iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

ACLU Sues Missouri School District, Alleges Illegal Censorship Of LGBT Websites

Aclu Sues

First Posted: 08/16/11 04:32 PM ET Updated: 10/16/11 06:12 AM ET

The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit against a Missouri school district for using software that filters websites advocating for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community.

ACLU filed suit against the Camdenton R-III School District on behalf of Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays National, the Matthew Shepard Foundation, Campus Pride and DignityUSA. ACLU argues that the school district ignored warnings from the organization as part of its "Don't Filter Me" project that its Internet filtering practices were unconstitutional.

The 36-page complaint filed Monday notes that Camdenton's software blocks sites like ones belonging to the plaintiff organizations, which provide information for preventing anti-gay bullying and other student resources like access to gay-straight alliances. But at the same time, the district's censorship doesn't cut off access to comparable anti-LGBT sites, ACLU says.

"We have made every effort to inform the school district that its filtering software illegally denies students access to important educational information and resources on discriminatory grounds," Tony Rothert, legal director of the ACLU of Eastern Missouri said in a statement Monday. "Unfortunately, it will now be up to the courts to compel the district to grant its students viewpoint-neutral access to the Internet."

The lawsuit seeks, among several items, to uproot the district's use of the current filtering software and relief from nominal damages for constitutional rights violation.

Blocking sites that advocate for the LGBT community makes it more difficult for students to complete assignments about current events and hinders LGBT students' abilities to access information that could help them "with the difficult issues of coming out to family members, integrating their sexuality and religious faith, dealing with the threat of bullying, and surviving high school as an LGBT person," according to the complaint.

ACLU says that Camdenton's custom-built filtering software has a "viewpoint-neutral" URL Blacklist that blocks sexually explicit sites, but also has a "viewpoint-discriminatory" category titled "sexuality" that also blacklists non-sexually explicit LGBT pages, but permits access to anti-LGBT sites.

URL Blacklist automatically generates an aggregate of URLs that are available on the web. From URL Blacklist:

The blacklist does not only contain sites that are considered 'bad' but it also contains many other categories that can be used as white or grey lists. Being listed does not infer that the site is 'bad' - these are just lists of sites ... The blacklist does contain sites which are wrongly categorised which is due to the bulk of the entries being collected using automatic scripts.

According to the complaint filed Monday, Rothert wrote a letter to district officials in May requesting that Camdenton lift its sexuality filter or switch to a new Internet filtering software, noting that the current filtering is a violation of the First Amendment. Officials first denied using URL Blacklist as its filtering software, but later admitted its employment and agreed to unblock specific sites noted in Rothert's letter, but declined to lift the entire "sexuality" category ban, according to the document filed Monday.

Last Friday, Camdenton Superintendent Tim Hadfield told Lake News Online that the district will not change how it filters sexually explicit websites despite ACLU's initial complaint, noting that district officials do not believe its filtering practices violate student rights. ACLU has incorrect information, Hadfield told Lake News Online.

The superintendent added that the district will make exceptions for students who request to access automatically filtered sites, provided the content on those pages comply with district policies.

"We do not specifically filter sites promoting alternative lifestyles. We do specifically block sites that are inappropriate and will continue to do so," Hadfield told Lake News Online. "We disagree with their position and turned the issue over to our attorney to address."

ACLU's "Don't Filter Me" campaign stemmed from a growing wave of complaints across the country that schools were filtering LGBT sites -- after ACLU convinced two Tennessee school districts through legal action to discontinue LGBT site filtering, the Associated Press reports.

This lawsuit comes as the state caught attention for another controversial Internet-related decision, when Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon signed into law a ban on teachers friend students on Facebook last month. Legislators pushed for the move to protect students, while teachers argued that the legislation limits education and intellectual dialogue.

Most prominently, Minnesota's Anoka-Hennepin School District was hit last week with a lawsuit from a sixth student alleging that officials failed to intervene in anti-gay bullying, in which several cases led to a series of student suicides.

