Age of Autism are still working to help pharma sweep it under the rug.
01:24 PM on 08/15/2011
If you don't have it genetically, Mercury will do nothing to you, except maybe give you Mercury poisoning.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nogggin
06:17 PM on 08/15/2011
Mercury is one of the most toxic substances known to man. I'm reminded of a hypothetical scenario where toddlers are shoved out of moving cars on busy freeways, then scientists try to determine the genetic makeup of the ones able to crawl to the shoulder without getting squashed. Sound ridiculous? It's no more ridiculous than our current vaccine program, and the 'research' that's done into the cause of the autism spike. (oh btw, there's no such thing as a genetic epidemic)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:33 AM on 08/16/2011
We know that low level exposure to lead has subtle, but detectable adverse effects in population studies. I wouldn't be surprised if there are many adverse effects of mercury exposure at various levels of exposure.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
12:41 PM on 08/15/2011
I consulted a geneticist before I became pregnant, because my family is really messed up. They did not recognize the description of autistic spectrum disorders that can be traced through at least four (now five) generations, including both of my children.
The good news is that those of us with ASD can live fulfilling, if not very normal, lives. My advice to parents who find themselves raising exceptional children is to focus on function, not normallity. You can achieve function.
photo
Dee-Dee
A retired teacher and administrator, now doing bus
01:09 PM on 08/15/2011
Ditto, from a third generation Autistic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaurieAnn
Wake Up! Grow Up! Lighten Up!
05:17 PM on 08/15/2011
Functioning is exactly what my family struggles with for our autistic teen; he's very resistant to learning independence skills.  His level of anxiety increases dramatically whenever it's time to work on skill development and even when we talk about independent living with this psychologist.   I don't need him to be anything like 'normal.'  I just wish he could live life without a crippling fear of independence.
12:33 PM on 08/15/2011
I don't understand this. In Europe, we've known this for ages, while in America they serve you this as hot flash news. WTF?

Of course it's genetic. And the reason why it's 3-fold more prevalent in man is very simple- it's because it's an X-factor disease, meaning that its is transmitted through the X-chromosome from the mother. Men have only one X-chromosome, so if they have the affected genes, they are both carriers and afflicted, while women could be only carriers.

This just boggles my mind. Go let everybody know already. I feel like they keep the truth from the public, pretending that "we don't really know", "we didn't think it was genetic", bla-bla-bla, why? To sell more drugs and treatments?
01:02 PM on 08/15/2011
Easier to blame other factors than to blame yourself. If people could blame environmental pollution or even vaccines for "giving" their kid autism, then it's easier to accept compared to "regardless of whatever I did my kid would still be on the spectrum because of my genetics."
01:22 PM on 08/15/2011
Well... but there are plethora of genetic disorders around, why keep this one under wraps? I mean, from Tay-Sachs to Cystic Fibrosis, from Balanced Translocations to Cancer, there is a long list of ailments parents can transmit to their kids. Autism is just one of them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:16 AM on 08/16/2011
I'm afraid I feel a little more, much more actually, at fault for the environmental pollution that I failed to protect my child from than for my "genes" that may have made her more vulnerable to the condition, or the exposure, but that perspective fits what I've seen happening in her development and has made some improvements possible.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
07:27 PM on 08/15/2011
I appreciate the intent, but the genetics are a little more complicated. If it were simply a x-linked genetic trait, we would have a marker for it. It's very likely that there are x-linked genes involved, but it is a complicated cascade that is not currently fully understood. There is also some research that points to mitochondrial DNA involvement and population studies that have linked it to MS. It's a complicated picture and, in solely my own personal opinion, will ultimately be found to be multiple disorders with multiple causalities and risk factors that we are currently putting into one group...because we don't have the data to know what else to do.
06:55 AM on 08/16/2011
Of course, it's a little more complicated and not yet fully understood. However, it is no longer questioned if it's of genetic or environmental nature, not in Europe anyway. We do know that it is genetically based. Which is not to say that environmental factors do not play a role, they do I'm sure.

I do agree that we are dealing with multiple disorders that we tend to put together in the same vast group called ASD. And ultimately, chances are, we will discover than many of those are physiologically and epidemically unrelated, that they have different causations, different outcomes and need diferent treatments.

As I said, in many cases, it is not actively transmitted to girls, who can remain simple carriers of the genetic makeup but not suffer from the disorder themselves. It has been suggested, though, that when active in the gril, the severity of autism is lesser than the severity of it in the boy. Which, it is believed, points towards gender differences in the brain, whether chemical, systemic or structural.

You do see it in families with autism- the boys are sometimes severely disabled, whereas the girls or women are mildly challenged, sometimes even undiagnosed and untreated, or treated for manic depression or other psychological conditions.
12:31 PM on 08/15/2011
Although interesting, this still does not tell us much. Reoccurrence in the same family might mean there is a genetic link, an environmental link or a parental input link, or all of the above. We still do not know specifically what causes this condition.
12:48 PM on 08/15/2011
Yes, we do. It's an X-factor genetic makeup.
01:10 PM on 08/15/2011
I think what 'sak' meant was, science has yet to identify the precise gene sequence that causes ASD, and what triggers the disorder in some who are at-risk but not in others.
02:25 PM on 08/15/2011
Allow me to clarify,since I am not a scientist. What I meant was that even though we see evidence of this syndrome running in families, it could be that a family line lives in West Virginia, for example, exposed to the toxic effects of coal mining, or on top of a toxic dump site, or is exposed to pesticides more so than most of us. It could also mean that because of cultural or family habits the exposure to junk food or other poisons is higher than in most families. Until we can identify the exact factor in the genetic code, we really do not know why it runs in families. What seems to be true is that there are more children like this. Could it be that there are simply too many chemicals in our food and environment? I don't think anyone has a clue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaurieAnn
Wake Up! Grow Up! Lighten Up!
05:19 PM on 08/15/2011
I am still of the opinion that there is more than a single form of autism and that there are different etiologies.
07:32 AM on 08/16/2011
Of course, there is! ASD is a very vast umbrella. Conditions in that group have, indeed, very different etiologies, different outcomes, and necessitate different treatments. Aspergers is obviously nothing like full blown Autism. In many cases, they fail to differentiate between mild Autism cases and cases of different ASDs, but that doesn't mean they are not different forms.