American Civil Liberties Union Lawsuit Against Camdenton R-III School District

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit against a Missouri school district for using software that filters websites advocating for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community. ...
The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit against a Missouri school district for using software that filters websites advocating for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community. ...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,627
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:29 PM on 08/19/2011
The district needs to get this right. Especially after they were warned.
grdndoctor
HS Biology/Earth Science Teacher, Progressive Mind
08:57 PM on 08/18/2011
please please please take a look at Clovis Unified in CA, they are the worst or best at this sort of censoring... Please!!!!
photo
Misterioso Adversario
THE THIRST MUTILATOR!
11:32 AM on 08/19/2011
Clovis Unified School District is one of the worst school districts period.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Christian puppets scare me
08:31 PM on 08/18/2011
The only reason religious fundies do not want thier kids to see any pro gay web sites, is becasue the parents themselves are homophobic bullies and want to teach thier sickness and homophobia to their children. They want to continue the lies their preahers teach them and keep thier kids in the dark about the real world.
photo
Misterioso Adversario
THE THIRST MUTILATOR!
11:33 AM on 08/19/2011
Its hard to teach their kids that gay people are bad and evil if their children learn the actual facts about homosexuality, or meet a gay person for that matter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Christian puppets scare me
09:20 AM on 08/20/2011
I agree. but the problem is that fundie parents teach the hate to their kids when they are young. If they see a gay couple or a gay person they pull their kids away, saying "Dont look at those freak. you'll catch aids.' and no it's not an exaggeration. how is a little kid to fight that?
04:35 PM on 08/18/2011
They dun goofed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
01:38 PM on 08/18/2011
Perhaps schools should prompt kids to visit websites that...teach personal finance management. That might be a good place to start. (All of this other stuff is, simply, emotional subterfuge.) Today's kids need "real" education in financial matters and not bombardment from political organizations...with agendas that don't measure up to most Americans' morality (or what's left of it).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Christian puppets scare me
01:48 PM on 08/18/2011
or religious sites that push an agenda of hate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
02:48 PM on 08/18/2011
Wouldn't know about those sites. Remember, disagreeing with something doesn't automatically = hate -- except in the LGBT community. Such points of reference are rooted in the extreme and inflame positions with overt emotional hyperbole (i.e., logical fallacies). That, mi amigo, ain't the way to convince anyone...of anything.
photo
cable1977
Against logic there is no armor like ignorance
04:33 PM on 08/18/2011
"with agendas that don't measure up to most Americans' morality"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_States_public_opinion#Polls_in_2011

Except that currently a majority of people in this country support same-sex marriage. So, how do you come to the conclusion that allowing children access to non-sexual information about LGBT issues doesn't measure up to Americans views of morality.
photo
duckpuddle
Coexist, it's easier.
11:25 AM on 08/18/2011
I'm glad to see the ACLU uncover the apparent deception and mishandling by the school district.

Like it or not there is a difference between sexuality and sex. Any exposure that ACLU can bring to this will be good for all, even those who would deny children access to information about sexuality.

Schools should be on the forefront of providing support for all children who are coming to terms with their sexuality (gay and straight). Parents can manage their family's morality education. Schools should be talking about sexuality on a level playing field, after all every kid has one.

Sex and porn should be filtered in school, parents should manage the home filters.
10:41 AM on 08/18/2011
Keep to basic school curriculum and academics. It is not the school's responsibility to "teach" about the personal aspects regarding young peoples' potential se_uality. I believe this school is right, because they are not 'only' concerned with LGBT issues on this site, but some of the more explicit references made on it. Parents Need To Be Parents, and have such discussions with their kids... not a school. It is not the 'job' of the school to step into what I consider a parenting role. If parents don't 'tune-in' to their kids' lives....their kids will 'tune-out'.
photo
TBJ
Irrelevent Blurb
10:47 AM on 08/18/2011
That's not what's happening.

No one is demanding kids go to these websites.

And if you want all mentions of sexuality out of schools, you should at least want the anti-gay websites blocked as well.
11:27 AM on 08/18/2011
Never implied it was "demanded' that students visit that site...? The fact is that the ACLU is "demanding" it's availabilty, and the school is saying no because of the explicit content associated with said site. So yes, anything that is unecessarily explicit should not be available, no matter the site; gay, LBGT etc...

That said, I am merely a parent who thinks that other parents should be, just that...parents. I am able to discuss any topic openly with my kids. It has been because of years of being involved in their lives in and out of school and showing them respect for their space, w/o jeopardizing the parent=parent, and not falling prey to the parent=friend trap that some, intentionally or unintentionally seem to do.
06:52 PM on 08/20/2011
courts are ruled according to the judges views, all the way to the supreme court!!! "MAJORITY RULES"!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:30 PM on 08/19/2011
The balance of anti-gay and pro-gay filtering is askew.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Christian puppets scare me
09:50 AM on 08/18/2011
Many on here are upset that the bible and god are not in schools. The only reason you feel this way is because you want your right wing christian faith taught. And only that. If they did make some law that required the bible and god to be taught and I was a teacher this is what i'd do. i'd break down the school year into segments. 1. right wing christian bible thumping religion. 2. Jewish. 3. catholic. 4. Native ameircan religions 5. satanism. 6. Islam. 7. Scientology. 8. mormons. 9. Klingon 10. lord of the rings and harry potter. 11. Pro gay churches. 12. The moonies. 13. Jaehova witnesses. ( I know spelt wrong) I wonder how many of you "We need god and the bible back in school" would be happy with your kid coming home with the satanic bible for homework?
photo
cable1977
Against logic there is no armor like ignorance
12:29 PM on 08/18/2011
To be accurate though, the Bible and God are allowed in schools. The same act that protects the formation of a Gay-Straight Alliance in a school would also protect the formation of a Bible Study or other religious club.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Access_Act

Students are allowed to express their religious views in school. The ACLU has defended those rights on numerous occasions. For example, they have supported the rights of an individual to sing a religious themed song at an after-school talent show, as well as to defend the rights of two teenage girls who were threatened with punishment by school officials after seeking to wear, for religious reasons, anti-abortion t-shirts to school.

http://www.aclu.org/aclu-defense-religious-practice-and-expression

The ACLU defends the rights of individual religious freedome just as vigorously as it fights against the encroachment of religion within governmental agencies.
03:29 PM on 08/18/2011
Your statements are inaccurate. The ACLU does not fight for religious freedom....and here are the key words...FOR ALL. They will back the muslim faith and others, but not christians who believe in creation. PFLAG even states that it condemns any religous ideals that disagree with the moral compass associated with LGBT.

And further, God and the bible are far from allowed in school, and is also inaccurate, your statement that students are allowed their religious views in school....FAR from it.

This double standard about let's allow support and even advocate the LGBT and NOT allow or support the Christian values including creation is wrong! PFLAG even states that as well. That's not acceptable.

Special interest (PFLAG), wants to push their agenda, and all that surrounds it while clearly stating that christian views are mythical, etc. Again....NOT acceptable.

We will either open all doors or shut them all. As I stated before, let's keep to basic curricullum and academics and leave sexual orientational subjects to the private life; i.e. parents, family, etc.
04:44 AM on 08/18/2011
THese gays ( LGBT) are trying to infiltrate all aspects of american society to make themselves seem normal. I agree that it should be censored , for one thing LGBT should not be taught in school, the kids need to learn basic learning subjects. The ACLU also needs to be knocked down a few notches too, who are these people, we don't even vote for these people but their union has become powerful in tearing down american morals.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kittyburger
Schrodinger's micro-bio may or may not be empty.
07:49 AM on 08/18/2011
Why can't people listen to someone else talking about their life for once, instead of insisting on imposing their own meaning on them?

Is that too frightening? Is it too scary to let other people have their say, instead of filling the world with your noise about what you THINK they're saying?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Christian puppets scare me
09:50 AM on 08/18/2011
Yet if they wanted to teach the bible and god i bet you'd be all for it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conuly
08:27 PM on 08/18/2011
Something Christians should shy away from, really.

Which translation of the Bible would they teach? Whose interpretation? How would they deal with tricky subjects different denominations wildly disagree on?

They're better off having parents teach religion, if they'd only stop and *think* a minute!
photo
wolfml1
making sense out of a senseless world
01:46 AM on 08/18/2011
It's not about sexuality, it's about protecting children by informing them, opening their minds and teaching them to protect themselves from intolerant indivduals in the school system who want to Bully them for their sexual orientation and may cause them irreparable psychological damage and may cause some of them to take their own lives. So much for schools looking out for the best interests of all the children under their care.
photo
duckpuddle
Coexist, it's easier.
11:53 AM on 08/18/2011
I agree though I would say this is not about sex, it is about sexuality, or sexual orientation.
01:39 AM on 08/18/2011
im not a homophobe...nor am i a literary type but i personaly think that school internet should be for school purposes...period.....visit w/e sites you want to on your own time and in appropriate places...not to say if human sexuality is being discussed that thats not an appropriate time...i dunno...its a gray area sort of...il be reading up on it...i dont like to just comment w/o info i honestly thought the whole issue pretty cut and dried but it doesnt seem that way now after reading some of the posts...but i dont think emotion has any place in the decision.emotion is logics arch nemesis and when ppl are angry or overly emotional the right decision isnt often the 1 made..if anybody has legal precident or valid reasons pro or con reply and il be glad to discuss on a personal level...id be glad to learn w/o attitude
photo
duckpuddle
Coexist, it's easier.
11:57 AM on 08/18/2011
Mmmmm.

You wouldn't make any decisions without information. that is exactly what is being asked for here: access to information that has been deemed constitutional.

Everybody has a sexuality. Kids should know, or at lest be able to find out information, that there is a broad continuum that includes m/m and f/f relationships at one end and m/f relationships on the other and everything in between.

Kids deserve to know about the world if they ask.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:45 AM on 08/18/2011
LET THE SCHOOL DO WHAT IT WANTS, THEY DON'T WANT THE KIDS WASTING TIME ON STUFF THAT ISNT SCHOOL WORK. LET THEM CHECK OUT THE WEBSITES AT HOME & SEE IF THEIR PARENTS STOP THEM & BUY THE SOFTWARE TO BLOCK ALSO. IF THE SOFTWARE ALSO BLOCKED PORN SITES, WOULD IT BE OK 4 THE PORN INDUSTRY TO COME OUT & SUE THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ALSO. HOW ABOUT GOD, MAYBE HE CAN GET IN ON THE LAWSUIT ALSO.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conuly
01:21 AM on 08/18/2011
Wow, ease off the capslock there, dude!
01:23 AM on 08/18/2011
you dont have to yell but your point is valid i think...+1fav
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ruthieriver1
constitution not institution......
12:44 AM on 08/18/2011
I'm actually going to sideway the whole internet a privilege or a right thing, the fact is schools have it, so to filter the sites of the LGBT, is just anothet way to make our youth feel invalid, none of these sites promote homosexuality, if anything they offer an outlet to the youth that are feeling so alone and confused, they encourage thier individuality and encourage self confidence, you can not turn someone gay, as you can not turn a gay person straight...I am so tired of seeing our youth in this country turning to drugs and suicide, lets stop all this self destructive behavior, by letting our youth know we love and validate them no matter of thier sexuality...Please dont censor this and take another step back and allow the youth to believe that there is only one "norm" and if they don't mimic it then they don't belong...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doughertyhan
01:39 AM on 08/18/2011
Is it possible? I only skimmed the article, that the software just automatically censored things out. For example, we had health projects senior year and some of us chose Sexually transmitted diseases and we couldn't use the school computers because of the word "sexually".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ruthieriver1
constitution not institution......
01:53 AM on 08/18/2011
I'm guessing it's possoble, I reread this, and I don't think so, the fact that ACLU is taking legal action (big suprise)...talks about that they have put filters from these web sites particular, as I'm sure others also...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conuly
02:16 AM on 08/18/2011
It's *possible*, but if that is the case then the district still has not done all they could to remedy the situation. They were alerted to the problem (which is not just that you cannot access LGBT sites, but also that you CAN access anti-gay sites - I suspect if both sites were verboten it wouldn't be so huge) and instead of even manually whitelisting at least some of the biggest sites, as near as I can tell they sat on their butts and twiddled their thumbs instead.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Dick Stone
My Andalusian works hard and loves his job
12:37 AM on 08/18/2011
The school should just yank the computers out and go back to teaching students, instead of entertaining them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conuly
01:22 AM on 08/18/2011
Well, that's one option, and perfectly constitutional.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dwes09
One can never be clever enough.
06:26 AM on 08/18/2011
This is the 21st century. Computers are essential in schools, not just as research tools, but because kids need to learn to use them and they are not in every household. They are not in schools for entertainment.

The fact that the school district in question was using software (custom built) that filtered non-sexual sites relating to LGBT issues, but not anti-gay sites is distressing. Obviously ALL sexual sites need to be filtered, but not those dealing with issues of importance to students, such as the acceptance of diversity of all kinds, and the prevention of bullying.
photo
spunkyphd
Grok Karma
11:58 PM on 08/17/2011
What worries me about this entire thing and most of the auguments that the internet is a privlidge not a right, is that schools are replacing their libraries with computers. That being said, yes being able to control the information accessed gets really tricky. You have schools across county lines from each other, one leans far right the other far left imagine the fights as each truly believe only they are right because their computer said so. Yet niether of them is really right, just imagine! So you want to talk about slippery slopes, lets talk about alienating Americans from each other more and more by use of censorship at school. As a parent I taught my daughter to think for herself and as a parent by the time she was in high school I expected her to know how to use a computer without me to monitor her moves. I expected her to make mistakes but better she make the first ones at home than in collage and away from home and a safe place to learn from those mistakes. Censorship should not be used as a tool to "protect" our kids into a padded room nor, as a tool to teach only one view point. If computers are a privilege then what are libraries and the ablity to perform cognitive reasoning. Outdated quaint concepts?